Bitcoin Forum
July 03, 2024, 01:37:18 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 [160] 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 ... 317 »
3181  Economy / Reputation / Re: Merit abuser user... on: May 08, 2018, 02:03:17 PM
Not tag worthy in my opinion.
3182  Other / Meta / Re: Bounty manager (staff & merit source!) Anon11073 embezzling $4000 on: May 08, 2018, 10:04:48 AM
@Anon11073 I'm really sorry for what I did on another thread. I was under the impression that you were no longer a merit source for Japanese board.
I'll go and edit my post. this seems like I was trying to take your place. I wasn't.
3183  Economy / Reputation / Re: Account connected on: May 08, 2018, 09:53:47 AM
Tag them and never forgive them because they have seen the opportunity to earn money and they have used that opportunity. they have used different accounts to participate in facebook bounty. did they cheat? let their manager know. did you tag them without thinking too much? correct your mistake and remove their tags.

Note: just an advice for DT2 members.
3184  Other / Meta / Re: How to reopen a self locked topic? on: May 08, 2018, 05:24:54 AM
There is an unlock topic button where the "lock topic" button would be. (bottom left corner)



Much love - thanks Smiley

How did you lock it in the first place?
3185  Economy / Reputation / Re: Trust ratings on: May 08, 2018, 04:26:02 AM
I'm not making money by being on DT.  If you can point me to where that's true, I'll listen.  The importance is in the weight of my feedback when I tag someone--that's basically it.

That's what I'm talking about, you should ignore untrusted feedback until it is trusted, if you are tagging people with the knowledge of that your feedback
Has weight on people's reputation, if you are not listening to reason when you are called out, you are not to be trusted. I called you out to ask your opinion.
What do you think about mprep action in this case? if you think leaving retaliatory feedback is wrong, say it. if you refuse to speak, then you will face the
Same situation someday and nobody would trust your words then.

Stop trolling.

OK I will stop trolling. you want to know my opinion on this? retaliatory feedback is wrong. if you know it, you should tell that to mprep, let him read your opinion, let him know what you think. refuse to talk and I will confront you next time when you are judging others.

Fucking be a man.

This is me being a man. @mprep, I believe retaliatory feedback, positive feedback to complement each other back and forth is wrong. I also believe they
Are on to you, OP could be a bought account because his email was reset recently. they want you gone and they have the support. reconsider everything you have done and edit sent feedback if necessary. if you think you have made a mistake, correct it.

This is me weighing other factors, my support for him for whatever good he has done for this community. now if anybody else is reading here, facking be a man and speak.

3186  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Marketplace (Altcoins) / Re: ICO whitelisted accounts on: May 08, 2018, 02:22:46 AM
This is illegal.
Because you are violating US laws. I will tag you OP.
3187  Other / Meta / Re: My idea for automation in recovering stolen accounts on: May 08, 2018, 02:05:47 AM
Sold accounts not stolen, people should stop selling accounts. you want automate the process to farm and sell accounts industrially and then scam people.
3188  Economy / Services / Re: Looking for Yobit traders for chat messaging on: May 07, 2018, 07:48:18 PM
Are you related to trollpayment? lol. PM me here and give me some details about how you are going to pay and when you are going to pay?
3189  Economy / Reputation / Re: Trust ratings on: May 07, 2018, 07:27:28 PM
I have a lot of respect for mprep based on his posts and the job he does, but I think he was in the wrong with that auction and with the negative feedback he left for BAC.  The way I see it is that we all make mistakes if we get emotional about something, and I think that's what he did with the feedback he left.  Hopefully he learns from that auction debacle.  Also, I see green trust when I look at his trust page--but I have a very customized trust list.  BAC is also green.

There certainly is a lot of infighting here, but I'm pretty sure that's unavoidable, given the diversity of people we have here.  Most DT members aren't corrupt, and if they do get caught in a blatant scam they'll get removed.  I've seen that happen with a few former DT members, like Quickseller, Master-P, and most recently TheButterZone (though he requested he himself be removed).  TBZ isn't a scammer, but he has a slight problem with leaving negs--and positives--too readily.  I know there's a lot of others, but I can't remember any more off the top of my head.

I do wish there wasn't so much bickering among DT members and that there wasn't this drama between OGNasty and Lauda that's split not only DT but a lot of members into factions, but that's how it is.  I try to stay out of all of that, but OGNasty excluded me from his trust list, which got me booted off DT the first time.  Ouch.  Nevertheless, my fight has always been with the account sellers, farmers, and shitposters--not DT members.  I'd like to keep it that way.

What do you get for being a DT2 member? is there any benefit for you? if there is no benefit for you then staying in or out shouldn't cause any trouble for you. if you are afraid of losing something by staying out of it, then you are not an honourable man and you would never achieve anything in your life, you'd Stay the same person with the same life. waking up every day to do what you are doing just for the money. nobody would come to your help when you need it if you don't help others when they need it.

Do you see mprep is doing something wrong? ignore his position and your own, judge him like you judge everybody else. this is another test like
All other tests. I'm asking you now. if nobody has ever asked you for your opinion, this is it, judge or stay quite. whatever you do there will be consequences. your reputation or your DT2 status? there is only one good outcome.
3190  Economy / Reputation / Re: Signature Designers exchanging merits on: May 07, 2018, 06:35:32 PM

Just ignore their names and what they are doing to earn money. look at their merited posts and decide, would you tag them or would you say they deserved their received merits?
3191  Economy / Reputation / Re: Signature Designers exchanging merits on: May 07, 2018, 05:02:01 PM
Without naming names I can confirm that one user of the three were extremely pushy towards me giving them merit for.. nothing really.

Watching this to see what happens.

Why would you wait for others to decide? be a real man and have your own mind. do not allow others to tell you how to think. act according to
The rules, if you don't like the rules, try to suggest something better. watching this to see what happens is not the kind of reaction we expect
From you. if you are not able to assess this situation, nobody would ever ask for your opinion on anything else. nobody would ever value your
Opinion.
3192  Economy / Reputation / Re: Trust ratings on: May 07, 2018, 03:41:30 PM
If you are not NEW here then why you are posting and asking like newbie here? This retaliatory feedback means both DT has their own reason for giving it and this is normal since we have different perspective. Later on this issue will be resolved so don't bother anymore on their personal problem and focus on your own life. Read carefully the description of the feedback. You can start there on judging if they are really Trusted or not.

Read my red tag by marlboroza. would you say I deserved it? ignore my name and read the reference. if you think that I don't deserve it after I asked you to review my case, and if you keep quite and say nothing. nobody should ever trust your judgment. if you lie, people would see and nobody would ever trust you.

If you see some powerful people are doing something wrong and if you say nothing, your words would mean nothing for anybody after that.
3193  Other / Meta / Re: What to do with such members ? on: May 07, 2018, 03:00:33 PM
I agree that users that are here solely for bounty campaigns

Would you stand by your own words? when you say something like that, you should be ready if somebody had to challenge you, if you believe you are not
Here solely for money. I am daring you to remove your signature and participate in discussions. if you are not going to do that then you are a hypocrite.
Being a hypocrite is worse than being a shitposter.

as long as there are campaign managers like the one for the campaign that the referenced user is in, there will always be shitposters that are accepted into shit campaigns, unfortunately.

Bounty portal and bounty hive. how would you punish them?
3194  Other / Meta / Re: What if that happens? on: May 07, 2018, 02:35:30 PM
Tag these members with deleted posts, if they have traded merits and then deleted their posts. you can't just reverse merit transactions, what happens if
They have already used their merits on other accounts? if I give you 50 merits for a garbage post and you give 25 merits to a high quality post.

Reversing the first transaction would cause all the other transactions to be reversed. you should tag me for sending 50 merits to a garbage post. I will also start tagging people for such cases. merit shouldn't be used on your friends, you shouldn't send 50 merits to somebody just because you know them.

If theymos is the only one to decide which merit transaction is abuse and which one is not, he should intervene in all the cases.
3195  Economy / Reputation / Re: New Form of Cheating Bounties on: May 07, 2018, 01:43:41 PM
I have sent a PM to the campaign manager to notify him about this case.

I believe that this is not just a mere "double entry". This is an intentional act of deceit which, in return, fools campaign managers that might lead to double or triple pay for a "work". I believe that this act is an act of an untrustworthy person. An act which is somewhat similar to scam or ponzi scheme.

Tagged. I wrote "double entry" to cheat in bounty. spreadsheet is also redacted.
3196  Other / Meta / Re: Reapplying as a merit source! on: May 06, 2018, 05:20:47 PM
Snip.
Read previous posts before talking. pay per post campaigner.
3197  Economy / Reputation / Re: Signature Designers exchanging merits on: May 06, 2018, 02:38:47 PM
and things that help the community, i've seen that people give merits to do infographics about the merits system). Yes, they've good designs but there was another way to appreciate the help they were receiven, as i said before, by the Trust System. Are you trying to say that if they aren't merits souces, they can do merits exchanges?

Depends on the quality of their posts. for example: if you read my latest red tagging, you'll understand. if these signature designers are meriting each other back and forth for some low quality posts, you could tag them. don't wait for DT members. you should tag them yourself.
3198  Economy / Reputation / Re: Signature Designers exchanging merits on: May 06, 2018, 12:32:38 PM
Let them send some merits for their nice designs. let people see their merits, who cares? they are not merit sources. let them have fun. it's not meriting
Garbage posts. it's not like they have traded hundreds of merits this way? because I only see 20-25 merits on each one of their designing threads.
Just don't tag them for this.
3199  Other / Meta / Re: Reapplying as a merit source! on: May 06, 2018, 11:10:48 AM
I don't think he has the right to be one again. Because he personally knew that he has wrong doings and stepping down is the right solution at that time

Currently Japanese board has no merit source, I'm still not sure if I could effectively distribute merits, but nobody else has offered something better. I think you ignored my last post and my reasons.

resorted to attempted to extort money out of people just to remove your red tag for them

Typical reaction. do you see anybody care about my red tags? are people lining up to pay me for red tag removal? did I ask for money for myself?
Typical reaction of account farmer/seller, are you farming accounts and cheating bounties with multiple accounts? because you'd think of me as
Extortionist and would accuse me because you don't want to pay a fine or report thousands of garbage posts. of course I'm racist, lier, extortionist.
Because if I'm to be taken seriously, you all would have to pack and leave, no more cheating for you guys.

Tagging persons with the option to remove it for money makes the trust system worthless in the forum.

What makes the trust system worthless is allowing people to abuse their positions, when they see a long term signature campaign, they would use their influence to apply as many alt accounts as they can. bribing campaign managers with merits and DT2 status. using merits on threads of their own trades with other people. oh this guy just bought a physical Bitcoin from me, let me return the favour by giving him some merits.
3200  Other / Meta / Re: Reapplying as a merit source! on: May 06, 2018, 08:19:08 AM
It's whether he's cut out to be a representative of the forums. I think all would be fine and dandy having him as a merit source if he didn't blatantly announce it so often across the forums,

This is the mentality of people like you, that's why I say I need immunity because you all are too afraid to say anything when somebody in a position of power is doing something wrong. when I was a source, you were insulting theymos by saying that making me a source was a mistake.
I resigned to achieve not one but a few things, first I was offended by having 0 sMerits for days, because I didn't become a source for my own benefit.

Second, I wanted to show you that I'm not in your way, didn't you and LoyceV say that I should be replaced with better candidates? you are saying it now.

Third reason, I thought there are better choices than me. it was a mistake. all of you people are here for your own benefit. you are hypocrites.
I will remove my signature on wednesday whether I'm a source or have no negative trust, I'm going to stay here and help this community to show
Who you really are. @all of you hypocrites.

I say there are other qualified applicants for the merit source position. It's a "nay" from me (not that it matters).

It matters (to me but to theymos? I think he has his reasons), I did care and I proved it to you by resigning. I do care about your signatureless campaign, I requested to move your thread back in services section. if that is what it takes for you to contribute, I'd say we should let you to get paid per post by Chipmixer, we should let you to help in distributing merits even if people are selling their accounts after getting merits. I'd say we should also ban account sales.

except that he crossed paths with a DT member that doesn't take lightly to joking about the things that he has joked about.

Except he wasn't a DT before crossing path with me. I say that we should also let him stay on DT now that he is helping and we should also hold him accountable for his actions. if theymos is moderating merit sources, if he is reducing or increasing their source merits. he should also care about DT members and their actions. if that DT member is only a DT member because he crossed path with me, he should know that.

He has also stated that he wants to use his merit source status as some sort of "immunity"? That, to me, shows irresponsibility.

You are a hypocrite. do you want to know what is really irresponsibility? when you see me doing something wrong, if you know that I could benefit this community given the chance. you should discuss with me to help me improve myself. you should think about what I'm suggesting. red tagging me just because you can and just because you know nobody would question you is the definition of irresponsibility.
Pages: « 1 ... 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 [160] 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 ... 317 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!