|
Still on the first page and the shills have already arrived lol
|
|
|
|
|
Their other coin is still getting developments lol
|
|
|
|
did you already update the OP with the new wallets?
my wallet had gotten nothing but orphans the last couple hours while I was at work (and was 3000+ blocks behind) I downloaded a new one thinking you had but it still says 5.0.0.0
restarting the wallet got it un stuck and finding blocks again YaY
I have not. The new version will be 5.2right on, I'm back finding blocks so I'm all good  I don't even want to count how many blocks I missed out on while it was locked up lol but it's a shitload overall I'm noticing a few more orphans than 10k etc, is that due to the extra calculations it's doing to find the primes? No, faster blocks. The prime-check isn't working properly in 5.0 and is defaulting to NOT prime at the first check (rounding numbers did not work as anticipated, which is why I switched from division/rounding to a modulo-based formula in 5.2) |
|
|
|
did you already update the OP with the new wallets?
my wallet had gotten nothing but orphans the last couple hours while I was at work (and was 3000+ blocks behind) I downloaded a new one thinking you had but it still says 5.0.0.0
restarting the wallet got it un stuck and finding blocks again YaY
I have not. The new version will be 5.2 |
|
|
|
|
They've been shitting on the altcoin section for years. I don't think anyone there likes the mods
|
|
|
|
Thinking this debate is because of storage space is quite ridiculous..
Probably you have good broadband and never have a problem with it! But for the ppl who have low connecting speed, it matters to them! This is exactly why I am on their side for not increasing it  |
|
|
|
|
The ability to manipulate it
|
|
|
|
|
I see many of the same holes still present..
Don't take this as talking shit, just a friendly reminder that chains cloning these coins are much more vulnerable than previously thought. Be cautious
|
|
|
|
|
Thinking this debate is because of storage space is quite ridiculous..
|
|
|
|
CoinGather is happy to support NEG trading until it makes it to a larger exchange. I know we are small, we have been the first exchange for a number popular coins such as LIMX. We don't mind being the skipping stone for now  Your picture will always be the first one listed in this thread since you were first to add us and I really do appreciate it |
|
|
|
network weight has been on a steady rise, def need more peeps staking tho... and an exchange with some volume
+1 I know, but let me get it working properly first before we worry about trading it. Richie and Yuriy both know what I'm working on, and as soon as it gets to Bittrex, we can add a multipool for it very, very quickly There are many wheels in motion, but we cannot put the cart before the horse; basic functionality needs to be perfect first |
|
|
|
|
Oh, now THIS is gonna be fun
|
|
|
|
Ok, I have finished the update. I'll have new clients for Windows up soon, and will upload to Github at the same time. Still testing a few things, but as it stands, Block 200k will be the fork (may change) Final Changes (as long as they work)- Normal Reward is now 1 NEG (Down from 10)
- Primes will still reward 10,000 NEG (Unchanged)
- Switched to modulo, rather than division/rounding
- New formula for calculating Prime Candidates
- Will produce more accurate results and process faster
- Added Non-Prime Logging to debug.log
- Search for 'NOT Prime' in debug.log
- Will record nCandidate, as well as it's lowest divisible integer
- Recording for Primes is now more user-friendly
- To see your Primes, search for 'Congratulations' in debug.log
|
|
|
|
its a good guide, can you make a guide about POW+POS coin, with basic of what veriables to change when making a POW/POS coin
I want to learn, can you help me through PM for some basic about veriables to change for making a POW/POS coin
That is exactly what this post will show you how to do. These coins will have both PoW and PoS |
|
|
|
Also, no source. I would say this is going to compromise your system
so this coin not come from you ? Are you fucking kidding? |
|
|
|
i didnt really have much opinion about you i've just been reading up on BUCKS.. and humorously enough i was on c=cex chat when you discussed the BUCKS exploit. i'm not really sure what my opinion is of you now. but it certainly isnt the best opinion in the world... i am kind of curious about negative staking though. that would be pretty funny. I don't care in the slightest. BUCKS showed vulnerabilities in many coins, such as DASH and CRAVE. The codebase is quite fucked up and only after things went down with BUCKS did further examination turn up even more holes. I would suggest being very, very careful with many new coins right now Spots! people left the holes in Dash and Crave and exploited your bucks? why? was there more money to be made exploiting bucks than Dash? I am not against you in any way, but statements like these make no sense. I would like your take on why bucks was exploited and Dash/Crave were left alone although you claim they have these same bugs. I been long time out of crave and did not trade Dash/dark since mintpal, so not defending their code just wondering what exploits/bugs you found. Yes. To spite me personally. Those two chains, in particular, are much more vulnerable than even I previously thought. That's all the details I will give so stupid malicious shit does not become common knowledge |
|
|
|
|
Someone has just pointed out a small error I made. Will post updated clients shortly (next few days). Most of the reward structure will be rewritten, as I believe I can simplify it a bit
Rewards will also drop to 1 NEG per block, instead of 10. I wanted to keep it at 10, but we will dilute the supply way too fast once these bonuses are valid, so I have made the decision to lower them now, and for good, instead of waiting like we did last time
If Primes are properly calculated after this fork, there will be no further updates to the reward system, other than in an emergency situation
This fix will allow Primes to be properly generated, as well as add in YET another sliding scale factor to make the generated numbers even more random
It was an error on my part, I skipped one small step in the Prime number generation. Currently, primes are impossible
|
|
|
|
i didnt really have much opinion about you i've just been reading up on BUCKS.. and humorously enough i was on c=cex chat when you discussed the BUCKS exploit. i'm not really sure what my opinion is of you now. but it certainly isnt the best opinion in the world... i am kind of curious about negative staking though. that would be pretty funny. I don't care in the slightest. BUCKS showed vulnerabilities in many coins, such as DASH and CRAVE. The codebase is quite fucked up and only after things went down with BUCKS did further examination turn up even more holes. I would suggest being very, very careful with many new coins right now |
|
|
|
|
It's referring to the general shit attitude people have towards me
Originally, we launched with negative and positive staking, but a couple assholes shit on the party real quick, so now it's based on Prime Numbers for bonuses
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
