Instead of a drop down menu, perhaps just type the three letter code for the coin/token which would narrow down the selection (i.e. type "S" and all codes with "S" appear, type second letter "X" and just those with "SX" appear).

---

---

Just a side question are you open to a suggestion for something else on a fresh page?  I have an idea but I don't code/have the resources to do it.

It's not up to @Tnt1971 to prove there is no connection, it's up to _you_ @BTC_Mouse to prove there is a connection and so far you haven't done so.

Newbies are so cute when it's obvious they are just sock puppets...  Why wouldn't you just start a new thread asking your question instead of necro-bumping other threads?

Technically both LoyceV and ( @suchmoon and/or @ibminer ) have altered the entries on their reciprocal sites - with good intentions I'm sure.

In LoyceV's case just recently there was the weekly trust list which was a duplicate of the previous week owing to the weekly run being done *before* theymos had run the list.  LoyceV then deleted the entire week's results and re-ran the sweep hours later (thus giving different results)

In the case of BPIP I'm not sure if it was suchmoon or ibminer on the edit button, but entries have occurred then been removed such as has occurred over the last (about two months) in the Trust Log page whenever a user removes their DT trust list - it is shown (I might be paraphrasing here) "the user has lost the ability to vote for DT2..." and then a long list of "X" no longer trusts/distrust this/that user" (again, another paraphrase)...  Those entries are then removed manually, or at least they were done manually at one point...

There are actually two things happening in conjunction with each-other which infulences the price of withdrawing (cashing out) from any casino:

• The price of bitcoin is rising
• unconfirmed transactions have from time to time recently pushed the TX price sky high.

The problem with the latter is users who do not engage coin control, or, worse still, are unable to utilise coin-control due to their choice of wallet program.

It's no skin off of my nose when the bookies payout on the POTUS wager, but I'm wondering if there was any disclaimers made by any of the gambling sites to say they wouldn't payout until the 20th of January which is when it looks like some sites are wait for to ensure they get their payouts right.

(and do these sites assert they have funds on hand to actually pay out the wagers one way or the other?)??

@Tnt1971 - please modify your post so that it looks like the above with three dots as there is no need to quote the entire post we have already seen.

As you can see by this post:


Doubts were raised at the time and the poster, @BTC_Mouse has not come back to this thread to clarify their assertion (which I find to be flimsy at best).

I will PM @BTC_Mouse to come back to this thread to respond to this.

All five of their posts since they registered two days ago is to bump similar services, so it's *possible* they are bumping their own services using a new UID (and if they are nuked/banned by an over zealous admin/mod, then their main UID isn't affected)

Does anyone know when the trial for that guy (who has name suppression) (who is a former employee of Cryptopia) who was arrested for stealing crypto from Cryptopia more than a year ago is going?

I'm surprised no one in this thread has picked up on it as yet.

From what I can tell it appears as though the various wagers for one topic are from shortest to longest odds and adjust accordingly.  I've got two bets that'd payout nicely if BTC gets that high.


Thanks - I can't imagine what 2021's price range might look like...  (merits won't go astray either  )

$ 30k - $ 35k at the end of 2021 ??

But you wouldn't do it hundreds of times though.  Or, to threads that haven't been posted in for months if not years ??

And just like that @Rainbowsky has been banned after-all.

I wonder how long it will be before there are alts CH style echo-chambering each-other concerning Rainbowsky??

Has the method of counting trust scores changed?  I'm certain I've seen where a user has two or more trust feedback from the same user and the reciepient appears to have 20, 30 whatever scores reflecting (instead of counting just one from each person) - (and I'm talking about on the Forum pages, not the BPIP site)

---

---

Another example of how you can boost your personal score is to become and admin or mod and then start moving threads backwards and forth leaving "this thread has been moved to <name> section." posts.

An example of that is Lauda's early posts (into the hundreds, if not thousands) are like that. e.g. LINK Archive [1a], [1b]

Something for the BPIP team to factor in when counting such scores.

Sorry if this has been asked previously, but in the bitcoin price for the end of 2020, there doesn't seem to be a $25,001 to $25,500 band to place bets on:



As you can see, there's a $24,001 to $25,000 and a $25,501 to $27,500 bands, but none for that sweet spot $25,001 to $25,500 (I can't sort the wagers on their ascending or descending prices, but have scrolled back and forth a few times and can't see it anywhere)

You really need to take a chill pill, have a nice walk in the park and feel refreshed.

Here's an image from bing.com which is today's image.  Imagine a tranquil place such as this.



Have a nice day.

That's a very lame excuse (and a very old one at that) - try coming up with something a little more original next time.

Hi and thank you for this week's payment.  I was wondering if I can change my wallet address for payments to the following:


as I've upgraded to core version 20

Thanks again,

I can see that being left open to abuse with users simply using the site to exchange their crypto to another coin without actually engaging in any game plays (or very little to give the illusion of gaming) - tracking IP's should go a little way to keeping tabs on punters who are just swapping crypto4crypto

You're crying because of NEUTRAL trust feedback that I left some ten months ago?


Dry your tears, here's a part of why I think know you're manipulating the system:

---

---

Week 56 I distrust you.

Week 58 you create a trust list of ten UID's

Week 86 after nine users have distrusted you in the proceeding thirty weeks, you in one week add sixteen UID's to your distrust list, of the nine who distrust you, you in turn distrust eight (a fraction over 90%)  -  I doubt you could claim you didn't know about the DT system and "just happened to pick the eight at random".

KYC might slow things down a little.  (OR 2FA at the very least)

One "main" account plus one "mobile" account for account recovery/ban appeal etc.  Any other accounts for a specific purpose such as alt coin [ANN], ICO or similar should carry an entry on the profile page of which UID is behind the curtain pulling the strings.

Officially outlawing the sale of UID's (not just turning a blind eye because it's gone off site for the most part) would go a long way to restoring order and accountability.

Banned should be just that.  Temporary suspensions should have a different name to avoid confusion and successful ban appeals should be documented in their own thread.