I see there are a lot of vip's and players that are eligible to play the daily lottery, but don't even know about it or the forum Lottery thread hereForum here5PM -- 0.06 bitcoin is up for grabs and if there is no winner, tomorrow there will be 0.07 bitcoin up for grabs .. But to reach that VIP level one need to wager a lot of bitcoins. If you got old stock then can do it. Need to be level 20+ to play.. I'm at level 16 atm with a small 13 btc wagered (1.2btc loss lol) so to get to level 20, yeah, you don't need much wagered.. not really lottery is for levels 20+,VIPs are level 30+ you got to have 150 bitcoins wagered to achieve the status I'm level 28,almost level 29 not that far from the VIP status I wonder if litecoins wagered are counted towards the level? or its just the bitcoins,or the highest wagered is counted?
|
|
|
think he is trying to say that the owner is a cheating scammer and the gambler was not impressed with his losing streaks at all I suggest you open a scam accusation first hand,but you would need more than an emotional breakdown and incoherent ramblings that are hard to decipher get your thoughts together and produce a coherent topic with proofs and screenshots the owner of luckygames is not particularly known for playing it fair,as it has been mentioned above,so I would not dismiss this guy's allegations as groundless
|
|
|
At first glance, the website is quite nice and has a simple design statement. It is also neat-looking for my taste. I know that there are other websites like these that provide more trusted reviews than this on so I'm just curious on what is the edge of this website to the others? Others can say that you are just here to promote other BTC casinos and will not provide "true" review. What's your take on those accusations? Another one, do you accept payments from this BTC casinos so that you'll make your review more appealing towards them?
The website is still fairly new, we are in process of adding more content to the reviews and creating tables for the users to compare different casinos with others. Our team has many years of experience in both working and playing in an online casino. And no, we do not accept payments from the casinos to modify the ratings/reviews. if you do not accept payments from the casinos to modify the ratings/reviews what is your monetisation scheme? I don't see any banners on the site you can't be hoping to make money from refferal comission,it just will not work also you should add more content,but your site is new,so it is fine I suggest you look for the topics like this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2097255and use the sites in your reviews,good luck
|
|
|
I'm not saying that. I'm saying that there's a possibility to be an issue with the system. Or I'm extremely unlucky.
Because in two days, I hit 2 0.39% odds - if my math is correct.
With the other two dice website, I never hit 5 lost bets in a row. 4? Yes. multiple times. 5? Never.
I'm not saying I don't trust probably fair system. I don't trust the probably fair system that DuckDice have.
Speaking only from the odds of happening point of view.
you really should do some research before you post about chances 0.39% odds means that you will get this event every 256 bets on average if you roll 1000 bets in a row there is a very high chance y u will get it! to learn more try this site: https://dicesites.com/tools also this one: http://streakcalc.azurewebsites.net/duckdice's provably fair has nothing weird or special about it you can verify it with the onsite tools,if you have any reasons to suspect foul play,open scam accusation in the appropriate topic
|
|
|
get a jubilee lottery,with the ones rolling the 20 bil bet get rewarded,of course with a mininimal 100 satoshi/bet requirement plus make it fun for everyone: maybe the ones who roll 20.00 or 20.20 between the 20 bil and 20.001.000.000 get a little something happy hour+chat giveaways,a radio controlled car and a helicopter for me,roses for Bojana new hat for Milan,cyberbeer for Hui and free Ledust from his gay slavery den oh,maybe Edward could stream too and shower us with love and australian accent
|
|
|
she should have offered a collection of her movies this would motivate MP's much better than her stating that bitcoin is the future you gotta admire Russia,it never fails to entertain it has always been an interesting battle between "we legalise" and "we ban" sides with Putin himself has entered the fray,mentioning cryptocurrencies and the risk they bring to the bank system and now with porn actresses rooting for cryptocurrencies,too
|
|
|
They want to learn crypto currencies first, but to what it is going to lead? To new banning or to new legalization? I have just heard the news from Russia and their banning of exchangers.
they didn't ban exchangers,this is just gossip,based on what Putin said but nobody cares to read the original message there are contradictory statements coming every week from Russia,ranging from "Russia legalises bitcoin" to "Russia banning cryptocurrencies and closing exchangers" once there is a concrete law stating that bitcoin is banned or legalised I would not bother to believe gossips
|
|
|
I wonder what preferences do I get if I buy their citizenship? as far as I know its not exactly the best country to have a passport of doesn't offer much,just visa free travel to the UK and Commonwealth countries its an island in the Pacific,must be the weather or the taxes,or both all in all 44 btc seems too steep there are much cheaper and better offers (Spain,Thailand to name a few)
|
|
|
was having same error on Firefox,Chrome was working fine in any case,try to clear cache and remove the site's cookies -it should fix the problem it seems allright now,on any browser,it could have been a Cloudflare error or something wrong woth the Stake's servers autobet gets stuck too often now,hope this is being fixed
|
|
|
I got 9 continuous losses with setting 51% winning chances.
Just come back when you got 20+ reds. Those are rookie numbers, literally You HAVE to hit 20 reds eventually, I mean, if you're playing with a low bet, you're placing hundreds of thousands of bets You're bound to hit 20 reds 0.0002% chance to hit 20 reds (if I calculated correctly, might be off), so running 500 000 bets will have pretty nice odds of you hiting 20 reds in a row Yes it is very possible to hit 20+ losses in a row. I used to basically be very heavy on the martingale. And basically I knew that when I got close to 9-10 losses in a row, I knew the next one should be a winner? Guess what, it wasn't. However being burn on martingale before, instead of doubling my bets, I just left them constant and would just hope to hit 3-4 greens in a row. Well what happened was I think until bet 21 or so, I finally got a winner. Then I think it was 2 losses and after that I got like 5-6 winners all in a row. It was a loss of a day but it would of cleaned me out completely if I kept on martingaling. Because it would of been impossible to keep doubling my BTC until the 22nd bet. I hit 26 reds in a row once and countless times > 20 reds, think 23-24-25 a few times,too once you are rolling millions of bets per day,the odds of you getting streaks like that are common you can use the simulators to test run ,lets say, a million bet simulation the odds of hitting a 23+ red streak in 1 mil rolls are very high i.e. every second-third 1 mil simulation you are bound to hit it at some point you can use this site to estimateyour chances to hit a certain streak: https://dicesites.com/toolslets do a quick 50% chance calculation (base bet 1 satoshi and bank 2 bitcoins) as you can see the odds of hitting a 23 red streak is 100/0.00001499%= 1/6.667.000 rolls approximately but in reality,it happens way more often than the martingaling gamblers would like to see it
|
|
|
The number of people wanting to see Amazon take up BTC and LTC payments might seem insignificant but for a company as big as Amazon... am pretty sure they are consulting on whether its safe to accept cryptocurrencies on their stores...should this happen these digital currencies will go to the moon.
Apparently half the households in all America are signed up to Amazon Prime. So let's conservatively assume 200 million people in the US alone buy from Amazon. 10,000 people is just a little bit fewer than that figure. They don't give a shit about crypto. They don't need to give a shit. Almost all merchant adoption has been tiny or a failure. At this stage in its life it isn't what Bitcoin is for. they don't just yet,they have a group of analysts that are paid ridiculous money to calculate such things as soon as they check the figures and realise that accepting bitcoin as a form of payment is preferable for their business they will do it ASAP,the current testing water gossip means that they do consider adding it,its just not the right time
|
|
|
whichever country it is next it is going to have an advantage and a good headstart Japan is doing very good in this regard,they legalised bitcoins and the businesses that accept bitcoins are booming there its a very technologically advanced country with almost 130 mil of people South Korea is another good example-the exchanges volumes are at all time high India,Russia,Singapore,Phillipines are all toying with the idea of legalising crypta,but you cannot be sure until it is official
|
|
|
Amazon sneezes on petitions that ask things they do not want to introduce this is akin to petitions to the goverments in some countries i.e. get 20.000 people sign it and get a chance for the president (or whoever does this work for him ) to read it and... disillusioned members of "democracy" (which is as we know,the power of democrats) do not realise they decide nothing,if Amazon considers adding bitcoin good for business-it will be added not any other way
|
|
|
another questionable ICO backed by the "Austrian Alps super efficient mining facility" and offering 25% extra tokens is the first sign of a "successful" enterprise besides the bonuses: each of the 4 weeks of the H2O token Sale the contributors will be able to receive bonuses:
20% – 1st week 15% – 2nd week 10% – 3rd week 5% – 4th week
this is the reddest flag if i have seen any... but,maybe,just maybe I'm wrong and its one of the 10% of good ICOs
|
|
|
Champ ended up going +27 BTC then back down to 1. That was insane to watch.
27 bitcoins profit, damn! too bad he didn't stop at such good profit. btw he's -1 BTC now. Champ ended up going +27 BTC then back down to 1. That was insane to watch.
What should I say about this player, greedy player or real player? +27 is so great amount and down back to 1 is really a bad luck even though he is still in profit. Curious to know how much profit that will make he stop betting? He's not in profit lol, i checked his profile apparently he lost 1 BTC. he was +28 at one point and then he started doing insane 1.37 bitcoin bets and then there was this red wall for him and he could not stop.... it is hard to stop even at 10,hell 5 bitcoins profit would have been an epic result but this is the biggest gambler's curse-inability to stop while ahead if he could have done it with one-two bitcoins bank,he should have stopped at 4-5 btc profit and start anew,with lower stakes and try to build up again and yeah,he has lost it all it seems ,his profit is negative and he doesn't roll anymore
|
|
|
that will show them Bitcoin.org is one of the oldest and most trusted sources of info about bitcoin and the core "nest but I highly doubt they are as influencial as they think they are: “On 2017-10-11 at noon (UTC), Bitcoin.org is planning to publish a banner on every page of the site warning users about the risks of using services that will default to the so-called Segwit2x (S2X) contentious hard fork. S2X companies will be called out by name. To ensure that we only warn users against companies that will actually put user deposits at risk, we urge all companies to publicly clarify their stance before the above date, either by a highly-visible public statement or by commenting on Bitcoin.org issue #1835 (or by doing both).” this banner looks like an ultimatum more than anything-come and pledge your allegiance or we will denounce ya,this would create another rift in the community more than anything strangely enough,they haven't been so fussy about Bitcoin Cash fork
|
|
|
let them bitch and twitch in uncontrollable fits of anger seeing the decline of fiat currencies as the grip of the Central banks and the likes of JPMorgan,GS,on the world's economy is loosening more and more people see the bullshit behind their words about monetary policies,inflation,cryptocurrrencies etc. Dimon looks like a fool indeed,as bitcoin is stronger than ever,having survived the chinese ICO and exchanges ban
|
|
|
so if,lets say ETH becomes the best performer,we should all forfeit bitcoins and become the etherium worshippers? bandwagoning and judging things according to their popularity is not the best way to do especially if you are writing articles pretending to be an informative analytical piece and your caps lock is broken
|
|
|
* 5,000,000 * * Bonus Rain *
~ Courtesy of Rock48 ~ Rock48 has been more than awesome and generous! a highroller and an investor and a cool dude , wish him all the luck in the world! rains are huge at the moment,almost 120.000 tokens a pop
|
|
|
This really makes me wonder why the SEC or others haven't tried going after the other cloud miners. I strongly suspect that this guy was merely copying the strategies of the big guys in cloud mining. Yes, I do believe they actually have legitimate mining in place, but with some of the largest companies supposedly having tens of thousands of clients with at least 1 contract, and incredibly long waiting lists, they should be making serious dents in global hashpool share (but not all are). Hopefully, more "scammed clients" lodge reports with EU bodies to look into the matter.
I know people say that idiots should just be left to their own devices, and that those who fall for cloud mining is just natural selection at work, but I just dislike the fact that some of these cloud mining companies are seen as solid entrepreneurs while fleecing a lot of innocent people who actually want to be a part of Bitcoin - their version of it anyway.
thats because GAW miners were semi-legit,unlike the majority of the cloudminings out there GAW miners had the paperwork in place,registered and looked fime from the SEC's point of view...at first they did have some mining,equipment,but like modern banks they had 1/10 of the reserves and strarted to accept invesments while having no chance to repay,running a classic pyramide while SEC and other financial institutions close down cloud minings,the largest scams aka banks keep doing fine and stealing our money
|
|
|
|