Latest posts of: a_cat_named

Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16]

301

on: November 30, 2014, 01:32:54 AM

Quote from: hashforce101 on November 30, 2014, 01:15:45 AM Quote from: GREEDYJOHN on November 30, 2014, 01:03:17 AM Quote from: hashforce101 on November 30, 2014, 12:09:59 AM How many active connections do you have so I can compare mine is 17 whats a hardfork? so using the old database is correct in a hardfork. I'm still learning everyday I have 35 active connections right now. something is not right here . I have 20. Someone explain whats a hardfork etc why . everything. hardfork & old blockchain & richlist?? 20 connections are OK. A hard fork makes the old blockchain direction redundant. It creates a new direction that everyone must follow. A richlist is simply a compilation of addresses that have the the largest coin holdings.

302

on: November 30, 2014, 01:24:42 AM

Quote from: tylerderden on November 30, 2014, 12:42:45 AM unless the news is moolah got attacked by a pack of shiba dogs. that news would be spectacular. Spectacular, but very understandable! Many Shiba dogs much trouble.

303

on: November 30, 2014, 01:17:42 AM

Quote from: Hueristic on November 30, 2014, 12:34:10 AM Quote from: a_cat_named_joe on November 30, 2014, 12:20:52 AM Quote from: helloge on November 26, 2014, 10:09:32 AM Quote from: lynn_402 on November 25, 2014, 04:37:59 PM Quote from: helloge on November 25, 2014, 03:47:21 PM It seems that ~50 is the bottom in nearly period. still wait for 30~40 sat. Last time it went to 30 sat, it jumped to more than 100 in only a few days. It would be a great time to buy indeed. yeah, so I still want to wait for the cheap price again, under 50 sat is all OK now. Wasn't the jump from 30 to 100 sat because of news that Doge was fronted on a payment platform? Was it Moolah or some other outfit? I think this coin needs the same kind of good news to get back up again. Hahah, Moolah news would be bad! BTW opened and closed v1.8 a few times and it's unstuck now. I think that might explain something of why we are here!

304

on: November 30, 2014, 01:11:29 AM

Quote from: GREEDYJOHN on November 30, 2014, 01:03:17 AM Quote from: hashforce101 on November 30, 2014, 12:09:59 AM How many active connections do you have so I can compare mine is 17 whats a hardfork? so using the old database is correct in a hardfork. I'm still learning everyday I have 35 active connections right now. Is it good to have a lot of connections? I know you have to have an adequate number, say 10-20. That's what I usually see. Isn't there more competition to stake with numbers higher than this?

305

on: November 30, 2014, 01:05:02 AM

Quote from: shahim on November 29, 2014, 11:10:09 PM Quote from: a_cat_named_joe on November 29, 2014, 10:48:13 PM Quote from: pgb on November 29, 2014, 12:58:48 PM Quote from: Kunfu on November 29, 2014, 05:45:17 AM if I use the old blockchain that was downloaded as of earlier today with the previous wallet, it will continue to download from block 192 and complete, will this have problem? or will I need to download from beginning which it isn't working I had the same issue as Kunfu. My wallet would not sync from 0 so I used my "old" blockchain as it only had a few blocks to fully sync. Now I'm staking and everything seems fine with the new wallet but as you guys mentioned this was a fork, am I in the wrong blockchain or everything is OK? Ta There was some advice to sync an old wallet & save the .dat file and graft it into the new wallet. Does that still hold? I don't know. Dev, can we have something concrete on this hard fork question? You can keep all files and just start the new wallet. Just make a backup of your wallet.dat!! And btw we are working at the sync issue and releasing a small fix asap! Regards Shahim Thanks. These posts have really got me thinking on wallet blockchain issues.

306

on: November 30, 2014, 12:20:52 AM

Quote from: helloge on November 26, 2014, 10:09:32 AM Quote from: lynn_402 on November 25, 2014, 04:37:59 PM Quote from: helloge on November 25, 2014, 03:47:21 PM It seems that ~50 is the bottom in nearly period. still wait for 30~40 sat. Last time it went to 30 sat, it jumped to more than 100 in only a few days. It would be a great time to buy indeed. yeah, so I still want to wait for the cheap price again, under 50 sat is all OK now. Wasn't the jump from 30 to 100 sat because of news that Doge was fronted on a payment platform? Was it Moolah or some other outfit? I think this coin needs the same kind of good news to get back up again.

307

on: November 29, 2014, 10:48:13 PM

Quote from: pgb on November 29, 2014, 12:58:48 PM Quote from: Kunfu on November 29, 2014, 05:45:17 AM if I use the old blockchain that was downloaded as of earlier today with the previous wallet, it will continue to download from block 192 and complete, will this have problem? or will I need to download from beginning which it isn't working I had the same issue as Kunfu. My wallet would not sync from 0 so I used my "old" blockchain as it only had a few blocks to fully sync. Now I'm staking and everything seems fine with the new wallet but as you guys mentioned this was a fork, am I in the wrong blockchain or everything is OK? Ta There was some advice to sync an old wallet & save the .dat file and graft it into the new wallet. Does that still hold? I don't know. Dev, can we have something concrete on this hard fork question?

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16]