the proposed bonus is really big ,only a few ico offer 100% bonus, but I do not know if in the long run is a good thing, the next stages of ico could be undertone and i think that at the end of ico there will be an inevitable dump of the token price...
It's a really aggressive marketing and potentially harmful in the future, if I make 100% profit from what I've invested, an eviction will certainly happen because the thinking is the same on the part of several investors. Are there any plans to temporarily block tokens? |
|
|
|
The slow and steady wins the race is what they say in proverb, and Ehealth is doing the same.. waiting ..
Persistent one will probably succeed, but persistency is not probably enough now. I know many persistent people with no luck to succeed... But the consistent persistence of continuous work, especially in a market that leaves us despondent. The more we are watched now, the more we will watch this when in better days |
|
|
|
|
Both new people and those who return after the hard days. What I am analyzing today is more related to the way Icos behave in bad times, because the financial situation of the market is reversible soon, but the way of acting of each team and the commitment in the projects is decisive
|
|
|
|
|
I just got to know the project and I'm looking for an interaction that will make me understand better. So ... The Team is made up of Members of an active ESports Team? Would this contribute in the future to a possible integration and actual use of the token? Why do I see a wide range of ESports projects now, and having a differential would put them on top, I think
|
|
|
|
|
The concept of blood on the streets is infallible, one that claims little or no investment gain in difficult times, certainly did not know how to choose their applications well
|
|
|
|
|
There is some partial pre-sale result to be released, it might be interesting to know, as I believe that just like me, some members or the majority that follows here, want to see the initial results of Jarvis, mainly as a comparison of their performance in this weak market
|
|
|
|
so actually those who invested when the btc was $ 6k would have invested half if investing at this time receiving the same number of tokens,they should do (all the ico active) let's say a fixed exchange value for investments for example 1 btc = 4k $ to be maintained at least until the end of the year, this would give investors more security,dusk should look for some other partnership...
Fixing the btc invested in 4K would be detrimental in a future leveraged, Nobody would invest Btc to 6k to receive the same amount of who invested the 6. The term security for investors applies to the opposite situation, but in case of price increase becomes a problem No one can say for sure what will happen in the next days, at any moment major players can come in and Bitcoin will start to grow, perhaps now is the time of cheap BTC and ETH. Apparently, the movement pre black friday was the same as last year, I'm not sure for what reason, but it influenced the market a lot. I base myself on the retrospect, which may not be infallible, but it has brought me good results today. |
|
|
|
Done my vote for Bitcoin RM in Xiphos exchange. Let's do it with your vote for Bitcoin RM, everyone. me too, keep voting everyday all the best for BCRM  I hope for days of glory for BCRM, the project needs to have its value recognized, I just read the update on the increase of the block reward, an attractive addition to new miners |
|
|
|
so actually those who invested when the btc was $ 6k would have invested half if investing at this time receiving the same number of tokens,they should do (all the ico active) let's say a fixed exchange value for investments for example 1 btc = 4k $ to be maintained at least until the end of the year, this would give investors more security,dusk should look for some other partnership...
Fixing the btc invested in 4K would be detrimental in a future leveraged, Nobody would invest Btc to 6k to receive the same amount of who invested the 6. The term security for investors applies to the opposite situation, but in case of price increase becomes a problem |
|
|
|
I was reading comments of Jarvis representative to have idea what kind of wisdom is behind the concept of this exchange. It was pleasant experience to see people with maturity and vision with deep understanding of these markets by every possible angle are running this project. They are well aware of the market and are positive without speculating or hyping those aspects about what people have high expectations.
Apparently the team masterfully masters what they are trying to implement, just as they understand the market and its adversities. I went through many Icos that seemed to have mastery and wisdom, but before the market they became just another obsolete project in a short time. I have good hopes for Jarvis, I see potential |
|
|
|
I fear that the EU will regulate more than the US as this is the case with most fields of regulation.
I thought the same, they are slow and sluggish, but when they wake up from their technological hibernation, they can be very mean-looking and bureaucratic. The thing is, Europe already missed the Silicon valley boom where tec giants like Google or Apple emerged. They better should try to be more crypto friendly otherwise they are going to be left behind again. Taking into account the people and projects working in the crypto, the more bureaucratic the investees are, and the less friendly they are, the less chance of reaching a common ground, which is why I still see years of "irregularities" . |
|
|
|
|
In the crypto it is necessary to think and act with the head before the heart, the Teams end up leaving their topics aside by the market sentiment. But currently in the case of Ehealth, I think they do not bring something simply because there are no updates to do, you can notice this by following other networks. Of course, this does not justify lack of interaction and questions left unanswered
|
|
|
|
what is current state of ICO? Setback in market may cause some issues raising funds.
The problem is that if a private investor invested 1000 ETH one month ago, dollar value is not the same thing as today's value, unfortunally for them Problems like this will always exist, unfortunately, currency exchange has its risks, and every investor who has joined previously has this knowledge. Everyone wants to make a good profit by supporting good projects, but unforeseen things will always happen, as will the reversals |
|
|
|
I guess the whole crypto community are in a very challenging period amid this gloomy crypto market and most projects are beginning to succumb. But I hope the EHF team would see this as an opportunity to show their worth and rather be inspired by it.
Investors are very selective now, this has a good side and a bad side ... Projects with potential like Ehealth will have bigger run field, while shit projects go down the drain. It's a half-full glass, and a matter of selection |
|
|
|
|
Considering that the market is down now and the selectivity of projects by investors has increased, we can consider Jarvis a project of extreme potential, raising 1.2m in its beginning is a feat and so much now
|
|
|
|
I have to say that these token specs with a fairly low hardcap are exciting from an investor's point of view. There's lot's of room to grow.
They have to be realistic in this crypto economy that we have now. Its hard even to reach softcap yet alone hardcap. Typically, i rather join ICOs with lower hardcap which ussually means your tokens will be worth more but on the other had, there will be less money for development and promotion. True, projects with soft cap lower are now more likely to achieve some success, especially if they rely only on this for the secondary achievement of the project. What is the use of stipulating exorbitant values to achieve, and having to abandon the project? |
|
|
|
I was the bounty manager for Vidy and also a native Portuguese speaker and had to reject this user work due to its low quality.
He's obviously not native Portuguese/Brazilian as his translations are extremely low quality. I've tried confronting him on Telegram but unfortunately he never replied back.
Truly a shame the fact that he's running around claiming to be providing high quality translations and actually talking down on managers for rejecting his work.
Olá a todos, gostaria de informá-los que sou, sim, Brasileiro, nativo e falante da língua portuguesa, e que a conta e trabalhos realizados, até o momento eram divididos com a minha Esposa. Lamento a existência deste tópico e qualquer problema relacionado a campanhas anteriores, entendo o seu posicionamento, Continuous, mas vejo que na maioria dos comentários acima, não há unicamente a intenção de notificar Devs, mas de eliminar a minha concorrência. EM MOMENTO ALGUM RECEBI CONTATO DE QUALQUER MEMBRO AQUI RECLAMANTE, SEJA POR TELEGRAN, DISCORD, BITCOINTALK, OU QUALQUER OUTRO MEIO. Agradeço até mesmo as críticas dos erros, quando houver, pois estas levam a um trabalho aperfeiçoado, e agora, gerindo a conta unicamente, faço nos posts atuais o meu melhor. Desejo a todos um bom trabalho e bons ganhos sobre este, e que nossos sacrifícios de tornar a Comunidade inclusiva, justa e digna não sejam em vão. Hello everyone, I would like to inform you that I am, yes, Brazilian, native and speaker of the Portuguese language, and that the account and work done so far were divided with my Wife. I regret the existence of this topic and any problem related to previous campaigns, I understand its positioning, Continuous, but I see that in most of the comments above, there is only intention to notify Devs, but to eliminate my competition. IN NO EVENT SHALL WE RECEIVE CONTACT OF ANY MEMBER HEREIN CLAIMED, BY TELEGRAN, DISCORD, BITCOINTALK, OR ANY OTHER MEANS. I appreciate even the criticisms of the mistakes, when there are, as these lead to an improved work, and now, managing the account only, I make the current posts my best. I wish all of you good work and good gain on this, and that our sacrifices of making the community inclusive, just and worthy are not in vain. |
|
|
|
|
People insist on citing Master, Visa and other flags as if they were similar services in the crypto, in my Country, names like Master and other card companies are only responsible for the indebtedness of the People with their abusive interests. I want to hear something different, like a card that is innovative and allow us to live the future of technology, with less fees and more convenience and security
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
