Will you burn tokens after the launch of the project? It’s common practice in many projects which hold the ICO.
No, there’s no such info. Moreover, its written in the description of the project that tokens will be life-long while mining cryptocurrencies is profitable. Btw, as for the profit: has the management solved the issue of electricity? The less the price of electricity is, the more profitable mining cryptocurrencies will be. The creators of the project have chosen the coolest region with the cheapest electricity price in Europe. They will pay 0.065 Euros per kWh. |
|
|
|
Will you burn tokens after the launch of the project? It’s common practice in many projects which hold the ICO.
No, there’s no such info. Moreover, its written in the description of the project that tokens will be life-long while mining cryptocurrencies is profitable. |
|
|
|
Will it be possible to somehow by the info from the data suppliers in order to be able to download the neural network from Skychain after it’s trained?
No, there wont be such an option in Skychain. If you start creating the neural network in this system, it will be possible to use it only here. But why will it be so if I buy the data for training out? Because training of neural networks will be made by miners, they will receive a percentage from your reward in the future, too. |
|
|
|
Will it be possible to somehow by the info from the data suppliers in order to be able to download the neural network from Skychain after it’s trained?
No, there wont be such an option in Skychain. If you start creating the neural network in this system, it will be possible to use it only here. |
|
|
|
Apparently, the TiesDB platform is linked to economical activities. This is always very risky. That’s why I was surprised to learn that there wont be any arbitration system.
If you think so, you’ve got acquainted with the description of the project poorly. The arbitration system will work in TiesDB and users will be able to use arbitrator’s services if necessary. Will escrow be used? Yes, of course. This is one of the bases of fair activities of all the parties in the system. It means that the funds will be transferred to the account of the receiver only after the fact that the work is done will be confirmed by all the parties to the deal |
|
|
|
Apparently, the TiesDB platform is linked to economical activities. This is always very risky. That’s why I was surprised to learn that there wont be any arbitration system.
If you think so, you’ve got acquainted with the description of the project poorly. The arbitration system will work in TiesDB and users will be able to use arbitrator’s services if necessary. |
|
|
|
Hi. Perhaps you should increase the number of the coins put on the sale on the ICO?
150 million is more than enough. Moreover, the ICO has almost started, it’s too late to change anything. Don’t forget that some part of the tokens has been sold during the pre-sale. I remember. Anyway, there’re 120 million TrustedHealth tokens remaining in the pool. |
|
|
|
Hi. Perhaps you should increase the number of the coins put on the sale on the ICO?
150 million is more than enough. Moreover, the ICO has almost started, it’s too late to change anything. |
|
|
|
What will be the role of the token in Votes platform’s operation?
This will be the main and the only payment method within the platform. |
|
|
|
If people refused to withdraw their own bonuses as the research shows, I doubt that they’d change the point of view at once.
You know, bonuses are usually absolutely useless, so they forget about them almost immediately. How will BitRewards allow to change the situation? Their bonuses wont be accepted everywhere. The area of use of their bonuses will be much wider. Also, you’ll be able to sell the tokens on the exchange. But who will buy them? Especially at the dawn of development of the platform when it wont have many partners. The stores which want to connect the loyalty system by BitRewards will. |
|
|
|
If people refused to withdraw their own bonuses as the research shows, I doubt that they’d change the point of view at once.
You know, bonuses are usually absolutely useless, so they forget about them almost immediately. How will BitRewards allow to change the situation? Their bonuses wont be accepted everywhere. The area of use of their bonuses will be much wider. Also, you’ll be able to sell the tokens on the exchange. |
|
|
|
If people refused to withdraw their own bonuses as the research shows, I doubt that they’d change the point of view at once.
You know, bonuses are usually absolutely useless, so they forget about them almost immediately. |
|
|
|
Yep, technologies keeping moving on and the approach of BitRent can become revolution for building. I sometimes visit the expositions but I haven’t faced such high-tech approach – I mean the use of chips and indicators. Everyone is trying to solve the problem with the help of security cameras. Them I have a question: doesn’t such a decision seem superfluous today?
I think that developers have been thinking about this and chosen this very option. If we look at the concept of the project as a whole and its creators, the key value for BitRent is transperancy and constant informing of stakeholders about the course of development of the project. That’s what this approach seems to be chosen. I’m trying to imagine this in terms of technology… Who will control the chipping of individual components? Will this be a representative of the builder or BitRent agent? I wont say for sure. But if we consider the motivation and the builders themselves and BitRent, we’ll see that they will be able to agree upon distribution the responsibility of this or that stage of work. Many issues will become clear soon – the team of the project presents its first project at official events. Well, lets solve this problem now… How will the result provided to the investors? There’re lots of possible options at the moment, I think it’s the smallest problem. I’d make a 3d model of a building which is under construction on BitRent platform. |
|
|
|
The arbitration system will be very strange on the platform. One arbitrator to resolve the dispute, it seems to me, is not enough to draw an objective conclusion and make the right decision. Over this company still need to work.
I'm wondering where you get this information from. I want to tell you that five arbitrators will participate in the resolutions of each dispute. Yes, like looking at the official documentation, I do not know ... Do the parties to the deal themselves choose arbitrators? Arbitrators for each transaction will be assigned automatically. This is done to improve the fairness of the resolution of each dispute. I do not like that any LeadCoin user can become arbitrator! Always believed that they should be competent in this area people. In order to make the right decisions in disputes, one must know the specifics of the service well, so the choice was made in favor of the users of LeadCoin. In addition, only sellers with a rating of 4.5 or higher will be able to become an arbiter. |
|
|
|
Yep, technologies keeping moving on and the approach of BitRent can become revolution for building. I sometimes visit the expositions but I haven’t faced such high-tech approach – I mean the use of chips and indicators. Everyone is trying to solve the problem with the help of security cameras. Them I have a question: doesn’t such a decision seem superfluous today?
I think that developers have been thinking about this and chosen this very option. If we look at the concept of the project as a whole and its creators, the key value for BitRent is transperancy and constant informing of stakeholders about the course of development of the project. That’s what this approach seems to be chosen. I’m trying to imagine this in terms of technology… Who will control the chipping of individual components? Will this be a representative of the builder or BitRent agent? I wont say for sure. But if we consider the motivation and the builders themselves and BitRent, we’ll see that they will be able to agree upon distribution the responsibility of this or that stage of work. Many issues will become clear soon – the team of the project presents its first project at official events. |
|
|
|
The arbitration system will be very strange on the platform. One arbitrator to resolve the dispute, it seems to me, is not enough to draw an objective conclusion and make the right decision. Over this company still need to work.
I'm wondering where you get this information from. I want to tell you that five arbitrators will participate in the resolutions of each dispute. Yes, like looking at the official documentation, I do not know ... Do the parties to the deal themselves choose arbitrators? Arbitrators for each transaction will be assigned automatically. This is done to improve the fairness of the resolution of each dispute. |
|
|
|
Yep, technologies keeping moving on and the approach of BitRent can become revolution for building. I sometimes visit the expositions but I haven’t faced such high-tech approach – I mean the use of chips and indicators. Everyone is trying to solve the problem with the help of security cameras. Them I have a question: doesn’t such a decision seem superfluous today?
I think that developers have been thinking about this and chosen this very option. If we look at the concept of the project as a whole and its creators, the key value for BitRent is transperancy and constant informing of stakeholders about the course of development of the project. That’s what this approach seems to be chosen. |
|
|
|
The arbitration system will be very strange on the platform. One arbitrator to resolve the dispute, it seems to me, is not enough to draw an objective conclusion and make the right decision. Over this company still need to work.
I'm wondering where you get this information from. I want to tell you that five arbitrators will participate in the resolutions of each dispute. |
|
|
|
Hello. Arent u afraid that distribution of your app will make it too simple to access cryptocurrencies?
I don’t think it’s bad even if it happens. Nowadays there’re extremely many cryptocurrencies. It was easy to deal with them in the past, but it’s almost impossible now. At the same time, there’s too small number of universal crypticurrencies and DragonGlass is one of them. What do you consider to be universal crytocurrencies? Tokens that have no clear dedication? You may say so. Their activities arent limited by the framework of one theme or platform, this makes them really available. |
|
|
|
Hello. Arent u afraid that distribution of your app will make it too simple to access cryptocurrencies?
I don’t think it’s bad even if it happens. Nowadays there’re extremely many cryptocurrencies. It was easy to deal with them in the past, but it’s almost impossible now. At the same time, there’s too small number of universal crypticurrencies and DragonGlass is one of them. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
