Max is in Moscow now. international jetset playboy! where's the whitepaper?
|
|
|
I'm an early investor in LISK and i'm also an UX/UI Designer full stack for big french companies. Here is my Dribbble https://dribbble.com/bpdesignI'de like to create a team with skilled JS developer with 2/3h free per day to launch different projects on LISK like rebuild real projects (Aribnb, Twitch.tv, ...). I can also use bootstrap to integrate my designs for more efficiency. Let me know by PM. this is what matters to Lisk's future, and not what the next exchange trading it will be.
|
|
|
I am back guys. Need to sort out all emails, messages, calls, and other stuff first. Then I will work on the blog post which needs a review by a few Chinese people before it can be published, because I can't mention everything about my China trip yet. the "big announcement" thing was a mistake. now it's "things i can't mention". if you don't know how to be a CEO then find someone who does and give them 1 million of your Lisk and go and do something more useful for the company's future.
|
|
|
is Sasha active here, or elsewhere?
|
|
|
GBP is going down. the UK will soon be applying to join the eurozone. LOL
|
|
|
Trading does not start today. Thats is Maid. Lisk trading will start on 25 June 15:00 afaik. is that 3pm Beijing time?
|
|
|
anything built off Ethereum has a ? against its name right now.
You never joined Slack, did you? DGD can exist on any blockchain. i applied more than once... with no response. it may need to. www.dgx-public.slack.com - you don't have to apply. Just create a slack ID and log on. it was a while ago. i'll take another look -thanks.
|
|
|
First of all: The term "DApp" is dead. Please use "Blockchain App" or just "App". And I don't see that Lisk has to switch from JS to another coding language. Why? If you know what you are doing, you are "safe" as every coder is (no matter what language you are using), if not, better don't write an app. If you don't trust in a app developer, don't give him/her your money. That's it. Just to make it clear: If an app in the Apple store fails, because an app developer did mistakes when coding it, it has NO effect on Apple. I think we can say nearly the same for Lisk. But I am not a core dev and not a app dev, so it's just my view. Proof me wrong. i agree. please do not use the term dapp or crapp, just use term "app" or "blockchain app". these craps dao, dapp, dick, mist,gas... whatever is so confusing. there is no reason to created many useless terms just to hype it. blopp
|
|
|
I believed in the LISK in dark times and faith rewarded me, ty LISK .. Next step - 70-80k. Hallelujah bro
"dark times" - fucking hell.
|
|
|
I really think Max needs to learn how to dress in front of public. I mean he doesn't need to wear a suit, but a collared and pair of trousers is preferable.
I asked a lot of people here in China and it's definitely not required. In some of the pictures I will post after I'm back in Germany, you see many big guys with shorts and a t-shirt. It just doesn't matter in Beijing at 35°C. Also, I'm not a business man. I'm a normal startup guy who loves to build products and speak to people. That's just how I'm and I think a lot of people have a lot of fun with me here in China. What matters is the idea behind Lisk, not how I dress. just get a hoodie...in black
|
|
|
anything built off Ethereum has a ? against its name right now.
You never joined Slack, did you? DGD can exist on any blockchain. i applied more than once... with no response. it may need to.
|
|
|
Why my LSK go to floor?
Because Mr. Market has learned through DAO crisis that Javascript based languages are too insecure for writing DAPP contracts holding more than toy money. Even highly qualified folks (Lisk can only dream of) didn't find that bug when DAP code was reviewed. Now you can imagine what will happen, when all those Javascript jockeys are starting to code their Lisk DAPPs...: Cracked/hung/orphaned DAPPs en masse. A security nightmare in the making. Would you trust your real money to such an insecure toy setup? It's a real big luck for Lisk that Lisk DAPPs currently cannot blow up. Because there aren't any Lisk DAPPs so far (besides that beard oil DAPP...) Solution: Throw out that Javascript junk Use OCaml https://ocaml.org/But then Lisk would lose all those "gazillions of Javascript coders" capable of writing (insecure) code. But 100 devs capable of writing DAPPs in a secure programming language are worth more than a million of Javascript hacks whose DAPPs will blow up . PS: And forget that BS about those more secure side chains. If a DAPP blows, it doesn't matter if it burns down on the main chain or on a side chain. Your money will be gone. ever heard of...sidechains?
|
|
|
anything built off Ethereum has a ? against its name right now.
|
|
|
is this the very definition of a crypto SCAM?
|
|
|
LISK should take advantage of ethereum/DAO fiasco, I read everwere that solidity is shi, and that code is vulnerable...World should know there is LISK who can do the same as ETH but eliminating ETHs dangers. Max needs to get on some big media and tell em.
If you read that carefully then you ought to understand that JS may have similar vulnerabilities, so it's worth to conduct a security audit of Lisk's approach to smart contracts. I'd love Max to come with an official statement about Lisk security. Investors and Lisk community need to be reassured. at lisk.chat today: LSK:"Oliver, based on the present development trajectory and velocity where do you anticipate the core tech of Lisk will be by the end of 2016?" Oliver (Lisk founding parter and CTO); "Current development trajectory and velocity will change soon enough. We are in the midst of a rethink after announcing new advisers, also recent events are a tell-tale we need to focus on security, and stability foremost. There is a lot of work to do still, this is evident, but once we start using our funding and expand the team significantly, we will accelerate no doubt. A solid roadmap and whitepaper is needed before I can make any predictions, but we hope to have the applications platform in full use, with applications maturing and developing an ecosystem of their own." For Lisk to overtake Etherereum it would have to grow faster but they are not even ready to deliver... N0 whitepaper No roadmap No team No forging No predictions No applications platform clearly selling up and moving on is the logical thing to do.
|
|
|
LISK should take advantage of ethereum/DAO fiasco, I read everwere that solidity is shi, and that code is vulnerable...World should know there is LISK who can do the same as ETH but eliminating ETHs dangers. Max needs to get on some big media and tell em.
If you read that carefully then you ought to understand that JS may have similar vulnerabilities, so it's worth to conduct a security audit of Lisk's approach to smart contracts. I'd love Max to come with an official statement about Lisk security. Investors and Lisk community need to be reassured. at lisk.chat today: LSK:"Oliver, based on the present development trajectory and velocity where do you anticipate the core tech of Lisk will be by the end of 2016?" Oliver (Lisk founding parter and CTO); "Current development trajectory and velocity will change soon enough. We are in the midst of a rethink after announcing new advisers, also recent events are a tell-tale we need to focus on security, and stability foremost. There is a lot of work to do still, this is evident, but once we start using our funding and expand the team significantly, we will accelerate no doubt. A solid roadmap and whitepaper is needed before I can make any predictions, but we hope to have the applications platform in full use, with applications maturing and developing an ecosystem of their own."
|
|
|
LISK should take advantage of ethereum/DAO fiasco, I read everwere that solidity is shi, and that code is vulnerable...World should know there is LISK who can do the same as ETH but eliminating ETHs dangers. Max needs to get on some big media and tell em.
If you read that carefully then you ought to understand that JS may have similar vulnerabilities, so it's worth to conduct a security audit of Lisk's approach to smart contracts. Lisk = sidechain security Ethereum = mainchain (bloat) vulnerability. it has no 'buffering' security. dreadful architecture for a new and complex programming language (Solidity).
|
|
|
what was the ICO price?
ICO Price per 1 Waves - 0.00036867 or ±0.20$ # 1 BTC = 2712 Waves without bonuses (signature/twitter/5-20% discount/etc) thanks. so right now it's trading at around the ICO price on Bittrex. disappointing. +50-40% in the dollar equivalent. true.
|
|
|
what was the ICO price?
ICO Price per 1 Waves - 0.00036867 or ±0.20$ # 1 BTC = 2712 Waves without bonuses (signature/twitter/5-20% discount/etc) thanks. so right now it's trading at around the ICO price on Bittrex. disappointing.
|
|
|
|