The blockchain is splitted into 2 branch at 268522 block height. One branch is going to 272276 block (and stopped there), the block explore is on this. The second branch is going 308389 (and stopped there), the 144.76.100.197 client is here. There is other client (106.187.41.34) on this branch, but he is stopped at 284784. Other wallets are below than 268522. |
|
|
|
my thought is only that solo mining can ensure more fairer distribution because is more hard to mine with Mining Rig Rentals..
Nope. The pool mining has a good advantage: miners get coins continuously! Imagine: there are 2 miners, one with a large hashpower, other with small hashpower. If the small miner has a big unlucky, he run the rig days without coin. While, in pool mining, the smaller miner get every hour/day/etc a small coins. And if someone want to use a rig rentals, he just setup an own stratum server, and point the rented rig to this. so solomine doesnt prevent rentals. The solo mining works only, if everyone have almost the same hashpower. But it is not...  moreover, i see often at the launch of the coin some pools dont work.. and people FUD In thread.. i dont want this.. so, wallet in OP, download, mine.. stop.. pool will be set up later when the launch is ok.. also because if there is some problem with launch, we paid pools server for nothing  (our pool, dns, website and e-commerce servers will be hosted by digital ocean i think, i have to talk with dev about it ).. anyway for is also ok if solo is for first 1 week instead of first day.. let see what others miners say You can handle it easy: the first 100/200/1000 blocks have 0 reward, so pools have time to setup (100/200/etc min) the system. |
|
|
|
It looks like there are several blockchains out there. My guess is there are insufficient running nodes and as a result the blockchain cannot appropriately converge.
Which one is the good blockchain? the longest? this is my current peer nodes: "addr" : "75.145.121.37:42747",
"startingheight" : 254325,
"addr" : "178.23.119.147:56211",
"startingheight" : 242434,
"addr" : "106.187.41.34:50558",
"startingheight" : 284784,
"addr" : "192.99.167.40:36592",
"startingheight" : 272276,
"addr" : "201.217.52.34:50421",
"startingheight" : 251494,
"addr" : "144.76.100.197:44308",
"startingheight" : 301476,
"addr" : "116.231.149.86:60033",
"startingheight" : 251668,
"addr" : "96.47.226.22:58190",
"startingheight" : 34557,
"addr" : "176.52.43.173:55888",
"startingheight" : 254325,
|
|
|
|
if we want to do something with this coin, we need to "clean" the blockchain from fork. my wallet see this nodes: "addr" : "93.174.90.30:1634",
"startingheight" : 284784,
"addr" : "82.102.93.58:56044",
"startingheight" : 242434,
"addr" : "178.23.119.147:53195",
"startingheight" : 242434,
"addr" : "106.187.41.34:32837",
"startingheight" : 284784,
"addr" : "76.168.200.112:50916",
"startingheight" : 296518,
"addr" : "192.99.167.40:44057",
"startingheight" : 272276,
"addr" : "71.164.205.74:64991",
"startingheight" : 262557,
"addr" : "144.76.100.197:59686",
"startingheight" : 296529,
It's a big caos! |
|
|
|
Block maturity is 2 hours not 9 hours
why you need 9 hours?
diff was high for that hashrate -> slow block creation -> 120 blocks needed 9 hours...  |
|
|
|
Here is a bootstrap.dat for dmd until 583000 block: bootstrap.dat.zipIf you need a clean blockchain, download, unzip, put the bootstrap.dat file to datadir, start the wallet, and have a coffee  |
|
|
|
What time to payout evry day? Block maturity is ~9 hours. |
|
|
|
|
go into the upgrade dir, and run the run_upgrades.php script.
|
|
|
|
Post the source code so we can see it is clean.
I don't consider to make it open source. Also, you can decompile apk file and see the source of it. Android is completely open If anyone can decompile and recompile the apk, what protects the closed source?  |
|
|
|
hmm... Oh shit, I got it! I don't really know how, but I did. Just used this:
Yeah, it works, because you simply remove the first character ( new_key.remove(0, 1).toHex() ). Anyway, this code QCA::BigInteger bnd(bnl);
bnd /= bno;
if (bnd > 0) {
bnd *= bno;
bnl -= bnd;
} else { bnl -= bno; }
equivalent to the modulo division ( bnl % bno), only just incorrectly (if bnd is 1 and bno is 2, after /=, bnd will 0, else is runing and bnl is -1)... |
|
|
|
|
Could you pastebin the php code?
(i got different HMAC SHA512... :/ )
Elbandi
|
|
|
|
What program do you use for generate this files? |
|
|
|
You definitely want to stay away from customers that aren't even willing to spend $5 on a Digital Ocean VPS.
God forbid, everybody buy a server without serveradmin skills. Thus, the net is full of zombie servers... If shitcoin devs want a daemon, they sould pay just for the daemon hosting. |
|
|
|
any pools yet?
I'm testing on my pool for a day. it works: http://coinspool.cu.cc/You need the latest cpuminer: minerd -a scrypt:131072 -o stratum+tcp://stratum.coinspool.cu.cc:3033 -u yourwalletaddress -p x Doesn't look like your pool is finding any blocks though. Are those hash measurements correct? 80-90 blocks have been found with 240 hash/sec, cpuminer report: [2014-09-14 23:41:35] thread 1: 3468 hashes, 0.06 khash/s
[2014-09-14 23:41:35] thread 2: 3480 hashes, 0.06 khash/s
[2014-09-14 23:41:40] thread 0: 3456 hashes, 0.06 khash/s
[2014-09-14 23:41:40] thread 3: 2484 hashes, 0.05 khash/s
|
|
|
|
any pools yet?
I'm testing on my pool for a day. it works: http://coinspool.cu.cc/You need the latest cpuminer: minerd -a scrypt:131072 -o stratum+tcp://stratum.coinspool.cu.cc:3033 -u yourwalletaddress -p x |
|
|
|
I'm sure I've lost everything! Not of to recover. My old funds did not work with the new version do not know why. Actually, I'm tired of trying.  what is the new wallet address? |
|
|
|
[2014-09-11 17:13:39] accepted: 5/5 (100.00%), 0.26 khash/s (yay!!!)
Looks Hash is less than you GTX560
;)G1620 1 thread=10H/S
Well, good news and bad news. Good news: Your GTX is doing fine. Bad news: after an evening or three of testing, we can confirm that --algo=scrypt:131072 is required, although we have no idea why. That should be the parameter for a N-17 coin. If you use scrypt:65536 (which is what we expected) the miner will hash, but all blocks were rejected. This was previously reported and is now confirmed. Alas, that is what I was using with Cudaminer in my previous reports so my 560Ti numbers were double what they should have been. Our best guess is that there is an additional 63 byte wrapper associated with the scratchpad space, meaning scrypt:65599 might work, if the code accepted that value, which it doesn't... Here it the N expression: https://github.com/IMAcredit/imacredit/blob/master/src/scrypt.cpp#L261So nfactor is 16 -> n = 1 << (16 + 1) = 2 ^ 17 = 131072 Other values are not good. |
|
|
|
0-oh dang, missed that above, sorry  { "blocks" : 263773, "currentblocksize" : 1000, "currentblocktx" : 0, "difficulty" : 1.40193813, "errors" : "", "generate" : false, "genproclimit" : -1, "hashespersec" : 0, "networkhashps" : 126719293, "pooledtx" : 0, "testnet" : false } There are some forks... I'm following the block explorer chain, i think that's the longer chain. |
|
|
|
Your pszTimestamp is a long string, right? Search this lines in main.cpp: if (vin[0].scriptSig.size() < 2 || vin[0].scriptSig.size() > 100)
return state.DoS(100, error("CTransaction::CheckTransaction() : coinbase script size"));
Change the "> 100" condition to something larger, like 200, 300: if (vin[0].scriptSig.size() < 2 || vin[0].scriptSig.size() > 300) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
