There are more than 12,000 cryptocurrencies available in the market. If we consider 90% to be worthless and 10% useful, we are taking 1200 cryptocurrencies into consideration as possible investments, so I guess it's more likely above 99% of cryptos are worthless.

The fact is that very few altcoins worth to be invested and shared side by side with your bitcoin holdings. Some have short term potential, others medium term potential, but on long run no one can beat bitcoin's potential.

Who is going to pay the interest generated to users staking on your app? This income must come from somewhere. How are you going to earn money with this app?

These ideas seem too simplistic at this point we are in cryptocurrency, where there are many exchanges and staking platforms accepting hundreds of different cryptocurrencies, besides the fact there isn't a clear indicative on how it's going to be profitable for you, as the app operator.

Bitcoin is supposed to be the main investment in cryptocurrency for every investors. It's advised to have a portfolio of 90% in btcs and only 10% or 5% in altcoins.

Altcoins aren't totally excluded because they also give access to interesting benefits for some investors, which they can't find on bitcoin, so they go for those altcoins as well and we can't say they are wrong for investing this way. Although they are more risky than bitcoin, the potential is still there, anyway.

It just need to be a calculated risk.

I think dogecoin won't fail, because it has already become a classic of crypto universe. Classical coins don't die, because there will be always fans and enthusiasts supporting them. On the other hand, it shouldn't be expected dogecoin to go to the moon. It has its place in crypto market, of course, but it's not going to be one of the main cryptocurrencies among all. Elon Musk can shill for doge as he wishes, but after all, even he knows it is just a meme coin, as he knows it's not possible to make money by playing jokes all the time, otherwise he wouldn't be on the wealthy level he currently is.

Is Bitcoin Group a bank or an investment fund? I've read they have their own asset at stocks market which have increased in 5,50% today, and is continuously increasing since the announcement of the purchase.

These companies are bringing the old world of finances to the new digital world. It seems a good deal for both sides, because the owners of the old businesses (such as this mentioned bank) can also profit some money with something that, to say the truth, shouldn't have any significant cost anymore, because it's obsolet. Anyway, they are being paid 15$ million for that, while the buyers are already being benefited by the increasement of their assets' value on the market. Maybe this purchase inspires trust among investors.

As I understood, OP starts from the principle regulations are the reason why bitcoin is going to have its price pushed upside again soon. However, the main historical factor to benefit bitcoin's price has been the halving, not regulations. And that is something which is going to happen only in 2024, so there is a long time by there yet. Meanwhile we don't know what can happen to bitcoin. The market is still too pessimistic regards cryptocurrency. We are probably at the worst moment in the whole bitcoin's timeline, due to so many big scams happening in this environment.

The point is: do people want to be saved? I don't think so, because they don't care or simply don't pay attention to the big ponzi scheme they are inserted on through fiat economy. People are still blind and seem to be satisfied depositing their money in saving accounts which generate annual interest inferior to the annual inflation.

When we talk about bitcoin to them, they say it's too risky to adopt and invest, although they ignore the fact fiat doesn't even have the risk of being profitable for them on long term. Fiat is a complete loss and the only way to avoid its depreciation is to save large chunks of money fast and invest in properties or valuable and durable goods.

As long you don't love money and don't put it above everything else it's fine to gamble. Balance is needed in everyone's lives. We need money to thrive and achieve a better confortable life. There is no crime or sin in aiming this goal, but we can't sacrifice our values in order to conquer wealthy. That would mean putting money above everything, what is the real sin accordingly to The Bible. Unfortunatelly that is what many people do and end paying a bitter price because of their actions later.

Why would this money be paid by FIFA in bitcoins? And even if it happened, those teams would immediately cashout the received bitcoins into fiat, so they could avoid the volatility of the currently bearish market which has potential to depreciate the prizes more yet on short term. Also, so much money (163$ million) dropped in bitcoin market at once could lead to panic selling and more dumps in price.

At first I thought you were going to ask what awareness a FIFA sponsor like Crypto.com can bring to bitcoin.

This World Cup is a complete mess. Results are totally inconsistent, what means most people are losing money, so the minority of gamblers who are betting on underdogs can make some profit in a match or another (it's nearly impossible to bet on every correct underdogs' results, though). At this point I wouldn't doubt if Morocco won the cup anymore. Analyzes mean nothing...

There are also those cases of countries which have completely banned bitcoin and crypto: Algeria, Bangladesh, China, Egypt, Iraq, Morocco, Nepal, Qatar and Tunisia.

Besides the full legalization (legal tender) of bitcoin by El Salvador, the ban is another way to recognize bitcoin by the state, although in a negative form, as it's recognized as a threat which has to be neutralized with maximum effort and surveillance.

There isn't a direct relation on every cases, but there are higher chances you will fall at a scam casino if you only stick to random reviews on the internet. I've already signed up in theoretically legit crypto websites and suffered phising and hacking attempts from them later. What I mean is that those sites collect your email and password, so what they do next is to try logging in your another accounts in exchanges, emails and more using those same credentials. They also send phising emails to your mailbox from the most diverses themes and subjects.

The problem with random reviews is that you don't know the history of those people, for how long they have been active on this niche, if they are legit gamblers or members of the casino itself or even haters from a rival company. With the forum it's more guaranteed, because you know the reviews here are legit are are posted in real time. There is more activity and as soon something shady happens at a crypto casino promoted on the forum, it's going to be immediately posted here. It's a more efficient platform for checking legitimacy of casinos, I mean.

US is trying t decrease its dependance on chinese exportions and they seem to be doing this gradually. The division in the world is getting deeper and in a decade or two we will be even more segregated than now, between occident and orient. Each side of the world trading among themselves, while attempting to overcome the opposite side on economical and military aspects.

Personally, I see the increasement of imports from Europe good news if they can supply the occident with goods superior in quality than the chinese ones, which are well known for being cheap, but with low durability and high fragility.

I tend to avoid these websites, not only because I fear they are scam casinos, but also because I suspect they are phishing websites which can attempt to steal your personal informations, accounts or put virus on your device. It's easy to spot these services: you search on google and there are only reviews websites talking about them. The informations disponible are scarce as are the reviews given by users. From the few reviews, some will say these casinos are great (probably employees of the casino posting as users), while others will say they are complete and blatant scams. When you see there is a big imbalance between reviews, without any consistent replies from the casino official support itself, stay away.

Yes, for third country's nations signature campaigns can work greatly as a full time job, but only if you are fine with 1-2 wages monthly. it's possible to survive, but not to thrive and to live with confort, like everyone aims to live, I suppose. Chipmixer is an exception, though.

It's hard to say if someone lives exclusively from signature campaigns' income, because it's totally possible to work in something else and still post on the forum for extra earnings, without difficult or prejudice on your personal results. But I can say to live from trading is more unlike than living from signature campaign, due to the risks involved and long term outcomes.

Yes, moreover there is still the "cold storage" alternative for those afraid of storing their files in cloud storage through the use of pen drives. Although they are obsolet, there is still people using them to protect more private and exclusive files, fearing they can be leaked if stored online. A desktop or laptop without internet access are also alternatives.

For a currency which has already hit 238$ to hit 4,50$ is a very bad sign, despite being in a bearish market. For me it's a clear indicative filecoin's proposal has failed. It didn't inspire investors purchasing the idea of decentralized virtual storage. Probably people feel confortable with the traditional means of storing file that they saw no reason to adopt a new cryptocurrency for that. And it's understandable because there are many ways to store files online or offline in relatively safe ways.

Every projects attached to FTX and Alameda must be avoided. We have been watching every big crypto scam scheme collapsing other scam schemes connected to each other, increasing the possibility the tokens you mentioned are also going to be impacted negatively by FTX's influence. We are living uncertain times, and in moments like this the best you can do is to avoid altcoins and focus on bitcoin to mitigate risk.

Religions are created by men to emulate concepts, principles and morals of spiritual world. But since they are driven by men, religions just subvert such principles and then we have religious leaders portraying themselves as the masters of universe, who know every secrets and details of God's creation.

They are greedy for money and ambitious for power and popularity. That is why politics and religion are mixed so easily and when this happens, a false Messiah is always raisen by the nation as a savior. That is one example, idolatry.

Within it, every kinds of abuses and absurds practiced by authorities are justified in name of God and in name of a higher noble mission to save the nation from the evil forces. Citizens blind by idolatry just accept it as the only true.

---

Bitcoin isn't islamic, protestant, catholic, buddhist, atheist, conservative or liberal. It's simply a currency, which can be used for the good or for the bad, depending who is using it and for what. And the most important: bitcoin is for all!

Where I live rural areas already have access to internet, so it's not impossible for them to adopt and deal with bitcoin daily.

The other point is a minor issue yet. To live in rural areas isn't a synonym of poverty and misery. The life at countryside can be very confortable and more economical than living at big centers.

Rural population also likes investments and economies. They just have to be presented to bitcoin. I'm sure some farmers would enjoy investing part of the profit made through the sales of their crops, pigs and cattle in bitcoin.