we need graphics guys to reskin this ASAP! Anyone working on it yet? Figroll and myself are currently working on it, screen shots have been sent to james with the initial concept. Waiting on a response from James. But he is more than likely busy at the moment so we will wait on his response. In general I prefer if you just do stuff without waiting on me. I am not graphics guy, so who am I for saying what is better to do. Just do what you think is best and if it is absolutely horrible, then I will complain  so for anything, the last thing I want is to become some sort of centralized bottleneck to progressing If I see something I am not liking, then I wont be shy, but usually I am happy to see other peoples doing things James |
|
|
|
|
I make mistakes and when coding, it is not a big problem as long as you are still developing it. You just fix it, recompile and its as if it never happened. Now to make perfect SuperNET design ahead of time, this is beyond me to get it perfect. I think I am doing pretty good so far, but this thing called the future is always so chaotic and I worry that what seems like some good ideas now will become not so good later.
So, I had an idea to use the Voting process for making any significant changes to the operating parameters of SuperNET. Things like should the supertraders get 10% or 11%? What if some fiat advertising seems appropriate, but the budget of 10% revenues is not enough? What if we really should be making these "Hello Kitty" things?
You see, there are things unpredictable and rather being rigid and permanently using the initial parameters I would think it is better to allow for the asset holders themselves to select from several options. So, without solving all the details of the Voting process, I think there are three categories of Voting. the relatively minor but still money affecting things, like the base percentages tweaking where a simple majority would be enough. Then some medium level things, like significant changes to some percentages or starting a "Hello Kitty" sticker manufacturing sideline, now this is requiring two thirds supermajority and then finally some really big changing things, like should the SuperNET be liquidated or should jl777 be replaced by a monkey, these would require near unanimous 90%.
These percentages I am using are ownership. SuperNET honors the golden rule. Now if this is not objectionable, then SuperNET is having the ability to reconfigure itself based on the will of the people that own it. The NXT allows voting by weight of the assets owned, at least this is a simple thing to do, so we can make a public blockchain record of such votings. I dont expect to have many votings, but I think it is nice to know that it is possible to protect the people's capital with future based changes to SuperNET that can allow it to adapt and to have the people directly vote their choice.
I think it will be pretty clear which of the three categories any particular voting should be. In the event this is controversial, we can always have a pre-vote vote to determine what category the vote should be in. this pre-vote voting would be the category with the max votes wins. So now for all things we can not only get a asset holder proportional voting, but even make sure the right amount of majority is needed
Unless I am incapacitated, I think I will be the one to call for a vote, but I am always listening to the community, so if there are any such issues that the community wants to vote on, I dont see why I wouldnt allow a vote. If some coin is really wanted by supermajority 2/3'rds, then I think the popular vote would be something that the coin evaluation group would not be able to ignore.
So maybe there are other categories of override/veto that the supermajority should have. I think there must be, but I am happy writing this as a big weight of having to get every detail right is removed. I need to get close, but if there is some parameter that is not right or even a thing I am overlooking (it happens!), then there is a way to solve this without just declaring it to be fait accompli. The people most affected by structural changes to SuperNET will have the power to determine such things.
James
P.S. to clarify, the business as usual stuff is not requiring any votings! these are for the unusual scenarios and maybe we done need to use it at all until the far future
|
|
|
|
Not all things US Gov are bad, I like flushing my toilet and having my garbage picked up weekly. Anyway, I think his point is be careful about using Poloniex for your IPO because the Gov can shut it down pretty easily.
Lol do you really believe that the US gov flush your toilet and pick up your garbage ? Come on, you are joking. The US gov don't do anything but take all your wealth and force you to wage slavery while they enjoy watching the world burn. Dubai, now there is a place all fancy |
|
|
|
super NET super MAN... what's new?
For those not too familiar with NXT and even those that are, the following is a must see page: http://www.nxttechnologytree.com/It shows the view from inside the SuperNET core and a bit of a glimpse into the future |
|
|
|
For those not too familiar with NXT and even those that are, the following is a must see page: http://www.nxttechnologytree.com/It shows the view from inside the SuperNET core you know how somebody is taking the picture you are seeing? since there are only two coins in the SuperNET core at this moment, I am thinking that BTCD is the one that took this pic!! James |
|
|
|
I guess most people cant look at C code and simulate the flow of data and progress of the algorithms. Seems this is a lost art.
If " most people can't look at C code and simulate the flow of data and progress of the algorithms" and " it's a lost art" and this is known beforehand, then why choose C? Perhaps this is what was behind Kristov's logic? I am a simple C programmer I am superfluent in C This allows me to be order of magnitude more productive I still have this art That's great and all, but we're not talking about your skillz (at least I'm not). We're (or I am) talking about "most people" and their use (or abuse) of the Turing complete scripting aspect of the coin. What is it that I'm missing? Are you going to write every single line of code that will ever be used in the Turing complete scripting? I'm pretty sure the answer is no, hence why I'm asking. Well, have you seen the other languages? It is a brand new language that nobody has ever used before Also compilers for a lot of languages are written in C, so if somebody really wants to use some other language they can make a compiler for their language. It is like using the most common low level building block. It is lower level, but not as low level as assembler. It is the language from where most other languages are derived, so most people are at least familiar with it. Now, I will be able to write a lot of tradebots very quickly, so even if there are only a few others who can do it, there will be plenty of tradebots available. So, the design choice is something that allows other languages to be implemented on top. While if I selected, I am not even sure what else can be considered, then it is doubtful there are many other languages that can be implemented in it, and doubtful that there are anywhere as many that are familiar with it and no doubt that I would not be so good coding in it. As far as I know Tradebots C is the script language with the most power and this is what I need. Also, have you ever heard of Metatrader? Their language is based on C, and Tradebots, are initially for making automated tradebots, like the zillions that metatrader has. So it is not just my personal preference there is an entire industry of C scripted tradebots from the Metatrader universe. James P.S. I thought you hated me, why are you here? i almost put you on ignore, so these semi-reasonable questions are a bit confusing |
|
|
|
we need graphics guys to reskin this ASAP! |
|
|
|
I guess most people cant look at C code and simulate the flow of data and progress of the algorithms. Seems this is a lost art.
If " most people can't look at C code and simulate the flow of data and progress of the algorithms" and " it's a lost art" and this is known beforehand, then why choose C? Perhaps this is what was behind Kristov's logic? I am a simple C programmer I am superfluent in C This allows me to be order of magnitude more productive I still have this art |
|
|
|
Not all things US Gov are bad, I like flushing my toilet and having my garbage picked up weekly. Anyway, I think his point is be careful about using Poloniex for your IPO because the Gov can shut it down pretty easily.
wow, you dont have to live in garbage and the toilets actually work! USA is a paradise indeed. Hardly anywhere else in the world has such luxuries you probably even have hot water and electricity! Now seriously, just how primitive do you think the rest of the world is? James |
|
|
|
“ C is probably the worst language in the world in terms of making it easy for vulnerabilities to be encoded into the programs that you write.” - Kristov Atlas Source : http://youtu.be/upcVcW2d790?t=16m43sHas this been addressed? If so, where? Edit : I see above it has been posted already. remember all Turing complete languages map to each other. What this means is that there is nothing inherent in the language about vulnerabilities, it is dependent on the specific coder. stuff like all the gnu code, unix, apache, a lot of code is written in C, so it is natural for a lot of bugs to be in C code. Changing the language doesnt usually change the vulnerability. Maybe there are many C coders who shouldnt be? Now, the C code for Tradebots is interpreted code running on the node that your are writing the Tradebot for. So if you want to blow up your computer, you dont need an C to help you, you can just use a hammer. At some point there will be Tradebot vendors sharing profits with people that are using their Tradebots. The open source requirement and user feedbacks should allow for a good way to know if a Tradebot is stable. So, until a Tradebot is certified by some third party Tradebot certification agency, then maybe it is user needs to use their judgement James P.S. I think it is safe to say that assembler is the worst language in the world to use for the vulnerabilities I agree, what is it about C that makes people think everything is automatically going to break? I think people are just scared of C for some reason. You can easily break stuff in any language. I guess most people cant look at C code and simulate the flow of data and progress of the algorithms. Seems this is a lost art. Once you can feel the data flowing through the algorithm, then you just fix it until it stops feeling wrong. James |
|
|
|
“ C is probably the worst language in the world in terms of making it easy for vulnerabilities to be encoded into the programs that you write.” - Kristov Atlas Source : http://youtu.be/upcVcW2d790?t=16m43sHas this been addressed? If so, where? Edit : I see above it has been posted already. remember all Turing complete languages map to each other. What this means is that there is nothing inherent in the language about vulnerabilities, it is dependent on the specific coder. stuff like all the gnu code, unix, apache, a lot of code is written in C, so it is natural for a lot of bugs to be in C code. Changing the language doesnt usually change the vulnerability. Maybe there are many C coders who shouldnt be? Now, the C code for Tradebots is interpreted code running on the node that your are writing the Tradebot for. So if you want to blow up your computer, you dont need an C to help you, you can just use a hammer. At some point there will be Tradebot vendors sharing profits with people that are using their Tradebots. The open source requirement and user feedbacks should allow for a good way to know if a Tradebot is stable. So, until a Tradebot is certified by some third party Tradebot certification agency, then maybe it is user needs to use their judgement James P.S. I think it is safe to say that assembler is the worst language in the world to use for the vulnerabilities |
|
|
|
just a question:
if I put 100k nxt on this IPO (i.e the second day) how can you calculate the % of SuperNET I buy?
I mean, value of nxt is changing every second, value of btcd too..
will you consider the value at the IPO start, when I buy or when IPO end? There are many dangers and someone can "play smart"..
I think the assumption is the total percent will be divided by all tokens sold. IF 100BTC worth of IPO sells, and you spent 10BTC you should expect 10% If 100,000BTC sells and you spent 10BTC you should expect .1% IF you purchase early, and/or with NXT or BTCD bonus you will get that much of a bonus, so your 100k nxt with a 19% bonus would get you little over 7BTC at todays price of 0.0000591 If its its 100BTC total, 7%.. etc.. Sorry I am on a mobile so I do apologise if that has been answered. At what rate would Nxt and btcd be converted to btc? Would it be on the day your coins go into the ipo address or at the end of the ipo? If it is at the end that can be gamed . gaming will be too expensive do not worry my friend we have a plan! details very soon |
|
|
|
I don't have time to read the entire thread. But one thing strikes me, that I feel I should comment on.
You are talking about an IPO here. The word is right there in the title of the post.
In my opinion (an opinion that is informed by ten years experience as a Security Principal for three different securities broker/dealers) everyone involved (James and everyone who is thinking of investing) needs to understand clearly the definition of the word "security". In this case, the definition we are interested in is the definition that involves investments.
In the United States, the US Supreme Court has ruled (in SEC v. Howey) that a "securities contract" is defined as a contract, transaction, or scheme whereby a person invests his money in a common enterprise and is led to expect profits solely from the efforts of the promoter or third party.
If you are offering an IPO for SuperNET, you are almost certainly creating a "securities contract".
Let's look at this definition in terms of the issuance of a cryptocurrency. Let's say that the promoters issue a certain number of coins to the company or the development team, and then open up sales to the public. As soon as someone buys those coins from the promoters, with the expectation that the value will go up, you are walking straight into "securities contract" territory. I believe there is very a real possibility that the SEC could (and would) take the position that the developers have offered and sold a security. The regulators would make the case that sale of the coin is a "transaction or scheme" where people are investing money (by buying coins), in a "common enterprise" (the IPO) with the expectation that the value of the coins will go up based on the efforts of the "promoters" (SuperNET and its developers).
All it takes is one dissatisfied purchaser to bring this to the attention of regulators (if they aren't already aware of it). Far from unifying the crypto community, this could easily lead to more scrutiny from the regulators and a black eye for the community. And, frankly, it could even lead to civil or criminal charges.
But wait. What if the developers of the business and coin are incorporated in a jurisdiction outside the United States? Or, what if the business is a Distributed Autonomous Corporation, with no headquarters or jurisdiction anywhere? In either case, if a developer individually, or the "company" as an entity sells to US citizens, it generally needs to comply with US laws. And, I think it is fairly clear that it also doesn't make any difference if the start-up company's coins were purchased in exchange for another cryptocurrency, like Bitcoin, NXT or BBR.
The guys like Ethereum who have done this type of thing successfully have structured their offer very carefully, have given investors lots of disclosures and warnings, and still could be treading on thin ice.
Since Poloniex is a US company, I think they should take a long, hard look at what they are potentially getting themselves into before they start participating in an offering of unregistered securities. I like Poloniex -- and have coins there -- so I hope they have a good attorney.
To any potential investors, I would point out that this (SuperNET IPO) is exactly the type of risky venture that the securities regulations are designed to protect you from.
Please note that I am not taking any position, pro or con, about the technology involved, or about James as a person. I'm just trying to warn about a situation that could be harmful not only to individual investors, but the entire community.
I don't have a lot of time to try to follow this thread, so don't necessarily expect me to reply to the (probably inevitable) crush of angry replies.
warning: the following response is insulting the great nation of USA. please protect the children, women, and anybody else from exposure to such things and do not complain if you are reading some things about USA you are not liking to read. end of warningit goes without saying that if your country is not allowing for such things, then please do not invest. There are hundreds of countries and hundreds of sets of laws and in the crypto there is the concept that no one country's laws is to dictate globally. I think maybe USA should learn that it is just one small part of the world and the sooner its fiat hyperinflates, I think the better for the rest of the world. Personally, the laws of a country that makes using crypto or making a coin backed by precious metals the same as having weapons or being a terrorist, well it seems to lack common sense. Its a good thing the "eminent domain" legal theory is allowing for all the levels of government to simply take someones land and give it to the much more deserving real estate developer. I dont know how the rest of the world can be called civilized without its govts protecting their citizens in the same way. Can you imagine a life without shopping malls built on the land stolen from its rightful owners? Now 99% of the funds raised will be held in escrow and the other 1% will have all of its transactions being documented. I will run the operations side at a 90% profit margin. All of these revenue flows will be left visible on the blockchain (I wont be teleporting it out of sight!) and significant amounts fed back into the coin communities. The 10% for the supertraders are not able to be withdrawn. Common sense protections are in place for the funds. Also, we are not spending a zillion dollars on fancy suit lawyers, bankers, etc. The money not spent is allowing for the book value sale. Maybe we can change this to being totally donation based. Such donations would happen to get tallied, and and asset issued to each donation in proportion to the donation. Then this asset will be used to determine the amount of counter donations that are sent to an address holding these assets. As some sort of nonprofit coop, I believe it is a totally different animal than selling "air" backed by just tech + future expectations. I am working for no salary, I am putting my own net worth into this and investors are getting the same ROI as I do. Now the SuperNET is not selling "air", it is backing the funds raised (whatever you call it) with the funds raised and there is no charge for the future revenue streams to the people participating. I will hope you are not quibbling over the 15% bonus that gives the early investors below liquidation value. Is this something USA has to protect people from too? This too is probably illegal in USA for some guy to give away the revenue streams to investors. USA needs to protect the investors from receiving future dividends. What else will USA protect us from? Is the 99% in escrow not enough? Is the 90% profit margin too low? Is my zero salary too high? Is the fact that we have no overhead too risky? I am saying I dont know how much the future profits will be. There is no price for this portion. It is quite possible that I forget how to code and cant finish any of the nearly finished projects. it is possible that no coin will want to join SuperNET. it is possible that people all stop using crypto. it is possible that blah blah blah. There are risks with everything. does listing out all these risk factors change anything? The Bitcoin community is an intelligent one, call it an international club and they are not seeking the USA's protection. I am making as low risk vehicle as I can think how to do. Can you do any better than me with all your experiences? The only one thing I can guarantee is that I am not made of cheese. So the fiat empire is wanting to make troubles to the crypto movement. I am making what is arguably the most secure thing in crypto, which also has an upside. To my limited knowledge SuperNET is a unique thing and cannot be compared with any prior crypto. this means general advices are potentially meaningless. Please tell me specifically what are the things about SuperNET that USA must protect people from? without any specifics, you are like the troll using the FUD. this is fiat FUD. now you are writing as if you are so concerned about the crypto community, then please take the one hour out of your precious billable hours and donate it to the crypto cause to advises us poor simpletons who can barely understand about this danger thing called money. I mean we hardly deserve to be having any of it in the first place, maybe we should just send it all to USA so they can spend it to protect us from super risky things? James P.S. To the peoples of USA, please do not get me wrong. The people of USA are really quite fantastic and have such positive ideals and dreams and, well, the govt has just gotten so out of control and using all means at its disposal for sucking the humanity out of you. I am sad by this. Tragic events have been used to multiply the power over your lifes and from what I hear it is much more difficult to even just pay all the bills, unless you are real estate developer or someone else who is playing the proper people the proper monies. The hard working USA person is at a big disadvantage against the very system built on your back. I am hopeful that after some few short years, the inevitable economics of overspending will bring some happy changes, but there is some trouble to get through before the new happy times without the burdensome govt in every area of your lives. I wish you well and will do my best to help with whatever power the SuperNET achieves. |
|
|
|
jl777
Well, I will definitely buy some. No brainer. What I am a little confused with is how will this impact assets like cryptocard, instaDEX, MGW, NXTprivacy, and were you also connected in some way to NXTTYcoin?
My initial thoughts are to hold all those and try and get more NXT, as it looks like NXT may win the decentralized exchange race, which is about as big as it gets. Then obviously buy in on this one once Poloniex offers it. Does that sound like a good plan? I just don't know if this new project makes any of the older ones obsolete, or if it just raises them all as one along with NXT in general? Thanks in advance for any advice.
I am not involved in NXTTY, I actually havent had a chance to look at it, so this is no reflection on it in any way. I have been a bit busy this year. I cannot predict what prices any of the assets will achieve. there are some baseline formulas that are possible to know, but these are relative between the assets, so there is no anchor price to allow an accurate calculation of lifetime future cashflow discounted to the present (and adjusted for risk factors) (and adjusted again for general growth or lack thereof for crypto) There will be assets inside the SuperNET core and these will benefit from their services being made available. I just make these services, I am not able to accurately predict if more fees are generated from Teleport, InstantDEX trading, anon card (renamed to SuperNET card) fees, Privatebet gambling, etc. This satoshidice thing, I dont understand how it is so popular, but it is making many revenues, so do not trust my judgement for details on which asset is going to do better. This is like asking a farmer, which is better, your prize winning tomatoes or your prize winning oranges? they are not directly comparable. All I can do is continue to make all of my assets as good as they can be and then the market will tell me I should have made some "Hello Kitty" stuff. So, I have made matroshka assets and you can pick any specific one that you are feeling is strongest, or if you cant decide, just get JLH, it has pretty much all of them. sharkfund0 maps to Teleport, NXTprivacy has both the SuperNET card and Privatebet. The Privatebet is now having the instaDICE based on new tech just received, and will hopefully have a full set of casino games, each game with its own asset and of course the sportsbetting. Now the SuperNET future dividends are simply the combining of all of these into a single asset that just happens to be ~100% backed by crypto from its IPO and has a bunch of supertraders using 10% of funds to make bragging rights. I am not so good at predicting end user behaviors, but I am a bit better at predicting investor behaviors. I view the SuperNET IPO, even with no bonus and therefore some ~12% premium like a compressed spring. You are paying by its height when it is all compressed (book value), but we are not sure how high the spring will jump. Theoretically it should go to some multiple of book value. Will it be 1.1x book value or 10x bookvalue when it starts trading? Well, I am pretty sure it will be somewhere in between A lot of traders are perfectly happy with an immediate double so there will be some sellings at 2x book value. The question I dont know is if there will be demand at 2x. Certainly the sum of all the revenue streams from all the assets must have some value, quite possible a very large value when you start doing some spreadsheets with Number of users, Average fees per user, etc. like I know some of you have done. It is quite complex and the big X factor is what happens if BTC does indeed exceed TacoBell? All this increase in BTC will naturally bring more users into crypto and what will they find? SuperNET will be hard to miss, so as BTC keeps growing and bringing in more fiat money and peoples, the SuperNET revenue base is expanding. This is all conjecture and any large range of numbers can be justified, impressive flowcharts and financial projections to be made. I am sure I could have sold a bunch of SuperNET at 2x book value, but as I have written below, this is not about squeezing all the last dollars from investors pockets. I am no investment banker that specializes in such things. I am wanting to make many happy rich crypto peoples. And so we go back to the question of how much buying demand there will be right after the IPO. Since the IPO is not making any advertising and happening fast, I think a significant amount will still be on the sidelines, so let us assume that the lack of liquidity wont be a factor. Then we now come to the big question. is the spring going to jump a little or a lot? I am not sure, but I do feel there is some chance to be jumping to where we are filling the 2x offers, but remember I am just a simple C programmer. Please do the homeworks and your own evaluation. James |
|
|
|
So let me get this straight.
SuperNET basically will be its own blockchain kind of like BTC where all these alts can go and spawn off of instead of relying on the BTC blockchain?
If it's that, it's actually genius, alts should have had their own chain net to run off already instead of relying on the BTC net. And with better quality control, this can definitely show people that crypto can be trusted.
SuperNET is using offchain tech I made this year for NXTprivacy privacyServers. Originally it was a distributed thing, but after some feedbacks I was able to fully decentralize it. So now with the simple linking of libjl777 as described in the OP, any coin can directly tap into this encryption network. It is the fundamental base that Teleport is built on top of and supports the onion routing and even bitmessage like broadcast. However due to the expected number of nodes I am limiting the broadcast method for the publishing of public addresses and your node's privacyServer (which can be yourself!) so that the other nodes can connect to it directly The UDP is used to prevent the usual TCP/IP DOS attacks. It is not foolproof but I think much harder to be attacking the connectionless UDP packets. There is API you invoke by making a JSON string with the SuperNET function and some are processed locally, some are query to your privacyServer, some are sent to the destination via N randomly chosen privacyServers, and this N it is also selected randomly each time to avoid attacker to know how many more hops to final destination. So, there is a publicNXT address that is derived from a publicCOIN address (the privkey for the publicCOIN address is used as NXT passphrase) and this allows for everyone in the SuperNET to directly address anybody else with a single pubNXT address. I am still working to make a pubBTC address as I feel some would prefer that. This way if you are a node on SuperNET you put in sig your SuperNET pubaddr and also in the .conf file (I hope that the GUI will make this easy for people!) and then the libjl777 automatically does the linking of NXT addr broadcasting of the required details so that all the other nodes can address packets/messages/telepods/payments to your node Not as simple as I would like it, but the need to allow people to shield their IP address is very important, so it is possible to have a VPS with some public IP address you dont mind people finding out about and this is where you run a node, then on your local machine you are running another node specifying your VPS as your privacy server. Now when people are sending packets to you, they are sending to your pubaddr, but via the IP address of your privacyServer. Of course, if you are not shy about people knowing your IP address, then both the local node and privacyServer are running on the same computer and you put in 127.0.0.1 as your privacyServer's IP address So, there is no SuperNET blockchain, it is more like the ocean that connects all the islands that each coin's blockchains represent. I hope I have answered your question satisfactorily James Interesting concept, bringing all of the coins together to make a SuperNetwork then. Tip my hat to you for creating such an intricate network. My head exploded just thinking how complicated this whole thing is, trying to bring so many different kinds of networks together into one super network. I will watch for further updates. I use a shortcut, I just use the Internet No, really, this network for all coins is always there I am doing some calcs to make sure each node can directly address all other SuperNET nodes and it is not a problem at first, but as more and more coins join, then it does become an issue. but we can cross these hurdles as each new coin is added. At worst we need some few special gateway nodes to interconnect coin networks via nodes with highbandwidth and running both coins. These nodes will get a subsidy from the SuperNET revenue sharing to pay for the extra costs. Wont be a money maker, but shouldnt be a money loser either So, this is an area where I could use some assistance. I have some funds available to use for a bounty to have the code for these gateway nodes to be done. If anybody can help with this sort of thing, plz PM me. James |
|
|
|
Maybe someone can answer what step we are at now regarding BTCD? Are we still waiting for someone to review JL's code or waiting for something else? I checked the ANN thread and through all of the conversation on here and questions, it's hard to figure out where we are right now and what the next steps are.
Thanks!
I am busy with some new project until Thursday, after that I will be able to 100% be on Teleport debug and I am getting initial releases so I should be able to start tomorrow. please understand there is a lot of work behind the scenes to put together a 10,000+ BTC offering I think this is worth whatever delay to Teleport it causes, but since I am still waiting on release, the time lost will be less than a couple days still no volunteers or even anybody that is willing to be hired to look at my some few lines of C code. James Dan Metcalf? does he have any time for this? is he willing? does anybody know him personally? |
|
|
|
mostly right, seems a bit confused that node specific script written for that node is not adding any security issues that are not already there. now when we have linked-tradebots that are downloaded to multiple machines, this does become some factor. but that is for later anyway also the anon-card of $500/day is a bit above what he says is possible I have been working at my pace of 7+ years I like kitchen sinks James P.S. oh yes, wait for the pullback, BTCD is already pretty high. How many peoples are listening to him? seems he is not heard of SuperNET yet, but since it is recorded cant fault him for that. The majority of the show was about BTCD, is that normal? |
|
|
|
Maybe someone can answer what step we are at now regarding BTCD? Are we still waiting for someone to review JL's code or waiting for something else? I checked the ANN thread and through all of the conversation on here and questions, it's hard to figure out where we are right now and what the next steps are.
Thanks!
I am busy with some new project until Thursday, after that I will be able to 100% be on Teleport debug and I am getting initial releases so I should be able to start tomorrow. please understand there is a lot of work behind the scenes to put together a 10,000+ BTC offering I think this is worth whatever delay to Teleport it causes, but since I am still waiting on release, the time lost will be less than a couple days still no volunteers or even anybody that is willing to be hired to look at my some few lines of C code. James |
|
|
|
Put me down for an Anon Card.
Ooh, ooh, me too, me too!! James, at least 100 pages ago, when we were still collecting funds for the anon card, you mentioned the possibility of picking the anon cards up at trade shows. Individuals who did not want to supply a shipping address would then have the opportunity to get their hands on a card. What are the odds that this will be a viable option, how serious were you about this idea? It seems, with all that's going on, this wouldn't be possible for quite some time. Just asking for those who might have reservations..... it is SuperNET card, so the next time any coin in the SuperNET core (BTCD + NXT currently) is having a presence (or anybody) at a tradeshow, we can get the people to say how many cards, then ship that many, plus some few extra to the person going to the trade show. Then some sort of secret handshake to show you are already paying for the card and you grab a random one from the box of SuperNET cards I dont see why this cant be done. All we need is some sort of list of txid for paying of the card issuing fee and the person at the trade show crosses off the list your txid when you grab the random card |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
