Bitcoin Forum
May 28, 2024, 04:27:36 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 »
301  Economy / Speculation / Re: so... how long till we pass the old high of 32? on: February 09, 2013, 06:47:52 PM
the btc value is strongly tied with difficulty. I dare to say that if and when ASICs go public and diff bocome 10x,
then it is logical that BTC goes 10x (=200$) as well  Wink
This would only be true if difficulty added value, it does not. Bitcoin has never been hacked before ASICs so the ASICs just add frosting to the cake.

The current stable price of BTC is about 22$ rising some 100-200% per year. If it goes further and then crashes though we will probably never go below 10$.

BTC is following a predictable exponential adoption curve, but is varying along that curve.

However that variation will get smaller as BTC has gotten bigger, the 2011 spike was a times 30 increase in value, today that would mean 300$ per coin or some 1-2 billion dollars moving into BTC within the year. This will not happen. The traders are also more numerous and smarter today, I doubt we will see such clear bubbles again.
302  Economy / Economics / Re: Higher price. More people should sell. on: February 09, 2013, 06:35:04 PM
That would be incorrect. I haven't heard of anyone buying BTC for status yet. If you think BTC will be worth more tomorrow it makes sense to buy it now.
303  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: There needs to be a new bitcoin address format... on: February 02, 2013, 01:07:55 PM
... Ideally their client should be smart enough to either say "You're paying Casascius" or "I don't know who you're paying, so you better be sure about this!"
I'm not sure this is possible, the address derives from a key only you know, if it were to derive from your brand name everyone would know the private key.

Seems to me there's no way to get both.

I would suggest letting a beefed computer run a week or a month to create a vanity address for your company and then use that. 1 layer of extra security anyway.
The more serious the company the more money and CPU you could put into it.
304  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: The MAX_BLOCK_SIZE fork on: February 02, 2013, 01:02:05 PM
The first thing you need to understand that it's not just a matter of the majority of miners for a hard fork.... it's got to be pretty much everybody.  Otherwise, you will have a blockchain split with two different user groups both wanting to call their blockchain "bitcoin".  Unspent outputs at the time of the fork can be spent once on each new chain.  Mass confusion.
The only way to do it is to get most major clients to accept larger blocks AFTER a future specified date.

That way once say "2017 Dec 31" rolls around 90% of BTC users will all accept larger blocks at the same time and the confusion will be minimal.

This is not that hard honestly just get MyWallet, Armory, the Satoshi client and Electrum programmers/distributors to agree on a date say "2020" and a new limit "100mb" and you're done.
I don't see why that many people would reject this change and as such the new standard should be rolled out way before it takes effect.

Miners are irrelevant in this, but they should welcome the change; BTC will never grow if normal people can't use it. We would be right back to trusting banks, only backed by BTC instead of gold this time. We all know what a wild success THAT has been!
305  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Win 10 BTC: Guess the price on February 1st (no entry fee) on: January 30, 2013, 06:39:32 PM
Quote
Quote from: nobbynobbynoob on October 27, 2012, 05:21:40 PM
Would you like to bet BTC10 with me? I wager BTC10 that the price will not be equal to or above USD 15 on the stroke of February 1 2013 at 00:00 UTC. If the price is below USD 15 at that point, you pay me BTC10. If the price is equal to or above USD 15, I pay you BTC10. Sound good?
Quote
Quote from: Realpra on October 27, 2012, 04:10:02 PM
That's a bit much, lets say 1 BTC and it's a deal - I'm not a (very) betting man;)
Quote
Quote from: nobbynobbynoob on October 27, 2012, 01:11:26 PM
Yes, still a deal. BTC1 it is then.
Bad copy paste job I know.. anyway do I get points for getting it so close 3 months in advance?

Here is another quote of mine from Nov 4:
"In this case total price increase factoring in market anticipation is: 20/12.5 = 1.6."*
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=122197.msg1315679#msg1315679

The interesting thing here is that market anticipation had pretty much 0 effect.

EDIT: * as in ~11$*1.6=17.6
306  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I created a website, woolong.com, to promote bitcoin as the real-world woolong on: January 26, 2013, 08:27:08 AM
Haha not bad really. Might be we get a wagon load of anime freaks to join over that Cheesy
307  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: List of Major Bitcoin Heists, Thefts, Hacks, Scams, and Losses on: January 19, 2013, 09:23:44 AM
Wasn't ASICs the huge thing coming out in December, what happened to all that? Another scam to be revealed in the near future...?
308  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Would you buy a pure Bitcoin card? on: January 15, 2013, 09:05:55 PM
Could you describe the price multiplication security in more detail?

Is this the way it would work:
  • The terminal requests a 2 bitcoin charge
  • The secret multiplication number is 42
  • The card returns 84
  • The terminal displays 84 to the customer.
  • The customer verifies that 84 is <the requested change> * 42 and therefore authorizes the purchase.

If this is the correct algorithm, can't the terminal fake this pretty easily.  Instead of sending a bitcoin charge of 2 to the card, it sends a charge of 100.  The card returns 4200, the terminal determines the multiplication factor is 42, so it displays 84 to the user, who then validates the fraudulent charge.
You are correct except the secret number will cycle only between 1 and 9 and I will encrypt the number I send back so the terminal will not be able to read it.
Your attempt would also be limited to 6 times the user's median purchase or about 10-12 BTC.
It will probably be a simple Caesar cipher, but that should be safe enough for 8 characters ("1,23e-99" encrypted to say "A,AFeDBJ").

I estimate that most people will never use the card more than 10.000 times (about 27 years if you make one purchase per day on average).
If 1 in 500 purchases happens on fraudulent terminals (with most happening at trusted merchants) the PIN code will have incremented itself the next time you use a fraudulent terminal and even a network database of fraudulent terminals would need to collect data over a few years to decrypt the Caesar cipher.

With the maximum amount in place any such criminal effort is largely wasted.

To make high value purchases you could either pay simply using your normal BTC client OR use the card multiple times charging up to the maximum amount. (the median/maximum purchase amount will update exponentially upwards should you stubbornly try to buy a house with the smart card)
309  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Bitcoin API with callback function? on: January 14, 2013, 08:32:34 PM
As far as I know the Electrum client is open source, since this is a lightweight client you can run it without killing your server easily.

Either it will have an API OR you can modify the code to write out the events you need etc..
310  Economy / Economics / Re: Egypt: yet another country where Bitcoin is now a necessity on: January 13, 2013, 08:13:47 PM
We should do flash advertising to such countries concentrated on a few days... sad to say I have little money.
311  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Would you buy a pure Bitcoin card? on: January 12, 2013, 10:59:42 PM
Is this coming out of your previous work using the ZC5.4 card?

The biggest problem would be trusting a hacked payment terminal or host not to just steal all the funds from the card.
It is still the ZC5.4.

However I developed a payment process that does not require trust in the terminal (its in the thread somewhere):

The card will multiply the requested amount with a number only you know and then you only give the PIN if this number fits. The terminal cannot fake-double-charge either as the card will lock itself for while after each transaction.


You can still trick this system, but it requires quite some effort and the card holder could immediately know who ripped him off and can call the cops.
Further safe guards are possible like self-incrementing PIN codes or maximum withdrawals.
Even if somehow overcharged the keys never leave the card so it cannot get compromised the way a VISA card can.


The paper wallet thing; if you just keep the card in a safe and only use it with your own phone/PC to withdraw once in a great while it becomes safer than paper since paper doesn't require a code to read (except for encrypted paper wallets).
312  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Would you buy a pure Bitcoin card? on: January 12, 2013, 03:10:01 PM
Is it pure Bitcoin or is it mixed in with other currencies?
If you mean litecoin and such you could conceivably add support for those too.

USD, EUR, Yuan and such; no.

I would like to see a multipurpose card with a chip for Bitcoin and a strip for fiat.
That might be pretty neat.
313  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Would you buy a pure Bitcoin card? on: January 12, 2013, 01:46:25 PM
The card will behave as follows:
1. It is very secure, more so than even a paper wallet in some ways.
2. It holds Bitcoin and pays Bitcoin, no MasterCard/VISA etc. involved.
3. Anyone with a PC or an Android phone could accept this BTC credit card (globally).
4. You can pay no fee if you want or easily program your own card if you don't trust providers.
5. Is open source.
6. It would cost 6-20$ with the price dropping every year as with all electronics.

Would you buy this?
314  Economy / Speculation / Re: When the price is going up as expected? on: January 09, 2013, 07:30:03 PM
Ok most of the people here were expecting the price to go significantly up after the block halving, now over a month later and the holidays behind us it's still stuck at just $1-2 above what it was before the halving.
Is that all? What do you think?
I was in camp claiming that it was NOT priced in and that the price would increase.

(My logic was that
* Bitcoin is not just speculators;
* that there is a constantish flow of money going into Bitcoin from people who just discovered it
* and hence COULD not buy in the summer 2012
* and finally that this flow and the shortfall of new coins would push the price up.)

Now I will admit I expected BTC to be easily above 15$ by now but I also knew that it would not be an overnight thing (unless there was some panic buying).

I think there HAS been a strong upwards pressure though - it is a whole 1$ more now than at the end of November and every drop has been quickly reversed since.

I expect continued strong behavior the next few months.
315  Economy / Economics / Re: Why I think Bitcoin will not become an national currency on: January 09, 2013, 07:11:22 PM
I don't think that bitcoin and nations go well together in the first place.
Perhaps not most current nations, but I think for the people a Bitcoin nation would be strong.

I also agree with DeathAndTaxes that Bitcoin will benefit the poor and protect what savings they have. I have always held the view that Bitcoin will help even the last adopter.
316  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: is ripple a trojan horse that will destroy bitcoin? on: December 23, 2012, 11:50:08 AM
In a way you could say that simply holding cash is a loan you have given to the world.

As for traditional banking loans I don't think Ripple can replace that, those things are based on police kicking you out of your house if you don't pay.
Trusting family and friends is not really foolproof, I have seen many family members rip each other off and its not pretty.

Ripple is extra risky because a chain of people owe each other money; if any one of the people in that chain or net doesn't pay up then the next link may have no money to pay with or may decide not to as well.

Loans, stocks and contracts are based on police and courts. Honestly I think people should rent or fully buy with savings instead of continuing our failing credit-card-economy.

Tell me; why all this debt slavery and personal bankruptcy when you could rent the first years and then buy, effectively ending with the same final price as a loan would have cost you? Lets do away with the old system.
317  Economy / Speculation / Re: [poll] - how confident are you? on: December 23, 2012, 11:31:46 AM
people voting 100%

you read all the source code and thought about it for months, or you blindly believe it 100%?
I read rather carefully about the EC algorithm Bitcoin uses and this is the very core of Bitcoin. Everything else follows and is patchable.

EC is like an equation with more than one unknown, there is mathematically speaking no way to solve it except brute force.


(I assumed your poll meant catastrophically hacked not some minor and temporary exploit or rare double spend.)

EC is used for signing transactions, not for mining.  It is the SHA256 hashing algorithm that brute force collision finding is used on.
I am rather confident about SHA256 as well and it is a little less critical due to the difficulty adjustments.

If it starts to break down slowly like MD5 has in 50-100 years or so I am sure most bitcoiners would agree unanimously to a protocol upgrade.
318  Economy / Speculation / Re: [poll] - how confident are you? on: December 22, 2012, 11:02:26 PM
people voting 100%

you read all the source code and thought about it for months, or you blindly believe it 100%?
I read rather carefully about the EC algorithm Bitcoin uses and this is the very core of Bitcoin. Everything else follows and is patchable.

EC is like an equation with more than one unknown, there is mathematically speaking no way to solve it except brute force.


(I assumed your poll meant catastrophically hacked not some minor and temporary exploit or rare double spend.)
319  Economy / Speculation / Re: Bitcoin nearly reaching its highest ever market capitalisation on: December 22, 2012, 10:51:35 PM
On a seven day average bitcoin is nearly reaching its highest ever market capitalisation - http://blockchain.info/charts/market-cap?timespan=all&showDataPoints=false&daysAverageString=7&show_header=true&scale=0&address=
ya so everyone clam down and wait for dumps!  Wink
I don't know about that. I still think there is upwards pressure due to the halving. That pressure will likely persist as a strong factor until we reach 15$/BTC or more.

Plus Bitcoin is looking more and more mature by the day. I myself am working on a bitcoin card that will let anyone pay to any Android phone user in the world in a secure and fast manor. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=7539.140)

Wordpress accepts Bitcoin along with thousands other online shops now. The list goes on. Even skeptics I am talking to are starting to take it a little more serious when you throw around the big numbers Bitcoin has already and they are impressed when largely any country they can name shows up on LocalBitcoins.

The USA alone has 100 billion $ in fraud costs per year due to VISA/MasterCards; sooner or later people will start using Bitcoin for everything at all times.
320  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Bitcoin smartcard Point of Sale terminal on: December 22, 2012, 06:45:45 PM
Another month, but I have meaty progress and good news to report!

The link at the end I ask you to download and share, it contains the source code, my research and progress so far. It has everything you need to get started etc etc..
(You wouldn't want the FBI to shut this down now would you!?)

What I have done so far is familiarize myself with the ZeitControl IDE and I have programmed some key commands and key/address pairs into the card-program. I still have to work out some kinks with correct command definition as their book has a really crappy way of showing syntax (no examples!  Huh).

I have started to program every day on my commute so I think step 1 of my plan could be done in a week or two. (Step 1 was making the terminal and card exchange addresses).

Quick guide to ZC IDE:
1. To add a file you first create and save it. Then you include it and rebuild. Only then its will show up as part of your project.
2. Under "help" and then Example projects->"Calc" you can easily access examples of basiccard code.


Now as for the good news: It seems ZeitControl does in fact have a Java library. As you may know Android is mostly straight normal Java and so this could mean putting the terminal program on Android phones could be very easy. The only major problem left is to figure out USB standards. (Android expects an out-going USB connection but the smart card reader is in-going, USB is a one way host->child standard as far as I can tell. Basically both reader and Android are normally "child")

Link:
http://www.4shared.com/zip/HdI942A-/BitcoinCardProject.html
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!