User yxt has also negative trusts but is not in the list
[...]
and the other question is, why am I only on the list for the first time since 06.03.2021? The two neg. trust are already years ago?
This list shows only DT members who have negative trust ratings from other DT members (or are banned but that's not relevant here). yxt doesn't have negative ratings from other DT members: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=23810;dt (note the ;dt at the end - this shows DT ratings) In your case - either you weren't in DT or Finksy wasn't in DT until now, not sure. |
|
|
|
He has only two red trust ratings, so this shouldn't be difficult to figure out. I think Finksy's red rating was showing -1 at the time when LoyceV created the list. Now Finksy is no longer in DT so it doesn't. I'm gonna let you figure out who made Finksy DT. |
|
|
|
|
This is just some ridiculous gobbledygook. "I have something worth $300m, trust me". Are you out of your fucking mind? Rhetorical question.
|
|
|
|
I wonder why?
Because geography? I wonder if you ever went to a school of any kind or maybe you're too young for that. |
|
|
|
I take this thread seriously and wondering the price for this kind of service (in the past or in the future).
I reckon 1 million bitcoins of 2011 vintage would be about right. |
|
|
|
|
Can someone explain to me the rationale of not paying out shitbounties like this? They just made a bunch of tokens out of thin air. What do they stand to gain by not giving a few of those tokens to the bounty hunters?
|
|
|
|
I will never stopp to such a level as to admit Biden won the election fair and square, because that would be giving up! And that's just not something I'm prepared to do. I will only accept that Bernie Sanders is president because Biden's puppeteers rigged the Democratic Primary election, with the help of China, and George Soros. And... Hillary, obviously.
Well, if you listen to Quicksy and other nutcases you'd think that Bernie is sockpuppeting Biden, what with the radical communist agenda like... uhm... I can't come up with any examples right now but I'm told it's radical and communist. Speaking of stupid shit, I saw some twit somewhere (can't find a quote, sorry) telling trumplings to not cash the $1400 checks. Which is so fucking dumb for a couple of reasons, one being direct deposit, another - like... why? How would that help Trump and/or hurt Biden/Hillary/deep state/etc? |
|
|
|
To me this smells like a sale of an account and that the same guy who sold him the account has given him the merits to rank up.
Or no sale, just someone sending merits to rank up their sockpuppet because their main account is red-tagged. AFAIK, merits given are not reversible, not even by the mods. Somebody correct me if I'm wrong.
Admins (or maybe just theymos himself) can reverse them but it's only done in very rare cases - I know a couple of examples, one was abuse by a merit source, another one was a hacked account. This is probably not one of such exceptional cases. In the long run these few merits won't matter. This user is unlikely to get any more. |
|
|
|
How can you say in all seriousness "It does not matter what's in there"? That's the only thing that does matter.
I meant if it's really not personal information or bot for sure that does not matter. If this is bot still there are no way to verify as mentioned by other users. One mistake can expose someone's privacy. Most importantly this kind of practice is very risky for the clients in your platform. They know that their personal information are at risk. The whole point of me publishing it was to prove beyond all reasonable doubt that they were not real people and were in fact fraudulent accounts of a bot. I really don't know how I'm supposed to defend myself against the botter's accusations without showing the evidence. This evidence is mostly meaningless unless you can be trusted to provide truthful information, in which case you could just say "auto-generated e-mail addresses" and "same AWS subnet" instead of posting actual e-mail addresses and IPs. Or post them hashed. Or ask a third party to verify. Another thing that stood out in one your debates with a supposed abuser is that you're saying it's obviously a bot if they run it 24/7... if it's obvious why are you allowing it? Why not limit to 16 claims per day or whatever is "human". Or at least ban them after a week instead of letting the whole farm run for months and then get to the point where you feel you have to post e-mails etc to defend yourself. I understand that this business attracts all sorts of shitheaded freeloaders but you're not going to scare them away by posting e-mails publicly. You might scare away good customers though. |
|
|
|
No, I was clear about my source regarding the baseless information I received that lauda had a pill addiction: The information I received was from someone who I trusted at the time, but I have seen to bend and stretch the truth. A review of my other private conversations with this person reflects even more egregious examples of this, including examples of while I cannot affirmatively say is a lie, some representations are what I would consider to be dishonest. Exactly my point. The above is "clear" the same way all your other lies are "clear". Over the years, people have told me things. I am guessing the person who told me they know lauda's IRL identity is reading this, and they can post to confirm if they wish (I don't recall if this same person was the one who told me about the 2nd person who knows lauda's identity). If they don't, thats fine too.
Have there been any cases where your secret sources fessed up and corroborated your fantasies? Suspending disbelief for a minute and assuming there are actual people who would trust you enough to tell you important "things" in confidence, you seem to be betraying their trust by posting it publicly. Or, it would be even weirder if someone asked you to post it publicly when even a newbie sockpuppet would be more believable. Either way, I don't care if you believe me or not.
Oh, I have great faith in you. I believe - no, I know for a fact, can you guess how? - that you can be relied upon to make up the most fantastically cringy stories. |
|
|
|
There is not much of a reason for anyone to trust SM (being honest), and I don't think lauda would have voluntarily given her personal information to SM. I know of two people that know who lauda is, and they both have been successfully trusted with a lot. SM does not fit that description. If SM has roots in Croatia, then maybe she was able to figure out who lauda is, idk.
One of those "two people" no doubt is the very trustworthy source who informed you about Lauda's pill addiction LOL. It's amazing how you still think that this nonsense you say about you knowing some "secrets" might impress anyone here after you've lied so many times. Anyway, I'm not gonna deny this so by definition I'm Lauda. Glad we cleared that up. Lock the thread. |
|
|
|
|
I thought 25th only applies to presidents but you've been telling us for months that Biden is not it. Make up your mind. Maybe create a poll "Is Biden the POTUS" first.
|
|
|
|
I reported a few of this users' posts and now they are banned. Kind of wonder who they are an alt of -- somebody tagged by Yoshie I would imagine.
Don't go raining on my parade now, I'm sure it was my reports that got them banned  Technically, he broke these two rules: 12. No duplicate posting in multiple boards.
15. No on-forum altcoin giveaways
Exactly. No thread needed really for this kind of shit, just report it. |
|
|
|
Lend money to a degenerate gambler, what could possibly go wrong. he'hem: I'm a lifelong degen
I'd loan you money, lol. Ah shit, busted. You shouldn't though. If I start asking for a $200 loan you should probably paint me in red on the basis of being hacked or gone insane. |
|
|
|
|
Lend money to a degenerate gambler, what could possibly go wrong. Lulz at that "collateral" too.
|
|
|
|
Is that not a mixer sending those bitcoins to the final address that currently holds the BTC? Or are they where the BTC originated without a mixer?
What I wanted to know, and was my original question was, where did Mr 13BTC have his 13BTC originally?
Before sending it to the above BECH32 addresses and ending up on 38JSoBKFuAYXgvMAKsk8aHYmiMfuFS2AyA
Or was the above BECH32 addresses where they originated from and did not go through a mixer?
From my understanding he made one transaction to a mixer, which outputted the 13BTC to the address 38JSoBKFuAYXgvMAKsk8aHYmiMfuFS2AyA
So, what is that original BTC address that Mr 13BTC used before sending his BTC to the mixer or to these BECH32 addresses?
Read the fucking thread and use a fucking block explorer, Mr. Crypto Fraud Compliance Expert, instead of multiposting like a squirrel on cocaine. OP claims to have sent funds to 38JSoBKFuAYXgvMAKsk8aHYmiMfuFS2AyA. Mixer claims to not have received the funds. This is literally what this thread is about, so get on the topic or get lost, how hard can it be. |
|
|
|
I do know blockchain works, I just do not know how it works to levels of you mixer guys, as I do not need to wash my filthy bitcoin to evade being traced back to crime.
So its subjective to say to someone "You don't know how blockchain works" if you are referring for it to be used in a way that considered illegal or facilitates money laundering and funding terrorism.
I will say a person who can wash bitcoin must have a very high level of knowledge on blockchain, as well as a criminal behaviour to provide such a vehicle.
The fuck are you still on about... you were given an address and you said: That doesn't show the original BTC address where the 13BTC originated from does it, it just shows the mixed BTC and where it was sent to.
What do you think blockchain does then? BTW the bitcoins in question never even touched the mixer, OP transferred them to that address and that's where they remain. Yes one thief stealing from another is still wrong, but in society its a normal occurrence, and what one should expect when doing such activities that law wont protect you from.
Its a bit stupid really to cry and complain that someone stole something from you, that you potentially stole or sourced from other criminal activities isn't it.
Drug dealer gets shot and robbed, it happens. Murderer gets killed in prison, it happens. Do we say "oh my that's tragic"? No, we know its a part of the criminal world. Those who act in such circles will probably feel for another criminal loosing such wealth, people who have no association with crime will probably think the same as me. TOUGH SHIT
Well, you seem to be the expert so I'll take your word for it. In your comic book fantasy, what's the appropriate criminal world punishment for a worthless piece of shit illiterate troll? Confiscating all their money and beheading sounds about right? |
|
|
|
There is a person in Boulder, Colorado that is just dead convinced they are going to die from global warming... but the funny part is that Boulder just got the fourth largest snow on record this past week!!!
OMG it's 10 degrees outside, it means the summer will never come and ice age is imminent!!! Seriously LOL the "it's cold so can't be global warming" argument is so 1995, go read some new conspiratardery and report back. |
|
|
|
Yes I know how blockchain works
You don't: Please provide wallet address
It's posted here. That doesn't show the original BTC address where the 13BTC originated from does it, it just shows the mixed BTC and where it was sent to.
Why not?
If this moron stole/hacked/scammed 13BTC, and someone steals from him, tough titty.
"If". And it's a fallacious argument even without the "if". Outside of good-guy-takes-down-a-bunch-of-bad-guys-and-saves-the-girl movies, stealing from a thief is still stealing. But don't let that distract from your intertubes tough guy act. Let us know how that letter works out for you.
MrCryptoMixer seems to be the culprit.
There is no evidence of that. |
|
|
|
~
It's ok, a few angry tweets will solve it in a jiffy. Oh wait, wrong guy. I guess the solution is gonna be slow and not very exciting. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
