The situation gets worse only if the gambler won't stop playing because he is too addicted chasing bonuses rewards. It's a big mistake to play because of bonuses. As I said previously, gamblers should play normally as there weren't any bonuses and extra rewards involved on the process. If they earn something else in the end due to those bonuses that will be an welcome surprise, and that is all, but never the primarly goal of a gambling session.

About sympathy, I think some casinos have some empathy for gamblers, especially the ones immersed in huge losses. I've already seen cases of gamblers who lost money they couldn't afford to lose, so they contacted the casino support and asked for more cashback than the regular cashback another gamblers have access. Depending the situation I know some casinos accept the gamblers' demand, although they don't recover the money entirely, anyway.

For me NFTs are only interesting if they have a practical purpose to exist and if they give benefits to the holder. Pictures' NFTs are worthless and can be easily copied and reproduced with a simple print-screen. There isn't any uniqueness when holding such NFTs. For me it's a pump and dump scheme with the participation of sellers and some buyers aiming to encourage naive investors to purchase the promoted product as well, deluded into believing he is purchasing something really valuable, while in fact it's not.

Besides talents and shape, there is also a mysterious element that take one side or another to the perfect opportunity of scoring in field. There are so many variables that the game isn't exclusively about technique, but also about luck or something similar, that can't be explained. Because how could Saudi Arabia overcome Argentina, and Argentina still reach the finals and win the Cup, if it were all about technique?

There is so much adrenaline and uncertains during the match and players still position themselves in perfect spots to receive the ball and shoot directly to the goal in a second or less. I mean, they don't program anything, it just happens.

Indeed. Many people are earning 50$-60$ a week through signature campaigns and that is considered a decent amount. Here in my country that sum means a monthly minimum wage already, so it's a pretty welcome income. Most people in the world work an entire month to earn 200$-300$, while OP wants to earn that in 4-6 days. I won't say it's impossible, but also not possible through this kind of activity he is looking for.

In the end bonuses are just consolation prizes for gamblers in loss, so part of their losses are diluted thanks to bonuses and cashback received in counterpart. There isn't any strategy to be used to take advantage of such offers. Gamblers just have to play normally, like they would if there weren't any promotions available, without expecting anything back. And if they earn anything extra they weren't waiting for, I'm sure that will be seen as a great surprise.

Giveaways, on the other hand, were the real advantage for gamblers, since they could simply claim a reward without requirements. But they don't exist anymore.

It usually happens when the person is at his comfort zone and don't want to leave it in order to try something new. It's hard to say what must happen to change the behavior, but I guess it's related to an inner discomfort you start feeling with yourself and your currently life conditions, until it becomes unbearable, so you finally find the needed energy to act.

There is also an important factor which influences procrastination on the individual: the quality of the influences around him daily. It can be friends or family. If the influences aren't good, you are going to have more difficult to start doing the things you know you have to do, but you don't, because you lack the energy and initiative.

The system being based on proof is what proportionate people trusting on it.

Proof and trust are connected here and both are needed to make bitcoin workable as currency and widely adopted by a large number of people.

What is the chance of having a group of attacker nodes controlling more CPU power?

I agree with you. Gambling is a hobby for people who have money to spare. Riches and middle class are the ones who can afford gambling without compromising their finances negatively. Poor people who insist in gambling as a way to change their lives are wasting their money and time, as in most cases they earn nothing with this and end wasting the opportunity of investing their little funds in something they could work with and make profit for more gains, leaving the poverty and becoming part of the middle class. Then it would make sense if they started gambling from that moment on.

A good reminder... Every new year there are a lot of taxes and bills to be paid. January is a problematic month from this perspective. But to say the truth, it's quite depressing to think like this during the Christmas Season. It should be a moment of the year where we could celebrate at its maximum with our beloved ones, while in reality it's when our worries start growing in our minds. Well, what comforts me is that every new year is a new hope that is born. It's a new chance to make things different and smartly, so besides thinking about managing your budget to make it last longer, it's also a good moment to think in a solution to increase your income, so next Christmas you don't have to worry about spending less to save money for the next month.

The problem with centralized exchanges is that you will always have to rely on the people behind it to store your money safely. The threat of being scammed will be constant and there won't be peace of mind for the individual storing his funds there, especially if in large chunks. Unfortunatelly regulations have proved to not protect investors efficiently after so many scams that have been seen this year. Scammers CEOs are able to escape from the jail with stolen money on their pockets which is ironically used to pay their lawyers and the bail. Somehow regulations even contribute to those scammers, as we can see. The system is made to favour them.

It makes me think it's very unlikely to have a safe centralized exchange.

Terrible excuse and propaganda when looking for investors...

You claim to have a "way to make money", but at same time you are in debt, because you have been losing money... It can only mean two things: you don't have any method or your method doesn't work.

You have been losing money gambling for a while and now want to recover the losses somehow. I suggest you working. Asking for free money and deceiving potential investors with fake promises definitely isn't going to do the trick.

It's true. We can find different specialists and gamblers on the internet saying Curacao's license doesn't include their participation in disputes between the casinos and gamblers, in case the casino refuses to pay or takes too long to pay. That is why some countries don't allow their citizens to play at Curacao licensed casinos, such as USA, UK, Germany and Netherlands.

Curacao license is great for casinos' entrepreneurs to start their businesses, since it gives them complete advantages, like low costs plus fees and fast acquisition. But for gamblers there aren't advantages, as far as I know.

Poor people are poor for a reason and it's usually for their own fault: for not having initiative to work a little more, for declining doing more effort, for rejecting learning something new, added to the fact they can't control expenses properly and are constantly spending all the money they have on the current moment. Poor people are the biggest spenders and the ones who the least enjoy the money they spend, because they do it almost automatically, without measuring the consequences and how the spending could be more advantageous for them.

Poor people need to change their mindset in order to leave the precarious life they are inserted in. It's totally possible and they surely can, but they have to be strong and show genuine desire to change it at first place! It's an inner battle against themselves everyone has to face sometimes, for different reasons.

Crypto market and bitcoin, more specifically, have gone too far and grown too much to go back to 100$. There are too many companies, developers, workers, investors and enthusiasts involved on this market, what makes it completely impossible to retreat to a stage bitcoin was during its initial years of existence. Bitcoin is taken seriously even by its biggest criticizers because they know the potential of the digital currency. I believe if it were possible for bitcoin to lose so much price, it wouldn't have the respect of the global financial category, like it currently has.

The problem with third world countries is that importation fees are too expensive. And luxury goods like a PlayStation which is relatively cheap in first world countries where they are manufactured, become too expensive for us. Every electronical related goods fall under this category in my case, as they are imported goods and not considered basic need items.

Besides that, there is also the voracious inflation which decreases your purchasing power faster than in first world countries. You can save some money every month, but since we can't save a lot, until we reach a decent amount of money saved (after several months), the initial goal we had in mind will have to be calculated again, taking into consideration how much the currency has been weaken on that time period.

Trump is a famous and wealthy businessman. These people don't have much scruples when the goal is to make money. They change their opinions overnight, if it's going to favour themselves somehow. I also remember when he said he was totally in favour of dollar currency and against bitcoin, because bitcoin could harm dollar on long term, and some time later he said that, his wife started a NFT art pieces campaign accepting payments in SOLANA, and now Trump himself has his own NFT cards campaign as well.

To not contradict his previous statement, he should have launched a physical cards' campaign asking for payments exclusively in dollar, since he is totally in favour of his native currency.

In the past the number of gamblers dealing with cryptocurrency were lower than the currently numbers, especially after the pandemic, when gambling acitivity spiked in the entire world. Crypto gambling websites were archaic and didn't have much attention from regulators, maybe because they didn't see potential threats to the financial systems of their countries back then.

But when crypto casinos got more attention and went mainstream, regulators started controlling it very closely and then KYC became heavily demanded at almost every crypto casinos. That is the price you have to pay for being popular and successful on the business niche where you work. Like Superman said: "With great power comes great responsibility" or "With gambling popularity comes KYC procedure requirement".

A gambler would like to go to a thematic casino he hasn't been before, possibly in another region or country, with accommodation, transportation and food included on the package. It's a very expensive gift to give someone, but that is an ideal one many must dream about.

On the other hand, there are cheaper gifts possibilities as well:
A simple credit of few hundreds of dollar for a gambler to play at the casino of his preference would be already a very welcome surprise for most of them in this Holidays' season.

I think casinos aren't concerned if the IDs provided are false. They simply ask for IDs because that is the mandatory protocol to be followed. If the informations given by gamblers are legit or fake, it's a concern for the authorities to go after those gamblers and punish them also accordingly to the mandatory protocols. With so much technology available I guess it must be really easy to create some fake IDs and pass it ahead as being true. In some time KYC process must become worthless due to the high volume of IDs provided in a global level and the incidence of fakes among them.

A hardworking and communicative merchant selling cheap food at houses can earn more than that daily, but that must be in real world, not on the internet. Not only people with degrees can make a decent income, even the non-educated ones are able too, since they are skilled on what they do and since they work with goods in high demand, easy to be sold. In crypto it's hard to earn that amount of money in a daily basis, because most earning concepts here are based purely on speculation. There aren't real products being sold on most cases. Cryptocurrency is still more like a side-job, if you aren't employee of a company, like exchanges and casinos.