This thread grows so fast that it's tough to keep up.  Has Stunna posted any further about his plans for next month?  The last I saw he said he might be closing it but it didn't sound 100% sure.

Did someone turn of the showing of trust by default?  All of a sudden I don't see TF's -600 trust and I wonder why?

Aaaand I do still see trust in other threads so it's not my settings.  Is it the default for off-topic?  Or does the OP control this in some way?

Are you still holding your CGB?  How many did you buy?

Lol, as bitcoin prices fall, bitmixer.io starts to look like a good idea again.  No nonsense and automatied weekly payments of up to 0.01BTC.  The closer bitcoin goes to 100$ the better and better that deal looks.  The closer bitcoin gets to 1000$, the more terrible it looks.  For some reason, bitmixer.io doesn't change their sig rates no matter what happens (it seems).

I just saw the last page of this thread which includes the final shots of the recent spat and the resolution.  I also found the "just stop" post kinda shocking.  I had to double check that it was actually posted by the same guy who resolved the issue only a few posts below that.  Very strange to go from "just stop" to "we are checking things and will tell you if we are wrong" to "we were wrong".  Good to see everything was resolved amicably in the end but still, what was up for a moment there?

I think that legal is the wrong word in this context. 

Account selling makes me feel sad for playing to get my meager amount of krill.  I think I could prolly bargain for a much badasser acount for way less than the cost of playing.  Anyway, I'm still holding out hope that that one day micon is going to give me a cool avatar which encapsulates 3 imporant aspects:

1) tspacepilot has been on our site for a fucking long time
2) tspacepilot is generally a terrible poker player
3) tspacepilot is an ok guy anyway

What does DAC mean/stand for?

Also, glad to see you guys put some fundage in escrow. 

Also, even if you aren't associated with UpDown.bt, you must have heard of them and the situation here?  If not, you must be very new to the scene.

I think it is the birthday of the signature campaign, not the site itself.

I don't know why he would threaten you about your sig, but that's TradeFortress' old profile.  As far as I know, having negative feedback from him is actually a mark of pride.  Check it out, I have one!

But the asterisk should be there to warn people about campaigns which, for whatever reason, might not make it to the next payday.  If this guy is paying dayly for several days, it seems that the asterisk is misleading.

Or a desperate altcoiner, or someone with a short on bitcoin.  Doesn't seem disinterested, that's for sure.

I see, I got overcaughtup in the headline.  It seems the fact is that paypal bought braintree.  Braintree apparantly makes apps that can accept bitcoin, or something along those lines.

How do you know they aren't tips?

http://yro.slashdot.org/story/14/09/09/1550251/paypal-jumps-into-bitcoin-with-both-feet

From what I have read around here, I thought that paypal and bitcoin were mortal enemies.  Is this story correct?

See, this is where I'm obviously confused, I thought that just above you were saying "marco, you're fine" which I interpreted as meaning that you approved of his change.  I don't know what's happening, obviously.

Good point, I can, of course, hard code that address since there's just one such example like this.  Anyway, I'm still curious about the detail of the "quirk" which makes this one unspendable.  Let me know if you know.  Cheers and thanks for the replies!

Thanks for the replies.  No offense but I kinda hoped you'd say 'no'.  Being negged by tradefortress is kinda a mark of pride these days---like a reputable war scar from fighting a well known and universally disliked enemy.

Cheers!

Ok, I kinda thought that was the deal.  Hillarious, you're so fast that TF has no chance.

I admit that I am not completely following what's going on with this dicebitco.in thing, but I do have to say that I think your point seems questionable, marcotheminer.  If I paid you to advertize for ACME Rockets, and we agree that you'll bear the advert for a given time, and then you tag a "sux" on the end of the advert or something equivalent, I think that I would consider you to be in breach of our contract.  Again, maybe there's some detail here that I'm missing.

Ahem, "-neq" is shorthand for "is not equivalent".  Let me spell out my message in more formal language:

"Attention: asking about origin is not equivalent to accusing of a particular origin."

Since you seem so lost, allow me to spell out the immediate context which seems to have passed you: in the 4th post of this thread, I ask:


And below was your reply with cute epithets and qualifiers for the masses: "half of you don't know what we're talking about...they are different...you start accusing him without knowing which website you are talking about".

Therefore, my reply is germane, even if it was apparently too subtle for you to grasp.  Now, you've got other mudslinging to do about whether or not I can read?  Try not to be such a troll, dood, it's not the way to make friends, ok?

Finally, I want to point out that in your glorious moment decrying the ignorant bitcointalk.org citizens for their unsupported accusations, you, yourself, the amazing __chance__ have (perhaps unwittingly) fallen dangerously close to the same behavior you disdain in others: making claims without evidence.  That is, you say the two parties are distinct but it seems the only support you have for that is the distinct urls.  Yet, we all realize that the urls are distinct.  The question was whether the proprietors are distinct.  As far as I can tell, you have added nothing to that debate beyond "__chance__ believes they are distinct".  If you have anything more to offer, let us know.  If you just want to add your opinion to the thread, there are ways do to that without acting like such a jackass, should that interest you in the future.

Cheers!