|
How is Bitcoin ranked like 8th under game credits and such?
|
|
|
|
Up again  |
|
|
|
I suggest not just put all your money in any one site because you may lose big percentage of your investment if anyone wins a big amount. So it is good to put your money in few good sites, so your losses will reduce in such worst cases. I never keep all my money in any one site. Actually you may put all to one investment more over if gambling inveatment though because in the end house always get profit so it just matter of time when you will reocver it though. And you need some review about the site that you want to put your money too. Not all site give you some good payout from their investment and you need to see whether that site have a good traffic or not to get some good roi I don't agree to keep all your money in any one site whether it is has got a super performance in the past because in gambling industry old performance will not give any guaranty that they will repeat same performance in the future. So to avoid sudden surprises, it is always good to go with diversification than sticking with any one or two sites. What do you mean by super performance? Nothing has to do with their performance though and what they really want is to attract big whale to play on their site, so with all of my money put it on one investment (big amount), they will have big bankroll so the max bet that player can play is much more bigger so this will attract big whale to play and we can hope to earn from this. When you diversify it and make it become less investment better you need to stop though because the payout only some tiny penny i think he is talking about their popularity and how many players they have attracted to play on their site. and i have to say it may seem like a good idea but at the same time the risks are still there but in another form. imagine a famous site which has lots of players many of them whales, this makes the risk of one of those whales winning a big amount that much higher. In the long run those hales will still be losers. How do you think some gambling sites make big profits? It's not the fish, it is the whales that feed them. I mean... it kind of depends. Some sites depend quite heavily on whales to make up volume with the volatility being quite high at the low 1% house edge. Some sites have enough volume from a large player pool to push out consistent volume. Different sites carry different risk and different levels of consistency. |
|
|
|
|
lol how are these going for so much?
I have a friend that has 100 real nintendos.
Should I buy them off him and start unloading them online or is it just these 'new' ones that are worth anything?
|
|
|
|
|
We've gone ahead and credited the players that were affected out of pocket.
There were four 50,000 bits wagers that had won the main bet but carried along a sidejackpot that exceeded the 20BTC cap. They were all fully refunded and allowed to keep the winnings (they all resulted in winning bets).
There were a few dust lottery that barely exceeded the 20 BTC cap. These players were credited with an amount that covered well above the summation of their bets.
|
|
|
|
|
The 20btc cap was in place but setup incorrectly. This is on us, but investors were not affected.
The system was coded to restrict bets to 20 btc max win payouts. If someone had hit a 64 bitcoin wager, the house bankroll would only be deducted 20 bitcoin and the player would be credited 20 bitcoin.
We realize this was not what we intended and we will be changing it.
We also realize that this was unfair to any player (there were only a very short few) that had an accepted bet that showed a higher payout than 20 bitcoin. We will be reviewing all those that were affected and contact them to credit their accounts for more than their potentially lost equity.
For simplicity and ease of coding, we are heavily discussing the possibility of abandoning kelly criterion completely and implementing a straight forward 1% of bankroll max win with a mandatory minimum house edge of 0.75%.
|
|
|
|
Wow, Thank you Dogedigital, I can play slidedice without an error now on my side  Joint effort with lead dev and BubblesBit dev. Glad you can play more smoothly now |
|
|
|
It's a bug that's being fixed. The owner is changing his jackpot manually to cap out at 20btc to adhere to the guidelines of Moneypot |
|
|
|
It's not easy to navigate the posts here, but is API V2 Cross compatible with API v1? Or will we have to completely rebuild the current apps?
------------------ V2 will have the same API methods as V1. The same routes will exist, just with added routes.
For an app to migrate to V2, they will need to update endpoint from API.Moneypot.com/V1 to URL/V2.
It should be as simple as switching hte API endpoint
We will have it setup with both being compatible for a temporary period and will help with the transition for existing app owners. After a short while, the V1 api will expire. |
|
|
|
|
Currently working on a fix now.
Edit; Bug Bounty has been rewarded for the tip.
|
|
|
|
I think Moneypot need to check on this error, I received this error sometime when betting on slidedice.
it shows bet stopped! no response from moneypot
We're trying to get in contact with the developer. It only seems to happen with 'Slide dice' in particular. All other games inside and outside of Bubblesbit seem to work fine. Am sorry to contradict you but experienced same error, if we are talking about that undefined "something" error that also causes my balance and bet amount and bet outcome showing as NN or N/N (not sure about it but will screenshot if it wil happen again ) at least three times while playing (botting) roshambo. I'll check it out. edit; Did 10 minutes of auto-betting. I couldn't reproduce it. I'll try a few other things. |
|
|
|
I think Moneypot need to check on this error, I received this error sometime when betting on slidedice.
it shows bet stopped! no response from moneypot
We're trying to get in contact with the developer. It only seems to happen with 'Slide dice' in particular. All other games inside and outside of Bubblesbit seem to work fine. |
|
|
|
Sorry, a little confused, where is the guaranteed investment option? Or is that still in the works?
I'd be interested to hear about this too. Where did you hear about it? I'm not sure there is any such thing as a guaranteed investment, but am willing to learn more. Fixed investment would be a better term than guaranteed Editing for clarification so this isn't taken the wrong way: We will not be calling it a guaranteed investment. No investment is guaranteed. You mean to say, if people invest X amount and your site gives X + some fixed % of interest for a fixed term? Is that correct? If that it correct then you can call it even guaranteed investment because investors no way they can lose the money in this investment type unless it is different from what I understood. I think the best thing to do here is just to wait until we have everything in place. However, we will never label it as 'Guaranteed'. There will always be risks. |
|
|
|
|
Any luck on this?
Throw me in the buying it for my spoiled kids club.
|
|
|
|
|
Crypto-Games Nickname: Moneypot
|
|
|
|
|
Still haven't received any information.
|
|
|
|
He hasn't been online since April this year so not sure what you should expect. I don't think that it's much of a worry to you, $625, as you already own a much larger business that has hundreds of BTC in volume each week, but I understand that you don't want him to get away cheaply... Good luck with getting him to repay i guess.
I mean it's not the end of the world, but in the end it's still $625. I have his place of work and personal details. I'm really just hoping he comes by, visits this thread, and makes things right. I really don't want to potentially ruin someone over a mere $625. |
|
|
|
|
I really like how you broke down the investment stats.
Great job. Might have to incorporate some of this.
|
|
|
|
|
I am so confused to the point that this gave me a chuckle lol.
Are you sure this is the right section?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
