I strongly disagree with you. Yes, Inter looked decent and even had chances to score a goal, but mostly it happened when Manchester City had already scored a goal and therefore City no longer had to rush headlong into the attack to score a goal. Although it is worthy of respect how Inter was able to pin City to their goal at the end of the match and, with luck, could transfer the game to extratime, although it seemed before that Inter already had less strength left in the last quarter of the match than City. In any case, the Inter players and Simono Inzaghi can be proud of the work done on the eve of the game and the match itself.

I also think that Kane's bet on Tottenham looks pointless, because loyalty to his hometown club turns into a lack of titles at club level for a player. I will not say that Tottenham has a small budget, but still the main competitors have more and therefore they are playing titles among themselves, and Tottenham continues to remain on the approaches to them, even if they are very close. Therefore, Kane urgently needs to move to the grand club, which really claims titles, even in another championship, in another country. Kane has less and less time to win trophies, the age of a football player may well be interrupted by some stupid injury.

I also think that there is no reason for Lewandowski to leave Barcelona in search of super-profits to Saudi Arabia, following such stars of European football as Cristiano Ronaldo and now Karim Benzema. Still, I think that Lewandowski has not yet said everything he wanted in La Liga and therefore he still has to stay at least a season, especially since he seems to have a great relationship with Xavi both personally and professionally. I was much more surprised that Luka Modric decided to stay at Real Madrid, and did not leave in search of big money to the Arab sheikhs.

I think that even taking into account the loss of Messi and the potential loss of Neymar in the squad, Paris Saint-Germain is obliged to take the championship title in France with a margin. And so, yes, you definitely need to strengthen if PSG still wants to win the coveted Champions League. I would not exaggerate so much for the fact of Messi's departure, because strictly speaking, the club simply served as a kind of incubator for Lionel to finally win his coveted World Cup title and also pump up his personal statistics on effective actions in European championships, but globally for what he was called into the team, the goal was not fulfilled and maybe it's even for the best that Messi has gone to the MLS and now PSG can build their game exclusively around Mbappe.

As for the fact that Pep changed the game and took the trophy because of it, I disagree a little. Nevertheless, the main reason for the next championship of Manchester City and Guardiola is that Arteta and his Arsenal failed to finish when they began to lose points en masse, where in theory they should not have done it. Which of course does not negate the fact that Manchester City had a very powerful finish in the Premier League, but still the root cause is a strong decline in Arsenal's results at the finish.

A notable battle awaits us and it is very difficult for me personally to give preference to any of the teams. The teams are very close in strength at this point in time and all the nuances will decide. But still, I think that Manchester United have some advantage, because the match will be held at their home stadium and, according to the idea of MU, winning the Europa League may be more important, whereas for Barcelona I think the main priority now is to keep their advantage and separation from the rest of the teams in La Liga and take the title.

In my opinion, Pavard was one of the best on the pitch and the fact that Paris Saint-Germain did not show the advantages of their attacking power is also a huge merit of this player. It is not a fact that the loss of Pavard in the second leg will be fatal for Bayern, but still it will add headaches to Nagelsmann to build the defensive actions of the team. Personally, for the situation with the second leg, this is 50-50 percent, especially since the away goal rule is no longer valid and PSG will only need to score one goal to move the match into extra time.

With all due respect to Al Ahly, the FIFA Club World Cup is a completely different tournament and more of an exhibition and by no means indicative in terms of Real Madrid's chances of winning the title in La Liga. The European and South American teams are a priori considered favorites and enter the fight only at the semi-final stage. However, this did not help Flamengo in the other semi-final match and now we have a rather unexpected final. Therefore, if the current Real Madrid squad can win the FIFA Club World Cup, this does not automatically mean winning La Liga. Different tournaments, different number of matches and different depth of the squad is needed for success.

Well, it's too early to talk about the breakaway yet and we'll watch Real Madrid play their match. There is still a full 2nd round of the championship ahead and a lot more can change, and indeed in the current conditions for Xavi and his wards, the most important thing now is to continue to win and score points. And then how the situation will develop. It seems that Real Madrid is slowly getting out of the semblance of a crisis situation in which it found itself earlier. And you don't even need to talk about the ability of Real Madrid to get out of almost hopeless situations. The only thing that is alarming is the fact of a complete lack of transfer activity in the winter.

It depends on what tasks the club sets for itself. If the club is going to become the first after Barcelona in La Liga, then this is one thing, if it still wants to beat Barcelona in the standings, then this is another matter In any case, it is not for nothing that it is said that there are no limits to perfection and strengthening the club will never hurt. If last season Barcelona failed the first part of the season and gained momentum only in the second half of the season, then this year Xavi's wards joined the fight for the title from the very beginning and the match for the Super Cup should at least make you think. Still, I think that fortune cannot be favorable to Real Madrid as it was last season, and therefore the composition of the club should be formed with some margin of maximum capacity.

Well, it's a completely different matter when you need to tune in to the leader of the standings and it's much easier to do it. It's just that Inter decided at a certain point in the game to win with little blood and less effort and gave the initiative to Monza. But this is a dangerous strategy and Monza, even in extra time, was still able to equalize the score, especially since she played in front of home fans. However, Lautaro Martinez's goal, which was victorious almost until the very end of the meeting, was quite curious in itself and was not the result of a meaningful combination of Inter, but the result of a curious mistake of a delayed Monza player.

A striking example of these approaches is the fate of Ronald Wayne, who, along with Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak, was the third co-founder of Apple. He did not want to take risks at the beginning of the company's work and sold his share of it, missing his chance to fabulously get rich then. This path is not strewn with roses, success is achieved by a few and not always purposefulness allows you to achieve this goal. The same Jobs tried to bring Wayne back to the company again, when money was urgently needed, but Wayne was adamant. Therefore, a lot depends on the character.

An even more real big problem is that cryptocurrencies are no longer worth as much as they were worth some time ago, and here a really paradoxical situation turns out. Those who do not believe in the future prospects of cryptocurrencies try not to keep them for a long time, and those who believe in further prospects keep this asset at home. And yes, people use cryptocurrencies according to how convenient it is to use them at this time. And at this time, cryptocurrencies are much more convenient to use as an asset, and not as currencies, because in this situation cryptocurrencies are by no means a competitor to traditional fiat currencies and I don't see any reason yet when normal states will give preference to some other people's cryptocurrencies rather than their own banknotes.

In principle, this is what experience is for, to try not to repeat your own mistakes and the most important thing in such mistakes is when a person makes these mistakes himself, because there is nothing more effective for assimilation. Another question is, not everything is so clear and what was a mistake last time will not necessarily be a mistake next time. Therefore, there are a lot of successful people who nevertheless acted contrary to all the rules and broke the bank, unlike those who, having burned themselves last time, no longer began to take risks next time, and risk is also the basis of success.

Bitcoin cannot undermine fiat currencies in any way in the near future, because bitcoin and fiat currencies have different fields of application. Nevertheless, fiat currencies are inscribed in the economy of any capable state and serve as one of the most effective methods of economic policy, and therefore no major state will give such a tool from its arsenal, especially into the hands of other persons who have nothing to do with the state system and it is not clear what goals they pursue, even if the most benevolent.

The main problem at this point in time is really too long a bull market period, which contradicts the basic nature of capitalism, when periods of growth should be replaced by crises, when the market is being cleared of uncompetitive participants. The governments of the countries seem to have found an effective way against crises in the form of printing an additional amount of money, but thanks to this, the market is not healing and the problems are simply driven deeper, threatening even greater problems in the future. There is a kind of decoupling of the stock market from direct production, and because of this, the stock market really begins to resemble a casino that has less and less to do with the production of goods and services, for which the stock market was originally created.

In addition, at this point in time, the existence of cash is a matter of national security, because cash is not so tied to electronic infrastructure and may well exist and operate in the absence of it.

It just all depends on what you want to do, that is, just save your capital, increase your capital and at what rate you are going to increase it. Regarding stocks, that is, the stock market and the cryptocurrency market, you have more chances to increase your capital at a faster pace. But as you know, free cheese happens only in a mousetrap and in this case there is a much greater risk. As for the shares themselves, I would like to say the following, that everything depends on which block of shares you acquire, that is, in most cases, the acquisition of a large number of shares implies the acquisition of the company itself with real estate relying on this account, so I would not talk so superficially about shares, that is, real property.

In any case, the employer wants to control his employees and the best way to do this is to work in the office. Let Covid 19 and the events that followed have made some adjustments to the ways and popularity of types of work, but still no one is going to cancel traditional types of work and many large corporations have begun to force their employees to return to their offices.  It is not for nothing that Elon Musk, after acquiring control over Twitter, has an irreconcilable struggle with the remote method of work. By the way, do not confuse freelancing and outsourcing, if many companies are willing to outsource some of their activities, but only a few are willing to give it into the hands of freelance freelancers. Nevertheless, service subordination is a great thing and allows you to achieve incredible things in business.Now, regarding freelancing in the cryptocurrency sphere, I would like to say the following: because of the history of the subject itself, the positions of freelancing are strong here, but the more the industry develops and, accordingly, the larger the size of companies, the greater the role of traditional methods of building the labor process. Therefore, it's a little premature to say that it's time to forget about returning to the offices.

Along with the growth of capital, appetites begin to grow That's human nature and there's nothing you can do about it. It seems that the most reasonable option in this situation is to invest 50 percent of the earned and deposit 50 percent of the remaining capital. Another question is that a lot depends on all sorts of accompanying details like your temperament and what degree of risk you can assume, in what phase the market is in a bullish or bearish trend, what is the share of altcoins and bitcoin itself in investments. Therefore, first of all, you need to start from yourself and listening to other people's opinions, you should still have your own strategy and first of all rely on it.