OK.

I've made the assumption, possibly incorrectly, that there are a lot of educated, technically or scientifically minded people here. With that assumption, I set a high burden of proof before I am convinced of something. I hold mostly bitcoin, > 75%, but of my other holdings, drk is the largest, I have bought back in a few days ago.

I see a definable, demonstrable chain of evolution for drk. I see past ideas evolve into well used open source, technology, x11, dgw.

Here is my problem. Version 1.0 was the central mixer, now we are lead to believe the new version is a completely different idea. That is not evolution and appears to be a stall tactic.

The evidence I see presented is, a bunch of colluding 'dudes', with a known conflict of interest, saying trust us, it works. This is not sufficient evidence for me. It may be sufficient evidence for you. I take very little information, even from family and colleagues, on the basis of "trust me".

Here is my question. What kind of evidence do you, or others here, believe is necessary to convince the silent majority?

Yet more contradictory statements from the guy posting with 3 different account from the same ip, the same accounts that were fuding a couple of month back when cloak was doing what its doing now , rising to the moon.
When you try to fud it least try to make some sense, been said listening to the fud its like listening to a teenager ranting.