Just received 10 ethereum. another scam token. asset ID CAyBTqxngcwR4X1cyhcZBTwEhrmFAPu7A4jdx1Eiq6pp
Did you see the senders address? ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) 3P ETHWm73tZwiPaXGStwr2UiHiGMTKzuLuG Coincidence? I don't think waves already had vanity address service. So, I'm quite sure this is pure coincidence. When the owner realized he had a unique " ETH " address, he starts creating ethereum token. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Yes, there is a way for vanity addresses. User MaGneT has published a way to do this a while back. I guess I missed his post. Want to know how to do so. I'll check it later. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1387944.msg18807607#msg18807607That's my vanity post ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) I had it in my signature but right now there's the Waves signature campaign. Accidently Picked up another 230 Waves at Bittrex, during the panic dump ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
Whatever FUD is spread, I seen no reason to sell MGO under $12 The store is ready for launch, there's a huge budget for promotions, advertising, etc. Name a few other ICO's that had a working product at launch?
|
|
|
No update on Yobit. Turing contacted me, even he can't find an entry to get support. They just ignore support tickets or do not have the capacity to handle it.
My advice: stay away from Yobit, it's worse than MtGox or Cryptsy.
For now, the takeover and blockchain switch has been postponed (again). We can't start to exchange coins when people can't withdraw from Yobit.
|
|
|
It has been told to you by about 20 different users in the Waves topic: you made a mistake, you received your Waves but you don't have access to your coins and you accidently showed your private key (seed) in the screenshots you posted. The coins are lost, face it, accept it, be a man about it. And why complain now? The ICO was a year ago. Stop blaming others for your mistakes.
|
|
|
Russian Ruble gateway rumour? Anyone who can confirm?
Sent you a PM yesterday, would you please reply? ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) And about the Ruble gateway: Sasha is Russian. Have not heard the rumour but I'm sure it will be there.
|
|
|
Who needs Ripples when you can make Waves?
|
|
|
Bitcoin up & Lisk up? Last time I saw that happen was with Waves. Could be a good sign ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
Lisk is undervalued by at least 40 times. Yes, you read it right.
And it's easy to understand why.
There is no hyping, no pumping. Just a loyal community holding their Lisk and waiting for the Lisk team to develop their product.
For a long time, Waves was at the same level and now products start rolling out... and see what happens? It's slowly climbing towards the moon.
So for Lisk, just hold, it's nearly time.
|
|
|
Great! Road to Waves 1.0
Almost a year has passed since the launch of Waves project, decentralized Waves network exists since around 7 month, it’s still very young but we might say that the initial stage of the network bootstrapping is over. It’s time to move on to a more mature network, which can handle many more transactions and provide more advanced features such as smart contracts. This will be our Waves 1.0, robust and secure open blockchain network ready for “real world” applications.
How are we going to achieve this? What would the milestones be?
First off we’re going to start implementing an adaptation of Bitcoin NG approach to Proof of Stake systems, suggested by Dmitry Meshkov. In classical NG approach a miner generates so-called keyblock, which contains no transactions, and through this she obtains the right to generate “microblocks”, containing transactions. She can place incoming transactions into the microblocks and push them into the network until a new keyblock is generated.
In Proof of Stake systems we can take a slightly different approach: miner can update a block she generates with a new transactions, and push a new UPDATE transaction with new data into the network, since block generation is “cheap” in POS systems (in POW you can’t do that, you would need to solve the block again, expending your computational resource).
This (combined with increasing the block size) will allow us to handle thousands of transactions per minute, without giving up on the network decentralization. Combined with cheap transaction fees it will make Waves network suitable for applications requiring really high throughput, and will make Waves network really unique in this regard.
After that we’ll implement the state storage optimization proposal from Reyzin, Chepurnoy, Meshkov which is based on authenticated data structure approach. It allows a user not to store balances in all different assets issued on the network, but store only the balances in assets which are of interest to her. At the same time a node can still verify all transactions in all assets.
State storage is a big problem, which is probably more severe than blockchain bloat problem, since state is a dynamic structure which has to be stored in memory for fast transactions verification. If you have many tokens storage can take up more space than the blockchain itself. Waves is a network based on tokens, anyone can issue a token for just 1 wave. So we need to have a scalability solution to make it really efficient.
Afterwards we’ll turn to implementing smart contracts on Waves chain. Business logic put onto the blockchain is absolutely necessary for the success of any blockchain system that present itself as a “platform”, that is a full-blown complete ecosystem where users can get all the features they want.
We have our own approach regarding smart contracts. You will be able to run smart contracts for a price of a normal transactions, without any additional “gas” or other costs. This is a more direct generalization of Bitcoin scripting, non-Turing complete zero-knowledge proof based language which can handle most of use cases of what Turing complete languages can do.
And on top of that you get many additional improvements, such as transaction anonymization and multisignature transactions. When imlemented properly this approach will provide a much higher security guarantees than Turing complete approach can provide. It is much better suited to real world applications of open blockchains than any other existing approach.
Parallel to that there will be very many developments on the business side, but that should probably be described in another post. I’d like to highlight introduction of new fiat and crypto gateways, more streamlined DEX interface, and a compliant token crowd-investing platform Tokenomica.com
Once we have Waves 1.0 done and ready we’ll move on to even more interesting stuff! Many ideas are flying around — Lightning networks, anonymous order books, lite clients and side chains. It will be getting more and more exciting as we move further on!
|
|
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fpicadump.com%2Fpictures%2Fbitcoin%2Ftokenomica1.png&t=663&c=dd8zA1Fu0DtUqQ) That's great news! Was expecting this but was waiting for the announcement ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) This will be a hot summer for Waves, with all the updates and features coming! And on Slack they always said: we won't be "wasting" funds on promoting Waves before we have something to promote. Right now, we have a signature bounty so there must be something to promote ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
It seems no day passes without news or updates on Waves ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) The graphics charts are looking a bit like ETH's when it started to rise.
|
|
|
I hold both a lot of Waves and Lisk but I prefer the Waves topic over the Lisk one.
This seems like the "delegate" topic. Not attractive to be here at all.
|
|
|
Keep getting this error when trying to send WAVES tokens from the official wallet.
Error! Error:112 - State check failed
Whats this?
Did you lease your Waves? ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
Look at the price, just look at it!1!! yeah undervalued
Waves is moving up on Coinmarketcap.com. Should become a top-10 coin within a few weeks.
|
|
|
I'm all setup ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
does Waves employ a vetting procedure for projects wanting to ICO on the platform?
If I'm not mistaken WCT will handle this in future. Like the DAO on ETH, without shitty coding ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Yup, WCT will handle it ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
Be warned, this is a scam.
|
|
|
The pump is only starting. 20k in few days, just hodl.
It's 140k now, why 20k in a few days? ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|