Trump is gonna be in the Torah for liberating Jerusalem. Final details are being written now...

... Carefully review footage of the collapses, and you will find that the parts of the buildings above the plane impact points begin falling first, while the lower parts of the buildings are initially stationary. The parts of the towers below the impact point do not begin to fall until the higher floors have collapsed onto them. ...

... This is not what we would expect if the towers collapsed from a controlled demolition, but it is exactly what we would expect if the building collapse resulted from damage sustained by the impact of the planes and subsequent fire damage. A conspiracy theorist may counter that the buildings were rigged to begin falling from the top down, but what are the chances that those planning such a complicated demolition would be able to predict the exact location the planes would impact the towers, and prepare the towers to begin falling precisely there? ...

Lezards are dinosaurs... So here is the new official narrative: the father of the dude was operative for the soviet army during the soviet invasion, following the destruction and defeat of Russia against the mujahideen and their stingers manpad the father emigrated to USA because he was afraid to be discovered by the afghans. Once in USA he became cover operative for Russia and sacrificed his son for the motherland. Done deal.

It's ironic that someone who believes that a sky fairy created the world 4,000 years ago and that humans lived alongside dinosaurs at that time, demands more evidence of a shooting that happened a few days ago before he'll believe it.

 

<>

Your map of London doesn't exactly say what kind of crimes these are,  are you assuming these are all murdurs?  These could be petty theft and graffiti for all we know?  Do you propose we shoot all the graffiti artists in the city?  And the map isn't making a direct comparison with anywhere,  compared to some states in america maybe that's next to no crime. Don't get me wrong,  it's London so i assume there's going to be crime,  i don't think shooting them all will help though.

Freedom of speech with limits and sublimits is not exactly "freedom of speech". Either you allow full freedom, or you don't allow anything. There is nothing in between. Religion, race, skin color.etc are not immune from criticism. If people are allowed to praise these things, then they should be allowed to criticize it as well. Open your eyes.. we are living in the 21st century.

Wait a minute...You mean we have a Predator C built and nowhere to test it out?

Damn....

How about Grenada?

Ah, some Evil Jew Propaganda.  Well, it's in the middle of a confused rant about some future science fiction though, so who knows what the hell it might mean?

Bah.  With over 28000 terror attacks since 911, there's simply no need to invent them.  There are eager little jihaders all over.

www.thereligionofpeace.com

Excuse my ignorance but in what way does this reflect on gun control? you've linked me to a map showing that there is higher amounts of crime in london than the surrounding areas. I think this would be pretty obvious to most people without a map but what is it your trying to say here? Do you think everyone in london would be better off if they were shooting at each other?

Here, ive linked this since its relevant to a very recent shooting. notice how its a shock because guns are hard to source in the uk.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/06/16/what-the-fatal-attack-on-a-british-politician-says-about-guns-in-the-u-k/

$$$

Nothing at all unusual about tankers (or container ships) parked at sea.

To think it is the oil the US is after is naive. There are bigger things at play than some oil reserves, although they are significant.

<>

Further, everything that is being done on worldwide scales is to further the big banking Ponzi scheme that rules the world.

No longer are there enough people in the world, that if they ALL simply entered the Ponzi and started to use debt money, that they could keep the Ponzi afloat. To remedy this, the world banks use all kinds of behind-the-scenes deals to create new money for the Ponzi. The whole 911/Iraq/Afghanistan thing, the whole potential-war-with-foreign-nations thing, all have to do with keeping the banking Ponzi from crashing.

As long as nobody is really hurt from the Ponzi things might be okay. The problem is, masses of people are being hurt. Look at all the people killed in the 9/11 plot. And there are more and more people being hurt or killed all around the world, just so the bankers can keep their Ponzi going, and migrate into positions of direct dictatorship around the world, if at all possible.

Well, their Ponzi is failing. It is going to crash. The question is, how much turmoil will it all cause? How many more people will be hurt and killed? Prepare while you can. Money won't matter when the crash comes. Get yourself some fertile land with good water, and some true friends with lots of guns and ammo, all working together to protect each other on the land.

Hillary Clinton Plays Trump Perfectly As GOP Nominee Flip Flops On Terror Watch List Gun Ban … Hillary Clinton is perfectly pulling Trump's strings as presumptive GOP nominee announced that he is flip-flopping and now supporting a bill that would prohibit people on the terror watch list from legally buying guns.  – Politico

According to this Politico article, Donald Trump has decided to support a bill that prohibits individuals on the terror watch list from buying guns.

Politico suggests that Trump has "flip-flopped" because Hillary is already supporting the bill, which  70 percent of the public also apparently endorse.

Trump:
I will be meeting with the NRA, who has endorsed me, about not allowing people on the terrorist watch list, or the no fly list, to buy guns.

Politico suggests that the NRA will not support Trump's new position and suggests that Trump has "confirm[ed] that he was lying to the NRA. Trump is not pro-gun. Trump is pro-Donald Trump."

Not so fast. Trump may have shifted his position, but critics believe that his new position is a "fake" one.

From the Huffington Post:

Anyone on a terror watchlist who tries to buy a gun should be thoroughly investigated by the FBI and the sale delayed while the investigation is ongoing….

That has been the position of Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) and a majority of the U.S. Senate.

… Well, not really. The NRA-approved Cornyn amendment allows for just a 72-hour delay for investigation, and then the gun sale can go through even if the investigation isn't done.

So Trump is shifting his position but in a strategic way.

The article tells us that Cornyn's amendment has already failed, and that he guaranteed it would fail by demanding a restriction on federal funding to "sanctuary cities, or those who don't comply with federal immigration law."

The bill will include the same clause this time round. Thus, Trump is a willing supporter because it will fail again. The NRA apparently supports it as well and for the same reasons.

This all clever maneuvering, but  we've posted several articles now suggesting that Trump might actually be better off if he were forthright about the issues instead of positioning himself for political purposes.

Taking a position that people on an unconstitutional "terror watch" are guilty without a trial is probably unconstitutional itself.

In any event, the unconstitutional nature of the terror watch list, no fly list and other Homeland Security lists provide evidence that the fears of founders such as Thomas Jefferson have been realized.

Western governments have soured. More and more they are adversaries of their citizens rather than protectors.

Full honesty would involve explaining that the "war on terror" itself is a creation of Western intelligence agencies. Without an "enemy" to confront, the West's military industrial complex begins to run on empty.

And there are plenty of reports in the alternative 'Net media on how the FBI and other fedgov agencies seem in some sense to be enhancing or even arranging some of the "terror" attacks that have occurred.

Dr. Paul Craig Roberts makes a very good point… if we cannot prove the story, we are entitled to disbelieve it.

In response to my challenge, readers report that they have found no evidence of bodies or blood. One person reports that a TV station posted names of some victims, which is the way the absence of Sandy Hook bodies was handled.

One person who said he is a veteran said the AR-15 can have a 30-round clip. That would mean four reloadings in order to shoot 103 people. The veteran said that the rifle can be reloaded in 5 seconds: one clip is dropped out, another put in, and the bolt released. But 5 seconds is not fast enough to prevent being rushed. Remember, sprinters can cover 100 yards—300 feet—in less than 10 seconds. Ordinary people who are not couch potatoes can cover 300 feet in 20 seconds. That means they can cover 150 feet in 10 seconds or 75 feet in 5 seconds or 15 feet in 1 second.. In the crowded club, people were likely no more than 10 feet from the shooter, 20 feet at the most. Moreover, if there is only one shooter, he can be rushed in an arc that he cannot possibly cover. It is difficult to imagine that there were no veterans in the club, no people aware that guns run out of bullets and have to be reloaded and that so many people would miss four opportunities to disarm the shooter. It is hard to imagine that none of the hundreds of people present were capable of presence of mind. Bottles could be thrown at him, glasses, chairs. And no one did anything?

...

In the same way that the 9/11 inside job is coming out into the open for what it is, even so the oil glut is coming out into the open for what IT is. Neither of these inside-job conspiracies are remaining hidden.

<>

Read more at http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/stunning-map-oil-supply-glut-leads-to-massive-tanker-traffic-jam-would-stretch-for-25-miles_04142016.

Actually what the US people have done in the last 15 years, with little help from their government, was to develop fracking technology which is what puts the US in a unique position regarding oil today.

Regardless, "taking their oil" is a silly proposition.  Oil is fungible and is sold on the world market on a competitive bidding basis.  There were no long lines of tankers going to IRAQ from the USA to load up on "the oil the US took."

I'm certain there are enough real things to dislike about the USA without having to make some up.

While oil prices have jumped about 50% in recent weeks, there appears to be no real reason for the move other than pure speculation and billion-dollar market cash infusions from unknown plunge protection teams.

But as the mainstream media continues to tout non-existent reduction agreements between oil producing nations, the following evidence suggests that the world remains awash in oil, so much so that there is no space to store it… anywhere on earth.

The following report from Zero Hedge explains just how much oil is currently sitting in limbo while suppliers try to figure out what to do with it:

Last week we revealed what we thought was a "shocking photo" of nearly 30 oil tankers caught in a traffic jam off the Iraqi coast, an indication of just how much excess oil is currently parked offshore.

The WEists are the evil people of OUR time, they always speak or write using WE. They never say I. WE can't tolerate that any longer. WE the Ipeople must engage the WEism ideology in a battle of ideas.

I don't understand the point of saying we... Example:

We don't understand the point of saying we! It implies at least two Ipeople.

Basic grammar: 1 people = I; 2 or more Ipeople = we.

guns can be use for self defense it's purpose is not actually to kill but if it's necessary to kill someone just save many person or many live then you have to do it . but the government and the authorities should be strict of giving a permission to someone who want to own a fire-arms .

the government and the authority should not have to let people who have criminal record or those people who have a psychological disorders to possess a gun or any other firearms . and they should know if a person who wants to own a gun is capable to control his temper just to make sure that he will never become overpowered .