Is Bitcoin Private going to be given out to Bitcoin holders or Bitcoin Cash holders?
Bitcoin |
|
|
|
https://coingeek.com/lightning-network-cant-scale-needs-another-layer/  Still no block size increase, but an entire additional layer—and the same high fees (possibly more) WTF  Also...Coinex and other BCH exchanges..please add BCH-XRP, BCH-STR pairs... both xrp and str got huge pumps, when people want to sell they are forced into usd/usdt/btc ...none of these choices are suitable for BCH "real bitcoin " supporters.. we dont want our coins going through old btc(causing a big spike in the charts) to change to the real Bitcoin(BCH) Thanks guys  When a publication is owned by Calvin Ayre or Roger Ver then it's automatically void. It's like apple telling everybody why the iOS is superior to Android Sounds like black and white thinking... ..aaand that's a poor analogy - which mobile OS is superior is mostly an opinion. Unless of course you care to tally up the tech specs of each and try to make an objective decision. First you need to be clear about your priorities however (is cost more important than usability etc). OK, Let's try it with cryptos, I will go first: MY top Priorities (your can be different, but be honest please): 1. I can use it, merchants accept it and I can trade it on exchanges or with private parties 2. It's secure 3. It's safe from theft and govt meddling/inflation 4. Low fees So far, BTC only fits 2 and 3 - 1 and 4 are gone due to Kore's retardedness/compromise BCH fits all 4. Your turn. That has nothing to do with the quote You quote a post of me saying a BCH supporters publication is biased to the one side the same as if you asked apple which os is the best iOS or android no matter what the technicalities are apple will always say apple is better. As for the what you try to derail the content with then BTC fills 1, 2, & 3 you like to post your acceptbitcoin.cash site and if you look over it then you would see BTC is accepted at way more places than BCH yes the fees are higher big deal once the rest of the scaling solutions have rolled out then that will ease the mempool and blockstream are not against a block increase its just not needed yet once schnorr signatures etc are implemented BTC will be able to store more transactions in the current block as BCH can in a 8MB block and if a increase is needed after all this it will be rolled out in a future release Other busy coins are getting higher fees now too ETH is around $2.50 now and but its got issues but its not block space issue the network infrastructure cannot process the transactions fast enough also with the rise of ripple recently the transaction fee has gone up 3000% even BCH now has a average tx fee of about $0.40 yea its not much but a far cry from under $0.01 that it was a couple of month ago |
|
|
|
bc bitcoin mining reward half every 4 years, increasing in btc value will justify and provide incentive for miners continue mining btc, but by 2040 , last btc mined. No more btc reward, says transaction fees is low for mass adoption, how will btc network be maintained??? Anyone know?
I think you'll find its 2145 approx Yes, he got it wrong. According to estimates on stackexchange it will be about 2140, not 2040. https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/10486/when-will-the-last-bitcoin-be-minedThe estimate is 2140 based on the block reward halving frequency of four years. According to math and knowledge that there are 32 halving events, in 2136, the block reward will yield 0.00000168 BTC per day, which is 0.00000042 BTC per block. That's 42 satoshis. my bad, lol, nvm, yeah, its around 2140, another 100yrs or so. Yea a long time but by 2040 the reward will still be down to around 0.1953125 so still almost non existent and as the reward gets lower then the fees will be needed as this is the only way miners will be paid Also as the value increases more and more miners come online faster than the difficulty adjusts so the halving is probably closer to 3 1/2 years so by 2040 it could have possibly hit the 0.09765625 reward Year - Block Reward
2020 6.25
2024 3.125
2028 1.5625
2032 0.78125
2036 0.390625
2040 0.1953125
2044 0.09765625
2048 0.04882812
2052 0.02441406
2056 0.01220703
2060 0.00610351
2064 0.00305175
2068 0.00152587
2072 0.00076293
2076 0.00038146
2080 0.00019073
2084 0.00009536
2088 0.00004768
2092 0.00002384
2096 0.00001192
2100 0.00000596
2104 0.00000298
2108 0.00000149
2112 0.00000074
2116 0.00000037
2120 0.00000018
2124 0.00000009
2128 0.00000004
2132 0.00000002
2136 0.00000001
2140 0
Taking data from fork.lol Block Reward Fees (4.39 BTC) $73,109 (0.02 BCH) $55 So right now with no more block subsidy # A BTC miner will earn $73109 where a BCH miner will just earn $55 per block and to gain the same amount of reward as BTC right now BCH needs to be getting over 130tx/s so as of now BTC has around 85% miner share but with no block reward BTC will be around will be 99.5% so either BCH will need to gain HUGE value over BTC Have a Huge amount of on chain transactions Raise fees by a huge amount which wont be possible if they keep the intent to make every transaction get into the next block The only other way is to HF to increase the coin supply and go against what bitcoin was created for Everyone here keeps going on about satoshis vision and the whitepaper etc but the reality is the white paper was a technical proof of concept it was not a vision of the final project satoshis vision was a deflationary currency not controlled by the banks and yes he even said himself that it would need to scale to layer 2 solutions way back when he was active |
|
|
|
I am not down for Bitcoin cash it is a straight up money grab from big whales wanting to double up nothing more
There is no long term future the miners need fees to survive and Cash is going out of there way to make it cheap to use now they are compensated in block rewards but what happens in like 10 years when the block reward becomes closer to 1.5BCH and fees start to become much more relevant to keep security and if the rumor is true that BCH is going to HF again to reduce fees from 1sat/1b to 1 sat/10b then miner rewards get even lower there will just be no incentive to carry on mining with the same security level making the network much weaker overall in this scenario there are only a few of things that will help
1. There is a HUGE increase in on chain transactions you will need probably 1 million transactions per block to keep the security level
2. You gain HUGE in value way above BTC like 10x its value
3. You HF again increasing the 21m coin cap to create more miner subsidies inflating the coin supply and going against everything bitcoin ever stood for
It is absolutely hilarious , you mention the miners needing fees to survive. How the hell , do you you expect the Onchain Miners to make a profit when segshit wants everything done OFFCHAIN in LN , Where the Miners receive Nothing!It is like this miners can set a reasonable fees in comparison to other competing Payment Systems. Bitcoin Cash fee may rise, but they intend to keep the fees comparable to other payment services so they stay useful and relevant. Segshitcoin wants the ONCHAIN Fees to be insanely High to force people OFFCHAIN for all of their transactions, which will starve the miners of fees faster than anything else. Segshit /LN, does not care they have already priced theirselves out of the markets as a payment system. And the stupid segshit is a store of value crap , is pure hype, it has no use now except hoping the price goes up. Every Crypto has that feature. It is even stupid for people to hold segshit in a private wallet, as leaving it on an exchange is the only safe way to be sure you can sell it when you need too. It is like this, I can sell apples for $500 each , but as long as a competitor is selling them for $1.99 each, eventually I will run out of fools to buy my apples. Same thing is going to happen with segshit, once the greater fools run out , segshit will crash on a level of the Dutch Tulips. Crypto competes with Visa / Paypal / Money Wire Services / & other cryptos anything over $5 per transactions is an utter rip off denying that is foolish. ╥Aztek The miners will get plenty of reward LN does not take their reward there will be the opening and closing fee plus any transaction of a considerable amount a LN transaction is not meant for huge value transactions its for lots of lower value ones from the tiniest of micro transactions even sending 1 single satoshi will be possible something BCH cannot do. As for sending to exchanges to sell if the exchanges accept LN then you will be able to send and sell from your personal wallet in under a second this is much more secure than leaving your funds on an exchange just in case you need it fast if the exchanges happens to be hacked etc then you are SOL |
|
|
|
^ how many from this list forked before segwit was put in?
Just Cash and Clashic if you wanna call that a fork since its just the old EDA chain which is currently the longest chain and yes it has overtook the BCH chain I don't know if all took place though I know a some have and I can view by balance on their block explorers so 15 of your forked coins cannot claim to be REAL bitcoin..ever...they are all scams, imo inc btg & claschic now the remaining 3, BCH, btg and clashic. Out of the 3 segwit free coins, which one had no premine,never changed the orginal algo and was distributed fairly to all old btc holders? So the one that you started off shouting is the real bitcoin is now a scam even though it is unchanged in anyway and you you are now claiming a forked coin of this is the real bitcoin What changed with clashic to cause it to not be the real bitcoin anymore and a scam may I ask because it is 100% what bitcoin cash was the day it forked Clashic fits everything in your checklist as to being the real bitcoin 1. Exactly the same as bitcoin cash the day it was born (bitcoin Cash changed the rules clashic is preserving the original vision of jihan & friends) 2. It's the longest chain clutching straws m8...however if you want to consider clahsic as real btc then thats fine by me...its a scam as its not listed or followed by anyone..except a few blockstreamers trying to cause problems as usual. admit it, your down to Bitcoin cash and you know it  I am not down for Bitcoin cash it is a straight up money grab from big whales wanting to double up nothing more There is no long term future the miners need fees to survive and Cash is going out of there way to make it cheap to use now they are compensated in block rewards but what happens in like 10 years when the block reward becomes closer to 1.5BCH and fees start to become much more relevant to keep security and if the rumor is true that BCH is going to HF again to reduce fees from 1sat/1b to 1 sat/10b then miner rewards get even lower there will just be no incentive to carry on mining with the same security level making the network much weaker overall in this scenario there are only a few of things that will help 1. There is a HUGE increase in on chain transactions you will need probably 1 million transactions per block to keep the security level 2. You gain HUGE in value way above BTC like 10x its value 3. You HF again increasing the 21m coin cap to create more miner subsidies inflating the coin supply and going against everything bitcoin ever stood for not this problem that doesnt exist again, at least 10yrs upto 140yrs...and your solution is to make users pay mega high fees and wait extremly long times for transactions..(or set up a tab) also if core cared so much about the miners they wouldnt have taken the piss out tof them by lying about segwit2x and more....so please spare us the "we care about the miners future crap" trust me users are not going to set up ln or other complex unproven tech, esp when there are far better, easier choices like BCH that they can use today. You should be grateful Bitcoin cash forked a day before segwit was put in permanently to infect the btc chain. I see it as a rescue operation , not a cash grab... segwit is a cash grab, an attempt to control all of crypto through a company...this is wrong. tek..who are you?, your motives are becoming clearer ever time you post, ...you are part of blockstream somehow arent you. What's segwit2x got to do with core ? they never supported it segwit2x was an attempt by businesses to acquire control of bitcoin How is segwit a cash grab nobody earns from it you actually save money by making transaction sizes smaller thus paying lower fees and yes it has further advantages such as easy 2nd layer scaling and schnorr signatures etc that will give much greater capacity than segwit alone so instead of requiring a signature for every input you just have a single signature for all inputs saving about 40% With Segwit and schnorr signatures BTC will be able to store in the current block limit roughly the same amount of transactions that BCH can in a full 8MB block it's about efficiency. Would you have preferred microsoft to take the easy way out and just make you use your computer with 128GB or ram and a minimum of a 3TB HDD or like they did and made windows more efficient so it can run on 4GB RAM and a 60GB HDD. Just increasing the blocksize is like taking a car with a 1L engine that can do 100MPH and replacing it with a 6L and expecting it to do 600MPH. It's ok saying huge blocks are easy HDDs are cheap you can buy a 6TB HDD that but that 6TB mechanical HDD wont work reliable enough you will need 6TB worth of solid state disk to cope with the throughput and it's not just a matter of downloading the blocks to verify the nodes also need to share this data with other nodes Imagine a miner has just solved a 1GB block this 1GB block now needs to be sent to another node if there are 200 nodes then the miner either has to simultaneously upload 1GB to 200 nodes (200GB) fast before the next block is found or just a small sample say 20 nodes (20GB) then them 20 have to verify the 1GB and then pass it on say each one does 10 nodes thats 10GB and this needs doing preferably under 1 minute. While this huge block is being propagated the miner that found the block is already busy solving the next before the others have even got the block nevermind verified it this puts everyone else at a huge disadvantage especially if it takes a few minutes this puts every other miner at a huge disadvantage |
|
|
|
^ how many from this list forked before segwit was put in?
Just Cash and Clashic if you wanna call that a fork since its just the old EDA chain which is currently the longest chain and yes it has overtook the BCH chain I don't know if all took place though I know a some have and I can view by balance on their block explorers so 15 of your forked coins cannot claim to be REAL bitcoin..ever...they are all scams, imo inc btg & claschic now the remaining 3, BCH, btg and clashic. Out of the 3 segwit free coins, which one had no premine,never changed the orginal algo and was distributed fairly to all old btc holders? So the one that you started off shouting is the real bitcoin is now a scam even though it is unchanged in anyway and you you are now claiming a forked coin of this is the real bitcoin What changed with clashic to cause it to not be the real bitcoin anymore and a scam may I ask because it is 100% what bitcoin cash was the day it forked Clashic fits everything in your checklist as to being the real bitcoin 1. Exactly the same as bitcoin cash the day it was born (bitcoin Cash changed the rules clashic is preserving the original vision of jihan & friends) 2. It's the longest chain clutching straws m8...however if you want to consider clahsic as real btc then thats fine by me...its a scam as its not listed or followed by anyone..except a few blockstreamers trying to cause problems as usual. admit it, your down to Bitcoin cash and you know it I am not down for Bitcoin cash it is a straight up money grab from big whales wanting to double up nothing more There is no long term future the miners need fees to survive and Cash is going out of there way to make it cheap to use now they are compensated in block rewards but what happens in like 10 years when the block reward becomes closer to 1.5BCH and fees start to become much more relevant to keep security and if the rumor is true that BCH is going to HF again to reduce fees from 1sat/1b to 1 sat/10b then miner rewards get even lower there will just be no incentive to carry on mining with the same security level making the network much weaker overall in this scenario there are only a few of things that will help 1. There is a HUGE increase in on chain transactions you will need probably 1 million transactions per block to keep the security level 2. You gain HUGE in value way above BTC like 10x its value 3. You HF again increasing the 21m coin cap to create more miner subsidies inflating the coin supply and going against everything bitcoin ever stood for |
|
|
|
^ how many from this list forked before segwit was put in?
Just Cash and Clashic if you wanna call that a fork since its just the old EDA chain which is currently the longest chain and yes it has overtook the BCH chain I don't know if all took place though I know a some have and I can view by balance on their block explorers so 15 of your forked coins cannot claim to be REAL bitcoin..ever...they are all scams, imo inc btg & claschic now the remaining 3, BCH, btg and clashic. Out of the 3 segwit free coins, which one had no premine,never changed the orginal algo and was distributed fairly to all old btc holders? So the one that you started off shouting is the real bitcoin is now a scam even though it is unchanged in anyway and you you are now claiming a forked coin of this is the real bitcoin What changed with clashic to cause it to not be the real bitcoin anymore and a scam may I ask because it is 100% what bitcoin cash was the day it forked Clashic fits everything in your checklist as to being the real bitcoin 1. Exactly the same as bitcoin cash the day it was born (bitcoin Cash changed the rules clashic is preserving the original vision of jihan & friends) 2. It's the longest chain |
|
|
|
^ how many from this list forked before segwit was put in?
Just Cash and Clashic if you wanna call that a fork since its just the old EDA chain which is currently the longest chain and yes it has overtook the BCH chain I don't know if all took place though I know a some have and I can view by balance on their block explorers |
|
|
|
^ are you dumb??? how is/was it more profitable in old btc? BCH went from $200 to over $4000 (20x) and is still at over 10x during the same time periods, how many x has btc done...maybe 4x and is now around 3x as for other alts, thats for another time. The only time BCH was $200 was just after the fork when a lot of BTC users dumped and then it didn't make it to $200 I think it was around $230 and if I remember BTC was around $2500 and yes it reached $4000 but it remained there for less than a hour before it started dumping again and if we are talking about ATH then BTC has reached $20000 and is still around $17000 where BCH made it to $4000 and is now $2500 so has lost the most gains lols ok if you say it was $230, will you please also say it was $5200 on binance and $9000 on gdax also your saying if anyone bought btc $20k or bch $4k they bought at top...okay... but old btc dropped to $11k from top recently too  GDAX does not count it was suspended straight away for insider trading and im not saying that both have not gained or fallen just that the position they are in now percentage wise is no different from when BCH first launched it has made no real gains compared to the value of BTC What I have noticed is the value of BCH slowly falls to around 10% remains there for a bit gets pumped up to about 20% then slowly falls again averaging around 15% it was 16% the day it launched before the initial dump But even though BCH has made no real gains BTC holders are still better off because now you have just BCH and BTC if you held before the fork while BTC holders still have BTC plus BCH if they held and now bitcoin gold, superbitcoin there are more but I cannot think of them right now I need to look into whats officially launched I know a lot never surfaced I think bitcoin private launches this month that should be pretty big I would have thought that would have forked from BCH though since its from Rhett Creighton he was a BIG BCH supporter but no its BTC There is a list of all forks on wikipedia not sure whats real and what was fake https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Bitcoin_forksBitcoin Cash: Forked at Block 478558[4], 1 August 2017, For each 1 BTC you get 1 BCH Bytether: Cross fork from Bitcoin to Ethereum blockchain at block 478558, 1 August 2017. For each 1 BTC you get 1 BTH ERC-20 token. Bitcoin Clashic: Forked at Block 478558[5], 1 August 2017. For each 1 BTC you get 1 BCHC / BCL Bitcoin Gold: Forked at Block 491407[6], 24 October 2017, For each 1 BTC you get 1 BTG Bitcoin Diamond: Forked at Block 495866[7], 24 November 2017, For each 1 BTC you get 10 BCD UnitedBitcoin: Forked at Block 498777[8], 12 December 2017, For each 1 BTC you get 1 UB. Bitcoin Hot: Forked at Block 498848[9], 12 December 2017, For each 1 BTC you get 100 BTH Super Bitcoin: Forked at Block 498888, 12 December 2017, For each 1 BTC you get 1 SBTC BitcoinX: Forked at Block 498888[10], 12 December 2017, For each 1 BTC you get 10,000 BCX Oil Bitcoin: Forked at Block 498888, 12 December 2017, For each 1 BTC you get 1 OBTC Bitcoin World: Forked at Block 499777, 17 December 2017, For each 1 BTC you get 10000 BTW Lightning Bitcoin: Forked at Block 499999, 19 December 2017, For each 1 BTC you get 1 LBTC Bitcoin Stake: Forked at Block 499999, 19 December 2017, For each 1 BTC, you get 100 BTCS Bitcoin Faith: Forked at Block 500000, 19 December 2017, For each 1 BTC you get 1 BTF Bitcoin Top: Forked at Block 501118, 26 December 2017, For each 1 BTC you get 1 BTT Bitcoin God: Forked at Block 501225, forked on 27th December 2017. For each 1 BTC you get 1 GOD Bitcoin FILE: Forked at Block 501225, forked on 27th December 2017. For each 1 BTC you get 1000 BIFI Bitcoin SegWit2X X11 Not to be confused with a previous fork SegWit2X with the same name. Forked at Block 501451, 28 December 2017. For each 1 BTC you get 1 B2X Bitcoin Uranium: Forked on 31st December 2017, For each 1 BTC you get 1 BUM. Bitcoin Pizza: Forked at Block 501888, 1st January 2018, For each 1 BTC you get 1 BPA Bitcoin All: Forked on 1st January 2018, For each 1 BTC you get 1 BTA. Referenced on steemit post. |
|
|
|
^ are you dumb??? how is/was it more profitable in old btc? BCH went from $200 to over $4000 (20x) and is still at over 10x during the same time periods, how many x has btc done...maybe 4x and is now around 3x as for other alts, thats for another time. The only time BCH was $200 was just after the fork when a lot of BTC users dumped and then it didn't make it to $200 I think it was around $230 and if I remember BTC was around $2500 and yes it reached $4000 but it remained there for less than a hour before it started dumping again and if we are talking about ATH then BTC has reached $20000 and is still around $17000 where BCH made it to $4000 and is now $2500 so has lost the most gains |
|
|
|
For now bitcoin cash is all talk and promises from it's supporters but the reality shows it's just dumping, it's the one that lost the most in BTC these last days in the most known projects, even before the BTC pump, while other projects are more solid or even pumping
People that got in around $400 all think you are an idiot "notthematrix". When the same bunch of clowns were crying it was going to die then. Bitcoin Cash price per coin is $2,483.71 USD Market Cap => $41,964,267,418 USD Volume (24h) => $2,062,010,000 USD The Real Bitcoin (Bitcoin Cash) has a Long Prosperous life ahead of it. ╥Aztek The BTC/BCH ratio still remains steady around 15% which is what it started at sometime it's higher and sometimes lower but on average BCH has made no real gains yes it went from $400 to $2500 but BTC also went from around $3500 to $17000 |
|
|
|
https://coingeek.com/lightning-network-cant-scale-needs-another-layer/ Still no block size increase, but an entire additional layer—and the same high fees (possibly more) WTF Also...Coinex and other BCH exchanges..please add BCH-XRP, BCH-STR pairs...(BCH-BLK would be nice too..BLK will be a $bill coin this yr ) both xrp and str got huge pumps, when people want to sell they are forced into usd/usdt/btc ...none of these choices are suitable for BCH "real bitcoin " supporters.. we dont want our coins going through old btc(causing a big spike in the charts) to change to the real Bitcoin(BCH) Thanks guys When a publication is owned by Calvin Ayre or Roger Ver then it's automatically void. It's like apple telling everybody why the iOS is superior to Android eh...like coindesk refusing to mention bitpay btc/bch fiasco...like when barry chooses which stories to print? anyways...PLEEEEEASE leave the name targeting to the noobies... the people that understand crypto..know all the big players hold both coins, lots of dif types of fiat,prob gold and silver too... this does not make any of these currencies or pm's bad. Any publication owned by a big whale is void no matter which side they are on and yes that goes for BTC as well as BCH |
|
|
|
https://coingeek.com/lightning-network-cant-scale-needs-another-layer/ Still no block size increase, but an entire additional layer—and the same high fees (possibly more) WTF Also...Coinex and other BCH exchanges..please add BCH-XRP, BCH-STR pairs... both xrp and str got huge pumps, when people want to sell they are forced into usd/usdt/btc ...none of these choices are suitable for BCH "real bitcoin " supporters.. we dont want our coins going through old btc(causing a big spike in the charts) to change to the real Bitcoin(BCH) Thanks guys When a publication is owned by Calvin Ayre or Roger Ver then it's automatically void. It's like apple telling everybody why the iOS is superior to Android |
|
|
|
Hi guys,
I am holding some BCH at an exchange and would like to transfer them to a wallet, preferably a desktop wallet.
What is the best and safest wallet to store my BCH in?
Thanks
The recycle bin works well it comes free with Windows very helpful, great I do not think the recycle bin is a good place to store bitcoin cash trezor works better IMO He wanted a desktop wallet trezor is a hardware wallet Any desktop wallet is potentially vunerable to being hacked on a Windows system you may as well just speed up the process |
|
|
|
Hi guys,
I am holding some BCH at an exchange and would like to transfer them to a wallet, preferably a desktop wallet.
What is the best and safest wallet to store my BCH in?
Thanks
The recycle bin works well it comes free with Windows |
|
|
|
you can get 500 UCASH Currency by registering an account at their website: http://bit.do/your-500UCASH-tokenyou will need to verify your account by verifying email and phone number this new currency is very legitimate indeed and sure will go to the moon so get your 500 ASAP as this bounnty will end about the 6-7 of January You need to verify your email and phone number yea ok more like you want to harvest email and phone numbers to hack 2fa on exchanges. |
|
|
|
Why do u think people are selling Bitcoin Cash (The Real Bitcoin). That's right they buy better coins with a real use. That's right they don't like Roger Ver. That's right they are sick of the forks etc.
People sell and trade everyday, trying to claim it means anything more than that is silly. Marketcap is $41,227,561,345 Segshitcoin was the fork. And I doubt anyone prefers G.Maxwell's fat ass over Roger Ver. Or do you want to hate on the Chinese also. Funny thing is the Chinese Miners are what keep both coins running.
╥Aztek
Segshit Dominance: 32.8%How low can segshit go? Answer: $ ZEROBcash dominance is also dropping at the same rate don't forget to add that too |
|
|
|
Money from such shitcoin like ripple and verge should be transferred to Bcash and it will be like that soon
If the recent run of ICO's continue then BCH could be pushed down to CMC #8 |
|
|
|
^ no tek, you will find out soon. why you quoting 2week old comments...you drunk? lol
also someone should have saved ltc before it got segwitted...
because it didnt means less compettion for BCH( new btc ) as ltc was always a poor clone of btc and now its been killed off. (why u think charlie left?)
Possibly I use more than one device and didn't check to see what page it was on obviously not used it for a couple of weeks since im of work for xmas holidays Segwit is a prerequisite for almost all future upgrades this will limit the amount of code that BCH can now steal not 100% but I think schnorr signatures also require segwit to function and this reduces transaction sizes even further allowing even more transactions to fit in a smaller space |
|
|
|
^Segwetters lols...have you guys been doing your part, pm all btc users to start using complex segwit (i hear coinbase are struggling to add it) the segwit demand is so low, that you trolls are needed, but noooooooo....you trolls would rather come and spend your time here....  BCH price correction (up) is on the way.  So, have you been using your acquired BCH to make actual purchases? Or are you hording it, as to be expected from a deflationary currency? I'm sure the poor soul who spent 10,000 BTC to buy a pizza regrets it now. Are you going to plunk down your acquired BCH to buy a cup of coffee? If you want, you can send me 0.005 BCH and I'll send you a coffee mug and a K-cup. dude BCH is around 4months old... what is has done during those 4months ,should be enough to make you segwitters wet themselves lol. In due time, i will be spending BCH of course, just like i used to with btc. Lets talk btabs shall we...lol....have you opened a tab yet? so should people hire a programmer and create some sort of tab , or just use old ltc which is also in the clutches of blockstream lol Segwetters are scared, its obvious, the scam is being exposed more and more everyday... And how is litecoin in the clutches of blockstream the LTC foundation is nothing to do with and has no ties to Bitcoin or blockstream Are you really running that low of ideas to find ways that BCH is better that you need to resort to making stuff up. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
