@fillippone actually this fox you put looks like a man if you want advice on some "elements" to take inspiration from, take an example from "Ahri" who is a character from League of Legends, she is a nine-tailed female fox (magician) really cute and pretty (some video explane better) https://ddragon.leagueoflegends.com/cdn/img/champion/splash/Ahri_28.jpgbetter than last your image  Thank you Babo for your kind suggestion. Representing the vulpine beauty of our supreme leader is an astonishingly difficult feat. I fail every week. I have been warned many time about the quality of my work, and I tried following to improve day after day. For sure I was attentive on various suggestion over the time: every aspect of your suggestion has been dealt in the past: You said: @fillippone actually this fox you put looks like a man
But our leader said: On the plus side, it's nice to know that the AI has finally been convinced that one doesn't need conventionally feminine qualities to be a hot vixen. 🦊
You said: she is a nine-tailed female fox
But our leader said: Though, I'm not entirely comfortable with the number of tails on display. Which is not to say that I don't like it - just that it can be somewhat uncomfortable, if you know what I mean.
You said: take an example from "Ahri"
But our leader said: Those aren't even foxes; those are just garden-variety humans, one wearing an animal-ear headband and the other wearing an accessory that probably violates TalkImg's terms of service regarding NSFW content.  Babo, embrace vulpine beauty. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin fixes this  Tranquilli, sono le prove della patrimoniale per vedere come reagisce la gente  Come vuoi che reagisca. Abbiamo stampato nel DNA, grazie ad Amato, l'avversione per le patrimoniali. Un pò come i tedeschi hanno nel DNA il terrore dell'inflazione. Sarà perchè fu proprio crollo della Repubblica di Weimar, a causa dell'iperinflazione, uno dei prodromi necessari al successo del nazionalsocialismo? |
|
|
|
Ma se già sto scrivendo mettendo l'indirizzo email registrato e il nome e cognome del proprietario del conto chi altro dovrebbe essere?
Uno che ti ha fregato l'email. Scusami, ma proprio perché gli scrivi di cose "delicate" in effetti fa piacere che facciano delle verifiche. Altrimenti basterebbe avere l'accesso alla tua mail per avere automaticamente i diritti di modificare tutti i dati. Questa volta sto con Kraken. Le procedure di sicurezza sono una rottura di palle, ma stanno lì per un motivo, e gli "inverdenti" capitano proprio quando queste misure di sicurezza non sono rispettate. |
|
|
|
Dato il successo dell’asset, dato che ora han fatto bei guadagni, non mi stupirei che ora stessero facendo un bel po di vendite e cassa per poi ricomprare e ti accumulare da maggio a settembre/ottobre a prezzo consoni, cioè più bassi attorno a 40/50k.
Sento spesso parlare del fatto che gli ETF abbiano "anticipato" l'effetto dell'halving, e che il dump che c'è già stato, superiore al 20% sia il piccolo "minidump" che di Solti si ha subito dopo l'halving. Secondo questa teoria quindi da ora sarebbe solo da andare in alto. Tu come la vedi? |
|
|
|
Le disparità tra ricchi e poveri, ormai diventata voragine, ha tra le sue cause primarie la "moneta" facile.
L'opposto esatto di quello che ci raccontano.
Quando ci raccontano di società “inclusiva” che “non lasci indietro nessuno” e “attenta agli ultimi”, mi faccio delle grandissime risate, dato che è proprio scritto nell’inflazione (ricordiamo, tassa regressiva) che il povero sarà sempre più povero ed il ricco sempre più ricco. |
|
|
|
let me guess.. people dont know that this is not a power law but will now scream with glazed eyes and dreams of finding a new idol "OMG SOMEONE WROTE IN MSWord A DOCUMENT AND CALLED IT A SCIENTIFIC PAPER. IT MUST MEAN HE IS A GOD I SHOULD BLINDLY IDOLISE AND NOT QUESTION"
Franky1, he said he would send his paper to a peer review. I think this is a novelty in this field of research, and Santostasi should be credited for this. He’s stepping up the game and accepting a scientific method when nobody first was willing to do the same. When he publishes, we will see. |
|
|
|
Giovanni, PlanG, said it was going to organize all the material in a scientific paper, meant to be peer-reviewed. Apparently, he has been working on this:  I guess having a peer reviewed scientific paper on Bitcoin, is a considerable step forward when compared to medium post. |
|
|
|
Thank you again, supreme leader, for your flawless timing. Supreme Leader, your filthy, moustachioed, lustful Italian acolyte salutes you.
The Queen of Foxes guides us.
The Queen of Foxes teaches us.
The Queen of Foxes protects us.
In your light, we thrive.
In your mercy, we are sheltered.
In your wisdom, we are humbled.
We live only to serve.
Our lives (+wives, + holes) are yours.
 |
|
|
|
Speaking of fillippone, I am pretty sure that he is also expecting a gift from proudhon somewhere upon bitcoin reaching the early 6 figures, and it might have even been something like 0.1 BTC, but I cannot recall exactly..
Exact reference: <...>
Target price: 170,000 USD
Not bad.
Bullish.
My body is ready.
Money is going to leave the bitcoin ecosystem over the next 12 months (and forever after on average). Bitcoin will never reach that price. If it does, I'll buy $10k worth and give it to you. Quoted for reference. Please someone help me remember when it happens! Still pretty confident I will eventually cash in those SATs in a very short time. On a “great scheme of things” scale. |
|
|
|
|
I still don’t get it.
What is the risk of a fatal hardware malfunction once you have witnessed something like that one apogio experienced? 0.1%?
1 BTC is 70,000 USD.
1 Jade costs roughly 100 USD.
So 100 USD /0.001/70,000 USDBTC≈1.42 BTC
Ok, then it is not worth handling UTXO bigger than 1.42 BTC with such an hardware.
Provided you already have a functioning backup of the seed phrase (Master key).
This is how I would approach the question.
Also, I am irrationally risk-averse when it comes to losing Bitcoin (I said irrationally!) so I would further lower that threshold.
|
|
|
|
You open the jig, insert the washer, stamp a letter, rotate the upper part, stamp the other letter and so on.
Then you open it, remove the stamped washers and insert a new one, then close it again.
So yes, it opens and closes, and you need only one jig.
Did you alter the STL file from your end [specifically referring to the jig itself (apart from your name)]? I remember thoroughly checking the STL files when @n0nce created this thread, but AFAICR the squarish opening on the jig didn't open and close [the only way to reposition it was by lifting it first]. Exactly. I didn't modify the files from n0nce (who very kindly offered me a customised version of his jig—or was it one of the parameters in the file?). kindly offered When I said you could open and close the jig, I meant lifting and lowering the upper part. |
|
|
|
I was thinking maybe a device could be invented to automate many parts of this process. Anything that automates something adds the risk of storing the data. One part I do not understand is the serial number part. Why are you stamping that onto the washers? If you drop 24 washers without knowing the order, your backup is worthless. I think he’s actually referring to the washers with the serial number of the tamper-proof labels. It is an additional layer of complexity. This is meant to avoid someone breaking the tamper-proof labels and substituting those with new ones without the necessity also to restamp the washers, which requires new identical washers, with identical labels, and stamps. Not perfect, but I guess effective. |
|
|
|
A very nice event is taking place right now in Viareggio, Italy. TUSCANY LIGHTNING SUMMIT  The event has been organised Fulgur.ventures. The entire event will be livestreamed and accessible for free via PlanB.network ! |  |  | | Day 1 Program and Livestream | Day 2 Program and Livestream |
|
|
|
|
I am sorry for bumping this but lately I have been trying to figure out how this backup method works, so my questions about this might come across as ignorant. I do have some CAD experience so I get the washer part, but what is that black thing that is holding the washer in place? And do I need one for each washer (i.e. word)?  And according to the GIF showing the thing moving, it looks like you just rotate it to hide/reveal the washer? Or does it open/close? I wrote a thread, there is a gif and a video of the whole process: Securing Your Seed Phrase with WashersI hope that reading that you will find aclarificatiin of your doubt. Anyway yes, the jig is meant to hold the washer you are stamping in position. You open the jig, insert the washer, stamp a letter, rotate the upper part, stamp the other letter and so on. Then you open it, remove the stamped washers and insert a new one, then close it again. So yes, it opens and closes, and you need only one jig. In case, just ask. |
|
|
|
Tornando in tema.
Oggi discorso Powell e siamo anche a un momento verità.
La struttura di breve per ora non è bellissima, o recupera immediatamente (oggi/domani) area 68k o inizia la correzione di medio termine e sotto i 60k si può anche flashcrashare male.
Magari poi quando ho tempo faccio in analisi più dettagliata sul thread dedicato.
Magari aspettiamo conferme proprio oggi, se già oggi cioè tra poche ore non si vede un bel candelone verde, io inizierei a fare baracca e burattini almeno per una bella parte di profitti. E poi si vedrà
La cosa che però non mi spiego è che Nasdaq sia andato su, il dollaro si sia indebolito, l'oro sia andato sui massimi a sfiorare 2,300. Bitcoin invece è rimasto debole, incapace di reagire. Siamo in un momento di correlazioni un pò strane. |
|
|
|
I am not a scientist, a physicist or a statician, but it would have some value computing the following? Using different subsets of data, progressively adding days, see how some quantities evolve: - The variation of the parameters
- Hurst exponent
- Size of the state space
I mean: put the hypothesis of Bitcoin is a Power Law at a more serious test than graphically fitting a straight line in a log-log chat. |
|
|
|
Thanks again for your flawless timing  [...] I had to [... various reasons including, but not limited to -- kids put to bed, sofa (not Gazeta's BonBon ), drinking, lack of drinking, wife etc...] What about holes? In my version is + wife's + holes. Am I the only one here surrendering my most sacred orifices to our supreme leaders? Am I the only one with this privilege? <...>
Thank you again, supreme leader, for your flawless timing.
Supreme Leader, your filthy, moustachioed, lustful Italian acolyte salutes you.
The Queen of Foxes guides us.
The Queen of Foxes teaches us.
The Queen of Foxes protects us.
In your light, we thrive.
In your mercy, we are sheltered.
In your wisdom, we are humbled.
We live only to serve.
Our lives (+wives, + holes) are yours.
<...>
|
|
|
|
ho risposto al tuo 3d internazionale, sarebbe davvero figo riuscire a portare il prof sotto i thread per farlo commentare insieme a noi, ma capisco anche che il prof sarà molto impegnato anche se secondo me sarebbe per lui costruttivo valutare di rispondere ai dubbi degli utenti Beh, una volta al thread ha già risposto, e nel suo thread originale ha battibeccato per un bel po con Franky1. Vediamo, se non risponde nei prossimi giorni, magari lo “stuzzico” via X. Diciamo che non si sottrae al confronto, è sempre piuttosto “opinionated”, senza alcuna accezione negativa, si intende. |
|
|
|
E rieccoci puntuali come ogni inizio mese, all'aggiornamento della DT list. theymos puntualissimo, mentre noi tutti eravamo impegnati nello shitposting, ha aggiornato la lita degli utenti in DT1. DT update logaprile 2024Confermati nella DT1: (64) achow101
albon
anonymousminer
Baofeng
bitbollo
Bitcoin_Arena
BitcoinGirl.Club
BlackHatCoiner
bullrun2024bro
buwaytress
Coin-1
crwth
Cyrus
DaveF
DdmrDdmr
efialtis
FatFork
fillippone
Foxpup
GazetaBitcoin
gbianchi
geophphreigh
Harkorede
hilariousandco
Husna QA
ibminer
icopress
irfan_pak10
JayJuanGee
krogothmanhattan
KTChampions
Lafu
Lesbian Cow
LFC_Bitcoin
Lillominato89
Little Mouse
LoyceV
madnessteat
MinoRaiola
morvillz7z
NotATether
nutildah
o_solo_miner
paid2
philipma1957
Poker Player
qwk
RaltcoinsB
Real-Duke
Rikafip
roycilik
SFR10
Stalker22
Timelord2067
Trofo
tvplus006
TwitchySeal
vapourminer
Vispilio
Vod
willi9974
witcher_sense
yahoo62278
zasad@
(36) Agrawas
Ale88
bitmover
Charles-Tim
coinlocket$
cryptofrka
CryptopreneurBrainboss
d5000
dbshck
DireWolfM14
dragonvslinux
duesoldi
EFS
examplens
finaleshot2016
GreatArkansas
holydarkness
hugeblack
JeromeTash
jokers10
joniboini
Lakai01
lovesmayfamilis
mprep
OgNasty
stompix
stoos
teeGUMES
The Cryptovator
The Sceptical Chymist
The0ldl_lser
TookDk
Welsh
wolwoo
wwzsocki
YOSHIE
(36) 3meek
abhiseshakana
babo
bobita
Bthd
Buchi-88
buckrogers
comit
condoras
cryptodevil
El duderino_
HostFat
imhoneer
jeremypwr
Jet Cash
joker_josue
JollyGood
klarki
logfiles
Maus0728
minerjones
Mitchell
mole0815
MrCryptHodl
NeuroticFish
polymerbit
pooya87
PsychoticBoy
seek3r
shahzadafzal
sheenshane
theymos
TryNinja
tweetious
Yatsan
zazarb
Quindi per la nostra sezione abbiamo: Membri della board italiana confermati in DT1: (4) bitbollo
fillippone
gbianchi
Lillominato89
(3) Membri della board italiana aggiunti alla DT1: (2) Quindi 6 membri questo mese! HostFat (in) e duesoldi (out) continuano ad alternarsi.
Che cosa è la DT1? Tutto quello che avreste voluto sapere sul Default Trust System e non avete mai osato chiedere; [INFO] TRUST. Come funziona il sistema di feedback |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
