That is too much considering that you can buy the same amount of coins with only a little fee on some other exchanges. Other centralized services are already established, and won't need to do anything to prove their legitimacy. As some other people have already pointed out, perhaps the site isn't really doing too well to begin with hence why people aren't interested on it one bit. If Oobit offers something else that no other exchanges have done before then perhaps we can try it, but at this point, what separates it from the rest in the industry anyway to make us use it?

Employee retention is an uphill battle especially if employers are not willing to up their game in the job market. Common reasons why an employee leaves the company is because of being underpaid, or thinks that they are underpaid because they find out that X company gives their employees a few percent more than what they are receiving on current company, while also getting the most benefits and the most leeway for the employee. Another reason is the limited 'growth' an employee sees on their current employer. Most employees dream of being promoted and being paid more, but that usually isn't the case hence they will look for other employers that will give them this opportunity and snatch it at a moment's notice.

On the employer's side of things, it will be hard since you can't simply just up your employees' wages if your revenue remains the same. There's a lot of variables involved in the employers' side that employees would simply not care at all, because all they want is get paid for the work they exerted (and that's okay). It's a tough world out there, and I know how hard it is for both parties given this time of economic turmoil all around the world.

This is why it's always better to just drain your funds every session on the casino or withdraw it out if it's still something that can be taken out from it. I never know that this existed, but I'm always on the notion that whatever money you leave in third-party sites that you do not control are as good as lost before you can log back in and withdraw it. Now that I know that these ToS clauses exist, it's way easier for me now to siphon whatever dollars/cents are left on my gambling accounts.

Most of the time, ETH, but if the other party needs to receive it as BTC, of course it's way better to send it as is. There are times of the day wherein BTC fees are cheaper and you can get away with less than a few cents worth of fees, but it's not really consistent within the day so switching to ETH might be more economical before hitting send on your PC. You can use other alts for the same purpose too, but of course value will be an issue especially if the other party needs to get it as BTC or ETH and would not want an exchange to add to the equation.

I already have a degree and a masters, and would still love to earn one for a different field that I can use to integrate on what I want to do later down the line. I don't learn that much when it comes to solo learning, so I guess it'll be hard for me to pick up a new skill that I can make money off. True that is way cheaper and more flexible than going back to college, but not everyone is capable of learning things by themselves. Also, I am quite okay financially so I think I can fund my college degree if I want to. Luckily, I do not live in the US where college is extremely expensive, and so I think I'll go back to college if given the chance (and time).

Your name is really weird I must say.

Would your mates not help you gain access on gambling websites that you walk to us, complete strangers to you, in a forum, and helps us make money with your bets? You could just let a friend do that for you and you basically just cut all the hoops and bullshits but you're still getting money from a trusted source. I understand how easy it is to be limited on a sport especially if you win too much, but this just sounds complete bollocks to me. Better get someone reputable to vouch for you and we'll judge from there. Good intentions (hence your name) but sounds shady and too good to be true.

Hopefully I haven't, because if that's the case then I'll be luring people into a hobby/activity that is bound to give them endless disappointments and a lot of wasted cash. Also thankfully enough I haven't won anything substantial for the past few years, and all this time gambling has only been a money sink for me. $20 per week, multiply it to 40+ weeks a year for 3 years and that's how much I already downed on gambling alone. Not a lot compared to what others are spending but somehow enough to buy a car or even something fancy that you can still use until now. Getting into gambling because you saw your mate win is a no no. You are expecting lots of disappointments along the way and you might even turn to a degenerate if you can't handle your emotions carefully.

I handled both, and tbh I would prefer salary over commission. There's just a lot of variables affecting commission-based jobs that will really render you to put in the extra effort just to get something off of it. Whereas in a salaried job you literally just have to clock in for 8 hours every single workday and you'll expect something. Sometimes salaried job can be tedious but hey, there will be your 'downtime' days wherein you wouldn't really perform naturally, but you'll still be paid. If you do that on commission-based jobs, good luck finding a client or making a sale with that.

If you're the type of person that never runs out of energy, go for a commission-based job. But if you're average just like the rest of the populace, salaried jobs is IMO miles ahead than commission-based jobs.

As a rule of thumb re: crypto investments, I think people should really do a lot more digging and require 3 or more credible sources of information before they start digging. Anyone that easily believes anything on the internet is bound to lose some money - or something - eventually. I also notice that new crypto announcements that are popping off have this particular strat wherein a certain successful coin has its investors "leaving" for their coin. It's the oldest marketing strat, defamatory and deceptive at best, but it's somehow working still.

One main reason I see is because crypto casinos are popping off literally almost everywhere every single day. It's hard to make your brand recognized without some form of advertising like signature campaigns. Bitcointalk is like the main hub for all things crypto and bitcoin, and once you get the word out from here, there is a huge possibility that your platform will be referred to another people of which the referral will come from here. Previously signature campaigns were dominated by ICOs and IEOs and all that stuff during the boom of those things, but eventually, the gambling campaigns outnumber them just because gambling is the same old story but with always a different face and a different feel for them.

A thrifty gambler who is only after the experience would probably just move on and go on to another casino and not get more money than they originally allotted. I only gamble $20 a week on dice and I never expect to even make a withdrawal anyway, so any casino that accepts that amount I gladly use them. I can see the reason why there needs to be a minimum withdrawal amount for casinos, but on the deposit I just can't figure out why there needs to be a minimum. If it's a crypto casino, it might be that the platform is preventing dust inputs but apart from that, not a lot of good reasons, really.

No brainer answer: Sports Betting.

You can easily pick whichever event you are interested/knowledgeable in and gauge the abilities and record of the team you want to bet on. By doing so, you minimize the risk of you choosing the wrong bet. Also, you can literally bet on a sure win team and still get 5-20% guaranteed profit easily, and that is something that lottery can match - with online gambling (specifically blackjack) there are chances that you can get this, but it's a coin toss/probability still. Bottomline, you can win a lot and gain a lot in sports betting consistently than you would do on any other form of gambling available out there.

It's a huge IF. Those people will always have the option to not pay and still use the features of Twitter as is, they just won't have that blue badge displayed beside their name. We already saw a lot of verified users that are against this. They might just be another cheapskate or they just don't like the idea that a capitalist owner wanted to charge them for just a blue check mark. Whatever happens, I doubt Elon can easily recoup the sale in 1 year, and besides not all profit would even go to him anyway

Given that Instagram is a site wherein content creators are completely at, it's a no-brainer for Meta to simply integrate a blockchain that easily connects NFT creators and NFT marketplaces in one. It's not really mind-blowing at all, but it's something that is to be expected, especially since Instagram is ramping up its whole identity to be 'the brand' for content creators to flaunt their content and the updates on what they do, and hopefully create a product out of that and bam, you got Polygon sorting these final stages out.

It's either they perform so well against ex-Gambit players or they fall terribly against them, always no in between as I have noticed in the past. But you also have to give some props on Faze on defeating a lot of big names despite falling short most of the time on Tier 2/3 teams that are leagues below them. Well in any games whatsoever, there will always be a top-tier team that loses to a so-so team just because, and the rest they can defeat quite easily.

And here I thought online casinos are doing pretty good for themselves. I don't think there's that much to do for casinos to "cope" with whatever's happening outside. They can provide some bonues to entice peers and possible players on their platforms but that's just about it. They're doing great in terms of raking in profits and getting all the attention that they needed in order to attract new customers. Perhaps they'd only fall off if they fall short on what they previously promised to offer their players and if the service no longer feels like they want the money of their players.

I think we just entered a sideways market now. We've been seeing a lot of stagnant markets recently and it's evidenced by constant back and forth in the same price range for almost all crypto. Probably has something to do with the fact that traders could have been accumulating slowly to prepare for the next big runs. Better to prepare a lot of bags in the next few months IMO, because this stagnance might mean something.

I know these things would be available but honestly I'm not expecting too much. I'm still getting what my money's worth each week, and if they activated those bonus then that's great. However if it will be unlocked behind huge wagering requirements (like they usually do) then I guess other people can still try for it, but certainly not me. Deposit bonuses are completely welcome though - make my $20 worth $40 is something I wouldn't pass on

Should be declared as legal with limitations IMO.

It is continuously bringing a stream of revenue to the government, it's just that its workers aren't sourced from the Philippines but rather from another country. Lots of undocumented workers from China were being deported each day but lots are still getting sent here and that's the main problem. Instead of it helping to open more jobs, it just eats up space and a lot of other things compared to what it's giving to the country.

If only things are managed and handled in this god-forsaken country that would be great.

The man has quite the reason as to why he went disguised in claiming his prize, but whatever those reasons are, winners shouldn't have their identities be in public specially if it involves winning a huge amount. It puts their lives in danger, puts their personal relationship in fragile bridges, and also just gives away a lot of information to other people that might have some interest on the winnings of that person. I believe that there should be a law against publishing public details of winners of whatever contest that involves money, or if there is one they should strengthen its implementation.