I think it depends on each specific user and has nothing to do with the total number of logins to the site or DDOS attack. The Google captcha algorithm tries to distinguish bots from real (human) users. If it detects suspicious activity from a particular IP address, the captcha will become increasingly difficult to solve and will require more attempts. That is why captcha is always harder (and sometimes almost impossible) to solve through TOR or free VPN services.

Yes, that's a useful trick. We can create unlimited siblings of our Gmail address by using + sign.

There is a second Gmail trick to create multiple email aliases. We can also use dot (.) anywhere in our Gmail address to create multiple addresses of our primary address. For example, it is possible to write myname@gmail.com as my.name@gmail.com. The emails will still go to the primary address.

I really think everyone should stop bumping this topic already. Obviously the lightlord has decided to take a break from this forum, so it would be best to leave this topic alone. At least until some kind of update is posted regarding the future of bitvest casino.

Maybe it's time for the moderators to lock this topic for the time being?

Requesting admin/mod to check and ban the following user accounts for ban evasion:

1. Baoanhbmt
2. taynguyen_cry

Proof:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg58621808#msg58621808

---

1. ultr1k
2. Sashapopov787

Proof:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg58621808#msg58621808

Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active

1. Baoanhbmt
2. taynguyen_cry

Proof:



Related Addresses:


Miscellaneous:

Ban evasion (using or creating accounts while one of your accounts is banned) is not allowed.

---

Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active

1. ultr1k
2. Sashapopov787

Proof:



Related Addresses:


Miscellaneous:

Ban evasion (using or creating accounts while one of your accounts is banned) is not allowed.

It wasn't even aware that there are so many slot providers. As for me, I don't have any favorites. I mostly play games that I like, for whatever reason, no matter who provides them.

As some members already suggested, you can place bets on freebitco.in on BTC and ETH price predictions. Was that what you meant?

I see. I didn't really follow your old thread and I wasn't familiar with the specific case, but from what I saw here, it seemed like you were repeatedly deleting legitimate questions from your users and other forum members. Which wasn't cool.

However, back to the topic, is there any way of speeding up the process of verifying his bets? Or at least giving him some estimated resolution time?

Yes, I agree. They were sketchy right from the start. I see they had an ANN topic here from a couple of years ago but they later deleted it because one member called them out for false claims that they were Curaco licensed.


The account used to create ANN topic: Dkeys

Don't be like them.
You are accusing a respected member of this forum without any evidence of working for them, despite TwitchySeal explicitly stating that it does not endorse 1xbit and does not recommend anyone to play there. He just asked you a legitimate question about your bet. If you don't want to answer, then fine, but please don't go around smearing others for no reason.

That's great to hear. I hope the situation will be resolved soon.

I believe it's always best to communicate openly with the community and respond to all inquiries and comments. This is a forum after all.

@wheelsonic, I think that you asked too many questions at once and jumbled several unrelated issues together. If you want a concrete, and straitforward answer, it is best to concentrate on one problem at a time.

I think the other members have already answered your first question, you cannot spend coins from a "watch only" wallet. That's why it's called "watch only". 

I remember feeling proud as soon as I joined this community, since I received my first merit the next day. This proved to me that the community is welcoming to newcomers.


I just did. I think you're on the right track. Just be patient and continue to participate positively in discussions and help other members where you can. Your merit will come.

How do you define inappropriate comments? When I look at the post archives, I see that some legitimate questions were asked here, such as from the players to whom you refused to pay their winnings. As Bitinity said, you have to change your behavior on this forum if you don't want a negative trust rating that can't be censored. Is that what you want?

Why would you want to have two topics with the same title?

In my opinion, I do not believe there is a rule that specifically forbids this, however, it is easily possible that your topics will violate one or more of the following rules:


I think rule number 12 applies to single boards as well.

Scams are becoming more and more common in the crypto industry and they may involve anyone from an general public to an infamous entrepreneurs. So if you have to choose one project to invest in, don't be so concerned about profits. What you should consider is the nature of the project and the work that is being done. Some projects are genuine and they are being carried out by people who really want to make a positive impact on their community. However, others are not. There are people who have gone to great lengths to get your money, and are just looking to line their own pockets at your expense.

A potential scam project may be easy to spot by just looking at how much effort has been put into presenting it. For example: Does the website have a professional look and feel? Is the White Paper unique or do you find it contains copied parts? Is the project/product name used as the "generic" name or "hype" instead of the trademarked name? These questions can help you to evaluate if the project is legitimate or not. Another clear sign of a possible scam project would be the lack of focus and a lack of involvement from the team. This is typically a red flag that something doesn't seem right.

If you're in doubt, it is always best to take caution. Especially if you want to protect your money.

Historically speaking, diversification has been one of the most important characteristics of any sound investment strategy. The reason is simple: a diversified portfolio delivers greater returns over the long term than one focused on a single asset. The risk is of course that you might hold too many different assets.

Typically, an investor invests in two or three broad asset classes. The idea behind this is that these different assets will give exposure to different industries. This helps in taking advantage of different cyclical aspects of the economy at different points of time.

Generally, many people are skeptical about new things, and Bitcoin is no exception. While some people think Bitcoin is a way for criminals to conduct anonymous transactions for drugs or money laundering, others see it as a Ponzi scheme. Obviously, this is not true but there is little we can do other than try to explain to our skeptical friends and family members what cryptocurrencies are and what their potential is. In either case, the bottom line is that Bitcoin adoption is still relatively low compared to the popularity of other new technologies. However, the cryptocurrency does appear to be gaining momentum, and there is now a growing demand for education about the digital currency.

Yeah, that's fine. It's good to feel like you're at least part of the community. The way to join the community is to have at least some Bitcoins. You have to keep that in mind.

Fun fact, all of us here have had exactly 0 BTC at some point!  

Personally, I have never thought it would be possible to restrict the use of personal wallets. I never worry about that and still keep my BTC in my wallet. No one can prevent me from doing so, or anyone else from doing so. Those who claim that it will be possible to prevent or restrict the use of personal wallets are in the dark about crypto and its underlying principles.