|
it needs to get a lot worse, as fast as it can,
so that average joe feels it on his skin,
this retardation and protests are not helping,
either fight it extremely hard,
or let it get worse without saying a word, that way, system as a whole has a chance of detecting those changes as bad,
if it is done little by little (because protests are making it slower)
imo, this scenario that is happening right now is the worst possible one
|
|
|
|
and bet payout might be too high in value to honor it  |
|
|
|
|
keep coins in your PC wallet,
USD, if you must, on exchange
gox is bigger and older, so I recommend them
they will ask you to reveal your identity,
sooner or later they do it to everyone
|
|
|
|
nice service i received some and sent it back Funds sent. Transaction ID: 4d437d4661598db0de15d946f1f295a7ce360e2be0c5fc89cff6324589a1c327 it was so easy note : on arrival it came into my gmail spam folder |
|
|
|
|
I think you both did not get what I wanted to say
I am not preaching for any kind of centralization
I just asked is it possible that miners switch their duties
of writing current transactions in newly mined block
miner A mines new hash
broadcasts that he found it
then miner B is is chosen at random
he will use this new found hash to create a block
miner A gets his reward and fees
in the long run, there is no extra unpaid work,
just the miner with most hashing power would not be able to write latest blocks
if again, i got it wrong, I won't post here any more
|
|
|
|
|
miners of recent blocks would be randomly eligible to "write"
transactions in the next block
sounds ok
|
|
|
|
|
can this be done to avoid 51% attack ?
miners who discovered new block only get reward and tx fees,
but actual writing of transactions and verification
is done by some other miner ?
|
|
|
|
sorry guys, THEY said NO.
sorry, but there is more of US then THEM |
|
|
|
|
would you post your news letter here, 2-3 weeks after release ?
some of us like to read ur stuff
|
|
|
|
stumbled on it on poker forum in spring 2011, then went to wikipedia and read some more, after that I bought wherever I could (paypal, coinpal, through this forum, youtipit, mtgox) |
|
|
|
|
there will be girls just writing a few "firstbits" at random,
and then there will be some guys sending to that firstbits
some addresses will actually be valid to receive bitcoin...
|
|
|
|
why not? that might turn out to be the deal of your life.
i already bought now diversification |
|
|
|
some of these questions and the scenarios derived from the answerse indeed supercede any and all technical analyses.
while these are all well considered and interesting to read, the private investor (such as myself) should look far beyond what any trader (also: such as myself) would consider in making decisions.
if it all goes "to shit" then you're far better off with austrian harmonics and maples as well as some 5g gold bars than with some piece of paper you boght or sold for immediate profit.
there are in fact (at least) TWO DIFFERENT ways and motivations to invest in Gold and Silver. OP is in one camp. I am in the other. Both investors have completely different motivations. Holding PMs physically is a completely different ballgame (considerung the premiums alone).
Disclosure: I own physical gold and silver. I am constantly replenishing and adding to my portfolio. I will continue to buy because I do not trust paper money and I do not trust paper receipts. I do also invest in stocks and bonds, but only short- and midterm.
I also do not trust anyone anymore, so, btc, PMs, cash and real estate are my preferred choices, I currently do not own only real estate it is the only thing of the above that has no allodial title to it http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allodial_titlebut problem is that cash and PMs look too grim, and I "have to" exit the stock market soon cant put it all into btc |
|
|
|
inflationists and pm bulls will say that the Fed will just print and won't let markets go down. i ask; why did they let us have 2 devastating stock crashes in the last 12 yr and a housing implosion?
can you elaborate on these few things : ratio of physical to paper metals diminishing stockpiles of silver available for investors increasing investors fears, (nowhere to go) or, if you own stocks , when you want to sell and get out, it has to go through bank and could "vaporize" just like in mf global case possibilities of great war looks like big countries are abandoning usd china acting like all commodities are "too cheap" buying more than needed for production |
|
|
|
|
money velocity
sounds very reasonable, thanx,
I could not articulate that by myself, but i understand the concept
it was a pleasure reading above posts
|
|
|
|
|
P4man, you were wright
it was a full disc
I guess,
because it was not working with 3.9 GB free space,
but after I made 10GB free on that disc
it just continued downloading blockchain
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
