You can close this thread and move it to the following section: Other -> Archival.
Both things you can do yourself (without the help of moderators), have a look at the lower left (there you should find the buttons to do so).

Any spot left? If so, gimme.
a6bae1a4b0f30a98eacb2259823d0ee9e5f871629519b53fedf624c5862e1c81

Shorena used to offer a service like that, however, it's closed down.
Theymos (or any other forum staff) most probably will not do that for you, as it takes some time they'd rather spend with more important matters.
As a result, you'd have to go through every post yourself and delete it, if that's what you want to achieve.
Randomizing your email/password and being done with it probably is the faster way here.

Alle bitcoin Transaktionen sind öffentlich, für jeden einfach einsehbar.
Was der Service bei dem Du BTC gekauft hast sehen kann ist (was auch jeder andere sehen kann), dass die BTC von Adresse A zu Adresse B gewandert sind.
Ohne weitere Informationen ist es nun aber schwierig zu sehen, ob Adresse A & Adresse B der gleichen Person gehören (du könntest ja BTC an deinen Freund gesendet haben, oder etwas damit gekauft haben).
Wir nennen das ganze dann auch gerne "Pseudo anonymous".
Falls du des Englischen mächtig bist, lies doch etwas genauer darüber im Wiki hier.

Hm, given that this promotion is supposed to bring some revenue to your site and the fact, that the prizes don't come free either,
I see very small arguments for not paying for the draw, given that it would be way more transparent that way.

It would be easy to bypass that rule, given that the winners are supposed to stay anonymous (for the sake of everyone, that's a good thing).

Having a (paid) final draw might be a solution.
I'm not accusing you of doing anything wrong or unethical.
I'm just looking for a way to make this giveaway fair and transparent to all participants (yes, that's indeed including me).
After all, they gambled at your site for it, don't you think they deserve it?

Actually, they list all draws you had in the last 3 days.
So unless you're going to create new (paid) accounts and do final drawings up until the result suits you, that's indeed preventing you from redrawing.
Have a look at this draw here as example:
https://www.randompicker.com/Project/Public/Protocol.aspx?Key=334903x31728
You can see the list of entries and search for your own entry in the box below. You can also see the name of the draw, the date, the terms and most importantly, the last 3 days of draws.
https://www.randompicker.com/Project/Public/ProjectsRecent.aspx?Key=334903x31728
That way, you would catch any try to redraw the whole giveaway and could easily verify your participation in the list, aswell as the winners.

An easy solution without the need of a 3rd party would be using the block hash (or the last 1/2/3 characters of it) of an upcoming block in the bitcoin blockchain.
It's the common way how raffles in the collectible section are organised provably fair, without the need to trust any 3rd party drawing service.
If you need help with organising a drawing that way, I'd be willing to assist you.

Sind die Preise denn dem aktuellen BTC-Kurs angepasst, beziehungsweise bleiben die fest, unabhängig vom Kurs?

Let's do it the other way around.



Everyone besides cagrund (who's light green for me) and Lauda should look dark green to you.

Oh, I get it. You're accepting negatively trusted users. Anything else you probably won't get with those rates.

---

You really should rethink about your concept of this campaign, your ruleset, and your payrates.
I'd say you could run a way more effective campaign with more appealing payrates for the users.

And that would be? I don't see any codes here.

Banned users are not abled to write nor PM. How would they join?!
Did you want to say that enrolled users will be kicked, if they get a ban? That would make more sense than the rule above.

Yes.

Obviously it's not.

5 seconds of research would have answered that question.
It's an userID (tokens come with letters aswell), and it's the one of OP.

Bullshit. Now take your sig spam and move it.

---

@OP: I'd suggest you report any problems at the official thread, where people are around that can either help you or look into the problem,
rather than creating an additional thread about minor problems, clogging the forum up way more than necessary.

Obviously, it does matter. You would be stupid to think any different.

Meanwhile, Betcoin.AG acknowledges that there indeed is a contract binding jasonort.
Like we didn't all already suspect that.

They kow about that shitty thing. They didn't write "there is no nda." or "we don't know about any nda.",
they answered "the agreement is with [...] the software provider."
Unbelievable how a casino (/affiliate) could stand by and watch their software provider compeling their (paying) customers into signing some NDA to shut them up.

That's a joke, right?
https://www.randompicker.com/Project/Public/Protocol.aspx?Key=335414x62961
You used a test drawign, not a final one.
As a result, "The project has not been finished yet.".
We can't either check what numbers were used for the draw, nor can we know how often you were test drawing to get exactly that result.
You've destroyed any chance to make this "fair" or to show any "transparency" in your draw.

Seems fixed to me. Oh right, you made another 2 posts.
What could "leet" possibly stand for?!

If you don't want to, don't do it. Donations are voluntarily, the benefits of the special VIP/Donator rank just come as a side effect.
Also remember that you're not donating to theymos, but to the forum itself. Those are two different entities.
The forum heavily depended on donations in the early days, right now, that's a little bit different.
Anyhow, they spent a fortune of the forums savings on the new forum software that's currently being developed, so your first point is kinda invalid, there's a major update coming soon.

Awesome, thanks alot.

I've still got the video of Mitchell unboxing mine. It even comes with bonus features (Mitchell showed off a little after that, and went through his most recent additions).
Little sneak peak?!

Accepted.

---

Sorry, but denied.

Denied due to trust issues.

---

We're slowly approaching our cap, I'm currently mainly looking for users for the special rate spots, aswell as side advertisers.

We're talking about subjective definitions here.
There's no hard way to measure "post quality", hence there can't be a minimum of X to be considered a "good poster".
If you write good stuff, you're a good poster. If you don't, you either should improve or cope up with the fact that people will call you a shitposter.
Also, people could disagree on someone being or not being a "good poster".

(Welp, this was kinda off-topic right here.)