Are you referring to Lauda's tag on you? you were found guilty of bumping ANN threads. do you have any evidence to back your claim of being a victim of power abuse by Lauda? I need you to be honest with me here. if you were tagged wrongfully.

Here is what I'd suggest you to do:

1- delete any post where you have insulted Lauda and accused her/him of anything.
2- wait at least 30 days and then PM Lauda to say that you are sorry and there is nothing that you could do other than making it up to the community.
3- ask Lauda to give you a way out. tell her/him what would be the cost to pay in order to remove the tag? do not insult Lauda under any circumstances because your forum rank is not high enough to give you the right to have a mutual ground on this matter.
4- if you believe that you were guilty of doing something wrong, you should have waited for some time before contacting Lauda. did you do that?

---

Disclaimer: I am against ANN bumping services. I might as well tag you if I find you guilty, however I believe in second chances and I believe that Lauda should at least consider giving you another chance if there is any sign of remorse.
Tell me, what have you done ever since? other than attacking Lauda? because in this case she/he is the judge and we all know that you should never insult a judge.

What does this have to do with other forums? This is Bitcointalk and negative (or positive) trust can be be posted as many times as needed, regardless if the target is Quicksy's alt or some other "special" user. I'd say stop spreading bullshit but I know you won't so carry on.

Nonsense.

So your issue with this situation isn't Bazinga442 trying to scam people, or with Bazinga442 leaving nonsense retaliatory feedback, but with actmyname not reading every thread in the forum the day it was written? Lol. Just lol.

Bump. free service here.

When you quote something for reference, it's usually something incriminating that could maybe be used against that person in the future. I fail to understand why you have a quoted a perfectly reasonable statement that essentially says "I stand by my words unless I am presented with new evidence". I suspect it is because even you (along with everyone else) have no idea what you are talking about.


I didn't think it was possible, but you are making even less sense than digaran. You quoted your own question for reference? I don't even. The question also makes no sense. A thread was started on May 19th drawing attention to Bazinga442's shady practices - actmyname clearly read it and then tagged them. What is not to understand?

Here we go you kept negative for him on 2018-05-19 and the reference thread dated April 02, 2018, 10:12:28 AM

Why it took time to put this point on his wall?? please explain this thing?

UPDATE: 26.05 - OPEN for new retweeters!

Requirements: 10k+ followers
Post here or PM me your twitter account and audit links.

Saw the thread. What relevance does this have?

Because I don't think they are untrustworthy.

You were already tagged by marlboroza. I didn't feel a need to tag you for the same thing twice back then. However, they changed it.

You're trying to make it personal. You're trying to come up with some explanation as to why I tagged you. About anything but the reference. Causation is not correlation: we've already gone over this.

---

I have already answered the same questions from you over and over, yet you continue with these contemptuous strawman and ad-hominem attacks.

In my analysis, that behavior was not acceptable and as per review of Amazies bounties it seems trusted. But I got a wrong impressions to believe for because there was a huge problem that people who've been a part of his campaign was complaining on the telegram public chats. The admins who don't update regularly could be un impressive and they couldn't stop us from calling their project a scam ico. Aside of not answering those questions you had for them, they will blocked you exactly due to the aggressiveness that you're showing in the telegram, and reality is truth hurts as we say in vulgar that they were doing scam projects.