Everyone has his day in court. If he had his head screwed on, he would immediately require that his accuser be sworn in and that he be sworn in as well. This would eliminate all the cases where the plaintiff is the government, because the plaintiff government can't be sworn in. Government is only paperwork, and paperwork can't take the oath or affirmation and get on the stand.

From prison, it is difficult to do anything in law at a later date. In prison, you need to sign paperwork giving a friend or relative the power of attorney for you regarding you false imprisonment. They need to re-open your case, or file a new one, where a harmed or damaged person must come before the court. It is more difficult, but it can be done.

One of the greatest words in law is "property." Let the one in prison sign paperwork that he has been the property of his relative since the two of them were alive. Then, let the relative require his property returned to him, and get a surety bond in case the government is afraid that the one in prison is dangerous to the outside world.

This process for getting a friend or relative out of prison can take as little as two weeks. Remember one thing about this. If you get your friend out, you are responsible for his actions. Don't do it if he is dangerous, or you might wind up in prison for something he does bad after you get him out.

The thing that is a crime in the legal world, is not necessarily a crime in the lawful world - in America, Canada, Britain, and Australia, and a few other places around the world. It is only a lawful crime if there is harm or damage done.

The accused needs to require that the accuser get on the stand (in court) and speak into the record under oath, the damage or harm that was done to him by the one accused. The damage or harm must be evident. And there must be a tie-in from the accuser to the one accused... evidence and a witness that the one accused did it.

If the accuser is wrong in his accusation, the accused can require payment in the amount that would have been required from him.

However, if the ignorant person who is accused doesn't know this, he isn't going to require anything from his accuser, and he will lose. The prisons are filled with ignorant people who have been sent there with nobody having been harmed or damaged.

See http://voidjudgments.com/.

I would agree if you had said, regarding gods, "many" or "most."

The laws of science might be false, and it may be proven to be false sometime. For example, the simple law of gravity is true. We all see the evidence, and there is no evidence that it is lacking somewhere that we know of for a fact. But it just might be proven that gravity is something else sometime, like inertia in an expanding universe that is accelerating in its expansion. So far, not, though.

The laws of cause and effect, complex universe, and universal entropy show that God exists when combined. Whatever and Whoever God is, He exists, and that without mankind.

When the scientific laws can be proven false, then we might be able to say that God doesn't exist from a scientific standpoint.

Well, I can't show you how God gave and gives His prophets authority. The best I can do is tell you how to find out about it. The way you find out about it is to read the whole Bible. Read it in a modern translation of it in your "best" language. If that isn't enough, study how the Bible came into being, and all about the nation of Israel from its first beginnings.

Now that you mention it, I might have seen pictures of it before.



Because everything DOES revolve around religion, and because all people are liars.

Why do you ask if I am retarded? My IQ has a limit, just the same as everyone.

What does my parents' love for me have to do with anything? Besides, their love and their ability to show it are two different things. Can anyone get into the hearts of his parents to check out the depth of their love for him?

You ask some strange questions.

Okay. I'll say it real simple. The prophets of God are given authority by God.

If a prophet is not given authority by God, he is not a prophet of God.

There are multitudes of prophets around. Look at all the financial gurus who try to predict what will happen in the money markets. Some of these prophets are appointed by other people. Some of them appoint themselves.

Is that what you were looking for?

Is your avatar what you really look like? Or is it only part of your religion?   

Doesn't seem to do any good to answer the question. You don't read the answer. I am responding with this post, in case I didn't understand what you were saying, or if you were saying it to me. Ah, please clarify what you mean... if you want.

However, even if conditioning is continued, generally it weakens enough and finally fails over time.

Some of the best conditioning is done by violent converting to Islam, which uses Stockholm syndrome. But even this doesn't always last.

Astrology is just another religion.   

The beginning of Psalm 14:

And when you die, you lose control of your narrative.   

Oh, you and all your silly assumptions about the facts that I offer.     

On the authority of God, working through Moses, to do miracles through Moses, which destroyed the people of Israel who didn't do what Moses said.

The orders that Moses gave for future prophets said, that if what the prophet said didn't come to pass essentially every time he prophesied something, he was not a prophet of God. Many so-called prophets died at the hands of the people of Israel who realized that the prophet was a false prophet by the fact that the things he said didn't come true.

Saint Paul in New Testament times did a few miracles that showed he had the power. Some of the miracles were against bad people. That's what it is all about. The power.

Check the history of the Bible and Israel in detail to see that the Bible has the power.

In a lot of ways, yes. And so are the rest of the people.   

Tsk, tsk. How you talk! Just be glad God doesn't take your freedom away for how you misuse it.

How's the statistics for how many before-prison atheists find religion when inside?

As far as Christians doing worse than atheists (if your statistics are even accurate), the devil already has the atheists. He doesn't need to work so hard on them. He is trying to get the Christians, so he focuses on tempting them. Since Christians are only people, they often fall for this greater tempting to do wrong. Doesn't mean they are less saved as Christians... or that atheists will be saved at all as long as they remain atheists.

Turn while you can, and be saved for eternal life. As it is, you are throwing your freedom away.

Jesus was God as well as man.

Jesus-God spoke the universe into being.

Moses and the other prophets of the Bible were told by God spiritually what to write.

When a person doesn't know the history of the Bible and the nation of Israel, it is easy for him to think that God hasn't spoken through these people. But those who have studied the Bible and how it came into being, along with the nation of Israel and its history, realize that these things couldn't have come into being without God making them to exist.

Yes, but. An atheist believes in freedom. If he didn't, he wouldn't freely do the things that religions say you shouldn't... like raping.

The trouble with atheists is not in that they love freedom. Loving freedom is great. Their problem is that they don't realize how using their freedom to rape (for example) actually takes their freedom from them. They start to realize it when they are thrown into prison, where they lose a lot of their freedoms.

Now, I am not saying that all atheists are rapists by any means. I am not even saying that the majority of atheists lack understanding of how to be free in a general way. I am simply saying that their idea of freedom from God isn't really freedom. Why not? Because, just like theists, they are not smart enough to know how to live freely except that they go to God for the instructions God has placed in the Bible.

As I attempted to say above, here, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1418441.msg14607732#msg14607732, neither science, nor religion, nor the science religion explain everything in detail.

Science is limited mostly to things that are not important. Science doesn't explain the most important things, the souls and spirits of people, and the spirits of animals and plants... although scientists are finally trying to apply science to these.

But religion talks mostly about these important things.

Neither has the theoretical detail down in a factual way that can be tested. If science has such, it is theory no longer. Rather, it is fact.

Since science has proven that God exists, we can base our religion on faith in what God tells us. This doesn't prove something that God says to be true. But that is what religion is all about... faith, not proof

Science theory that is believed in as truth is religion by the believing, same as other religions... by the believing in something that has not been proven to be factual.

No, religion doesn't explain everything about the world. For example. Show me where Christianity talks directly about that one weed growing between the cracks in the pavement outside your apartment. No explanation exists about that weed in the Christian religion. A broad generalization might exist, wherein the weed might or might not exist. But religion falls far short of explaining everything about the world. Why does it fall far short? Because that isn't what religion is there for.

Science is there to explain everything about the world. But it does not. Science is not internally consistent. For example. There are 3 major Big Bang theories that are all different. There are 4 Black Hole theories that are distinctively different. There are scientists who understand that none of these have been proven to be fact. There are other scientists, some of which believe in each theory. There are still other scientists that believe the theories aren't true, but that something like them is true.

Science is picky in the detail area. Because of this, when it doesn't find all the details, it is almost useless.

Religion covers the broad generalities. Religion is better than science, because religion shows all sorts of things that science will never be able to show, because of the complexity of nature, the universe, and life. That's the reason why many scientists have turned science into a religion for themselves, by believing in parts of it that have not been proven to be fact.

Just like other religion, scientists have turned science into religion, hopeful and believing that parts of science are true, when in reality these parts have not been proven to be true... just like religion.