Same ol' same ol'. Your intelligence suck. Please make us a favor and read the last few pages of this thread.

"Throw enough mud at the wall, some of it will stick." ^^^^Perfect example.

Big red candle? Come on, it can't go lower than 16k. The only people selling right now are miners. Wait 3-4 weeks and there will be reward reduction. Incentive rewards are still rising + we have a great roadmap. Who would sell it now(besides miners)? When you are looking for a coin to invest some money, you can't really find anything better than vnl.

Throw enough mud at the wall, some of it will stick.

Usually I don't post things like this but VNL and Peercoin are similar in some way. Both are not clones of Bitcoin. Market conditions were totally different, that's probably why VNL is now ~10x cheaper than Peercoin at that moment.

1. John wrote all of the code by himself and that's basically the answer for your questions.
2. You need a lot of money, time and effort to examine it for license violations. Only ignorant could think that all what it takes is to compare two snippets of code and take an analysis made by some 10 yo wannabe dev as a truth.
3. You can write everything you want about any cryptocurrency, especially here on bitcointalk.  That's why some people are sensitive, because it's easy to spread the lies, but it's 10 times harder to straight them up. And asking this question again and again spreads the lie.
4. It's really a matter of common sense. All of the accusations are related to some not important, most basic methods. He was able to create zero-time, but you really think he had to copy-paste simpliest code and run it throught reformatter(or how is it called?)? Is something like this even under license, while it's a common knowledge and everyone can do this without looking at bitcoin code(and obviously it will look similar)?

Will VNL become fully anonymous after darkpp release?

It's all about money. He is not going to start testing untill there will be some contestants. But it's pretty obvious it is going to be a circle jerk, there is nothing bad about it. Some cryptos are obviously faster than the other ones, that's why there will only be few contestants(if any, but that's because of entry fee). On the other hand this is probably a lot of work so there should be a reward for the tester.

On this forum? It's a reasonable thing to not listen to people on this forum. But when the new ANN topic pops out and you are an investor you are going to make a decision - you are in or out. And when you saw a lot of Legendary and Hero Members spamming other coins topics, trying to hurt other coins because they have their own agenda you can't really trust no one. If I see the dev who delivered innovative, one of a kind tech, who should I trust? The developer or some random guy(even with a legendary rank) at the forum? If this tech was reviewed and clearly works very well it's a no-brainer.

But ok, I don't want to argue, because it's off-topic. Let the best crypto win.

You can say that about every coin and every community because people believe to what developers say. But you can check vnl's code and try to hack it. Apparently - easier said than done.
Your post proves how easy it is to manipulate people. Why anyone should believe you, or me? I would rather believe a skilled person, who can deliever the technology(and it works), rather than some random guy at forum who can't programm.

That's just the most logical explanation. No point in creating conspiracy theories. Block rewards are still high and miners are constantly dumping the coins. Hopefully incentive rewards will change that.

You don't need any collateral to become a superpeer, but you need it to collect the reward(I might be wrong).

You just embarassing yourself. Keep posting, I'm going to get my popcorn, cause this shit is funny. Legendary member posting like a child(now I'm sure it is sold, sockpuppet troll account).    You are comparing two year old(?) project - XMR with few months old VNL. Are you stupid or what? If anyone has any doubts, just look at the XMR chart. It was in -500% downtrend in the past. But it doesn't mean that something is wrong with the coin or technology itself. For VNL this is just the beginning.

Smooth and his army of sockpuppet accounts(aka ZeroCommiters) to the rescue of crypto-world. LOL

Nope there is no similarities, VNL is a fricking car, not a cryptocurrency. How can there be similarities?

No, you just can't prove that the license has been broken. Or I should say that any license APPLIES here. The way he behaves should be treated as a sign for every user to not take his words seriously.

He is in no position to accuse John for unethical behaviour or theft. He obviously has his own agenda(against vnl). With that in mind his judgement just can't be taken seriously.

I replied earlier that it's common knowledge. It doesn't take any special skills to write those methods. Smooth knows I'm right. I dare him to rewrite those methods. Guess what's going to happen... You'll see very similar outcome to John's.

These few lines of code which they are claiming are stolen - this is a common knowledge for every dev who has any idea about programming cryptocurrencies. There is no point in rewriting it. You don't have to be a genius to make those methods, for god's sake. It will always look similar.

WheatClove

There is just no point in writing this method in any other way. What would be your code to achieve this desirable functionality? I remember apple's patent war, when they tried to patent slide to unlock.
That's the court's verdict: "This user-friendly display was already suggested by the state of the art."

I can write here that you are a liar, my opinion has factual merit, because you are lying that John stole bitcoin's code. You are wrong, your arguments are not strong and valid. Anyone can write whatever he wants. It really takes a lot more to prove that someone stole code than stupid post on bitcointalk... You seem to not understand that simple fact.

Yeaah, now legality doesn't matter. So what matters more? If he commited a fraud(fraud is illegal, but it doesn't matter?) as you claim, you should report it. If my competitors would stole intellectual property and took my market share I would fight against it. But not by hanging a large banner "company x is stealing intellectual property" on my own company's headquarters like xmr and other devs are doing(you can go to jail for something like this). It's plain stupid, trolling, or unfair competition what you are doing. You can't prove shit, but you are still attacking.


Someone is stealing money from the bank, I'm going to post on his facebook that he is a thief but I'm not going to call the police because he  wasn't stealing. Fuck logic

I don't believe that false accusations are the only thing other devs can do... They can't code zero time that's for sure.  


You can accuse anyone for anything. That's why we have courts to prove that someone is guilty. If you are certain that he broke the law then go and inform the police... What are you waiting for... oh wait