Well in this case JollyGood may publish a list of users who he trust for discussion, so we can see LoyceV and whoever else are in it. It will save our time and we will know who to request to get answers from JollyGood. Don't tell me these are the users who he had in his distrust list.

Have a service, "I will get your answer from JollyGood for $5" (like they do on fiverr LOL). Whenever any of us will need the service, we will order the gig. They will be users like me or the people who received negative feedback but when they wanted to contact JG in PM or wanted to address him in reputation thread, he decided not to respond their valid reasons. Sounds like a joke. but look a the number of feedback he left. The service will really make them rich.

He obviously feels that he is above explanation of what he do now. If a user has such mindset then its risky to give them responsibility. DT is a huge responsibility. A DT member should come forward to clear his doings when its in question by anyone. Accepting or denying the explanation is something else but this anyone even could be the real scammer who received the feedback for a proven scam.

Who always had the coin in mind, most of them sold when they had a decent gain of the coin they purchased or even mined. So someone brought at $10 a coin, when it reached  $100 they sold. It made sense. That time bitcoin to have $100 was as big as bitcoin to have $10k now.

On the other hand there were people (even still exists), who forgot about their coin. Completely out of mind. Some incident or something reminded that they had some coins in their old device or they had the key somewhere, then they looked for it to restore the coins. These are the people who became rich. In this criteria there are many people who were not able to recover the wallet. Call them the most unfortunate. All their life only they know what they missed.

There are other type of people who always had bitcoin but they knew this has a potential and $100 was the start only. So even they sold a portion but they always kept some portion for long future. These are the people considers as true bitcoiner. They are the visionary.

I know how it works but since I was not able to access the link, I did not know the reason for the key. All looks good now 😉
Flag supported and left a negative feedback for the user too.
Good job in connecting him.

What do we do with the code?
The google URL is asking for permission. Is it possible to change the permission setting?

This is very common for telegram users.

All business has its own risks. In loan business it's safe to practice collateral but I understand for a small amount OP did not care. It's safer for lenders to give in crypto because price against USD does not effect him when price suddenly bulls which happened in this case. But unfortunately downside happened is since the price against USD was 10x it became huge amount for the borrower resulting not returning the loan at all. 

I am in his ignore list, this is the reason I am guessing so far. It's more of ego than giving a good reason. If this is the reason then it's obviously a childish which questions his mental stability. If someone is too childish to accept constructive criticism then how would you trust his feedback left from left to right, everywhere. Feedback system is not for children. It's for adults.

Ignoring PM, ignoring public calls question his self-confidence.

As long as you are right it prevents but if you are wrong then you are accountable for the damage you made to the account.

It not useless. The tag then save others not to fall in the same trap. Loan default accusations are the best example.

Two user is question in the topic. starmyc and nemgun.

I quote from starmyc
There were two jobs. The first one was paid and supplied. He must be talking about the 2nd one. JollyGood took the 2nd work but since he was not happy, he even asked for refund for the first work. starmyc obviously is conducting a business in the forum (from the stuffs in his signature). You and me know JollyGood leaves feedback for no serious reasons but it is not necessary for his potential clients to know who is what in the forum. They will see the feedback from JollyGood, starmyc lose his potential clients.

Read (including the quoted message of JollyGood) where I am coming from for nemgun: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5195361.msg52985918#msg52985918
I don't think it's justified to keep him tagged. JollyGood even decided to block his PM LOL

If he does then the casino do not owe him anything. Obviously that did not happened not at least when the title edited as Resolved. Two party had conflict in agreements, they resolved it. Both should forget the past and move on.

Updating your quote so the users can recheck the case.

Red Flag: LoyceV, Slow death, Pmalek, TwitchySeal, joeperry, WhyFhy, Jawhead999, Mahdirakib, Blossom15, naim027, GamblingBro, shrxkt
Yellow/light orange flag: LoyceV, Slow death, TwitchySeal, khaled0111, shasan, WhyFhy, Jawhead999, acroman08, Mahdirakib, naim027, PaperWallet, lule29, shrxkt, giornogiovana

It's hard to have faith in non-established crypto startup. Many people lost their hard earned money but it's also true that many people made life changing money from crypto. It's always is to do your due diligence before involving in any crypto startup.

You did not provide any proof for your words. It will be more credible if you add some form of evidence (blockchain transactions itself should be a good start)

Anything goes wrong on internet, Russians are there to take the blame LOL

As far as I know they have legal entity which means you can take them to the court. Why not take that route? $50 is a lot of money.

It could be. Even it could be an Electrum fork with malware injected. Install it, send coins from exchange or any wallet, the script will take the coins out before you know anything. Ebay, amazon are full with internet frauds.

It obvious he listed it to scam naive crypto users. You will not get a response at all. Ebay do not care to handle reports from regular users. Let's hope you are lucky.

You personal judgment (when wrong) should not damage others reputation.
How would you assure I will not scam at some time? It's not good either to stay suspicious always.
Where is the obvious red flag for starmyc and the same red flag for nemgun?
Why would I suspect starmyc and not suspect JollyGood?
If nemgun were to tag then all ICO that failed should be tagged too. Scam and fail has too different meanings. Scam is when you take from others in bad faith, a fraud.

When scam is proven, act there a no problem. Everyone of us act to a proven scam. If anyone speaks in favor of proven scam there is problem but you should not leave red tag for something that has not happened yet. Your tag damage the business. A red tag sent wrongly damage the motivation of a member who wanted to have a pleasant journey in the community.
Honesty is something I only know. I can well use the honesty as a way for me to make a place for me.
We don't know the real motive but a person who are always too harsh to leave red tag and too suspicious in everything, how do they took it as guaranteed for a casino they are promoting was clear until it was proven. My problem is there. If OP of that accusation was not admitting the exploit than the case still would continue and JolllyGood may still continue defending (from the history of his involvement). Clearly the weekly payment took a part in the changed behavior. So honesty, possibly something you are seeing that he wants you to see.

It was concerning but they are lucky that the accuser lost his patience.

When someone is asking you something then you respond in a good manner, when someone is asking explanation then you explain. That's how we practice in gentlemen world. Do you think we have several months for him to wait?

Has anyone noticed I had a spelling mistake for the topic title 🤣?
Nothing to surprise. He thinks he earned a name to ignore PM from other members who have valid questions to ask and even a thread created for them to clarify what they are doing. He is absolutely fine to harass others though.

If wearing a signature paying $70 a week can change their behavior then it's completely wrong. This could only mean that the user can not do right thing. They will do everything not in good intention but to pocket revenue.

Leaving a red feedback to starmyc could be a well attempt to justify not to pay him for the work, leaving unnecessary positive feedback to others also indicates that making a good reputation is the intention.

Isn't it important what bustabit has to say here?

I would want bustabit bustadice team to check the case again. We can not be sure that their intention was bad. It's obvious that they were lazy but that does not prove the wrong intention. If a business wants to establish their brand in the community then help them. We will not know a scam until it happens. I think we became too proactive to us and not considering us that we are becoming isolated from the world.

It has been discussed many times. If Theymos needs support then he will definitely find a right one.

We don't need to. How I understand SMF is a global moderator can access all boards and as far as I know our two global moderators are very active which means it's not making much pressure for bringing new staffs for different boards.

You are ambitious but I would love that if that happens.
Let's go for $500k 🤣
Reading chart, analyzing market all are BS. It all down to the supply and demand, market always move to it's own direction. I was never good at making a good trade (don't trade at all only when I need cash I sell). When I sell after few days or weeks BTC jumps to 2x LOL

Any prediction to reach anymore bottom and how much it could be?

I do agree too. Terms are like we reserve the right to confiscate any winning, we reserve the right to cancel any bet and many more one sided terms are to protect their business. I am not sure legally a company really can say it. But we all understand, casino makes money out of the loss from their clients. They are happy when customers lose money and worried when they win. They ensure everything is in right place to make as much as they can.

I liked one explanation from one of the casino who advertise on the forum and I understand it. They usually can not check every customer one by one because it's almost impossible to continue with the volume of clients. They set some flags especially when a client request a withdrawal. The algorithm of the flag alerts them when something is not right. That's when they act.

My best guess was they were not finding any fault from the user. They are lucky that the user lost his patience and admitted he used bug on their site.

Trust setting has been designed for that actually. Before adding or removing anyone from your trust list you should consider their judgements of how and why they leave feedback to others also their judgments to the different cases they interact in conversations.  

I read the whole case yesterday from my phone, I was not logged in. I believe your intention is not bad. But you were not clear how to use it.

No one is powerful 🤣
Before it was only on Theymos who used to pick the DT1 and rest those were picked by the DT1 were DT2. It was completely a single call from the admin which obvious was not better than the current system we have.

Before that there were campaigns that used to pay 0.1 BTC or more 😉
It's always the dollar value against the BTC you get.

For some reasons if BTC drops under $1k (God dammit it's not gonna happen) then a Legendary receiving 0.1BTC a week will not be surprising at all. I will love it 🤣