Last I looked at the price (a few hours ago) the price was $9689...now the price is $9691...
Any reason for the $2 jump?
Ahh.. Thanks for taking me back to 2011. It's been a lovely 10 years. |
|
|
|
Ibian, be nice.
You can't blame every individual of a whole (artificial) group for that groups collective actions.
Evidently he can. I have seen him do it with just about every group but his really. Oh, and I am not a boomer. But I *am* Gen X.  |
|
|
|
|
Piercing a trendline to the downside.. :/
But that is on stamp. I can't remember do we see stamp or finex as source of truth? We got room to go to 9650 on finex...
|
|
|
|
Price went up, then it went down and then it went back up again.
JJG, your T/A is without equal. |
|
|
|
Craig, a missed comedian right there, it seems. Where does he register his wallet keys?  Not to say that the message was signed with the private keys of said 145 addresses. Perhaps he thinks that if he throws enough random words into a reply that this will befuddle the interviewer and listeners? To be fair, it seems to have worked cause I don’t know wtf he was talking about :-) Edit: btw 4 more blocks until a -9% difficulty reduction. Bitcoin working as designed and all is well. I really really hope the courts in Florida throw the fucking book at him. He has wasted a lot of taxpayer money in my country. Looks like we got your >9% decrease. Might be enough for some marginal miners to come back on. In fact if this is the bulk of post halving stabilization, i am frankly surprised. Too easy really... |
|
|
|
The latest pump made clear that we ain't going down soon, it seems. So we're in some kind of truncated correction move sideways with the bias to the upside. The latest dump can only mean more of them sideways correcting/truncating. As indicated by others, it's still accumulation time. Those waiting for sub $7,xxxx:  Sub 7k would indeed be quite a drop. But is it possible? Absolutely.  (Credit @davethewave for image) Dropping to the well loved support levels of 6xxx in this giant triangle would not be impossible to see. But the thing is, since we are seeing the miners selling both all mined coins AND inventory left behind ( https://cointelegraph.com/news/grayscale-is-now-buying-15-times-the-amount-of-bitcoin-being-mined ) it seems highly unlikely that we will see those levels again without some huge fundamental issue. And if we do, I would not expect we would spend much time down there. The market forces around bitcoin are colluding in a way that the longer we go, the more likely we break this triangle to the upside. And when that happens? I think then the topic of fees will become very hot again. If I did not have a couple lightning nodes right now, I would be thinking about starting one. |
|
|
|
Really the killer app would be some kind of trust minimized atomic exchange. Via lightning/tari perhaps? Because in a sense Monero's least private bit is on/offramps more than anything else.
I agree, I wonder why it's taking so long? I would like to help but I do not have much skills. I assume it's just a lot of work developing that sort of thing. But in many ways having the ability to do trustless atomic swaps from BTC to Monero would be perfect. I suppose Bisq is close... |
|
|
|
So quiet here and in all my channels, I thought I better check if my internet broke, but no such luck.  Anyway I put my last few coins into BlockFi, seems such a great deal and such a safe place, nothing could possibly go wrong. /s In fact I think it will be one of the scandals we need to keep pushing us up the bull hill in due course. When they run of with the money they promise to in their terms and conditions. But I'll be in and out before then. "Jeb. Just remember, whatever happens, happens." |
|
|
|
|
Really the killer app would be some kind of trust minimized atomic exchange. Via lightning/tari perhaps? Because in a sense Monero's least private bit is on/offramps more than anything else.
|
|
|
|
Yeah, of course, mindrust was dumb enough to rely upon Masterluc, but still cannot blame Masterluc for the gullibility of others, can we? Don't get me wrong, I am no fan of Masterluc's phoney baloney, so I frequently criticize his pronouncements and/or the member propagating such nonsense, but still peeps gotta be responsible for their lil selfies.  I don't know why people get so bent up over Masterluc's predictions. He is just like a million other market gurus. And IMHO ANYONE trading primarily based off the analysis of others deserves to get bitten on the ass. |
|
|
|
Stop shilling turd coin Zilliqa. This is a sacred thread, ain't nobody got time for no penny alt.
++ I m Bitcoin maximalist but protocol / code stack minimalist You are also pretty much the worst kind of shill of all, and I would prefer a thousand Zilliqa, OMG, and Tron shills over your flavor. ;P |
|
|
|
Same guy dumping and pumping lol. How much loss would he make if he do that? Buy 5k coins, sell again at same price range.
That amount of bitcoin bought and sold at market seems like madness to me. Most people trading 50mm worth of BTC would do it over the counter, and of those who do trade on an open exchange would usually not use market buys/sells to execute the trade because of the enormous slippage this entails. Unless they had a motivation to move the market, or need the quickest execution for some dubious premise like money laundering, or sales of stolen coins. Perhaps I am just not sophisticated enough to understand the motivation. |
|
|
|
|
So I am not much on ALTs at all, being a BTC semi-maximalist, and only have any notable holding of ONE alt coin (As well as whatever fork coins I missed out on?).
But this situation has been interesting as the charge forward to >10k was accompanied by a fairly clear loss for alts, as I assume money moved out of them into BTC. And now today as BTC got hammered they are coming back.
I am fascinated with the situation where alts seem to run counter to BTC - at least in terms of BTC value - vs the (maybe more common?) situation where they move in concert and amplify the losses or gains for Bitcoin.
I find it fascinating, and if my brain was any larger I might develop some theory...
|
|
|
|
Am I the only one not seeing images in posts today for some reason?
I think you might be. All good here. He's in denial, nothing to worry about. Please disperse, nothing to see here. Very possible. I was sending the rollercoastergoingup.gif to a friend of mine last night... and now I suppose I have to send the rollercoastergoingdown.gif But since images have stopped working on the internet there's no use in it. |
|
|
|
|
Am I the only one not seeing images in posts today for some reason?
|
|
|
|
|
I assume someone is opening some really big short positions?
|
|
|
|
 Aaaaand... |
|
|
|
Ok, but to be serious, don't you think that reading this news it could help milions of real covidiots (pictured bellow) who believes that some scientists or medical experts couldn't be simply corrupted (or simply stupid enough) and spread lies as regular propagandists do? They really wear this mask to protect themselves from virus killer  The documentation on that box is correct: Cloth masks do not effectively prevent the wearer from getting a virus (I think it's a 20-30% reduction in risk). What they do is prevent the SPREADING of viruses to other people (and they do this very well, >95%). This is why people who are selfish dick-fucks do not wear masks: Why protect or assist anyone else, I am only concerned about NUMERO UNO! Fortunately not wearing a mask is easy to spot, flags you as that kind of person, and lets people know to stay very far away from you and prevent you from entering their property as necessary. This is also why I wear a P100 respirator when in close contact with others: It protects others *and* protects me from scumbags who don't wear masks. Unfortunately they are in very limited supply which is why we do option 2 (everyone wears lesser masks). Make sense? P100 in public? I imagine you get some looks. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
