Impossible as it is and disregarding our common sense, even for let's say the service is legitimate and 100% no crap, that service is not welcomed here in the community. Waste of time to deal on that service wherein there are lots of questions about the credibility of the one who is attempting to do it. In general, still, I can say that 90% of games aren't rigged.

OP's inside information is totally useless.

Replacement seems impossible but maybe we can rephrase that statement into, it can last forever but there will be something new that might overcome the popularity of some trending blockchain games today. There are honestly lots of blockchain games today that shine on the stage now and seem can reach the popularity of AXS. Not that close but still, there's a chance.

Your view about BNB does actually make sense. It's always a good choice to include BNB in our portfolio. Should have that buying action be done just a few weeks ago wherein the market is still on dip. If anyone is decided or considering putting money on BNB and looking forward to its long-term goals, don't hesitate to make an entry at any price.

Like Bitcoin, BNB also has its own use-case that's why you can bet that BNB is worth risking your money.

Maybe we can consider the NFT games as one of driving the hype to the NFT craze. There are lots of NFT games where investors already made some profits. Like in ICO, there's a hype period and with the right decision and timing, they able to gain profits while getting a good chance too to exit.

If NFT is hit and run to you, it means you are lacking research. But it's fine as you don't need to be hyped for something you didn't know and interest in.

For me, not a valid comparison because they have a different approaches. While both need a strategically ways to win and money is at risk, the ones they are dealing with are a different environment. When someone becomes addicted to gambling, majority will encourage those to stop. But when someone got addicted to trading, they will be even more encourage by others since it's not just about getting profits but the knowledge people will gain by trading can be useful in many ways.

I'm glad that there are people seeking help although they called the wrong line. These people should try to read trading stuffs 101 everywhere and practice it to make it perfect.

Every 4Q of the year, we have always seen BTC having an uptrend. Although past performance can't guarantee future results, reaching $70,000 is possible at the end of the year. But don't get excited nor set a price target to avoid disappointment.

I'm not really excited or expecting BTC to make a rally to $70,000 sooner or later as long it was possible to happen. $70,000 is a realistic price to achieve, that was the most important thing.


Seriously? What proof do you need? Are technical analysis really need on this?

We can't blame those who are trading against instinct if, in most cases, they are winning. Let's be honest here as sometimes, as an experience crypto-enthusiast lurking in crypto-world, we are also ending up trading in instincts especially if we are holding a coin that experiencing an over x100 without any explanation or resource we can rely on the web.

Of course, as long as we know what we are doing, it's totally fine to be like that. But in the case of a total newbie, it's common to see them trading against instinct but should not be a habit.

A basic rule of thumb, any upward trend will be soon will be a downtrend no matter how strong it is.

SHIB is something that can't be pumped to up to x999 with only market hype as the reason. It doesn't mean that everyone should not put their money at the current price but anything from the current price or around is riskier to take.

An experienced trader knows how to play with that trend but for newbies, better not be drove easily with the hype or else...

Partial payment sent thru Binance internal transfer.

80083735401
80083735401
80083735401

Thank you!

That's what I want to see, a close bout. We can expect that Crawford and Porter will give us that expectation.

They are the type of boxers that is not known that focusing on defense. Instead, they are the ones crashing their opponent's defense. It's also the reason why see their records mostly resulted in TKO. That's how great they are. That close counter scene is the most preferred action by the majority of viewers.

We can conclude that sports betting there is the most hype gambling game compare to the usual normal gambling like those luck-based games. The fact that it's now legal, brace for massive gamblers that will place a bet. According to the article here, 45 Million people are expected to place their bets on football alone this season. It shows about 5% of gamblers eventually develop an addiction. That's a huge number.

But on the industry side, legalizing sports betting will result in increased revenue of that state. Checking also to the article I linked, Colorado legalizing sports betting gained $18 million in revenue during the first year. Nevada has more than $61 million. Some of the highest revenue seen in any state that's legalized sportsbooks. It's expected that Arizona will follow too that decent revenue in their first year and so on.

Don't expect much from Terrence Romeo. The guy just came from hurting his hurting Achilles just last month. It's an injury that will not heal just within a month. Even with that, he was still able to play to around 20 minutes on that game. About Cabagnot and Ross, they are off-night. That means the Ka-tropa is doing a good job to contain some of SMB's key players.

But honestly, TNT is not in a good shooting percentage too compare to their usual. I consider them having an off-night too. It's just that they got the last laugh sealing that Game 1 win on their series.

I don't know if you really understand my statement as your response has nothing to do with my post. It's not that people who are addicted to gambling will turn into rampage mode if there's a total ban. That's not totally what I meant but on the whole gambling aspect if ever there will be a total ban of gambling there starting from financial aspects to the economic effect.

If casinos will find others to promote their brand then so be it. As long as they are complying with the new betting ads terms there should be no problem.

I'm from a gambling-friendly country and can access any form of gambling at most.

However, there are gambling forms that are illegal here especially those unregulated ones. But still not a problem as authorities here don't have that sharp fist to become strict. As far as gambling sites concern, we can also access them here without a problem. The only time we can't access a gambling site here is, if that site restricts users coming from this region or country.

I doubt banks will prohibit something against their advantage. More usage of credit cards, the more interest they will get. The hard regulations might be the reason why banks are opting out the credit card transactions on gambling sites because of money laundering or anything along those lines.

But whatever it is, gambling sites should not be affected if credit card transactions will be ban. Also, a right way as some credit cardholders can't resist the temptation of using it more because they can't feel the pressure of hard spending as no money physically is involved.

KYC I think is mandated, especially on the site that OP mentioned, the Draftkings.

According to their terms: "DraftKings, Inc. will take appropriate steps to prevent unauthorized withdrawals from consumer Accounts. Users are subject to an automated Knowledge Base Authentication ("KBA") verification process provided whenever a user attempts to withdraw funds".

Don't know how taxation works there but it should a have tier depending on winnings.

Yes, that's what I said to him. Not making sense to put money on Canelo Moneyline. The current betting odds (outside crypto) was Canelo Alvarez @ -900 and Caleb Plant @ +500. For others to give you a clear view, you need to bet $900 for Canelo to win $100 in return.

If you have that guts to risk some money thinking it's an easy win for Canelo, then up to you to decide. But for me, obviously I will skip on that.

Does Sportsbet always offer outright betting for Philippine Basketball? In Stake, I never see they did it before.

Anyhow, the odds for Game 1 Semis are out now: (stake.com)

Meralco Bolts @ 1.82 vs. Magnolia HotShots @ 1.89
San Miguel Beermen 1.8 vs TNT Katropa @ 1.82

We can conclude that bookies see these games having no underdog or favorites. Almost equal. Betting on Handicaps is the best option here for me.

Russell Westbrook is averaging 11.7 assists per game for 65 games last season. Another one, he is also averaging 22.2 points per game and take note, as a backup and not the main scorer. It's impressive that he is producing that kind of stats with Beal as the ball handler most of the time.

With that stats, LeBron doesn't need to perform most of the PG position and just allows Westbrook to do plays. Fewer loads mean a more comfortable LeBron James which is better as he's not in his prime already. Westbrook will surely follow with the Lakers system just like he did on his previous team.

Just as you said, where there is money, that's where people go. Unfortunately, most people will disregard the "proper research" part of choosing an NFT game as long as it was gone hype and many people are making noise about that project. Many got wrecked because of putting a trust right away on an NFT game that became hyped.

It's the worst thing because many lose their money but on the other hand, the good side is, the next time they will put money again, they are now more educated, strict and will do their best DYOR skills as much as possible.