Thanks. End of stupid questions.  |
|
|
|
|
Some blogs feature "keyword" links with new posts, so that the reader can cross reference other articles on the same topic.
I was thinking that it would be useful on the new forum, seeing how multiple posts on the same topic can be missed sometimes.
The "related articles" aspect of Google news is sort of what I mean, but tagged threads listed by popularity, not randomly.
Although a bit of a train wreck in itself, the recent Woodcollector saga springs to mind but generally, especially with news, people dash to post something without checking whether or not the subject has been covered.
Obviously too general tagwords like "Bitcoin" would be pointless.
I don't know how, but could thread merging be incorporated somehow too?
Just trying to think of how to achieve maximum relevant info on a subject without being at the mercy of "Search" all the time.
|
|
|
|
The last deposit was made on 2015-01-30 08:22:33 UTC, so the round will end on 2015-01-31 08:22:33 UTC if there is no more deposit.
New round will be ready about 6-10 hours later. Countdown will included on site.
if another deposit is made just before 2015-01-31 08:22:33 UTC and the clock restarts for another 24 hours, will the scheduled new round still start on time, before the old one finishes? |
|
|
|
Good Luck |
|
|
|
Thanks. And the last bet was .001. So if another deposit is made before 2015-01-31 08:22:33 UTC then the 24 hour countdown will start again? |
|
|
|
Last one gets 200%
I'm interested in this. What's the situation now: when does the 24 hours expire and how big is the last bet currently? |
|
|
|
yes you can hold them for months/years
but make sure you are trading with legit and reputable companies that will not run with your money
Depends what country you are in, but in the UK you can trade a BTC 'tracker' derivative with fiat margin off exchange, no need for wallet, transfers etc. on long established multi million backed platforms. Search CFD (contract for difference) trading. The problem with CFDs are they are mostly run by market makers most of whom are not known to be scruplous. I don't know of a CFD operator that correctly publishes their current volume and if the contracts you are trading does have good volume then yes, fine for short term holding; for long term they tend to apply all sorts of charges. Correct my impression of CFD operators if outdated or not correct. Thanks I hear what you're saying. The CFD industry (which I'm certainly not shilling for) has been around for 40 years now and a big player like IG has a market cap of £2.6 billion and is publicly listed. They took a £25 million hit on the recent Swiss Franc black swan and shrugged it off, whereas one or two smaller outfits went to the wall. I guess the lesson is to use the big guys, despite a natural inclination to support smaller ventures. Sure, there are costs of holding long term positions, but that's the nature of things. It depends on personal factors whether you think the overall package is worth the cost. I'm a full time short term trader and some of the things I see them do, stop hunting etc. irritate me, but then I remind myself that I'm dealing with a bookmaker. Volume disclosure is only important to me for trading analysis and I get that from the underlying asset stats. They make reasonable spreads 24/7 and I am not big enough to see any liquidity problems. Also, the tax situation is clean and simple. Spread betting (as opposed to CFD) profits are tax exempt, although losses aren't allowable. TL:DR Derivative trading is simple and can be useful where the underlying asset (like bitcoin) infrastructure is opaque. Trade with the big guys, keep your wits about you and remember, as they all say "losses can exceed your deposit". |
|
|
|
Wow this thread went from being a simple topical flamewar to a mud-slinging fest which appears nonsensical even to me who has participated before.
What the hell?
Right... I keep running out of popcorn. Bitcoinland.......unfuckingbelievable. |
|
|
|
Funnily enough, I came across the MLM world myself just recently, when I followed im0rtel's (the MineThatCloud shill) strange sig. It led to "BitClub Network, a Passive Bitcoin Mining Opportunity" (7/7 on the Puppet Scale) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=762075.msg10260402#msg10260402If you were to think that "passive" here refers to the ease of having a cloud mining contract, you would be wrong. It's classic MLM (Multi Level Marketing) speak for a matrix referral program. Briefly, MLM's are similar to Ponzi's but distribute the suckers' money amongst themselves by moving up thru levels. This is a huge industry worldwide, recruitment done by high pressure selling to naive investors and "Bitcoin mining" is perfect material for them. Just to give an idea of how they view Bitcoin mining, have a look at https://www.bitcoincycler.net/ Go to the Comp Plan page, they hardly mention hashrate or difficulty, it's all about referral levels and marketing bullshit. BitcoinCycler is "sponsored by Skycoinlab", as is made clear on Lavoie's Google+ page, he runs them both https://plus.google.com/110365658930595040182/posts. And as the http://behindmlm.com/ scambusters report, both Skycoinlab and BitClub Network operators have their roots in the $500m Zeek Rewards ponzi. These people are thieving filth. |
|
|
|
So if You are interested: Good luck and don't be one of the last!
Or be the last because last one gets 200%  (If noone sends any deposits after Your deposit for more than 24 hours
You will get back 200% of Your deposit. We can cover it with fees!)
So you say that ^^, but mean this For example:
Total deposited: 20 BTC
The last person sends 1BTC, and I need extra 1 btc. (We earned only 0.5btc(2,5%*20BTC))
So this person gets only 0.5 btc
So, which is it, 200% back, or 200% back if you can afford it? Also, will the round ever end? If the last deposit is 1 btc, you could put in .001 yourself and save a fortune........ |
|
|
|
yes you can hold them for months/years
but make sure you are trading with legit and reputable companies that will not run with your money
Depends what country you are in, but in the UK you can trade a BTC 'tracker' derivative with fiat margin off exchange, no need for wallet, transfers etc. on long established multi million backed platforms. Search CFD (contract for difference) trading. |
|
|
|
Your only option is to try to find out who owns the address they were sent to and ask them to send the BTC back.
He knows that, it's cloudmining.website, a some would say dubious cloud mining operation. They don't disagree that they have the coin and say that management will make a decision in the next 24 hours. http://forum.cloudmining.website/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=42&p=187#p187 |
|
|
|
These coins originate from the Bitstamp hack.
 |
|
|
|
Thank you for providing the details. As I can see, there is no mining payout made so far against your order. We can not refund a order if mining payout begins. But, in your case, it has not yet started. I need to discuss this issue with the management. In the mean time your payout may begin. So, can I dissociate your order mapping from the mining block ? You can almost hear from here the ass kicking that admin is getting for depriving them of an excuse not to return it. Interesting situation. |
|
|
|
Normal ponzi schemes aren't like this at all. They typically go on for days, weeks, and sometimes even years. Bernie Madoff's ponzi scheme lasted for almost two decades.
Yeah, that's what we need, proper Ponzi schemes that steal millions, not these crappy cheap copies.  |
|
|
|
Funny how you find things, isn't it? Just wondering what crap im0rtel was shilling, ended up here. Look what I found: BitClub Network is an offshore scheme seeking to fleece investors under the guise of “let us explain Bitcoin mining to you”, with the mining itself (if any actually exists) having little to nothing to do with the flow of funds within the scheme.
Whilst the owner(s) of BitClub Network are for now are sticking to the shadows, there’s evidence that factions of the Zeek Rewards Ponzi scheme might be behind it.
Under the YouTube account “BitClub Network Pro”, old hand T. LeMont Silver is marketing himself as the “top leader” in the scheme.
http://behindmlm.com/companies/bitclub-network-review-zeek-ponzi-veterans-at-it-again/ |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
