Come on, I'm almost as smart as a 5th grader, you can't fool me with fake links.

I did:


Not sure what else do you expect in response to the absence of any kind of substantiation for the dollar amounts that you're throwing around.

You even posted in the other thread that you received no responses from appraisers and other people you sent e-mails to. I don't think you're capable of reflection but if you are you should probably reflect on that for a few minutes.

Right, but you trying to bring your perennial dispute with Vod into this is obviously not a deflection

On the topic of not leaving positive feedback, I strongly believe that's preferable to leaving positive feedback for trades where you risked nothing, user has very little other activity, and your green trust ratings are useless - perhaps even harmless - to determine whether the user is actually "unlikely to scam anyone".

Therefore I would recommend that anyone who gives a shit about the trust system being a bit more than just a playground for some sociopath's ambitions should do the following:

Whatever floats your boat, we're not judging.

I find it interesting that you're comparing all those noobs you green-trusted for buying trinkets from you with zero risk to raising dogs... makes sense then you think about your trust farming and trust abuse. Fluffy puppies.

Ah, when you put it that way it seems to make sense. Probably grounds for type 3 flag. Maybe some light spanking too.

Never mind the payment processor, Tesla for 0.0017 BTC? I didn't realize BTC is worth that much today. Might as well buy a couple in case one breaks or catches fire or decides to turn left in front of a truck (although arguably you may no longer need the other one in that last case).

Would be cooler though if Musk started taking bitcoins for rides to the space station.

Really? Not the explosion of a tactical nuke in a Chinese rail yard?

Ok, there is a lot to unpack here. When is it ending? Why positive trust - is there any risk involved from your side? On the flip side, can we get negative trust if we do something un-club-worthy? What do I do to avoid that? Should I cycle more merits? Praise the supreme leader? Slap the OP? I've already sacrificed o_e_l_e_o to the club, I hope that counts for something.

Legendary or Hero means nothing. There is zero evidence of "value" that you speak of. You're posting massively cringy walls of text about how you want this to be worth millions but it obviously isn't. All of those exchanges and libraries and appraisers and other people you sent e-mails to (calling it conversations and partnership inquiries, really it's just spam) are laughing at this shit if it somehow even gets to an actual person.

At this point you must be either mentally unstable or trolling us. I hope it's the latter. This is not a good place for people with mental issues. Seek help if you need it.

How about asking for a $30m loan?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5325549

Scam? Idiocy? Idiotic scam?

tl;dr: you have a failed token ("failed" might be too generous, seems more like DOA) that has no value whatsoever, is not listed on any exchanges, although you somehow managed to con your way into CMC's "untracked listings". You want to make money by making it sound retroactively innovative. It's not. Editing old posts in your ICO thread just makes it look more scammy.

You'd be rich then. I have no idea why you're still talking to us peasants here.


Actually there is absolutely nothing here. You haven't showed us ANYTHING, much less anything that would be worth a dollar or 300 million of them. You just posted a bunch of words.


That means nothing. I have BASIC code I've written 30 years ago. It's probably worth more than your token but then again, many things are worth more than zero.


In this case it would be the art that is priceless. Not the room or the muppet who painted the walls of the room. I doubt your ERC20 token is WW2 loot. I doubt ERC20 tokens existed back then.


Or we could look at this thread and keep laughing at your desperate attempt to sell your failed craptoken rebranded as "NFT" because your heard that "NFT" is cool today.

So you're saying it's ~10 DOGE in 2027 post-apocalyptic dollars... sounds fair.


Exactly. It's quite clear that you just picked some buzzwords without having the slightest idea about it.

I have looked at it while drinking my afternoon "tea" thoroughly examined it and I can confirm that it is authentic. Not a single pixel is fake.

I would assume the OP is quite illiterate as to what it even means and just wants to make a quick scam with a clone of some... uhm... mixer site or something.

But technically you can scrape assets from a dynamic site too, not much of a difference except maybe more possible content.

Knowing that he's Hitler - no. But for all I know someone in my trust list, or someone I sent a positive rating to, may commit murder in the future. They may have already done something like that and could be sociopathic enough to play a nice trustworthy person on this forum. This is a weird place. Some trust concepts IRL don't translate well here. This place probably amplifies the worst in people due to the illusion of anonymity.

One thing to note though that lying and/or mental issues (how do you even quantify that... I'm sure we all look like we're on some kind of spectrum to some outside observers, playing with imaginary internet money) in general doesn't automatically mean the person is untrustworthy in trading. My favorite example is that you're probably a higher risk if you don't lie when your spouse asks "do I look good in this".

Create a thread and use it as reference if you have more to say than what fits into the 5 ratings. Keep in mind that multiple ratings from the same person count only as 1 in the score, so 1, 5, or 25 wouldn't make any difference for a casual observer, but if someone wants to read more - they can follow the link.

Finksy got into DT2 briefly (DT2 also counts, not just DT1). He's no longer in DT2.

Things like that happen due to the lottery and could be easily prevented if DT2 required at least two DT1 inclusions but that's a whole different story.

Neutral is applicable in almost any situation where something needs to be noted about the user, good, bad, or, well, neutral - something that doesn't mean "high risk in trading" or "unlikely to scam".

As for negative, I don't see how that follows from your experience. You did trade with the person. You got scammed. On this forum this would call for red trust or even a flag. On the other hand, if you had prior good trades and you didn't think the person would scam... mistakes (including mistakes in judgement of others) happen. That's how scammers operate, by gaining trust. But you can use trust ratings even if you didn't trade with that person as long as you can substantiate your claims.