One problem I have with value investing is that fundamentally it assumes that you are right and everyone else is wrong.
Does it? I can't actually see that...
People invest for different reasons and in different things. A high growth fund would be based on stocks that have done well in the past and are expected to do well in the future (like technology stocks). These stocks may appear in the s&p500 and they may be invested in by other people too: retail and hedge funds.
Some stocks have a small market cap and some are lesser known (a lot of funds are directed at the US for example and at global companies). Whereas British/Scandinavian/German companies might not be looked at as much by investors with larger funds and a lot just like to invest raely in the stock market.
Being wrong and not finding what you want/wanting a faster or more stable return are two different things.
So two things, A) Check what the s&p 500 did or whatever index you are trading in, if you outperformed that it means you did very well, and B) check if you made over 10% return, that is the base in most cases for a "good" return, it is not shocking or anything but 10% return is lowest point for being good in stock market world, under that and you are not really that good.
Yeah I doubled the index return for the same time period so...