You can make new animations too  |
|
|
|
Of course. Whole world crisis. |
|
|
|
Sorry, but I have to repeat part of my post again  Because you could see this in low developed countries who want to attract foreign investors and foreign investors do dumping on the first sign of the crisis. They produce crisis too. What does it mean rewarding investors:
4 Rewarding network maintenance on every level
Investors: people who provide funds and support the value by holding to itDo you plan to reward biggest investors?   Why? For what? For this dumping? AGAINST!It looks good this big font size. |
|
|
|
Yes, we agree. Earlier i wrote: this coin is searching for the the minimum of the bottom of the double bottom. I know you know what that means. |
|
|
|
So, nothing will be changed, we will have 2 coins with mostly the same relations, % of supply, between owners. And we have to prevent dumping. We can't prevent dumping of one coin. We will have another chance to fulfill our holy duty. Fun is here. Why? Why for crying out loud do you have to prevent dumping? Let the dumpers dump, let the fools give their coins away for basically nothing. The thing is, dumping can't go on forever, because the coin supply is pretty limited, so this will go away naturally. Just wait. It just boggles my mind that I hear people here talk about new features they want to implement to "PREVENT PEOPLE" from doing whatever the hell they want.You don't prevent people from doing ANYTHING in a decentralized economic system. That goes against EVERYTHING satoshi ever dreamed about. Don't mess with freedom. If you think that dumping is stupid, do the following: 1)Buy those coins for cheap. Sell them only at a much higher price. 2)Mine coins yourself, to take coins away from dumping miners. Sell those coins only at a much higher price. It's THAT simple... no restrictive coding required. (Again... this notion of "restrictive coding" inside of decentralized cryptocurrencies... it baffles me... it totally baffles me) I ironically commented previous post. I do so what you suggested, more or less. |
|
|
|
No, it would be written into the code and unalterable except by a developer fork. The reason they mature slowly is to stabilize the coin supply and prevent massive dumping. Additionally, slow coin maturation encourages investors to stay involved with the coin for the long haul, rather than just looking for a quick pump & dump. However, you should also remember that your percentage of total coin supply will not change during the initial phase of coin distribution, so your relative Core wealth remains the same no matter how many coins have matured.
So, nothing will be changed, we will have 2 coins with mostly the same relations, % of supply, between owners. And we have to prevent dumping. We can't prevent dumping of one coin. We will have another chance to fulfill our holy duty. Fun is here. |
|
|
|
mistake, 30 ksat I agree with you. |
|
|
|
What does it mean rewarding investors:
4 Rewarding network maintenance on every level
Investors: people who provide funds and support the value by holding to itDo you plan to reward biggest investors? Why? For what? For this dumping? AGAINST!It looks good this big font size. Investors are already "rewarded" buying up to 30000 sat. You have my wallet address from earlier, so you can reward me in front of this PoB. |
|
|
|
Flash, Actionscript for animation + FFMPEG (thru commandline) for good GIF compression.
Though I might use GIFs someone else created on the internet, and reuse them (apply QRK logo on it, etc...) as I have done for darkcoin and mazacoin, etc...
I saw similar original animations, but your modifications are nicer Thanks. |
|
|
|
What tools do you use for creating your pictures and animations? |
|
|
|
Probably due to bugs in boost_1_56_0 i can't compile Quark v0.8.3 wallet nor Bitcoin v0.9.2.1 wallet with that version of boost.
from:
boost_1_56_0/interprocess/errors.hpp:37:0
boost_1_56_0/interprocess/exceptions.hpp:20,
boost_1_56_0/interprocess/file_lock.hpp:20,
init.cpp:36,
problem is here:
boost_1_56_0/interprocess/detail/win32_api.hpp:1614:20
boost_1_56_0/interprocess/detail/win32_api.hpp:1541:31
return FunctionAdresses[id] ;
Is there some configuration solution?
The latest windows versions were built with boost 1.55. There might be something in 1.56 that broke compatibility. Probably, I tried to test compiling with fresh, 2 days old, boost v1.56. Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
Probably due to bugs in boost_1_56_0 i can't compile Quark v0.8.3 wallet nor Bitcoin v0.9.2.1 wallet with that version of boost.
from:
boost_1_56_0/interprocess/errors.hpp:37:0
boost_1_56_0/interprocess/exceptions.hpp:20,
boost_1_56_0/interprocess/file_lock.hpp:20,
init.cpp:36,
problem is here:
boost_1_56_0/interprocess/detail/win32_api.hpp:1614:20
boost_1_56_0/interprocess/detail/win32_api.hpp:1541:31
return FunctionAdresses[id] ;
Is there some configuration solution?
|
|
|
|
|
Probably due to bugs in boost_1_56_0 i can't compile Quark v0.8.3 wallet nor Bitcoin v0.9.2.1 wallet with that version of boost.
from:
boost_1_56_0/interprocess/errors.hpp:37:0
boost_1_56_0/interprocess/exceptions.hpp:20,
boost_1_56_0/interprocess/file_lock.hpp:20,
init.cpp:36,
problem is here:
boost_1_56_0/interprocess/detail/win32_api.hpp:1614:20
boost_1_56_0/interprocess/detail/win32_api.hpp:1541:31
return FunctionAdresses[id] ;
Is there some configuration solution?
|
|
|
|
|
SelfRegulation is in the bottom line of the price defence of the massive coins selfdestruction.
0
Nothing.
Zero.
Null.
|
|
|
|
From one of the endless similar topic. Governments don't like anything that they don't have control over and cryptocurrencies are totally opposite of that . So with time there may be wider adoption of crypto but banks are gonna stay as such.
You are naive if you don't think every coins, or almost every coins are controlled by few biggest owner of particular coin.
No freedom when money talks, or when coins talk. |
|
|
|
After making 1000 coins there is one much better idea. To make 10000 coins. One zero of difference is nothing. |
|
|
|
Governments don't like anything that they don't have control over and cryptocurrencies are totally opposite of that . So with time there may be wider adoption of crypto but banks are gonna stay as such.
You are naive if you don't think every coins, or almost every coins are controlled by few biggest owner of particular coin.
No freedom when money talks, or when coins talk. |
|
|
|
|
In Ponzi scheme only the top is not dependant.
Or it is?
I don't know exactly.
The top is independant if it sold coins to the lower but much "optimistic", oops, naive levels of the scheme.
|
|
|
|
Nice question in the title. No chance. Coino coini lupus. or something like that. |
|
|
|
Hi coinerer, can we see a source code for your wallet ?
Nothing new, I used source code from Max github https://github.com/MaxGuevara/quarkI am using newest available dependancy libraries, adjusting my scripts and compiling Windows wallet only. For example, latest version of openssl-1.0.1i, qrencode-3.4.4 and now it follows boost_1_56_0. Only compiling existing official Quark wallet. I don't know why official wallet is not updated. Coinmama, tell Max to try to check newest dependancy libraries. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
