I wish they would hold off for a year publishing this stuff on major financial news networks to give me time to accumulate more. But this is good news to see it reported on in a positive light like this. If it keeps up we can expect some positive action on the bitcoins and maybe even alt coins seen.
I havent seen a positive article on bitcoin in a bit, too much negative stuff going on with stuff like the silk road trial and the evolution exit scam. hopefully more stuff like this pops up. |
|
|
|
|
id like to purchase a key, pm sent.
edit: great trade, he even went first, key worked fine. would recommend.
|
|
|
|
Those scans ain't trustworthy. yup, the only way to be completely sure is to post the source code and let people go through it to inspect it, and compile it themselves. Maybe just me but has anyone experienced your account automatically tipping a user after using this bot?
this is exactly the type of stuff that can happen with shady malware such as this, wouldnt recommend anyone download this without source being posted. |
|
|
|
|
Great to see bitcoin expanding into more commercial industries, I think it will take a long time before it happens in the US though with the homeland security act and the reputation of bitcoin though.
|
|
|
|
Interesting. How did you find out that they are looking for people related to BFL? And stoopid noobie question here, what is BFL?  at least take a minute of time to read it before asking....  BFL, or butterfly labs, is a company with a huge scandal associated with it; they advertised ASIC miners then kept pushing back the promised shipping dates, and most customers did not receive any products in the end. huge case of fraud for tens of millions of USD. |
|
|
|
I am using it more, basically because I have a lot more than I did last year, and can't afford spending a bit more.
I would use it daily if my wage was paid on BTC.
There is actually a service that does that, not sure if its offered for your employer, but its worth checking out: https://www.bitwage.co/Why would he even need to use that? Just buy an amount of bitcoins every month instead. It might be safer not to get your whole wage in btc as well due to fluctuations and at least you can decide how much you want to invest in bitcoin per month. convenience maybe? some services are based on people being too lazy to do something themselves after all, like account buying/selling in league of legends, people are too busy to level smurf accounts themselves. |
|
|
|
I am using it more, basically because I have a lot more than I did last year, and can't afford spending a bit more.
I would use it daily if my wage was paid on BTC.
There is actually a service that does that, not sure if its offered for your employer, but its worth checking out: https://www.bitwage.co/ |
|
|
|
hopefully he can,
Any idea how far away i am to sr ?
accounts become senior members at 240 activity i believe. Thanks for d answer another question : what is fastest way to get activity ?  there is no fast or easy way, activity increases by a set 14 every two weeks; just keep posting and activity will increase steadily. |
|
|
|
hopefully he can,
Any idea how far away i am to sr ?
accounts become senior members at 240 activity i believe. |
|
|
|
|
that sounds like a simple martingale, simplest solution is to just use primedice's built in autobet and set it to 100% increase on loss, return to base on win. no need to do anything if the functionality is already there.
|
|
|
|
In regard to this topic, interesting post from satoshi from way back:
The eventual solution will be to not care how big it gets.
Reference |
|
|
|
Sorry to break it to you guys but they don't give a rats ass about small time scammers. My guess is that they are looking for whales who are holding large sums of coins. That is just my guess, but they care more about getting their slice of the pie than catching petty crooks.
yup, looks like most of what the feds are looking for is anything affiliated with big time scammers, BFL in particular. The upper and middle management of BFL needs much-needed jail time.
Much deserved jail time, and took way too long for this to happen as well. |
|
|
|
|
this isnt exactly a service youre offering here, try market > digital goods.
|
|
|
|
so we are at almost 2 tx per second(1.7 average) with this new record, it is indeed the time to move on with the tx limit, because the next spike could reach 200k easily
the chart also show perfectly, why one should not look only at the price, others indicators like this are constantly ignored, they are more tied with what will be the future of bitcoin, than anything else
at the same time, it really shows the growth of bitcoin with the constantly increasing number of transactions; all this "bitcoin is dead" FUD is just nonsense. |
|
|
|
|
i believe the formula was something along the lines of 148*(inputs)+34*(outputs) +10
so in this case with your address, there are 16 inputs and 1 output, along with the fixed 10 added to the size.
so in this case, 2368+34+10=2412 bytes, meaning you would need 0.0003 in transaction fees to send that transaction with multibit's default settings of 0.0001 fee/1000 bytes.
youre just a tad short
|
|
|
|
|
you shouldve read the sticky.
amount needed:
amount to be repaid:
reason:
collateral offered
basic info for requesting a loan.
|
|
|
|
|
great new signature designs by the way, love em. any plans for an avatar campaign 2.0 as well?
|
|
|
|
The entire consensus belief is the root of all this trouble. Do you think a company relying on "employee consensus" could have competed with a business with Steve Jobs as the helm. That's impossible.
A consensus model leads to nothing more than a circle jerk of inaction. Its sounds good on the surface, but in the real world it has never worked. I am unable to find a single example of how a consensus system has succeeded. What does work, is the "illusion of consensus" because it attracts users.
i see your point; the idea of "consensus" does tend to create a hivemind of sheeple, but still, no use panicking over it all, just going to sit back and watch what happens. |
|
|
|
|
Agreed; people are overreacting every bit of news bitcoin is associated with, especially over this fork vs anti-fork debate. Time will tell what the popular consensus will be, no use preaching "the end is near" until we know what'll happen.
|
|
|
|
|
I would have to agree that increasing the block size is the best solution; even though id rather just sit by and watch the "gavin this gavin that fork this fork that" drama unfold, i still have to agree the block size should e increased at some point in the future to facilitate the growth of bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
