Oh wait, do not say. Advertising in Instagram? Every time I go to Instagram - there's only sex
While it is not clear. The devs say they have their own channels of promotion, but this is a commercial secret. Um, secrets? It is not good Maybe they have something special there. Although I think they will spam in local forums The latter is more likely. And anyway, how else to go out on whores? Advertise on a TV channel?
|
|
|
Oh wait, do not say. Advertising in Instagram? Every time I go to Instagram - there's only sex
While it is not clear. The devs say they have their own channels of promotion, but this is a commercial secret. Um, secrets? It is not good
|
|
|
Oh wait, do not say. Advertising in Instagram? Every time I go to Instagram - there's only sex
|
|
|
If everything is really the way developers say (I just do not use the services of prostitutes myself), then this is really cool. The market is kind of big, my neighbor is a prostitute, lol. This is something new in the crypto.
This is what we tell you! Haha, it's too early to rejoice. How to make whores use this app? Usually they only use cash
|
|
|
If everything is really the way developers say (I just do not use the services of prostitutes myself), then this is really cool. The market is kind of big, my neighbor is a prostitute, lol. This is something new in the crypto.
|
|
|
Okay, smart guys, I read the documentation and I had questions. How are you going to legalize prostitution?
Again ... Payment by crypto currency does not count. This is not spelled out in any law. Okay, suppose. But someday it will be legalized! Not in the next five years. This discussion is a good joke, i was asking myself too, "but shit prostituion is not legalized" ( except in a few countries ) "so how such a crypto could exist ?" But yeah crypto is not even legal or illegal so it can support an industry which is not legal and make it less horrible or try it to do it better ? Think about the concept of these both idea and it's quite crazy what we can realise. Sexcoin is not exactly about this but ..... it's quite what it could do so..... you imagine ! Crazy Shit ! ! ! Crypto could be the super Hero the world was waiting ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) I thought for a bit - yes, to a certain extent you are right
|
|
|
Okay, smart guys, I read the documentation and I had questions. How are you going to legalize prostitution?
Again ... Payment by crypto currency does not count. This is not spelled out in any law. Okay, suppose. But someday it will be legalized!
|
|
|
Okay, smart guys, I read the documentation and I had questions. How are you going to legalize prostitution?
|
|
|
Meanwhile, there are three days left before the start of the pre-ICO
LOL. If these guys do not spoil everything from the top
|
|
|
So, what do we have here? Scam trade? Let's study the information
Dude, form your opinion. Do not teach me. I still read white paper Hey, dude, do not be so aggressive. If you have any questions, write, guys can prompt Thank you, Mr. Charming. Now do not get involved in my business.
|
|
|
So, what do we have here? Scam trade? Let's study the information
Dude, form your opinion. Do not teach me. I still read white paper
|
|
|
So, what do we have here? Scam trade? Let's study the information
|
|
|
this service is not working guys. I have put an ad on my website and nothing happens.
Was fine for almost 2 years. Turns into exitscam. - Sent funds to the address I always use. It changed to something else. Funds never received. - Sent funds to the "new" address. The funds never appeared.
|
|
|
It is behind cloudflare reverse proxy.
Sorry aobut this... My host says that it should be working then, no server reason for it not to. He asked is the script using curl to connect to the API? Anyone know the answer? Andy CURL + fallback to fsockopen or something like that. It may fail if the SSL version on your server is outdated... But better wait for Kazuldur since I'm just a user.
|
|
|
Hi, I'm not getting any response from the support ticket thingy, so I'll try asking here instead.
What IP address (or range) does the API request go to? My host said they will whitelist it. At the moment I'm not able to use the service at all.
Thanks, Andy
It is behind cloudflare reverse proxy. You can find a list of cloudflare IPs is here: https://www.cloudflare.com/ips/
|
|
|
I recently updated to r65 with antibotlinks 5.50, but after solving antibotlinks, claim button says "disable ad block and reload" but it's clickable, it works like get reward button, also the button timer seems to be gone. Any idea?
Did you update the template too? No I did not :/, will update it now, thanks for fast answer ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) You probably just need to add "claim-button" class to the button in index.php of your template. That way you won't have to redo all your customizations. Hmm i updated the whole template, and tried to add class claim as well, but the problem seem to persist. It somehow shows ad block button text, with function of claim button ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Are you using adblock? Is "Detect and block users with ad blocking software" enabled in your fb admin? Is the "Enable Get reward button after some time" greater than 0? When you do "view source" of your facet can you find:<script type="text/javascript" src="libs/advertisement.js"></script> If you want to make the button non-clickable open: Under: claim_button.val('Please disable AdBlock and reload');
Add: claim_button.prop('disabled', true);
|
|
|
Bots are insane today 50% of the claims from a ~100 satoshi faucet with nastyhosts disabled + no anti bot links. They continue to try even when I stopped paying them a week ago. I've port scanned few of the bot IPs - no open ports at all ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) He probably uses "port knocking". The only common thing between his IPs is that they are not pingable (it is not really practical to check for this). confirmed: - the default puzzles of anti-bot links 2.x are broken - either delete the default ones and create your own or upgrade to 5.01 - once the antibotlinks 5+ is in place (make sure ttf/otf fonts work) the bot will stop trying to claim (I hope for long). looking at that screenshot - what is waterfallmanager? how to use it in my faucet? it looks effective against bots! It is still in development (planned to be paid service since it uses alot of resources) but it is not perfect for now. Today it screwed 3 legit users ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) Maybe in a week or two I'll start a beta with all the users that have helped in the past few months and if everything is ok I'll make it available to everybody else. great to here this we need this ! iam also working on a VPN Defense !!http://shielded.cf/index.php?id=1but its not ready yet !! kind regards I thinked in your system too felicita, and other day I saw this topic https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1599533.0, is your alt account? Well, a lot of people trying to bring security for faucet owners, that's great! I upgraded today to faucetbox R65 and NeeditFindit's antiBotlinks 5.01 is not working anymore. I posted a message to him and hopefully this will be sorted out soon. So don't upgrade yet if you have antibotlinks in use and plan to continue to use it. I made a small donation and hope everybody else makes the same so we can have an update to antibotlinks. Keep up the good work fighting against bots! Thanks for the donation! The new version is here: http://bit.makejar.com/labs/anti-bot-links-550/http://bit.makejar.com/labs/anti-bot-links-550/install.phpThe only difference is in line: if (array_key_exists('address', $_POST) && $data['enabled'] && $data['eligible']) {
|
|
|
Bots are insane today 50% of the claims from a ~100 satoshi faucet with nastyhosts disabled + no anti bot links. They continue to try even when I stopped paying them a week ago. I've port scanned few of the bot IPs - no open ports at all ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) He probably uses "port knocking". The only common thing between his IPs is that they are not pingable (it is not really practical to check for this). confirmed: - the default puzzles of anti-bot links 2.x are broken - either delete the default ones and create your own or upgrade to 5.01 - once the antibotlinks 5+ is in place (make sure ttf/otf fonts work) the bot will stop trying to claim (I hope for long). looking at that screenshot - what is waterfallmanager? how to use it in my faucet? it looks effective against bots! It is still in development (planned to be paid service since it uses alot of resources) but it is not perfect for now. Today it screwed 3 legit users ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) Maybe in a week or two I'll start a beta with all the users that have helped in the past few months and if everything is ok I'll make it available to everybody else.
|
|
|
Bots are insane today 50% of the claims from a ~100 satoshi faucet with nastyhosts disabled + no anti bot links. They continue to try even when I stopped paying them a week ago. I've port scanned few of the bot IPs - no open ports at all ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) He probably uses "port knocking". The only common thing between his IPs is that they are not pingable (it is not really practical to check for this). confirmed: - the default puzzles of anti-bot links 2.x are broken - either delete the default ones and create your own or upgrade to 5.01 - once the antibotlinks 5+ is in place (make sure ttf/otf fonts work) the bot will stop trying to claim (I hope for long).
|
|
|
I think the anti bot link script should be pre-installed in faucet box script because many users who have lake of programing knowledge face the problem of integration of anti bot script in faucet box.
If they are too lazy to install it, they will be too lazy to add their own puzzles. If they don't add their own puzzles then it will be useless. The latest version is way easier to install than the previous ones (unfortunately it breaks the fb anti-adblock ... I'll need to fix it in the next version ...).
|
|
|
|