Has anyone been able to successfully deposit/withdraw Qora from Poloniex or Bter. I'm approaching 4 weeks now and still deposit credit. Meanwhile, their address they provided me is generating blocks.
@devs - just to confim, there are no pending issues that are being directly communicated between Bter, Poloniex and yourselves?
go ahead and open a scam accusation. this is unbelievable. they're not in contact with the devs either |
|
|
|
I'd say it's a great time to stop gambling and to work on your addiction  |
|
|
|
|
this is just another bitcoin-double scheme. you will get scammed, be very careful.
|
|
|
|
but there's a confirmation  at least your transaction cleared. better add a higher TX fee for the time being |
|
|
|
Address 17ABrUpBNURhgiSfTuRvtpMDEXwivcdCZ has 0.991871 BTC in it, if it isn't showing up in your wallet there's something wrong with the wallet.
oooo At first i was sure that 17ABrUpBNURhgiSfTuRvtpMDEXwivcdCZ isnt my wallet. but when i clicked "change addresses" i saw it....but why did this transation happened without me doing it? change addresses are used for security. each time you send bitcoin the remaining balance will be split to change addresses. |
|
|
|
A normal (1 input - 1 output - regardless of the amount of BTC send) tx is about 0.6kb --> min 0.0003 BTC in tx fee
Wrong. A typical 1 input - 1 output tx is 192 bytes. A more typical 1-2 or 2-1 is about 226 bytes. (Compressed keys, not multisig.) 0.0001 BTC fee is fine for both. High priority transactions will still confirm with no fees. I stand corrected. Still. Enjoy waiting 18hours for your transaction with 0.0001 BTC fee to get confirmed in the current conditions! The going rate at the moment is much higher. indeed. it's better to set a higher tx fee for as long as this attack goes. even $0.20 in fees is nothing compared to other payment processors |
|
|
|
|
If you want something secure check out ninki or greenaddress. both are relatively easy to use and offer good security.
|
|
|
|
mempool is at close 80mb and 95k transactions. what's the critical number for nodes to go down?
RAM. Restart the node and you delete all pending transactions and start from scratch! oh it's that easy? thanks, wasn't aware of this. so it's no problem for nodes, at least |
|
|
|
|
mempool is at close 80mb and 95k transactions. what's the critical number for nodes to go down?
|
|
|
|
any one knows when is the next stress test going to be ? i would like to be ready before sending out any transactions with manual fees last time i was stuck for like 6 hours with no confirmations.
Only 6 hours? Hahaha dude, i am waiting for more than 48 hours now and still not even one confirmation, WTF  uhh, did you pay some TX fee? can you please post here TX of transaction? this seems very unlikely to me tbh. during last test, I tried by myself to sent 0.1BTC with 0 tx fee and it was done in 15 hours.. Here it is, 49 hours and counting,the fee was 1114 satoshis. I dont know should i laugh or cry hahaha your tx fee is very very low... this could take some time. even without an attack I know and i regret now. Is it possible to undo things? to send somehow a bigger fee for that transaction? sorry if it is a stupid question but I am desperate. Nope. Bitcoin transactions are irreversible just so you know. You have to wait for days or possibly weeks for that to confirm. In some cases, it takes a couple of weeks before a transaction is confirmed, especially if the sender put no fees for it. in theory, he could just double spend it with a higher fee. if it goes through the other one will be invalid |
|
|
|
1NyauX8cGqPG16bAByFBabsivSZ8f71Xju
I will sign a message from this address in case my account is hacked/lost.
you should sign it now so that the public knows you're the actual holder of the key |
|
|
|
It's an attack at this point guys... We need to do something.. increasing the block size is not the right path. Dynamic fees IMO are the way.
We already have that. Bitcoin core does a pretty good job to determine the fee for a given block the TX should be in. but it doesn't force them. I think that was his proposal. but I'm not sure if that's the final solution |
|
|
|
any one knows when is the next stress test going to be ? i would like to be ready before sending out any transactions with manual fees last time i was stuck for like 6 hours with no confirmations.
Only 6 hours? Hahaha dude, i am waiting for more than 48 hours now and still not even one confirmation, WTF uhh, did you pay some TX fee? can you please post here TX of transaction? this seems very unlikely to me tbh. during last test, I tried by myself to sent 0.1BTC with 0 tx fee and it was done in 15 hours.. Here it is, 49 hours and counting,the fee was 1114 satoshis. I dont know should i laugh or cry hahaha your tx fee is very very low... this could take some time. even without an attack |
|
|
|
why not implement fee rules? like if a tx is under a certain threshhold it MUST offer a fee
This is already a soft rule. The priority is calculated from the sum of (input size multiplied by age) and divided by transaction size. Spam usually use young inputs as well, making the priority very low. If the priority of a transaction is too low, Bitcoin Core won't relay it at all if it doesn't offer a fee. Certainly not mine it. I see. but it won't stop the mempool from being filled. shouldn't this affect nodes at some point? what's the critical mass to shut a node down in terms of mempool size? |
|
|
|
20MB blocks would solve this  Probably not, and certainly not without generating other problems. We only know for sure that larger blocks will have room for more malicious spam and slow everything else down. why not implement fee rules? like if a tx is under a certain threshhold it MUST offer a fee |
|
|
|
Carillo said she thinks she knows who the owner is through doing Internet searches. "As far as I know, it's that guy who runs Bitcoin," she said. That's like a closing line from an Onion article. Yeah she really needs to delete that line. it's fine. it seems everyone from this state has issues. homero would write exactly the same bullshit line |
|
|
|
someone should tell them about stuart frasers involvement. could make another nice headline |
|
|
|
This isn't a stress test anymore boys it's an attack to convice us to fork.
Gavins plan is just way to aggressive.
I would agree to a doubling every 4 years to ensure the hardware advances well faster than the chain.
The plan can be changed is the hardware doesn't keep up. It is important to ensure the network keeps up with the transaction volume assuming Bitcoin continues to go mainstream. If the doubling ins't needed or isn't possible then I am confident it can be delayed. We can't be hard forking every other month man.. wasn't there a dust threshold that prevented tx spam like this? or did they patch it out? |
|
|
|
instead of trolling people you could just use something easy like antiblock.org |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
