C-cex is once again threatening to deslist SPN. Is it worth the fight at this time?
Just as an FYI to everyone, I asked c-cex what kind of trading volume would convince them to keep SPN listed on their exchange, and this was their reply: "1 BTC/day will be a good reason to keep it." So, unless anyone has a few spare BTC laying around, it looks like we're probably going to lose our listing on c-cex.
|
|
|
My 2 cents:
I wish it weren't true because I want the price to go up, but I think we need a game-changer to get another real rally going. Some things that I think might qualify include a very (preferably unexpectedly) positive revision of BitLicense or an announcement about an actual listing date for a bitcoin ETF on an exchange. Barring something big like that, I think we'll test the 266 area again because I think the collective market wants to know if that level will actually hold. I think many people expected a bounce off that area, which is why we got a good, strong one. But I'm not sure how many people believe that it will hold a second time...and more importantly, what happens if it doesn't.
The one technical thing that I think could lead to a new, sustained rally is TRUE capitulation. And by true capitulation I don't mean the dip into the 200s that we saw recently. I mean where even some of the earlier adopters start to question if bitcoin will survive. I think the market has been saturated with newcomers (myself included) since the rally at the end of last year, and it really needs a reset where most of those people are wiped out. Otherwise, I feel like we're just slowly going to sink under the weight of the miners, at least for a fairly extended period of time.
Long term, I think there's still hope. But short/medium term, I think we need something big to ignite another rally.
|
|
|
Thanks for your perseverance, SpartanCoin.
C-cex is once again threatening to deslist SPN. Is it worth the fight at this time?
|
|
|
It looks the network hash rate has been slowly and consistently rising. The last day or two we've been over 100 MH/s every time I've checked. And the bids on the exchanges have slowly been rising, too. Very good trends. The block explorer page ( http://blockexplorer.spartancoin.org) is having issues again. It's missing block count and difficulty.
|
|
|
Wow! Did anyone see Europex? Over 16 LTC volume, with trades as high as 90 Litoshis per SPN!
|
|
|
I would assume that after the wallets are all finished that we're going to be looking at a business type-front here soon? Being able to spend SPN will go a long way to boosting its value.
I'm not saying this is a bad idea, but we have to be really careful about this approach. If you just open up a store-front, there will be a lot of selling pressure as those that have mined the coin start buying stuff. See GPUCoin. Once they opened up their store, the price plummeted and never recovered. You need to make sure that you increase the demand, which is not easy to do. Edit: To increase the value of the coin, you need people not just to buy it but to hold it. If they buy and then spend right away (which most likely means selling as the merchant cashes out), it won't have much effect on the value.
|
|
|
great, holding it again Interesting news on c-cex. I never spoke with them in regards to re-listing. I asked when spartancoin gains traction after tools are out if it were possible to get relisted. They never replied. Oh, ok, then maybe it had to do with the ticket I had opened. They took a few days to respond, initially saying that they had announced that it was going to be delisted and everything. But I guess they listened when I explained to them how you had been in contact with them, and that they had taken it off the delisting list about 4 days prior to delisting it. Anyway, it was a great victory for SPN. I don't think I've ever seen a coin re-listed anywhere before.
|
|
|
In case anyone missed it, SPN has been re-listed on C-cex.
|
|
|
Yeah, what happened? Sorry to keep bugging you about this, SpartanCoin, as we know you have much to worry about, but could you please check on this? Edit: I opened up a support ticket about it on C-cex.
|
|
|
yep,deffo nothing to be interested in anymore.
Then why are you bothering to read this thread and post a comment?
|
|
|
It looks like C-cex has removed SPN from their delisting list. Thanks SpartanCoin!
|
|
|
the notation on c-cex will occur "if" no trading occurs for SPN.
I will contact c-cex again. I have them on my skype and will talk. I showed them all the projects and where they stand at the moment. They even got to see them as they are now, not just a white paper with ideas. It has to be an automated system of some sort, but in reality all exchanges only want coins trading which makes sense.
A slow trickle buy will help.
Thanks SpartanCoin. It would be nice to know what their minimum volume per time period is. SPN has been trading, just not a lot.
|
|
|
SpartanCoin, C-cex is again threatening to delist SPN, this time by September 14th. What is their issue? Do they have an automated process for marking coins that will be delisted based on low volume?
they delist because the market is slow and also the volume is less, so if less volume then the exchange will not make any profit form trading. I'm aware of that (although I doubt that they lose much if any money on low-volume coins as long as they don't require much maintenance). But if you look back on this thread, the SPN dev, SpartanCoin, has contacted C-cex a number of times to ask them to keep the coin. Obviously they listen to him since it hasn't been delisted. As I kind of doubt that they would again plan to delist it after SpartanCoin talked to them like two weeks ago, I'm wondering if they have a script or something that goes through and just marks all coins with low volume for delisting.
|
|
|
SpartanCoin, C-cex is again threatening to delist SPN, this time by September 14th. What is their issue? Do they have an automated process for marking coins that will be delisted based on low volume?
|
|
|
Awesome. i just checked it out. Thank you for the support. I will add you to the OP How does this help the coins value??? or get us on an exchange??? Maybe publicity, and it also should make anyone happy who uses cryptofolio and owns SPN.
|
|
|
To anyone who wonders if they could be legit, simply consider the math. 3% daily interest, if compounded (which I assume it would be if you keep reinvesting your returns) means that if you invest $1 now...
1*1.03^(3*365) = $113,962,259,727,591
you will own the world in about 3 years.
Many people will recognize this for what it is. But some will get sucked in because they simply haven't come across this sort of thing before. If someone is naive, they should be educated, not taken advantage of.
Time to start an anti-Cryptcominer sig campaign.
|
|
|
"Cryptco Miner is a corporate entity and has been officially registered"
You claim you are a registered corporation (as above), where are you registered? This screams scam, all people are doing is advertising a HYIP sham. This will be dead within 1-2 months.
This all seems too good to be true for any long period of time--how can you guarantee at least a 3% daily interest rate? How can you possibly get that kind of consistent return in a legitimate manner?
|
|
|
Cryptcominer, could you please explain a little bit about how you can guarantee such a high rate of return?
|
|
|
So 100 people enter a game with same amount let's say 0.001 each so 100 x 0.001 = 0.1 and winner gets all??
If the payout is 90x, then 100 people entering at 0.001 each means 100 x 0.001 = 0.1 is collected for the game, but the winner only gets 90 x 0.001 = 0.09. The worst part of the game is my chance to win this game is 0.01 % If 1 out of 100 people win, then your chance to win is 0.01 or 1%. 0.01% means 0.0001. To the owner: this is an interesting idea, but are you going to keep many players? I would guess that a lot of people will play a few times and then get frustrated because they don't win anything.
|
|
|
I don't see how this is surprising at all. They are in the US, registered as an MSB and the US does not allow online gambling. MSBs or other financial service companies must comply with the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA). If they willfully allow transactions from known gambling addresses, they would be violating the UIGEA and could face legal consequences. Don't get mad at Coinbase for following regulations.
If you are outside the US, in a country where online gambling is legal, then you should really use something else as a wallet as Coinbase still has to abide by US laws.
I say again, emphasis added: I believe it is a huge tactical blunder for an exchange that says on its home page "Coinbase is an international digital wallet that allows you to securely buy, use, and accept bitcoin currency", and that hosts its servers in Costa Rica (according to Flagfox) - to apply parochial American rules to its non-American clients. From https://coinbase.com/about (emphasis mine): "The Company At A Glance Founded in June of 2012, Coinbase is a bitcoin wallet and platform where merchants and consumers can transact with the new digital currency bitcoin. We're based in San Francisco, California." Their headquarters are in the US, which is what matters.
|
|
|
|