There are plenty projects that are building on Luna and these projects should really be more careful on choosing which network they will migrate too. I think they can choose more sensible replacement such as eth, avax or bsc network as Ive seen such privilege and opportunity to rebuild what was ruined on Luna. Its gonna be a hard task for them but hopefully these affected projects choose a scalable one that can handle massive transaction and remains its usability without paying a lot of fees

Actually it depends on the strategy you choose. Its not bad to takea loan but putting it on a right basket. Rich people becoming more rich when they are using banks or firms money and making it double or triple using that money leaving the debt getting paid and the rest is profit.

If you follow or check Robert Kiyosaki videos or learning he said that he got rich by borrowimg money and put that into investment. Thats definitely a testinomy or outlier that its not always be the same.

Is it sandbox era already done? I think most coins and tokens on the metaverse are racing for each one but with the trend on thr apecoin, I think there is more chance or opportunity with it as they are just started their ecosystem with their recent land sale and token launch, it still too early to judge if they can beat out sandbox but in terms of profiting, of course youll choose a smaller cap and you know what it is.

Oh I see, I just assumed that there are since its likely a benefit incentive to those testers. But maybe they will reward them by their own network since I knew that avax has testnet before and given them a validator node for trying which is locked on a vested period.

Does this testnet rewards can be convertible to avax main tokens? I think there are plenty of testnet coin that are presume to launch their own, but hence using such network first to try out and test their network. Is fuji network belong to the subnet of avalanche and can be considered on their own once launch on the subnet like swimmer network?

Volatility is the fluctuation of such price action on the market. Meaning it could go down and up on a short time period. Its really happened on crypto and stocks. The more volatile is that means a huge risk but also high reward to some traders. This is liked by some leverage traders since they are earning through it.

Sometimes even greater than 4% within hour of trading volume. Either its on going up position or going down.

Maybe its a glitch. There are projects showing price even there is no trading or liquidity being used deployed. Can you share the name of the project that has value but liquidity isnt correct. Cause no matter what value it did represent its gonna be useless when the token traded on exchange has no trading volume, or enough liquidity for it to be exchange to other coins.

You got a point actually. There are polite ways to respond but some cant help themselves trolling the trolls as well. Maybe because those guys knew that the account isnt serious enough. But if those newbie history post proves that they are really trying to learn and being corrected harshly then maybe he dont understand what being a newbie feels like.

Some also experience criticism but remember not to become so emotional to take it so deep. Everyone got criticise too. I advise take it as a positive feedback instead and prove them wrong.

Im afraid even with burning tokens circulation will still be the same on the exchange itself. Its gonna be take a while to reduce a trillion coin. Also the people loses its trust on the founder and the team. The reason why its still being traded is due to pump and dump reason of the traders.

Yes but it only applicable on selected European countries. Im from Asia but still this isnt available and hoping it to become available anytime soon. As this will be helpful if our funding page on binance can be used to services or such payment when using their Binance debit card.

Maybe crypto.com OP but thats supported limited too but maybe bsc chain also included.

Theres nothing wrong listening to them as long as they make sense. The only thing dumb is when they teach you or signal you a coin or token and you ape carelessly. Thats how you loss in the process. Of course aside from their signal its your obligations and responsibility to study it first and research on it before buying it. What if he only shilling his bag, you might become an exit liquidity. But if he able to gather up and add a good content without shilling it then why not right?

Start from ground root. Read Satoshi whitepaper and then analyze all those things you didnt understand on the paper by watching some videos on how thats work per topic. There are plenty of resources out there and you just need to tap it and see for yourself. You can also read here but mind you that this a forum so different response and reasoning you would encounter explaining bitcoin.

Im doing both so I know the pros and cons in my own perspective.

Pointing that there are factors on both when choosing which one is better. Some will say dex are better and safer maybe their right. But the convenient and the feels of trading will be on cex and thats a fact. For sure many cex and dex users realize it. But we can always choose which one we should prioritize in terms of safety or more wider application. If you asked me, then dex is the suitable one, but I am not denying using centralized exchange is very easy anf quite friendly.

I dont think these mentioned countries will do a legal tender for bitcoin. Yes it might been a legit currency for others, but there are still plenty of reason why they wont do it and thats due to volatility and of course bitcoin can be used to such crimes.

A highly volatile currency would not be good for reserved. Some warns other the risk of it so probably if there is a chance that it would be tender probably from other countries.

Ofcourse once they listed it there are times that it will be there since they put up data on that. Now probably getting hard time to monitor those projects that arent providing trading volume and liquidity anymore. There are plenty of projects that arent have any trading activity now but still on the list. Just dont mind it, maybe one suggestion to coingecko to delist any project that arent active.

Possible but needed to inject a lot of funds. You see many users have bought that ust including me during its $1 days and now its reallt below it. I am managed to salvage some funds when its almost half but not all funds have been recovered. I accept the loss and ready to move on but when Luna said rhey are planning to fork it. Somehow I have seen a hope but seeing the details of it. Still its not worth it especially they will only reimburse those ust connected to protocols which mine isnt since I just stake mine on a centralized exchange.

Suicide reports are probably the worse. Newbies must be not careless and join the bandwagon cause it hyped. The Luma incidents show how bad it is for some investors who even loan their investment for such projects. Yes luna has a good experimentation process of stablecoin however there are some plots they didnt see coming and vulnerable to such whale aggresive powers. What I hate is the founder is so arrogant maybe this is karma for him but bad for the investors whom suffered more.

Good choice but let me remind you that even bitcoin is decentralized dont hope for a no down scenario. Even its the number 1 coin it is still subject to risk and volatility. No project can even be safe, and even stablecoin arent see what happened to Ust and some stablecoin that shows depletion like dei. So its better to be cautious.

Be careful with some new nft. They might not be profitable especially when they are no hype at all. Nft becomes profitable if its getting hype on social media and if no news or trend on a project you invested then thats something scary I think. For altcoins stay only on major coins or those who got a lot of volume.

Thats a straighforward action from you but before purchasing any bitcoin make sure you are aware what aryou are buying cause its higly volatile asset which can let yout funds shrink if you buy at high price. Well I thunk you now knew what it means by that. You should study first on trading and everything related to blockchain cause its a risky investment. If you are a long time investor then thats fine but if that money is a burden for you when go down then you should think first.