Because you are converting twice by that trading path that you mention. OWL tokens original liquidity pool was OWL-BUSD so they will charge additional fee by trading OWL to BNB. As suggestion of some user in the previous post, You can increment slippage percentage by 1% until the transaction becomes succesful, I suggest to convert your OWL tokens on BUSD and send it to Binance rather than trading it directly to BNB because the fee is insane high for LP for owl tokens pool.
Seems reasonable, anyway, I still do it though I had to endure the fees, as I don't have binance account and I just send it to some local exchange where I can convert it to fiat with lesser fees. Anyway thanks for the info. |
|
|
|
Well finally today i swaped in pancakeswap part of my OWL tokens for BUSD and for BNB. Thanks to the man a few comments upside, for say to all how they can be swaped putting a slippage of more than 10%.
All fine and in seconds i have swaped the OWL tokens, so good point for the OWL boys, the other part i kepp putting in stacking or betting in the site. I really like the "stability" the token have.
Can you share how much fee did it cost? Is the GWEI is instant? 10% stability is pretty high imo. Now I'm stuck in the cycle of "Confirm swap" then "Price Updated", been trying hours already and it's pretty annoying, as I don't want to use higher fee. The fee on Pancakeswap is not affected by slippage percentage. It still fixed as long as you didn't change the transaction speed which is not required to process your transaction since BSC network is stable. The transaction fee for normal transaction is around 0.2-0.3$ plus the OWL tokens fee for liquidity provider which is 0.25% of the total OWL tokens that you will sell which is very minimal. Slippage is due to low liquidity on LP and not due to high transaction volume so you can still have a successful transaction using a normal fee. Good information, but the thing is, when I select "standard" for gwei, 11% for slipage (as mentioned above as recommended slippage >10). I see the "Minimum received" cut almost -10$ worth if I'm going to swap OWL > BUSD > BNB. Although I tried it. But I still can't move to this cycle of "Confirm swap" then "Price Updated". Just nothing happens. |
|
|
|
Well finally today i swaped in pancakeswap part of my OWL tokens for BUSD and for BNB. Thanks to the man a few comments upside, for say to all how they can be swaped putting a slippage of more than 10%.
All fine and in seconds i have swaped the OWL tokens, so good point for the OWL boys, the other part i kepp putting in stacking or betting in the site. I really like the "stability" the token have.
Can you share how much fee did it cost? Is the GWEI is instant? 10% stability is pretty high imo. Now I'm stuck in the cycle of "Confirm swap" then "Price Updated", been trying hours already and it's pretty annoying, as I don't want to use higher fee. |
|
|
|
Well, if you consider smart contracts and cryptocurrencies of blockchains like for example, the Binance Smart Chain, then you pay mere cents for each bet. That does not sound like a lot to me? So you pay 14 cents and you bet instead of 1 USD, 86 cents. if you want. Seems fair. Even for the poorest among us, that kind of gambling should be affordable. Most bet at least 10 USD so the 14 cent fee won't even be noticable.
Perhaps there can be some sort of bonus system to even out the fees?
Then 1$~ish fee for every 10 bets is still not reasonable no matter what's the amount use to bet. Plus not so many are fond using tokens to play which mostly can only get from swaps or so. If the gambling website will not implement bitcoin as payment option since the platform is made for smart contract I'm afraid it will be popular as what gambling website in this board. |
|
|
|
I bet its because of cloudflare interrupting your access. To get faster login you can use this url [1] to bypass the captcha including in tor. About the 503 code error, as the description said, it maybe because lots of users accessing the page at the same time, refreshing it will resolve the error. [1] https://bitcointalk.org/captcha_code.php |
|
|
|
During the first two days of a large-scale war, more than 3,500 Russian invaders were killed, about 200 were taken prisoner, 102 tanks, 536 various armored vehicles, 14 combat aircraft and 8 helicopters were destroyed. The enemy attack began to falter. They run out of fuel, shells, food. After all, Putin was counting on a blitzkrieg, and he clearly miscalculated.
The Ukrainian armed forces are repelling attacks in all directions with the active support of the population, which is formed into territorial defense battalions. In Kyiv, 14,000 machine guns were distributed to the population to repel the Russian bulk.
These number of casualties only came Ukraine tally, Russia reports otherwise, 3500 is more reasonable number if they are on offensive. Talking about running out of fuel, shells and food is unreasonable as well, knowing russia is just a 1 step ahead in Ukraine. Idk why they keep telling these information to media this way, like they are winning when their cities are often receiving bombings and air strikes. Even this numbers are true, Russia's force is way more bigger than this. In anyway, I hope this war stops already. |
|
|
|
@CoinbaseWallet now supports @Ledger hardware wallets.
Wait. How is this supposed to work? Hardware wallet with KYC enabled Coinbase does not seem like a working combination. Am I missing something? - Regards, PrivacyG Coinbase wallet is non custodial wallet, unlike its exchange that needs an account where you can buy crypto which needss kyc. Although there is feature to link your coinbase account to your coinbase wallet but they are completely different. So using HW to your coinbase wallet is somewhat reasonable. |
|
|
|
But are they going to that for a show? Not really, they don't even care that they should be found out as the owner of it, and for sure that they better keep it private than publicly known that they hold such funds.
Not everyone though, a business related person, influencer, or someone who wants an attention will do it. e.g. CSW, he really care, he's more with attentions than being secured, but unfortunately, he will not. Also an example for microstrategy and saylor, who wants to influence others business or a person to getting involved on bitcoin. |
|
|
|
|
It's good to see a community helping each other or even helping a country to fund at least only for victims of war, not to fund its arms.
But I don't see this as an ethical or even effective. How can they cashout these cryptos to fiat in terms of war? Also, if an exchange such coinbase or so supports like this, for a war, so it can be exchange and withdraw almost instantly as it is needed so badly.
Asking for transparency - don't expect that it will be a full audit or full transparency.
|
|
|
|
What we need is a gambling site which is as decentralised as possible and which does not store funds.
This idea is only good for the business, yes its somewhat secure the funds, but not a customer-friendly. If this is executed by a smart contract imagine you need to pay fee for transaction or gas everytime you bet from your wallet. This is not reasonable and no users will last not unless the fee is too small that it cannot affect enough your wallet balance. Since bitcoin doesnt have smart contract that works like that then the gambling site will only work using its token? Nah, I don't think it can gather lots of users here though. You cab call it a revolutionary or secured, but nevermind. |
|
|
|
Just read this report: ... 'The European parliament has postponed its vote on the proposed regulatory package for crypto assets after a leaked draft drew criticism for including a provision that sought to ban the use of cryptocurrencies like bitcoin and ether in the European Union (EU) over energy concerns.
"over energy concerns" Are they out of researchers? Lots of researches have done that the consumed energy in bitcoin mining is too low compared to other industry like banks or even much greener than gold mining. Even lots of these miners moved to green energy compared to this old-aged industries. Why they still keep pushing that it's their main reason? Would be reasonable if they just say that don't want it since they can't control over it. |
|
|
|
So having a cold wallet for a casino is recommended because that can prevent hacking that can happen anytime.
Cold wallets has nothing to do for security of the gambling website to prevent the hacking. If you mean it's used to minimize the damage of lost funds taken when a hack happens, then it's reasonable. In any way, gambling websites should have the same security feature of what exchanges do, it may be a matter of # of funds stored in its hot wallet but it is still a fund to run the business and should be considered in high level of security. |
|
|
|
Sometimes its part of their marketing plan, and will be removed sooner or later. Since mostly these withdrawals are not instant, it is still cheap for casino sending or processing multiple withdrawal in just one send. |
|
|
|
|
Why banning it if they can regulate it or somewhat control it? Monitoring or somewhat controlling both crypto and internet in an specific area is somewhat feasible, so why not do it in that way instead of getting rid of it since it's impossible to ban it in the first place.
Hearing such statement is good to hear than "we will ban bitcoin because it is used for criminals and to launder money", blabla. This statement is mostly comes from an old government guy who only knows fiat and old stuff.
|
|
|
|
do you think ongoing sporting events will be postponed (damn.. I have a lot of betting plans on European leagues)
There's no need to think if yes or no because it will obviously be stopped. Safety first, of course. Any sports event or any kind of events near the affected place (Russia and Ukraine, maybe Belarus too) will be postponed in regards of the conflict and war. Never read any news yet but this is sure for the citizens safety. |
|
|
|
This is highly unlikely. When it comes to legal matters exchanges like binance, probably they will ask legal documents regarding for criminal investigation or similar. Your only way to know the user if the wallet address is available publicly with his information which is nearly zero chance to happen. Here's binance policy quoting their statement about such issue. Protection of Binance and others: We release account and other personal information when we believe release is appropriate to comply with the law or with our regulatory obligations; enforce or apply our Terms of Use and other agreements; or protect the rights, property or safety of Binance, our users or others. This includes exchanging information with other companies and organisations for fraud protection and credit risk reduction. https://www.binance.com/en/support/law-enforcement/guidelines |
|
|
|
Shouldn't we be positive that another country adopts Bitcoin because finally another one comes up?
We seem to be clapping our hands with El Salvador adopting it.
It's always great and nice to hear, but not in a middle of a war. It will be another headlines of "Bitcoin is only for criminals" will be in trend once Russia did it. People without having knowledge about crypto will usually say this especially those who are greatly affected and used to say Russia is a criminal espcially for declaring a war. |
|
|
|
to be honest, I have a suspicion after putin declared bitcoin is a currency, I think they will make bitcoin a legal tender there, maybe that's the goal (free from sanctions). Russia is one of the countries with the largest natural resources in the world, so they are not afraid of economic sanctions from outside countries.
They are actually used to it. So it will not matter to them. Whatever Russia.does for BITCOIN to have adoption in their region is going to be great for crypto investors.
I hesitate to believe such positive statement just because its related to bitcoin or crypto, other countries or say US can make a decision regarding their bitcoin regulations when it comes to that to oppose its enemies. |
|
|
|
You can make a thread to Services board [1], put every details you want to expect or do it in PM for questions. Coz every questions you asked depends on the one who will make so its hard to assume since there are a lot of them here. [1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=52.0 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
