Fine collectible coins, good luck with your endeavors ... but I think you would have had more sales if you sent at least some of the coins to MJ for safekeeping and for further resending. This would give more confidence to those users who have never traded with newbies but who like your coins, (and those who, in principle, are not going to use escrow for obvious reasons). ^{[if i were a newbie who wants to sell dozens of collectible coins i would do just that]}

Well, firstly, despite the fact that my favorite was the Brazilian national team, I am happy for Argentina, since they really have not won for a long time. I also join in congratulations ... although a little sad, because I also scored the same points as MoSala, but it turned out to be even more ridiculous that we both blindly made the same predictions, so in any case, I would not have been able to overtake him. 

Skeptical Chymist, I will not argue about Lauda's stinginess, since I did not go into the details of his earlier smerit activity, but I can say one thing for sure ... on his last day on the forum, he was quite generous, meriting the posts of all who decided to say goodbye to him. And even though his last publication received a lot of merit, he had something to send, since it is unlikely that when assigning m'sources, Theymos could ignore such a famous name.

I agree with you ... considering that there are probably those who, after the first or second blackjack, permanently bet 5 mBTC. And since we did not have a win for about 9 weeks, but at the same time there were 5 losses, the profitability of a win with a limit of 2 mBTC will be only x3.2 ^{[Correct me if I am wrong]}

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOL ... ^{[Nothing personal, but this is the first time I see someone using such a utopian way of determining the winner during the drawing].}

FINAL GAME COMPETITION
1. First team to get to 3 corners? Brazil
2. Team to get more yellow cards? Argentina
3. First team to make a substitution? Argentina
4. Red card in the game? No
5. First team to have a shot on target? Brazil

Tie breaker: 38rd minute


ARGENTINA FLAVORED COMPETITION
1. Number of corners Argentina will have?  5-6
2. Number of yellow cards for Argentina? 3
3. Shots on target for Argentina? 4-5
4. Number of subs for Argentina in regular time? 3

Tie breaker: 68th minute

Live: Brazil - Argentina / The final game of Copa America ^{[the bet limit has unfortunately been reduced to 2 mBTC]}

• https://sportsbet.io/sharebetslip/60b22c97-b082-47f8-9f32-b84a34208f05

It should be a hot match, much more dynamic than the Euro final, ^{[I expect 10 corners, 5 cards and 3 goals + a couple of random ones, which in theory should lead us to BJ].}

Interesting fact: "Despite the status and strength of the rosters, Brazil and Argentina are only third and second in terms of the total number of victories in the tournament. They were overtaken by Uruguay, who won the trophy 15 times", ^{[Argentina national team since 1993, played in the final four times and lost four times]}.

a) 11 b) 1:53

Hello man! Something I haven't seen you on the forum for a long time! 

All these final discussions are of course good, but I'm in anticipation that it will be a boring game since both teams are pretty conservative. To be honest, I'm a little upset that there is no match for third place, given that in a parallel American tournament such a match will take place tonight. I mean, as mentioned in another thread, matches like this are often very dynamic, and I'm pretty sure a match like this would satisfy all the desires of hardcore fans.

I don't quite understand the meaning of this discussion if England wins, (+ It is not entirely clear to me why one more additional thread should be created, because the discussion of Euro 2020 is in a neighboring thread, created long ago). But I agree with SFR10, England really deserves to win as they are the only top national team that has never won this tournament, (not to mention the fact that the England team costs about a billion dollars). 

It is likely that in certain circumstances, neutral feedback should be changed to a red tag, (if the regulars of this thread do not get unambiguous answers). I remember how this competition started, and it looked like this thread was under the auspices of the Sportbet.one. Now, it really seems to me that this was some kind of trick to save a couple of marketing dollars, since no one in their right mind would do it for free (considering how OP has repeatedly emphasized the importance of Sportbet.one). If so, then each member of this thread through the fault of OP became for some time a "shill" for this bookmaker.

^{p.s. In any case, let's hope that the regulars of this thread did not waste their time and effort on this competition in vain, and all expectations will nevertheless come true} 

As noted above, only a very simple and transparent law will work, since the Ukrainian political system has long since rotted away, a system that is only meant to replenish the already fat pockets of oligarchs. There are really a lot of bookmakers in Ukraine, and I think probably even more than in England, but the highlight is that no matter what tax you set, the Ukrainian Tax Service has absolutely no resources to keep at least most of the bookmakers in check ...

The lack of dust on the account seems to me a rather strange phenomenon, given that for some reason it seemed to me that all the participants in our pool are regulars at Sportsbet. In any case, it doesn't matter ... because the thought occurred to me that because the amount is not significant, the winning bet in the end may turn out to be an absolutely absurd combination. Returning to the discussion ... what about "How the 1st goal will be scored" + "Number of corners in the first half" + "Both Teams To Score In The Second Half" + something that buwaytress suggested.

I would prefer to take number 61.

13)  Conor McGregor 
12)  Stephen Thompson 
11)  Greg Hardy
10)  Irene Aldana
9)  Sean O'Malley
8 )  Max Griffin
7)  Michel Pereira
6)  Ilia Topuria
5)  Trevin Giles
4)  Jennifer Maia
3)  Omari Akhmedov
2) Zhalgas Zhumagulov
1)  Alen Amedovski

98 strikes

You forgot to mention that Theymos is one of the moderators on this subreddit ^{[I wonder ... how to check all his publications if they were]}  

At least this explains why he is not yet married ... and if I remember correctly he is a member of only two subreddits and in both he is a moderator.

Guys, why don't we go the BetBuilder route? ^[screenshot] The winner is determined by the highest won odds (let's say the bet should consist of at least three of any combinations). I don't think that it is a problem for each of us to place a bet, say, in the amount of 0.02 mBTC ^{[this is the minimum allowed rate]}, especially considering that even with a relatively small coefficient, you can win (if the combinations of other participants do not work).

El duderino, congratulations, I'm glad a thread of this kind is now in the relevant section, but even more I'm glad that long-term BTC price prediction is again a hotly debated topic. Anyone looking to bargain, or buy some Bitcoins, is truly in the right place. 

So, on December 7, 2021, 1 BTC will cost $ 24,317. ^{[Well, everyone knows that on a global scale, the price of BTC does not rise by manipulation]}

• "The price solely follows an intrinsic value, which is described very nicely by the Stock-To-Flow theory for Bitcoin by PlanB".
• "The Bitcoin price is the result of a stable economic equilibrium".

Therefore, I suppose we will need at least half a year to recover from the Chinese news, although as you all know, in the long term this is good for Bitcoin (by the way, we returned to the 95,300 Ph/s mark). Although the general price trend will invariably grow, we still do not have enough broad masses with a fundamentally new mentality (the younger generation of investors is still growing up). By the same to the same, we all should not forget about the syndrome "Musk", which sooner or later (six months or a year) will lead to mass hysteria based on disappointment (Doge), which will undoubtedly affect BTC. To all of the above, I would add the fact that, judging by the reports of this year, there is no obvious flow of money from ETF gold to ETF Bitcoin (outside the USA), so it is unlikely that the phrase in the spirit of "Bitcoin & Gold [...]" will be relevant until December.

I also see that Theymos briefly mentioned ETFs, but unfortunately I disagree with him, at least it won't be this year for sure ... If it happened, it would be really great news, but the reality is that acceptance will become a precedent for challenging previously denied ETF requests. And, by the way, the fact that after Biden took office, the head of the SEC was replaced does not change anything. Not to mention the fact that Joe Biden's presidential campaign was sponsored by banks that are not yet ready for radical changes, (for changes that will lead to the emergence of a society of cashless money). This is almost the same if representatives of the oil and gas sector lobbied for the interests of green energy.

Man, do you know why I adore you? I adore you for your walls of text, because bumping into your messages, I have to close all extraneous tabs to focus on this reading. But no matter how you or I feel, I think in your reasoning, there is something that I think you missed. Firstly, in order not to be depressed, I think you should not treat this business as a job, then for you it will not be a burden. And as I said earlier, you yourself must calculate your strength, even if you want to squeeze into a 30-day period (if you don't have time, just increase the spread of merit per post).

I confess, looking at the leaderboards you mentioned, I can only say that I was not impressed by the amount of merit they sent, but in a good sense of the word, I envy these guys, because I understand how much free time it takes to read thousands of posts. Although I agree with you regarding a group of people who use the forum space incorrectly or unethically, for by meriting the posts of trolls, shillas, and other people of this category, you are kind of encouraging them to continue this behavior. But for me the main ... thing is that I would feel that there is a living person on the other side, only then can I appreciate the message.

It looks like someone lost a million dollars  

I think he can afford to lose a million dollars, otherwise where did he get it from? I mean, this whale apparently knows what investment risks are, since he has that kind of money, (I give up the idea that he lost the inheritance). Anyway, I'm glad that Sportsbet made a million dollars, and that England won anyway.