Replied, is it true that you can't send the last 200 XRP?? I'm pretty sure I remember reading that, I only have 20k in the wallet.

When I receive some WDCs -I haven't any yet- I will send you.

I'm figuring out where to put your ref.

Thanks.

I created a nice Google Docs exchange with some stats, graphics, scammers list and direct links to users (verify your user link).
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Aue1_DBCxEZpdEVJTTZWdnA4OVZEWDlQRXpnWFU2Q1E
http://tinyurl.com/wdc-ltc-exchange

Only post offers in this thread. Post the amount of WDC you are wanting to buy or sell, and the rate you are buying or selling at.

For example:
WTB 10000 WDC @ 5 LTC per 1k 
WTS 25000 WDC @ 7 LTC per 1k

Remember to post successful trades so I can update the spreadsheet.

An escrow service is available and I shall charge no fees by now. Please PM first. Addresses in the spreadsheet.

If you have scammers to add please post here with some sort of proof.  I do not take responsibility if you get scammed by someone that wasn't  added on the list.

Liked my service? Please Tip to
WDC: WbHhaW5bEL3EGPcDGcfEfLDx3gE4Zw7qPS or LTC: LctcQqAK26kZUHq1AWmQsR8BwgahT9QAVg
Don't send any coins here for escrow transactions.

Enjoy trading !

oh please no

I don't have any ideas on the why, but damn, I need to figure out how to sell off some of mine.

I still believe double digits is coming.  $70 may be realistic at some point.  I don't buy the "Bitcoin is stable" argument for one second.  Now, I have held the view that we'd retest our lows at 50-60 but our low might be higher than that now.  Bad news is, $2 is never happening and if it does, it's because BTC is about to die.  The single digit coin ship has certainly sailed.

i could do, but i was unable to compile a client never. always always always something is broken/missing. The rest i could do.


i just hate when people use libraries in his code and they don't add a copy of the sources used, version number or something...  u need to investigate what the f*** he used.
And no, not everybody uses boost, i dont see useful having million of random classes in random/kaos design ways, and not general aim. Less, when u are using Qt already.

I compile it fine on Ubuntu  
Guys!
I'm writing your Script, it will be a PHP script.
Release in 48h  
Prepare you to see 10 new alt-coins/day!

actually would be better a script.

Imagine, "double click" to:
1 - download/upgrade compilers libraries
2 - fork a coin
3 - change the code
4 - commit to the fork
5 - login on bitcointalk and publish a new thread with ANN and the ultra new coin skills (optional)
6 - premine (optional)
7 - upload the binary
8 - (if 7 skipped) set a list of computers to be just ready to mine (optional)
9 - (if 5 and 6 skipped) new thread with ANN the text "no primined" on the list
10 - (if 6 skipped) mine, mine mine (optional)
11 - stay checking bter/btce to dump coins (optional)

This is not a problem if the amounts you grant in trust aren't excessive (that is you can afford to lose them) and if you only grant trust to people you trust in the real world. Gateways are just special users that are trusted by many people, like banks. Well, not many people here might trust banks and I would argue they should trust gateways even less.

Within Ripple, whenever you trade anything besides XRP, you have counterpart risk and vice versa. This is because Ripple can only do bookkeeping, and the "official ledgers" for fiat currencies are not stored in the Ripple system. This would be an argument for using XRP. On the other hand, you don't have exchange rate risk if you are trading in fiat.

For fiat payments, Ripple is "just" a distributed system for keeping track of who owes what to whom.

For example, if A trusts B for $10 and B trusts C for $10, then C could pay A through B. C's balance with B would be decreased by $10, meaning that C now owes B $10 more than before, or B owes C $10 less than before. Simultaneously B's balance with A would also be decreased by $10.

Assuming all balances started at zero, A would now be owed $10 by B instead of by C, which is an improvement because he didn't trust C, but does trust B. Similarly, C now owes $10 to B, which is also an improvement, because C can now expect shipment of whatever goods he was promised because A does trust B. B's total balance hasn't changed, because previously he had two zero balances, whereas now he has one for +$10 with C and one for -$10 with A. For B this is not immediately an advantage, because he doesn't gain from the transaction but does have to do work for it. However, in practice you would expect B to be on either end of some transactions too, and then someone would return him the favour.

All three parties will want to settle the open amounts to take care of the credit risk. They could do so immediately, or they could wait a while until more transactions have passed through the network and have partially canceled out. This would mean less work.

Further you don't appear to understand the separation of powers doctrine. The Govt is as private person or commercial entity in-front of the court when it comes to seizure of funds, freezing accounts.

That's got nothing to do with separation of powers. Ok at this point, you probably need to get a formal legal education, or refresher if you have had one. Separation of powers has nothing to do with the executive having more ways to bring an action vs a private person. It is to do with the judicial arm being separate to the the executive and parliament.

Alright my confusion is clearing up - so you ARE just being a troll, right? I *really* hope you aren't a lawyer. Separation of powers doesn't have any bearing here.

The govt has to stand in line for property like anyone else or compensate: check your Constitution

for example

the 5th

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.[1]


see those last words without just compensation.[1]

My money held that is owed to anyone else eg your money held in say GOX's account and that bank and that account is seized by gov, for your part you are entitled to just compensation from the GOV for them taking your property.

:lol: :lol: - well I guess the DHS will be pissed when gox's lawyers show up in court and say "hey guys this law is unconstitutional kthxbai".

See the part where it says "nor shall any person ... be deprived of ... life, liberty, or property, without due process of law"? Do you know what that means? I guess the government can't throw people in jail either, right? Wrong. That's exactly what the "due process of law" part means. This order follows the due process of law - legislative branch made the law, executive sent out the DHS agents to ensure compliance and now the judicial branch is hearing it. There's your "separation of powers" lol. In any event the US can certainly make a law that says that if you break a law the property used in that lawbreaking is forfeit to the US Government and that's what happened here.

The part about "just compensation" is a restriction on the government's power to exercise eminent domain which is a direct "taking" and different from the case at hand.

Anyways if you seriously think the US government has NO power to seize funds (and can only "buy" them for fair market price) you'll be in for a rude awakening if it ever happens to you.

No.




ok...so then these are non withdrawable btc's

does this give TF access to your XRP?