Vote for sanders then.

VIDEO: Women defy media narrative, love Trump at packed Michigan rally






Thousands of women — the very people the mainstream media says shouldn’t like Donald Trump — turned out to see the Republican frontrunner at a packed Michigan rally in Grand Rapids Monday night.

Multiple sources tell The American Mirror over 30,000 tickets were distributed for a venue that held less than 10,000 people.

We were on hand and talked to several women — including one sporting a “Hillary for Prison” t-shirt — about why they support Trump.

“I like Donald Trump because I feel like he’s honest with the people,” one woman told us. She thought Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton are essentially in the same party.

She said she hasn’t been involved in politics before. “I’m registering to vote because I want to vote for Donald Trump,” she said.

“I think African-Americans are waking up to the fact that liberal policies are not working for us,” another woman said.

Sarah Anderson, communications director for the Michigan Republican Party, told us she hasn’t seen a rally like the one in Grand Rapids.

“This is our 27th visit from a Republican presidential candidate in Michigan since February 2015, and I’ve not seen anything like this yet.”

Another woman said, “I support Donald Trump because of his honesty and his willingness to say what he thinks and not back down after he says it. I support him because I truly believe that he’s a great businessman and I think the country needs a businessman to put the country back on track.”

She was asked, “the mainstream media tells us that women aren’t supposed to like Donald Trump. What do you say to that?”

“I love Donald Trump,” she responded. “I think women are far underrated if we should be stupid enough to vote for a woman because she’s a woman.”

“The American dream is dead, but I’m going to make it bigger and better and stronger,” Trump said during the rally, according to the Detroit Free Press. “This isn’t the real silent majority. It’s a very loud, very aggressive, noisy majority.”


http://www.theamericanmirror.com/video-ladies-gaga-for-trump-at-michigan-rally/

I.6 Measuring the Earth - Moon Distance with a Laser

1. Principle of this measurement

From the Earth, a flash of light is sent towards the Moon. This light is reflected back to the Earth with a reflector which was placed on the Moon ground by members of an Apollo mission. The duration of the travel of the light there and back dt is measured, and as the velocity of light is well known, the Earth-Moon distance can then be computed.
Suggestion:

Find the average distance Earth-Moon from the the books you have, or among the data on the server, or the minimum and maximum distances between these two celestial bodies, and find out the exact value of the velocity of light. Then, infer the duration of the light travel time (to the Moon and back) in those cases.


http://www.eso.org/public//outreach/eduoff/aol/market/experiments/middle/skills206.html

The rumor about her health started way before Trump. She fell, no one knows exactly why and she was wearing those:

http://www.foxnews.com/health/2014/05/16/ophthalmologist-weighs-in-on-clinton-glasses-spectacle.html

X-ray vision, a comic book fantasy for decades, is becoming a reality in a US lab.

A group of researchers led by Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor Dina Katabi has developed software that uses variations in radio signals to recognize human silhouettes through walls and track their movements.

Researchers say the technology will be able to help health care providers and families keep closer tabs on toddlers and the elderly, and it could be a new strategic tool for law enforcement and the military.

"Think of it just like cameras, except that it's not a camera," said Fadel Adib, a researcher on the MIT team developing the device.

"It's a sensor that can monitor people and allow you to control devices just by pointing at them," he said.

Work began in 2012 to determine how wireless signals could be used to "see" what's happening in another room, said Katabi, who directs the MIT Wireless Center.

"At first we were just interested ... can you at all use wireless signals to detect what's happening in occluded spaces, behind a wall, couch, something like that," Katabi said.

"It turned out that we were able to detect that. And when we figured out we could detect that, we started asking more advanced questions: Could we use it to detect exactly how people are moving in a space if they are behind a wall?"

The device displays the signal on a screen, where the person's movements can be tracked in real time. It depicts the target as a red dot moving around the room, occupying a chair and speeding up or slowing down.

The wireless signals used to track a person's motions also can measure the individual's breathing and heart rate - and potentially identify the person based on the shape of his or her skeleton, said researcher Zach Kabelac.

"The person won't be wearing anything on them, and the person it's tracking doesn't even need to know the device is there," Kabelac said.

"If something unfortunate happens to them, like a fall, the device will contact the caregiver that they chose to alert" by generating a text message or an email, he added.

That makes health care applications especially interesting, Katabi said. But she also sees military and law enforcement possibilities - particularly in hostage situations.

"You don't want to send the police inside without knowing where the people are standing or where the hostages are," she said. "If there is someone with a gun, where they are standing?"

A company set up to market the technology, now dubbed Emerald, will spin out of the MIT lab next year, with a goal of marketing the device early in 2017, and it's expected to sell for $US250-$US300 ($A348-$A418), Adib said. The team is working to make the device smaller and to develop an interface that will let users configure it through a smartphone app, Katabi added.


http://www.skynews.com.au/culture/offbeat/2015/12/22/us-scientists-developing--x-ray-vision-.html

Here is why:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYFN2kzSQAc

 

Do not worry about EVER explaining away the technique you use to tease my brain.


Free market will bring you to Mars and beyond and you to have sex in zero gravity. You could even use some kind of transport system built by Tesla to go to Olympus Mons one day.

Socialism will force you to wear the same ugly pair of socks forever, while waiting in your unisex bathroom for the next comet impact to wipe you out...

Capitalism is Nature.

 

If I prefer masturbating rather than having sex I run no risk of inbreeding. I also can't use public transports to move my good ol' moonshine around.



Socialism is a cancer any good amount of radiation can cure.

Judicial Watch Sues for Documents Withheld From Congress in New Climate Data Scandal


(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a lawsuit on December 2, 2015, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia seeking records of communications from National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) officials regarding methodology for collecting and interpreting data used in climate models (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Commerce (No 1:15-cv-02088)). The lawsuit sought the same documents unsuccessfully subpoenaed by a House committee.  Less than week after Judicial Watch served its lawsuit on NOAA, the agency finally turned over the targeted documents to Congress.

Judicial Watch sued the Department of Commerce after the agency failed to respond to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request submitted on October 30, 2015 – NOAA is a component of the Department of Commerce.  The timeframe for the requested records is October 30, 2014, through October 30, 2015, and requests all documents and records of communications between NOAA officials, employees, and contractors regarding:

    The methodology and utilization of night marine air temperatures to adjust ship and buoy temperature data;
    The use of other global temperature datasets for both NOAA’s in-house dataset improvements and monthly press releases conveying information to the public about global temperatures;
    The utilization and consideration of satellite bulk atmospheric temperature readings for use in global temperature datasets; and
    A subpoena issued for the aforementioned information by Congressman Lamar Smith on October 13, 2015.

Judicial Watch is investigating how NOAA collects and disseminates climate data that is used in determining global climate change. NOAA collects data in thousands of ways – from temperature gauges on land and buoys at sea, to satellites orbiting Earth.  Considered the “environmental intelligence agency,” NOAA is the nation’s leading collector of climate data.  In July, Representative Lamar Smith (R-TX) asked NOAA for both data and internal communications related to a controversial climate change study.  After the agency refused to comply with the document request, Smith’s committee issued a subpoena on October 13.  According to the Science, Space, and Technology Committee:

    In June, NOAA widely publicized a study as refuting the nearly two-decade pause in climate change. After three letters requesting all communications from the agency surrounding the role of political appointees in the agency’s scientific process, Chairman Smith issued a subpoena for the information. Smith subsequently sent a letter on December 1st offering to accept documents and communications from NOAA political, policy and non-scientific staff as a first step in satisfying the subpoena requirements.

    Information provided to the Committee by whistleblowers appears to show that the study was rushed to publication despite the concerns and objections of a number of NOAA employees.

Judicial Watch sued the agency on December 2 and served the complaint on the agency on December 8.  Less than a week later, on Tuesday, December 15, NOAA finally began to turn over documents to the House committee.  That same day, NOAA called and told Judicial Watch that it would begin searching for documents responsive to Judicial Watch’s FOIA request.

On November 26, Smith published an opinion editorial in The Washington Times, which accused NOAA of tampering with data to help promote global warming alarmism:

    NOAA often fails to consider all available data in its determinations and climate change reports to the public. A recent study by NOAA, published in the journal Science, made “adjustments” to historical temperature records and NOAA trumpeted the findings as refuting the nearly two-decade pause in global warming. The study’s authors claimed these adjustments were supposedly based on new data and new methodology. But the study failed to include satellite data.

“We have little doubt that our lawsuit helped to pry these scandalous climate change report documents from the Obama administration.  The Obama administration seems to care not one whit for a congressional subpoena but knows from prior experience that a Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit cannot be ignored,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.  “Given the lawless refusal to comply with our FOIA request and a congressional subpoena, we have little doubt that the documents will show the Obama administration put politics before science to advance global warming alarmism.”

Judicial Watch previously investigated alleged data manipulation by global warming advocates in the Obama administration.  In 2010, Judicial Watch obtained internal documents from NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) related to a controversy that erupted in 2007 when Canadian blogger Stephen McIntyre exposed an error in NASA’s handling of raw temperature data from 2000-2006 that exaggerated the reported rise in temperature readings in the United States. According to multiple press reports, when NASA corrected the error, the new data apparently caused a reshuffling of NASA’s rankings for the hottest years on record in the United States, with 1934 replacing 1998 at the top of the list.

In late 2014, Judicial Watch litigation forced out documents withheld in response to another congressional subpoena – one issued in the Fast and Furious scandal.  Thanks to the Judicial Watch lawsuit, Congress finally obtained the information it had sought for years on Obama’s gun-running scandal.

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-sues-for-documents-withheld-from-congress-in-new-climate-data-scandal/


-------------------------------
Good luck dudes! You'll need it with that rat infested regime.

I find the concept of socialism insane and disgusting, as much as sharia law is, as much as letting children being victimized for years because of political correctness, is.

The Donald is far from being perfect, far from it but he is WYSIWYG.

#oscar is an alien lizard

Your intention is to not care about sharia law invading your land bit by bit, or care about thousand of children being rapped with the blessing of your policeman and care givers, in your land, or care about Donald J. Trump in the US land, but you want me to be awaken by a youtube video, not even produced by you, because you do it to help mankind and because you truly own yourself?

Hmm... Does not compute.

Why care about Trump one way or the other then if it is none of your business anyway? You'll have the whole Atlantic ocean to protect you from him and a couple of ponds from sharia law...

Sweet dreams are made of this...

Just think about it. Some lands do not belong to england anymore because of sharia law, now, according to you. This is your reality. What are you going to do about it? Hoping for Trump not to be a US president? What about your homeland?

Rotherham child abuse scandal: 1,400 children exploited, report finds - BBC News
Media captionProf Alexis Jay: "It is hard to describe the appalling nature of the abuse the child victims suffered"

At least 1,400 children were subjected to appalling sexual exploitation in Rotherham between 1997 and 2013, a report has found.

Children as young as 11 were raped by multiple perpetrators, abducted, trafficked to other cities in England, beaten and intimidated, it said.

The report, commissioned by Rotherham Borough Council, revealed there had been three previous inquiries.

Council leader Roger Stone said he would step down with immediate effect.

Mr Stone, who has been the leader since 2003, said: "I believe it is only right that as leader I take responsibility for the historic failings described so clearly."

    Several staff described their nervousness about identifying the ethnic origins of perpetrators for fear of being thought as racist

The inquiry team noted fears among council staff of being labelled "racist" if they focused on victims' descriptions of the majority of abusers as "Asian" men.
'Doused in petrol'

Professor Alexis Jay, who wrote the latest report, said there had been "blatant" collective failures by the council's leadership, senior managers had "underplayed" the scale of the problem and South Yorkshire Police had failed to prioritise the issue.
Media captionA victim of sexual abuse in Rotherham tells BBC's Panorama: "I was a child and they should have stepped in"

Prof Jay said: "No-one knows the true scale of child sexual exploitation in Rotherham over the years. Our conservative estimate is that approximately 1,400 children were sexually exploited over the full inquiry period, from 1997 to 2013."

Revealing details of the inquiry's findings, Prof Jay said: "It is hard to describe the appalling nature of the abuse that child victims suffered."

The inquiry team found examples of "children who had been doused in petrol and threatened with being set alight, threatened with guns, made to witness brutally violent rapes and threatened they would be next if they told anyone".
Media captionCh Supt Jason Harwin: "We've failed our young people"

Five men from the town were jailed for sexual offences against girls in 2010, but the report said police "regarded many child victims with contempt".

District Commander for Rotherham, Ch Supt Jason Harwin said: "Firstly I'd like to start by offering an unreserved apology to the victims of child sexual exploitation who did not receive the level of service they should be able to expect from their local police force.

"We fully acknowledge our previous failings."

Ch Supt Harwin said the force had "overhauled" the way it dealt with such cases and had successfully prosecuted a number of abusers.

But he admitted: "I accept that our recent successes... will not heal the pain of those victims who have been let down."
'Racism' fear

The report found: "Several staff described their nervousness about identifying the ethnic origins of perpetrators for fear of being thought as racist; others remembered clear direction from their managers not to do so."

    It should have been stopped and prevented

Failures by those charged with protecting children happened despite three reports between 2002 and 2006 which both the council and police were aware of, and "which could not have been clearer in the description of the situation in Rotherham".

Prof Jay said the first of these reports was "effectively suppressed" because senior officers did not believe the data. The other two were ignored, she said.

The inquiry team found that in the early-2000s when a group of professionals attempted to monitor a number of children believed to be at risk, "managers gave little help or support to their efforts".

The report revealed some people at a senior level in the police and children's social care thought the extent of the problem was being "exaggerated".

Prof Jay said: "The authorities involved have a great deal to answer for."

A victim of abuse in Rotherham, who has been called "Isabel" to protect her identity, told BBC Panorama: "I was a child and they should have stepped in.

"No matter what's done now... it's not going to change that it was too late, it should have been stopped and prevented."
Analysis

James Vincent, BBC Look North

The scale of this report is simply staggering and some of the detail extremely hard to read.

It lays out how Rotherham Council and the police knew about the level of child sexual exploitation in the town, but didn't do anything about it.

They either didn't believe what they were being told, played it down, or were too nervous to act. The failures, the report says, are blatant.

The report estimates 1,400 children were sexually exploited over 16 years, with one young person telling the report's author that gang rape was a usual part of growing up in Rotherham.

The processes for dealing with these crimes have got better in the last four years, but still improvements need to be made.

There were more apologies from the council today but the report's author says they are too late.

Speaking about her abuser, Isabel said: "I think because the police were aware and social services were aware and he knew that and they still didn't stop him it I think it encouraged him.

"It almost became like a game to him. He was untouchable."

    The council and its partners could and should have done more to protect young people

Speaking after the publication of the report, Victims' Commissioner Baroness Newlove said: "I'm appalled by the extent of the horrific abuse endured by these vulnerable victims.

"It's deeply distressing how the authorities failed to protect these young people and their voices were not heard.

"Everyone involved needs to take responsibility for the shocking failings that this report has exposed. This must not happen again.

"I want to see every one of these victims getting the right support now and for as long as it takes them to help them on the path to recovery."

Maggie Atkinson, children's commissioner for England, said the number of identified child victims was "largely consistent" with the findings of their own national inquiry into "child sexual exploitation in gangs and groups".
'Horrific experiences'

Rotherham council's chief executive, Martin Kimber, said he accepted the report and the recommendations made and apologised to the victims of abuse.
Media captionRotherham Borough Council chief executive Martin Kimber: "Rotherham Borough Council failed in its duty to protect its young people...I am deeply sorry"

He said: "The report does not make comfortable reading in its account of the horrific experiences of some young people in the past, and I would like to reiterate our sincere apology to those who were let down when they needed help.

"I commissioned this independent review to understand fully what went wrong, why it went wrong and to ensure that the lessons learned in Rotherham mean these mistakes can never happen again.

"The report confirms that our services have improved significantly over the last five years and are stronger today than ever before.

"This is important because it allows me to reassure young people and families that should anyone raise concerns we will take them seriously and provide them with the support they need.

"However, that must not overshadow - and certainly does not excuse - the finding that for a significant amount of time the council and its partners could and should have done more to protect young people from what must be one of the most horrific forms of abuse imaginable."


http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-28939089


-------------------------------
Yeahh! "Asian men" rapping thousands of female brits... But Trump is your problem?

 

I thought sharia laws was taking over england.

Harpy Clinton.. Hey! Catchy!
 

TRUMP Support Is MUCH HIGHER Than Polls Suggest



    Donald Trump leads the GOP presidential field in polls of Republican voters nationally and in most early-voting states, but some surveys may actually be understating his support, a new study suggests.

    The analysis, by Morning Consult, a polling and market research company, looked at an odd occurrence that has cropped up repeatedly this year: Trump generally has done better in online polls than in surveys done by phone.

    The firm conducted an experiment aimed at understanding why that happens and which polls are more accurate — online surveys that have tended to show Trump with support of nearly four-in-10 GOP voters or the telephone surveys that have typically shown him with the backing of one-third or fewer.

    Their results suggest that the higher figure probably provides the more accurate measure. Some significant number of Trump supporters, especially those with college educations, are “less likely to say that they support him when they’re talking to a live human” than when they are in the “anonymous environment” of an online survey, said the firm’s polling director, Kyle Dropp.

    With Trump dominating political debates in both parties, gauging his level of support has become a crucial puzzle. The Morning Consult study provides one piece of the solution, although many other uncertainties remain.


http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-trump-polls-20151221-story.html