See that's the advantage of living in a surveillance state... you don't need to bother declaring bank balances in the US except foreign accounts, IRS probably already knows domestic ones

Banks (and e.g. PayPal/Amazon/etc) are supposed to report payment totals (like credit card receipts) above $20k. IRS gets the info, tax payer gets 1099-K or whatever the form is, however you need to pay taxes the same way regardless if you traded above or below $20k so it's a meaningless limit really.

Stock brokers report every cent and are probably pissed at Coinbase/Kraken/et al getting an exception to not do so.

No.

This board uses the new-ish bump system: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5183553.0

There is a bump link/button and also posting in a thread will bump it but only if you have earned merits. Last post date no longer matters.

That old thread was apparently bumped using the bump link.

I don't think leaving the US would allow them to ignore the subpoena. In other words, even if they leave they would still need to hand over the data about past activities conducted with US citizens and residents, at which point they might as well continue doing business and continue snitching on their customers.

These guys? Awesome.



Looks like you're all set. Why do you need our money then?

Maybe if you stopped trying to scam here and did some actual work, you could have more than "0 money".

To be fair, conspiracy theory business might be more profitable than pillows. Just make some shit up, BADecker distributes it, pure profit.

A sample of one doesn't really mean anything, except to people who thrive on anecdotes as "evidence" for their conspiracy theories.

It's not a secret that none of the COVID-19 vaccines are 100% effective but they are effective enough to reduce the spread of the virus to the point where we can reasonably consider it under control.

I can't be bothered to read the walls of text but I'm sure I can do a pretty good tl;dr:

Lauda posts copy-pasta - not plagiarism because <walls of contrived reasons>.

Person unfavorable to nullius posts something - plagiarism because <walls of completely differently contrived reasons>.

There, I saved you all two hours of reading.

I found a picture of nullius:



I hope this doesn't get me banned for plagiarism or doxing.

You're making it sound as if Biden's gonna go and stand in Tiananmen square... unlike Trump, he likely has proper staff for doing things. All Trump did "to stand up to China" was taxing Americans with tariffs and lying that China's gonna pay for it so I doubt Biden can do much worse.

If you have 1000 BTC - sure. In fact, having 1000 BTC would probably be fun enough, no need for NFTs.

But spending the real hard-earned ones... meh.

Lenders are not in the "fundamentals" business, they are in the business of making sure you can repay the loan with interest. Since you're having trouble even moving your supposed collateral to an exchange and it had a recent massive spike, there is a good chance you're either trying to dump it here, or would walk away if the price drops.

Keep in mind that you're the one asking for money here so cut that shit about agendas. I'm not a lender but I have a decent BS detector and some lenders might find it useful or they can just ignore me and give you money anyway. Free market FTW.

Are you serious? The token was below $10 two weeks ago and $1.50 in January. You're asking for a two-week loan and you still haven't told us how many of those tokens you have so I'm guessing ~2 based on the recent spike to $40+ and your valuation of $85.

Is is this one?

https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/livepeer/

How many do you have? You should dump it before the pump ends. Given recent volatility, it's worth probably $5 at best as a collateral. Don't expect lenders to assume your bagholding risks.

Domains are certainly no good here as collateral, and you haven't said yet what your token is and how much you have so it's still unclear if that's a valid collateral either.

I really doubt you can make this work, not with current TX fees. Keep in mind that the lender would need to be able to liquidate your tokens quickly if shit goes south.

The only sane thing the lender can do is send the tokens to their own wallet and they would have to pay the TX fee out of pocket. And then another TX fee to send it back to you if you repay the loan. If you don't pay those fees then the whole thing doesn't make sense.


Same here. You have to cover the fees. You are unable to do it. ERC20 roundtrip will cost $30-40 these days. You can't expect the lender to cover that on a $60 loan.

If you give the wallet to someone else, you still have the original PK/seed so that's not a valid collateral (you still have control of it). If lender has to pay TX fees to get the funds, you would have to cover that cost, so that's no different than doing it yourself.

If you can't send it you won't be able to use at as a collateral. You can't just say "I have it", you have to give the collateral to the lender (or to an escrow).

It's also unclear how it "ran out of gas". The TX was either confirmed or not.

Math?

2.8m * 9.5% = 266k
4.5m * 2.5% = 113k

Just a bit over half, 58% or so, not 95%.

And it might have something to do with this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5235502.0


I don't see how that follows from your data, nor is the traffic doubled: (4.5-2.8) / 2.8 = 61%