|
I think altcoin section should be renamed to "investor-based games".
|
|
|
|
Mdayonliner, I was refering to xtraelv's post, #41 where it shows you posted the same likes & shares links as nguyenthanhhieu did the day prior. I don't know if you explained that or if I missed the explanation or what.
In any case, after reflecting on this I suspect this is an error you made when copying the report format from another post, which I've seen many bounty hunters do. That was the basis for the feedback I left you.
I'd like to hear the opinions about this from xtraelv and any of the other members I generally trust who've posted in this thread. Just about the possible bounty abuse and the credibility of the evidence presented here.
I am not sure, these posts are very close and it doesn't make any sense to copy someone else's post while they could simple copy their own post and redact it (posts are 6 minutes apart), especially it doesn't make sense to use twitter account for facebook campaign:  Yet again, mday didn't use words "facebook account" as account quangtrung1991 in picture above, he used "link to facebook". They copied only his link?  As for account nguyenthanhhieu and their post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4361343.msg39695720#msg39695720 only way they could have done this is to go to mday's twitter and copy/paste link. However, he mentioned something about: I have a situation here to becoming sick from last 5 days. Too much body temperature with pain all over the body, even feeling inner organs are in great pain. I thought I was recovering but seems like it's getting worse. The last three (3-5) for both twitter and Facebook was done today. I understand it might not get count however I thought I let you know my sickness. So he either made mistake duo his sickness, someone used his twitter or someone tried to frame him. I was thinking, only posts these accounts posted are bounty reports so why would they copy anyone's post? They are doing this on daily base, I am pretty sure they have their own drafts. Someone made mistake? I am not sure, I would say that it is possible that nguyenthanhhieu is his alt account, as this is probably first case I have seen that someone has used twitter report of random person before they even posted it. |
|
|
|
You forget to mention that you are taking 10% for "marketing purpose", so it is not really that all depositors who gets to last place will get money, at some point that 10% will become one whole deposit, and then you will have 2 people waiting for 2 new deposits and so on. A classic ponzi-type of game.Lets say this is based on smart contract but still...
Seems like new type of ponzi. |
|
|
|
show me the rule where it is forbidden to reply to messages in the any thread!
13. Bumps, "updates" are limited to once per 24 hours.
32. Posting multiple posts in a row (excluding bumps and reserved posts by the thread starter) is not allowed.https://prnt.sc/ldi6bzhttps://prnt.sc/ldi6hyThis looks like violation of forum rules #13 and #32. the main thing is that your friend JollyGood(spammer,liar,flooder) "DOESN'T VIOLATE" forum rules. hahaha
Do you now see how your brain works? You can literally find my post in this thread: So report them to moderator.
Since you are complaining about spam, have you reported any of these accounts to moderator https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4720775.msg47435526#msg47435526 ? This: http://prntscr.com/ldi7fo http://prntscr.com/ldi8e6 http://prntscr.com/ldi8qt and so on looks like violation of forum rules number #1, #2, #13, 1. No zero or low value, pointless or uninteresting posts or threads.
2. No off-topic posts.
13. Bumps, "updates" are limited to once per 24 hours. |
|
|
|
I have received this PM and they said they are allowed to use whitepaper: FYI, i am a former member from GGC and i created the WP with them so don't accuse people of scam when you don't know.
I am fully entitled to use that WP since the project is the same and i contributed to the paper.I think before you give a foul feedback you should reach out to people first before trying to smear some project!
I am not sure why they have send me PM instead of replying here. Anyway, according to site, tokens is available here https://forkdelta.app/#!/trade/0xb244cdabf6f4c388095264f93c2e98c5cd84dab8-ETH which means it is not listed on exchange. Everyone can create erc20 token and add it to forkdelta like this. I would really like to hear from them which former member they are and what was their position in ggc. |
|
|
|
As I said at the time, the information on our license can be found on our site here. It's not a subject I've delved into because I don't know anything about license renewals or the legal side of things, and don't want to give out any misleading information due to my own ignorance (it's happened before!) Interesting choice of words. |
|
|
|
~
Yudi token was only one example. In addition, we carry out verification of ICO team members. This happens as follows: each team member must log in with their LinkedIn account, which is noted on the project’s profile and link his/her page to the LinkedIn or Facebook account. Thus, the members show that they are directly related to this particular ICO via social signin. However, we cannot prove legitimacy of LinkedIn profiles in the case of an ICO using fake accounts. Also, from these accounts, team members must confirm that they are engaged in the particular ICO. They can describe their roles, responsibilities and why they believe in the project. If none of the team members have confirmed their participation in the ICO, it raises suspicions. In such case, we mark team members as "Unverified". If someone doesn't verify their team members, (not a single project is obligated to do it at your site) - it raises suspicions, but if someone verify ALL team members, no matter they are real or not - it is OK. Is that what are you trying to say? verify
/ˈvɛrɪfʌɪ/
verb
past tense: verified; past participle: verified
make sure or demonstrate that (something) is true, accurate, or justified.
sinonimi: substantiate, confirm, prove, show to be true, corroborate, back up, support, uphold, evidence, establish, demonstrate, demonstrate the truth of, show, show beyond doubt, attest to, testify to, validate, authenticate, endorse, certify, accredit, ratify, warrant, vouch for, bear out, bear witness to, give credence to, give force to, give/lend weight to, justify, vindicate;
make sure, make certain, check;
swear to or support (a statement) by affidavit. Almost every ICO has linkedin and social media profiles of their team members and to be honest it takes few minutes to create such accounts meaning your verification process doesn't make much sense and it is highly misleading.
The rating isn't provided by our experts, but taken from all rating sites and presented cohesively. Care to elaborate? |
|
|
|
12. No duplicate posting in multiple boards (except for re-posting it in the local language boards if it's translated).
So, Hhampuz is also breaking the rules. S/he has posted his/her survey in two seperate boards. One in BTC Marketplace ( Archived) and another is in ALT Marketplace ( Archived) I am not sure, but perhaps this rule is for c/p threads in multiple boards? Both the threads serves the same purpose although the texts are not same.
In addition, the thread should not be posted in altcoin marketplace since the payment is BTC.
Payment is BTC but survey is bitcoin and altcoin related. I think this forum has bigger problems than Hhampuz doing some research and sharing bitcoins while doing it. |
|
|
|
just want to mention that some of the campaign managers had been tagged by DT members because they have run scam ICOs or not paid their participants as they mentioned here also they don't have any direct involvement with that project they had just hired by the ICO team for promotion.
There must be a reason for that. |
|
|
|
~ Bro, my loan thread is https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5030169.0For few member I keep their account as collateral. Sothat they cant take any other loan or cant make any scam. Anyway, if you think it breaks any rule or it may harm our forum please let me know. I will stop it. I want to say one thing that I do not want to do anything which will be harmful for the forum or any forum member. Edit:I have edited my terms for collateral. Yet I am waiting for both of your opinion. According to my current rule I will not take account as collateral. But if you think it will not be harmful for forum then I may take account as collateral. Until you response that will remain stopped. It is really non of my business what you will do, I only expressed my personal opinion about taking accounts as collateral because, at some point, you will have to sell them and I don't really want to talk about account trades on this forum because it has been discussed many times. For other "why is it allowed" related questions, read forum rules and eventually you will get to this part: Q: I saw a guy selling Bitcointalk accounts. Why is that allowed?
A: Since we can't effectively prevent these sales (proxies, TOR, sales in other forums), we don't because otherwise we would be giving the users a false sense of security. |
|
|
|
@TP they are taking forum accounts as collateral. I think I have said more than enough with this. Sorry but I am not recommending or encouraging account sales.
Actually you do. When someone default, you will have to liquidate account. |
|
|
|
Does even anyone read here?
Idk if I will continue to reports, seems nobody cares.
I am sure someone reads this thread, just keep your reports coming and tag every cheater you find, one day someone will find better solution for this problem. They are not only cheating bounties, they are also spamming forum. It is just here are so many abusers, bots, bumping services, I really don't know what is going on around here but it reminds me of random "spam" crypto forums where you can post your referral link. |
|
|
|
Project "333 ETH" is not a "Ponzi Sheme", because there is no person, no a company (businessman), who
"pays profits to earlier investors using funds obtained from newer investors"...
Who is it then? People are exchanging money between each other, when new money stop coming people won't have anything to withdraw. And there is this "not fee" part: 7.5 % Marketing, 5% technical support  Stop making it sound like it is not ponzi because this is exactly what it is. |
|
|
|
~
Also, the best way to get merit is to write about merit, not about cryptocurrencies
System was designed to reward constructive and interesting posts, not specifically for crypto discussion  |
|
|
|
I'll just drop this here for reference  Thread has been moved to archive, however it is not locked and I don't see OP is banned. Anyway, tagged and reported to moderator. |
|
|
|
Let's have a picture of Mr. Terrell with a shoe on his head, holding a piece of paper with today's date.
Take picture from 3 different angles or upload video with all team members. |
|
|
|
So, how we can do now? I loss my money for this project  Nothing, really. It was really obvious, brand new account, poor threads, angry OP, stock pictures etc. They even c/p their threads: PCN COIN (PORN CHAT NETWORK)(PCNC) will Be the Token For Online Chat and Porn Industry. Customer Will Be Able To Get Into Those services using the PCN Token Based On ERC 20
GPN COIN (GAMBLING PORN TOKEN) will Be the Token For Gambling and Porn Industry. Customer Will Be Able To Get Into Those services using the GPN Token Based On ERC 20
Stop being so naive and start using your brain before investing. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
