Though your intentions are good but I would consider this complete stupidity. Funds are needed for those people who don't have any money to survive in this world. This is not the case here. People have the money but the doctors don't have any solution yet to defeat Coronavirus. They can only prevent it by wearing masks.
Your argument is even stupider. If they've injected a huge load of money in their economy specifically for this purpose, it means they don't have enough funds to compensate with the costs. Masks aren't of much help - I bet you more than half of those wearing masks are wearing them and/or taking them off the wrong way. Funds can come in help for buying masks, drugs, food and whatever else is needed for the survival of those in quarantine. Funds are needed for those who don't have money to survive but the coronavirus may be deadly to those contacting it, so they're in danger of death. But I don't think sending BTC would be of much help because it needs conversion to actually use it for all the purposes they need money for. It'd be more helpful if funds would be raised in fiat.
|
|
|
I think we've had enough CW and Justin Sun threads on the forum. How many are we going to have?
I don't remember Satoshi being a compulsive liar and faking documents. This alone is enough for me to know the truth. And if he ever proves to really be Satoshi (chances are like 0 but hypothetically), I'd lose all my respect for Satoshi. It'd change everyone's view on him, not just mine..
|
|
|
".. oneday people will identify him but he won't know how they gain points and gain." Indeed. That comment just about sums up what the whole point of having the cryptotalk forum actually is: pointless And to think cryptotalk was being promoted here via signature campaigns all in order to get users to move away from this forum to another which they would control the narrative of. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Honestly, I'd like to thank YoBit for transferring some of the shitposters here to their crappy forum. Let their forum be, it's literally megathreads only with 99.9% of the replies being completely useless. It's like a playroom for shitposters who'd spend 10 hours a day posting crap just to earn $0.5. We don't need them here. Good to know there is a forum for the poopers to get together. YoBit released YODA on their exchange and was sold at over $1 without even knowing the total supply of the coin. Like come on ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) whoever is stupid enough to pay for a coin that most likely doesn't even exist deserves their money to be lost.
|
|
|
I personally think the idea is crap. Whales are winning enough through trades, dumps and pumps. Why the hell would we invent a game for the whales to win against everyone else? It would literally be an easy income and all the other players will not have any chance against them.
What would be a more fair design is the more you bet, the more chances you have to win. Large players will win a few times, but there is always this risk of losing all you have. In other words:
- player 1 bets 0.01BTC - player 2 bets 0.09BTC - player 3 bets 0.40BTC - player 4 bets 0.50BTC
=> player 1 has 1% chance to win, player 2 has a 9% chance, player 3 has 40% chance and player 4 has 50%.
Making it an assured win for those who bet the most is a bad idea.
|
|
|
Oh God, I love these threads. Their forum is literally a trashcan where hopefully all the shitposters here go and play around. I've been there to check out the forum and I barely found a damn topic to reply to.. I've curiously followed the entire YODA thing to see what happens to it. It was basically just hype for nothing - the rich got richer and the poor got poorer, just like it happens all the time. YoBit would probably not be able to financially sustain its business unless it goes through these ICO scams. I've got two tickets there that have been opened years ago and still haven't been answered to ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
For a lil' more laughs, these replies from one of their threads: Many is so curious these days.. "I thing Many want to know who is Satoshi Nakamoto , indeed his name is synonymous with Japanese people but not necessarily also he is Japanese.Really it very mysterious. And Satoshi went missing on Bitcointalk a few years ago. But Someone thinging guessed Satoshi was dead."Do you guys suffer from your vacuums too? "Satoshi Nakamoti is a hero for me because his invention changed my life As well as spent the boredom that I was suffering from the vacuum that I have I spend my time trading bitcoin and cryptocurrencies"Earning points is a mystery even to Nakamoto.. "It Nakamoto said that, oneday people will identify him but he won't know how they gain points and gain."
|
|
|
If you knew how big is their IRC channel lol.
They are one of the largest High-Yield Investment Program on the market.
I almost believed you. Too bad I've accumulated all these lies and put them in a little thread against you. Here's a well-written SCAM accusation from me.
|
|
|
I've done another research just about a week ago, which got very positive feedback from the community but action still hasn't been taken against all the users I've found and accused. Here comes a second research of something different: this time it's not a referral spam but even worse: spamming a scam. At this point, I think I can consider myself the little detective of BitcoinTalk!
I first wanted to publish in their active thread this entire post, but then decided to create my own thread so there could be a history record for their ongoing scam. This is a scam accusation against btc2xreturn, crypto2double, eecbitcoin, xrpdoubler and btc2double. The websites almost identical, only some very small details have been changed. The main idea is, all websites are operating this scam. First of all, they've created a thread for btc2xreturn in the Investor-based games board, this user ( Shaunq) pretending to be their customer leaving a positive review and very excited to receive the double of their balance. According to the archived 2018 version of btc2xreturn, 9498 BTC has been allegedly paid out by them to the investors. It's 2020 and the same amount shows up: 2018: 2020: ![image loading...](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.gyazo.com%2F36f24269fd3a07d600e4b546e275e85b.png&t=663&c=HEgAEoplF5KPlA)
It's literally the same crap. Would be fun if a programmer could take a quick look over the following script I found on btc2xreturn, "<!--Script - Data for Main Table-->": (edit: not needed anymore. I think the entire thread serves enough proof) $(document).ready(function(){ /*Mudanças PHP BD*/ $('.item_type').css('text-transform','capitalize'); /*FIM Mudanças PHP BD*/
var JSONItems = []; function refresh_table(){ console.log("start"); $.ajax({ url: './data.php', method: 'GET', success: function(data) { JSONItems = JSON.parse(data);
var i; var rand_number; var type_def; var raw_amount; var dep_amount; var td_string = ''; var counter = 0; var addr; for (i = 0; i < JSONItems["txs"].length; i++) { if(((JSONItems["txs"][i]).out[0]).addr === undefined){ //console.log(JSONItems["txs"][i].out); for(var j=0; j<(JSONItems["txs"][i].out).length; j++){
if(JSONItems["txs"][i].out[j].addr !== undefined){ addr = JSONItems["txs"][i].out[j].addr; console.log("attrv"); break; } } }
if(addr == null || addr === undefined){ continue; } raw_amount = (((JSONItems["txs"][i]).out[0]).value)/100000000; dep_amount = Math.round((raw_amount + Number.EPSILON) * 100) / 100;
//console.log("t"+dep_amount); if(dep_amount>5 || dep_amount<0.02){ console.log("c"); continue; } //console.log(JSONItems["txs"][i]); rand_number = Math.floor((Math.random() * 10) + 1); type_def = ((rand_number % 2 === 0) ? 'payout' : 'deposit');
td_string += '<tr class="'+ type_def +'"><td '+((type_def === 'payout') ? 'style="color: green;"' : '')+'>' + type_def + '</td>'; td_string += '<td><span class="time" style="display: none">'+JSONItems["txs"][i].time+'</span>'+toDateTime(JSONItems["txs"][i].time)+'</td>'; td_string += '<td><a href="https://blockchain.info/tx/'+JSONItems["txs"][i].hash+'" target="blank">'+addr+'</a></td>'; td_string += '<td>'+dep_amount/2+' BTC <img src="images/btcico.png"></td>'; td_string += '<td class="countdown">08:00:00</td>'; td_string += '<td>'+dep_amount+' BTC<img src="images/btcico.png"></td>'; td_string += '</tr>';
counter++; if(counter === 10){ break; } }
if(counter >= 5){ $("#space tbody tr").remove(); $("#space tbody").append(td_string); $('#space tr td').css('text-transform','capitalize'); }
//console.log(td_string); }, error: function() { console.log("erro"); }, }) }
//setInterval(refresh_table(),1800000); });
function toDateTime(secs) { var t = new Date(1970, 0, 1); // Epoch
t.setSeconds(secs);
return t.toLocaleDateString('en-US') + ' ' + t.toLocaleTimeString('en-US'); }
Then, according to btc2xreturn, their business address is "1-5 High st, ox1 4ab, Oxford, United Kingdom". I'm waiting for a street view image from them pointing to the exact location of their business, because I'm sure a business having worked with ~$100M should have a decent office. The only business I can find at the location their website shows is Lloyds Bank.
In the thread Shaunq has created, there are other users leaving positive reviews for the website. All of them are Newbies and their only posts are answers to Shaunq and btc2xreturn shills. Here are the users: Let's do some research and prove these accounts, together with Shaunq, are just spammers and shills of this scam. Every single one of these users are posting with one line in between sentences. Like come on, this cannot be a coincidence. (edit: I wanted to provide more proof that they're alts, but the rest of the thread is enough imo.. they've all got the same writing style anyway.) Hello,
I'm a new member here and as requested i'm giving my honest review about them.
I'm investing with them for some time and they are very professional and trusted. snip Received the money back.
As promised, all my posts have been deleted.
I request to all people who replied to my posts, delete my text or delete the posts. snip As an older member of Btc2xreturn i received an invitation too. Seems like they are open to public again! ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif) Made an investment few hours ago, i should receive a payment very soon. I will update once i receive. thx EDIT: snip Now let's go further in. These users have all posted in Shaunq's thread, right? Well, guess what - they've also posted in BTC2Double's thread. A quick Google Images search of "BTC2Double scam" results in these images, confirming the fact that BTC2Double is ALSO part of this scam. I went through BTC2Double's thread (which was edited to link to the newest scam website) and the following users are added to my list of alts of this scam (if you check their posts, they're ONLY spamming with fake transactions to create credibility..): To further prove my point, ballejordan's first post was on January 22, 2018 in the BTC2Double thread. "Coincidentally" (obviously not), 11 months later his last post was on December 14, 2018 in the BTC2XReturn thread. They have also bought (or hacked) a Sr Member account here to present credibility on the forum. The hacked/bought member is memphixx. Taking a look over his last posts is enough to notice the gap of activity and the sudden shill of this scam.
I swear to God, this scam is so deeply rooted in BitcoinTalk. The more I research, the more I find.... Just found that they've also created an XRP Doubler website.
Some of their victims:
They're even plagiarizing: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.kym-cdn.com%2Fentries%2Ficons%2Fmobile%2F000%2F023%2F397%2FC-658VsXoAo3ovC.jpg&t=663&c=fJS_dleZQ6ut8g) To finally end this thread, I would like to request a ban for all these shills of the Bitcoin/Ripple/whatever other doubling service scam I've posted above. They've been ongoing for years and they just started being active on the forum again, which means this scam's roots will just develop more and more.
Excuse any mistakes in the thread. This was a pain in the a$$ to research.
I am aware that the existing rules of the forum may not be enough to ban these users. If that is the case, I would like to kindly ask the staff to take this case as an exception, because I think we all can agree that this is not something we want to live on BitcoinTalk.
|
|
|
Still, the link makes it clearly visible on the LTC block explorer. But it can only be traced if BTC address is the same, so some level of privacy is still there but not a lot. Can't you just maintain a bigger balance of BTC on a wallet for some time (I mean have your transactions all on a single address for some months or weeks, you choose) and then, just visit an exchange like Localbitcoins or some gambling websites like Sportsbet or nitrogensports, deposit all your coins there and withdraw from there for free while having all those coins on a fresh new address which cannot be traced without Sportsbet or nitrogensports' revealing - which may never happen?
Before knowing that atomic swaps can be traced, I thought they could be used as a way to anonymize your coins in a decentralized manner. Moving your funds to a platform and then withdrawing to an unused one makes, I believe, no sense. The point of my thread was to share my idea that could lead to the slightest chance of someone being able to find out what happened with your coins. If authorities are having problems with someone's funds source/destination, they will address the issue to the platform which will answer them and make their job so much easier. Aside from that, you're going to risk your funds because the website could steal your money or just ask you for KYC - which, in the scenario of someone willing to anonymize their coins, is exactly the opposite of what I was trying to achieve.
|
|
|
Posts being considered constructive only if they meet a minimum character length would be a bad idea. I think we all know that, although some of us don't post just for the campaign, we're subconsciously putting more effort when writing a post so it would be considered a constructive one by the sig campaign manager.
However, adding a minimum character limit to the posts would turn into everyone writing all the crap possible in their posts while staying on-topic as much as possible, so they could touch that minimum limit. Constructive posts, imo, are posts that have some sense and are not just repetitive ideas to fill a wall of text. Constructive means for me writing my own thoughts when answering someone, so it would clearly be my idea, not others'. If you're really interested in the answer to a topic, you'd write constructive posts without even thinking about it.
Banning boards is subjective. A company willing to promote their website might not be looking for it to be promoted in a certain board. Example: if the website is banned in Romania, they could ban the respective board in order to make users post more on the other boards, because it makes no sense to promote a website and pay members for writing in an area your platform isn't available in.
I think the minimum merit in the past months should be required. It allows the more active and deserving users on the forum to get the spots they deserve. There should be a little bit of competition imo, or we'd have spammers and shitposters occupy some places they don't deserve. But they shouldn't be kicked out if they do not acquire a certain amount of merits per week. Merit earning is subjective to each user, hence you might not receive any merit even if your post is very useful.
The minimum rank limit should stay as it is. Let the websites set a minimum rank for their own campaign. Some campaigns are looking only for very deserving users (ChipMixer) and lowering the limits would only make the campaign threads fill up with hundreds of participation posts (ChipMixer already gets a ton of participation posts from hundreds of users every time there's a spot open - imagine what the board would look like if they had Member accounts the minimum requirement).
Min/max posts/week. They should be up to the promoted platform's owners. If they are willing to pay 100 maximum posts, why would they not do it?
Positive trust requirement would be a mistake imo. Most users I've seen with positive trust have earned it from trades or because they've done something extraordinary for the forum. It would not be fair to other members because I have seen some with 0 positive trust doing more effort for the forum than those with postitive trust above 0.
I've done burstposting before. It's basically writing as many posts as you can to just to hit that max counted posts per day or week and replying to lots of threads (especially megathreads or replying to the last few posts because it's the fastest way to do it) in a short amount of time repeating your same ideas. When it becomes spam, it's easy to notice.
|
|
|
After what happened with the crypto content creators on youtube recently (channels getting striked etc) I do believe that it will take longer and longer before those streams are taken down. Crypto related videos on youtube are getting falsely reported a lot, either by scammers or competing altcoins or content creators, which means that Google has to spend time analyzing the reports manually.
If Google yet again ends up taking (but now serious) action against those scam streams in an automated fashion by their algorithm, I'm pretty sure that they will affect even the non scammy crypto content. In other words, there will only be losers.
I still think that people just need to understand that free money doesn't exist. Sending 0.1BTC to someone that promises you to send 0.5BTC back is just retarded.
Oh come on, if I put up a livestream calling out people to send me $5 in order to receive $50 in return, I bet it would be taken down within minutes. I feel like Google is so strongly against crypto while pretending to help and support the community. Otherwise, if they cared enough, these lives would be shut down almost as soon as they're up and crypto-related vids wouldn't have been deleted. It's common sense. You just take a short look at the list of livestreams impersonating Binance and within a minute you'd get the idea that it's a scam. Let's not victimize Google.
|
|
|
These ratings shouldn't really exist in the first place. A neutral rating is more than enough to warn other users about trolling, spamming, etc.
Right. Forgot for a moment that these are under the Neutral category. People change so we can appreciate them to be good people even if they got doing something illegal in the past.
If scamming is the only intention of that user then he can throw the red-painted account and can start from the new fresh account but someone who really wanted to change their reputation will put efforts to prove them here.
Changing their red trust into neutral can be an option but it all depends on every individual.
If someone's commited a crime, they'll have to live with it. It's up to them if they change or not. Changing to neutral may be an option, but if they had done something severe enough in the past, negative trust should sit there. As I said, in +95% of the cases they're only changing if and after they're caught. Hence, I see no reason I would ever let the community trust them again.
|
|
|
IMO the negative trust should sit on the user's shoulders forever as soon as the user has done anything malicious such as scamming. Most of the time they are only pretending to change for the better just because they've been caught. Otherwise, they're going to keep scamming until someone stops them. Therefore, negative reviews should be stored in their history.
Even if the user changes for the better for real, there still has to be a little question mark above their credibility. Once a cheater, always a cheater - this is a fact more often than not.
However, negative trusts for trolling and other things that aren't very severe and did not directly affect other users could be changed/removed.
|
|
|
Buffett is probably going to regift that Tron/bitcoin to one of his grandkids, as I'm sure he has no interest in it whatsoever--though I'm sure he appreciated the sentiment behind it. Ultimately it doesn't matter what Buffett's opinion on crypto is, since he made his fortune with other investments and doesn't need to invest in bitcoin (or Tron). I wouldn't underestimate his knowledge of crypto's function, however. Buffett is no fool and knows a lot about economics, money, finance, and a lot more. And at this point in his life why would he possibly ruin his rep with something he is unfamiliar with. Crypto is a millenial thing, not a roaring 20s thing lol
He was born after the roaring 20s--just sayin'. Nor do I think he'd be ruining his reputation by investing in crypto. The fact is that he just doesn't see the need for it, as you mentioned. I'd be interested to know what happens to the crypto-gift that he got from Sun, but I'm pretty sure there won't be any followup on that. He's got enough of the top economy influencers in the world around him to know at least the basics of cryptocurrencies. Of course he doesn't see the need for it - check out his portfolio and you'd know why. He's a heavy investor in banking systems and, working with banks and with the system for so many decades, his opinion most likely cannot be changed. He's going to support the system because it's what made him become the billionaire we know today.
|
|
|
Cashless society sounds great when linked to Bitcoin. Otherwise, it's terrific.
First of all, why would they switch from fiat to Bitcoin in order to go cashless when they have bank accounts that are holding virtual money? Switching to BTC, especially in China where laws regarding Bitcoin are very strict and there is only one ATM in the entire country AFAIK, would be a pain in the ass.
Merchants are looking to boost their sales. Switching to Bitcoin and leaving fiat behind would kill your business.
|
|
|
What's the use of the smartphone if you will adapt it in a smartwatch? That's useless, although smartwatches are more handy. But if you have a smartphone, you don't really need to buy a gadget that also have features in a smartphone, because that's a waste of money. But if you don't want to be hassle when you go out with your friends, it is preferable to use smartwatch. But being practical bitcoin holder, smartphones are more secured and safe when having transactions in bitcoin. Also the screen of smartwatch are most likely small and it is hard to read, in transactions, to ensure things before sending it into a wallet address is very necessary, so it is risky to use smartwatches.
Well, then.. why use a smartwatch for messages and calls when you have a smartphone that has the same features. Right? Practicability is the answer to your question. But practical doesn't always mean secure. As I said, the smartwatch screen could act as a "Receive" QR code display for ease of use, as it would be easily accessible within the tap of a finger. Another problem comes with usage though. You will only probably use the app on your smartwatch once every few months.. You don't use it everyday.
|
|
|
Oh crap. I guess I shouldn't be surprised, but damn. Who in their right mind would send bitcoin to an address in a Youtube video, even if the channel is claiming to be that of Binance? Hopefully that didn't represent the person's life savings.
For some people it's enough to see the little check next to a name to believe the channel is legit. I wouldn't send my money to a giveaway, it's against the common sense. If you want to do a giveaway, it makes no sense to make me pay for it. Anyways, this is sad because too many are still falling victims for it and these hackers still find ways to proceed with their scams and make people trust them. Without the necessary education to find out what's legit and what isn't, falling victims to them is easy. I just wonder when the hell is Google going to take action and stop these streams.
|
|
|
Și eu cred că se vor liniști. "Ei" vor face un cadru legal făcut mai cu capul (sper că apropiat de cel nemțesc, unde dacă ai ținut monezile mai mult de 1 an nu se mai impozitează!!), iar "noi" o să fim mai cuminți la plătit taxele. Că na, până la urmă asta e normalitatea.
"unde dacă ai ținut monezile mai mult de 1 an nu se mai impozitează" Ha, ce glumă bună! ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Fomiștii ăștia nu mai știu de unde să tragă bani spre stat că parcă-parcă mai merge ceva de furat de la popor.. Speranța mea că ne vom apropia de nivelul nemților a dispărut de mult. Sunt foarte, foarte curios legat de felul în care aceste instituții vor analiza și cerceta să vadă care câți bani are în monede virtuale.. Și mai amuzant (teoretic, că practic te cam rupe o situație de genul) e faptul că în orice moment poate cineva să îți fure banii, să facă o plată folosindu-se de aceștia și mare mirare de nu ar crede fiscul că tu ai fost cel care a făcut plata. Succes să demonstrezi ceva ce nu ai cum să demonstrezi. O altă situație de căcat în care poți să intri dacă ai un "prieten" care să-ți facă puțin rostul? (situație puțin probabilă, dar ipotetică) Comandă cineva, folosind datele tale, de pe internet și plătește o sumă exorbitantă în numele tău. Succes să demonstrezi că nu ai fost tu cel care a beneficiat de acele bunuri. Mie de asta mi se pare că nu prea au cum să găsească mare lucru.. Da, să zicem că o plată se face în numele meu. Și? Cum demonstrezi ceva printr-o adresă care efectiv nu are nici o legătură cu identitatea mea? Furtul de identitate, dacă ai auzit de el, poate avea un rol foarte mare și grav în situațiile menționate mai sus. Atâta timp cât nu ai făcut în așa fel încât să îți legi identitatea ta de adresa de monede virtuale, nu văd ce mare lucru pot ei să facă.. fie și cu cea mai avansată tehnologie de pe piață. Eu momentan n-am de plătit nimic.. acuș fac un deceniu pe crypto și încă nu m-am atins de niciun bănuț. Aștept și eu acea minune cu legea dată de nemți, dar speranțele sunt undeva la aproximativ 0.
|
|
|
So I was surfing through YouTube and something caught my eye. A subscription to Binance exchange. I knew I was not subscribed to it, so I decided to investigate. This is something I've never seen before. Geohistory, a great channel with historical events explained through maps, has clearly been hacked, and the channels are now called Binance. Apart from that, they are broadcasting right now what is clearly a scam scheme. Here's one of the broadcasts: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqN5GwYVDLI. Has there been any reaction from Binance yet? The impostors did not only hack the creators I liked, they are spoiling the reputation of a great exchange. Is there anything we can do to help stop this? I'll try contacting Binance via a chat support on their website. The reputation of Binance isn't what is at stake here. It's people's money. Someone just sent a 0.2BTC tx to the address they've placed in the video. For reference in case the video goes down, this is basically most likely a hacked verified YT account someone took over and started a Live on, changing the channel name and everything as if it's Binance's. The BTC address in their video is: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/3Asy3jfxQ6NDDRdUmfQ5CA4UNSL2agBELqThe ETH address in their video is: https://etherscan.io/address/0x03209fc3305f22226fba633d23498ecbf41896a0I took a look over their ETH address and apparently two addresses have moved funds FROM Binance to this ETH wallet. At first glance, I thought I could track down the address (I initially thought the hackers withdrew money from their own accounts to this address), but I was wrong. WalletExplorer is of no help in the research of the two addresses. In fact, this is not the only livestream on YouTube that's scamming people. Go to this search query and you'll find a ton of these fake livestreams: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=give+away+btc&sp=EgJAAQ%253D%253DI have contacted Binance a few minutes ago to let them know about the ongoing scams, providing them the necessary links. They will probably ban these addresses from withdraws so their users cannot send funds to them, and the YT accounts/videos will be reported. At least that's what they told me. Other than that, there's nothing we can do unless we take all addresses and try to somehow link them to the owner (scammer). What happened is.. the Twitter scammers have moved to YouTube.
|
|
|
The moment satoshi becomes 1 dollar (which might happen of course) there will be people using bitcoin everywhere, and I mean literally everywhere. In order for 1 satoshi to be equal to one dollar the price of per bitcoin has to be insane, that could only happen if people around the world all together starts to see bitcoin as a payment. And I don't mean like "oh a card company in japan that accepted in 260k stores just listed bitcoin as a payment" type of deal, I mean literally accepting bitcoin just like they accept cash, that type of adoption. We can be assured that something like that will not happen anytime soon, maybe one day it will happen but it will take a long time for it to happen, at least a decade long adoption increase could potentially reach us to that level.
Even if BTC would be used everywhere, it wouldn't possibly reach $100M. According to rankred, there is about.. say approximately $40 trillion in the world, including physical and virtual fiat. $2.1 quadrillion is just too much and is most likely only possible in a Hungarian pengo-like situation of fiat inflation. At that point, you could literally use dollar bills to wipe your ass. It would be worthless (it already is, but whatever)..
|
|
|
|