Just pointing out the comment you made on Coach Pido that degrades his position as a professional head coach that's why I explained his possible thoughts during that time. His decision of replacing Greg during the few seconds might be wrong to you but to compare his action which you think doesn't have a point compare to an Inter-Brgy Coach with a good mindset is not necessary as feedback even he already admit the mistakes.

We can't say that's the reason why they lose on that game since it's also like discrediting Abueva's strategy to find an open shot. Even Greg is there, Abueva can still make that shot. It's another "what if".

We are just discussing things mate, healthy discussion. Part of an active and healthy thread.

Moving forward to the next game, Alaska has 3 days straight schedule which starts yesterday. They are always hit with delayed schedules so it turned out like that.

CSGO is really addicting. My wallet already hurts on that game. And at the same time, purchasing game credits too on any other games e.g Ragnarok, Metamorph M, Mobile Legends skins, etc. Another spending is these NFT games. Plus gambling habits especially my sports betting activity.

What I'm saying is, if you feel you are in still control of yourself and never forget your financial obligations and responsibility, you are free to do gambling as much as you want. Stopping completely is a good option but can you really do it? If yes then good. If not, then take it slowly until you are not looking for any gambling-related stuffs.

You are the only one who can answer your own question as you know your capability compare to us.

Yes, Ben Simmons is acting unprofessionally. Cutting communications with the team and his teammates is crazy and sh*t. He should settle properly those problems with the Sixers management. He is not even a superstar-level player to consider acting like that.

To get rid of Simmons is the key to somehow make the Sixers be better, at least. Up to this point, they still can't find a suitable deal.

The Sixers "Trust the Process" rally is not progressing after 7 to 8 years since it was made. It needs to be changed.

That's my always and usual concern about Player vs Player mode, the fairness of the game. We don't have any assurance that we are competing against a real human and not a bot. Even if let's say they are humans, there's a possibility that 1-2 players in that room do have a 3rd party program to directly help the player or guide them to the next move.

For new sites or doesn't establish yet a good reputation, I might bit hesitant to test their PvP mode. Will only do it on a site that has somehow already been in the industry for a long and already establish a large community and user-based.

2nd

€40,955.85

Username: harizen

On what part does it make unfair?

Try to read the article for more information or some insights about the subject.

It's not about the rent, fees, or tax-related thing but stats show that many people are really lurking on gambling establishments in those areas. There are also gambling establishments in the rural areas but revenue is not that close compare to the deprived areas.

The reason doesn't make any sense to me although he beat the same guy twice, that was close. If the other party is requesting a rematch and he thinks that something is needed in settlement to finally end the discussion, he should consider taking the rematch. 3 wins over 0 should settle the deal. Although he has a point that other boxers should enter the scene.

Back to the subject, Caleb Plant is now well-prepared and even more ready to the fight:

‘Caleb Plant Is More Than Ready [To Beat Canelo], Be Careful’

I hope not just hype. I'm expecting a close bout here even Canelo is a dominant one.

You are correct there that the decision will still be based on the viewers.

But disagree with the part of the way it was market is a dirty trick. It means the steamer's actions and way of advertising the site are effective. That was a skill that other streamers don't have.


Possible. And aside from that, the views are more important. They can make money there even without a direct sponsorship on the site. Of course, it's good to have sponsorship but it's not a necessary part. It's like other streamers who are playing games but the purpose is for number views and not a benefit from the games they are streaming.

- Are you ready to potentially play on sites that will be located, or will be registered, in Ukraine?

Why not? In crypto-gambling, what matters for me are features, promotions, bonuses, etc. regardless of where the site is registered or established.

- To become a key set of "features" for you that would attract you?

Don't have a specific answer to this. It's like if there's something "unique" and "good", it will attract me.

- What will be negative for you when placing gambling sites in Ukraine?

Hmmm. Maybe if there's part of the terms that I don't prefer. One example is, mandatory KYC and restricted locations. I also has a habit of using VPN.

Only a few books catch my interest but not in gambling. Mostly, I learn those card games by doing it in actual, against a real opponent. There's no trick behind learning but just playing regularly. I even do gamble at Chinese poker every single day because it's really addictive. The same goes for my preferred gambling which is sports betting.

For now, I only refer to some websites about my gamer side where every information is necessary. Gambling-related questions on the other hand can be referred by asking someone or reading a source on some various sources on the world wide web today.

I think that trade is not possible to happen. Irving will stay and play with the Nets for the next season. He is just creating drams like before.

Moving forward to Sixers, it's no secret plan already that Simmons will be traded in the future instead of Joel Embiid. Prior the start of Season 2020-21, Sixers made it clear (I'm sure I read it elsewhere and share it here) that it was the season we might see the final Simmons-Embiid duo.

Still no news for the future of Ben Simmons but I'm sure he will play at the different jersey next season.

It's just that the PH community is sometimes biased towards that view. When Mexicans trashtalking Manny Pacquiao, everyone is on rage mode about it. But when PH boxer is trashtalking, pointing to Casimero, it's now become ok. 

But for me, it's ok to trashtalk as long as boxers are able to prove it on the ring. The trashtalk of Mexicans before to Manny Pacquiao didn't yield a winning result. Now with Casimero, if he wins, then his trashtalk makes sense.

That's only a "what if". The last shot of Abueva was contested and defended. Around 3-4 defend him. We can't say that Magnolia won't able to drain that clutch if Slaughter was there. See how Calvin rotates? If Slaughter is there, surely the gameplay will be change but still have a chance to take that shot.


It depends on the situation. Pido's decision is good for me. It's just that Abueva hit the shot. If Abueva was able to shot it without defense then we can blame the coach. A coach removes big man in some cases in defense when there are only a few seconds on the clock or something that the opposing team might do a catch and shoot. On that play, I see an 80% chance that the last shot was a jump shot. Abueva just keeps running to stay away at his defense so he made an opening.

Well, Pido's take the blame so move on now on that part. That was a nice play on Abueva.

If I remembered correctly, Crawford before is making noise to his promoter to arrange a fight against a boxer that has a quite popular name.

Now with Shawn Porter on the line, at least he got that one. And if win, a possible big boxer again on the lineup. As for the shared odds above, I'm a bit surprised with the gap of odds. Crawford is no doubt the favorite but I'm expecting close odds.

 Well then, we all know odds are adjusted while the fight is closing so better wait before placing a bet.

I miss the response. Kind of late.

Ok, just for follow-up, almost all casinos are allowing huge withdrawals. However, we can't assure that it will always be smooth as ever that's why it won't hurt that much if withdrawals will on batches to somehow not trigger the bell.

When I say "huge", the amount is ranging from over $5,000 minimum, at least.

No need for too much deep and technical explanation about this. $100 bankroll right? I will use it on luck-based games such as slots and roulettes. That was a pretty small bankroll to me to spend time in strategy-based games. I value my time. Instead, I'd rather go all-in that amount in sports betting which I always do.

I only gamble with that kind of bankroll in real-life gambling if we are about to point out strategy-based games. In actual gambling right on the table, my skills in card games are more effective compare to dealing in an online PvP. My overall winning stats is also good playing at this, much worth spending time compare online.

Hmm, is this serious? That browser is alarming if behaving like that and my Chrome is not like that. As for my knowledge, there's no such thing as Chrome Browser or any popular browsers will force you directly to some gambling sites unless you click an ad as it will trigger another web page or tab.


With technology today and with the current pandemic situation where everyone is focused only on their mobile and computers, people at any age will really exposed to gambling sites. Ads are everywhere not just for gambling-related sites.

Just like what other things they are seeing in the internet, it's now up to them how to deal with it.


There's no solution but rather people have to educate one over one. It's not that easy and simple. After telling youth that they should not gamble, they won't just follow that easily.

Nothing wrong with me and that's a good initiative. That's for awareness and not totally telling the people that they should stop doing gambling.

It's good that they think of that kind of program for youths. Like I'm always saying, youth has no way to avoid encountering gambling that's why instead of limiting or forcing youths to avoid gambling, let them decide for themselves if they want to try gambling or not.

With that education program, somehow these youth will have an overview of what they will expect to see in gambling. No curiosity nor confusion once they enter and do the actual gambling.

Everything is running smoothly and everyone is expecting Lebron to pass Kareem within 3-4 seasons since he left the Cavaliers but injury spoiled that momentum on 2018-19 season where James was sidelined for long and the Lakers didn't make it to the playoffs. 17 games missed on that season.

The next following season, 2019-20 the Lakers, now with Anthony Davis, now becomes fully in shape to chase the championship on that season. LeBron is now returning to his usual phase like he's not aging or what and in the end, they won an NBA title.

Moving forward from 2020-21, LeBron James suffers an injury again and that makes him sidelined for 20 games during the season.

Imagine around 40 games missed and let's say with a 20-25PPG average, that's about around 800 to 1,000 points that James is supposed to achieve right now. He's now seeing hitting the age and 25 PPG now is a tough task for LeBron. He is turning 37 this year. Good thing there's Westbrook that will now act as their PG so LeBron no need to be athletic fully per game.

I agree. The anti-gambling enthusiast should understand the "positive side" of the gambling business in those deprived areas. Don't just focus on the word "gambling" but instead look at the whole. They should not look only for a single tree but on the whole forest.

It's clear that the gambling industry makes a big economic contribution to that country and we quote;

"119,000 jobs"
"£4.5bn in tax"
"£7.7bn to the economy in gross value"

That stats are a big help coming from a pandemic.