Ah, I see, no worries. And yes, the X4 will do better indoors, because well, the X5C is quite big. I can barely fly it in my own room, which is why I bought a nano quadcopter for indoor flying, haha.
For that I would recommend CX-10  I don;t know which is the best for the nano line, but Love that little quad. |
|
|
|
I would suggest buying the Hubsan X4 instead. The cost is around 70$, but it has a 720P camera, and is a great quad for both indoors and outdoors.
You can also replace almost any part on it. And do buy extra batteries if possible. Also buy the protection guard if available. All of these arguments (if you even consider them being arguments) are invalid. The Syma X5C-1 has a 1080P camera and flies great outdoors, a lot better than the X4 because it has more weight. Syma also has a lot of replace part and you get a protection guard as a standard. It even costs less (around $60). You are right. Didn't see that when I bought Hubsan X last month  And yes, they weren't arguments, Just things that I like about Hubsan, and recommend doing if you buy one. I haven't personally bought SYMA. But from all the reviews I could find, Hubsan is rated better, http://www.amazon.com/Hubsan-Channel-2-4GHz-Copter-Camera/product-reviews/B00EXBDWZC?pageNumber=2http://flying-drones.expert/syma-x5c-vs-hubsan-x4-h107c/Hubsan is also much smaller, making it more suitable for indoor flying. Again, I haven;t tested SYMA, but just posting from what I learnt from the reviews. Might be wrong. |
|
|
|
|
Would you happen to have Beats Subscription or can get it?
|
|
|
|
Any videos you made ? With stock camera or 808 #16 cam. I have, but my internet is sucky right now. Will post a link later I would suggest buying the Hubsan X4 instead. The cost is around 70$, but it has a 720P camera, and is a great quad for both indoors and outdoors. You can also replace almost any part on it. And do buy extra batteries if possible. Also buy the protection guard if available. |
|
|
|
In order to be eligible to get CLAMS, the addresses needed to have some amount of BTC or doge in them. Yours seemed to have 0, when the distribution happened. |
|
|
|
ohhyeaahhh i got the jumping sumo yesterday My sumo in my school Did you buy it from this site? How was the shipping, fast enough? Planning to order something as well. |
|
|
|
ROFl ... of course its a PONZI ... gtfo with your lame sites dude ...
Its funny that a Full member is promoting it, probably wasting his account for promoting it. |
|
|
|
Trading altcoins is the best one  Well maybe yes, you might be able to categorize that into gambling now. |
|
|
|
1. Famous and honest owner
2. Attractive Look.
3. Instant Withdrawls/Deposits.
4. Secure and reliable system.
5. Achievements, Level System.
1&3 are the most important for me.
Sound right to me as well, unlike other sites like PRC which don't payout for bugs many times, and don't pay affliates if they bring too much traffic to the site. Seems like a very boring game to me...  And why do you say Primedice? If its a boring game, then it should be boring on most of the other sites as well. Overall you don't seem to like dice, and are still referencing only Primedice in your post. |
|
|
|
I think what most of the dice sites lack are a better house edge and speed
Many dice sites are very very slow and lag especially on auto bot
A good autobot would be great. A lot of autobots do not configure well, having more functionality would be good. |
|
|
|
yup you add them to your account and they never expire.
Actually they expire in 10 years if I am correct. Amazon says that they never expire. It never says 10 years anywhere. |
|
|
|
The site is exactly like the other prime dice clone scripts. Arn't those worth the same price without having to rent them?
Yes its the same script, but some people haven't got hosting, some don't have the knowledge to set up wallets, and you will be amazed at the amount of people that can't set up a cron job, so I'm just offering a service for those type of people. I don't think its an unfair price, I supply the hosting I also supply a separate VPS for the wallet, and set everything up for them... Cheers Mark The price is fair, but I guess most people buy the script to try and improve on their website building skill.s |
|
|
|
Why has no other dice site that allows investing been getting close to the investments and action that JD had?
Thats because, other sites are not trusted. Recently, another dice site dicebitco did get over 7K BTC invested, but later it turned out that they were skipping nonces, and then just a few days later, they ran away with around 1500 BTC. Also another dice.ninja ran away with the funds. yes and now even its hard to trust any trusted site  Maybe its coming back , they have now added CLAMs, maybe it will start again soon. |
|
|
|
Why has no other dice site that allows investing been getting close to the investments and action that JD had?
Thats because, other sites are not trusted. Recently, another dice site dicebitco did get over 7K BTC invested, but later it turned out that they were skipping nonces, and then just a few days later, they ran away with around 1500 BTC. Also another dice.ninja ran away with the funds. |
|
|
|
Casino games are fun However, rist is too high  Always better to stick with a skill based game like poker. |
|
|
|
Understood, and I agree. I plan on playing for a bit, likely next week, and will then post my spreadsheet with auto calculations to share (updating it before I do with next round of gameplay). Not selling, just sharing. It doesnt integrate into PD at all, all it does is visualize betting strategies, took me a while to get the rounding patterns correct that PD uses, sometimes its Round Up, sometimes Round Down, and it does this at different decimal points depending on the variable its calculating.
Having this down really helps show the odds of "At 2.5 X Payout what are the odds of rolling 5000 rolls before hitting a streak that would bust to insufficient funds". It also factors back into the equation average per roll winnings into your BankRoll.
It works well when you use betting strategies that have a bust level of 1 in 800,000 rolls or greater. The higher the odds of busting, an odd multiplier comes into play I have yet to figure out.
Meaning if you played a AutoBet round where based on bankroll you could survive 25 consecutive losses based on starting bet, increase on loss, and payout factor, etc - and that 25 loss streak had a 1 in 1,000,000 chance in happening - the same (at least from what I can tell) is not true for the same odds (1 in 1,000,000) where the streak is only 8 deep.
Meaning odds aside, you will fare better with a larger depth regardless of identical odds.
If you dont believe me, try this simulation:
BankRoll: 0.05
PayOut: 2.25 X
Increase on Loss: 110%
Starting Bet: 0.00000002
Under this scenario, the odds of busting according to my tables are you would bust at 20 Consecutive Losses. The Odds of that happening work out to an occurance rate of 1 in 2.17 Million Rolls. So with a 44% Chance of Winning on 1 Roll, the occurance odds of rolling 20 straight losses are 1 in 2,170,000.
Now that said running a second simulation, with a much shallower depth of busting, the same does not (at least from my experience) hold true.
BankRoll: 0.05
PayOut: 1.123 x
Increase on Loss: 800%
Starting Bet: 0.00000040
Under this scenario, the odds of busting according to my tables are you would bust at 6 Consecutive Losses. The Odds of that happening work out to an occurance rate of 1 in 2.17 Million Rolls. So with a 88.16% Chance of Winning on 1 Roll, the occurance odds of rolling 6 straight losses are 1 in 2,170,000.
However, the Second Scenario listed plays much riskier and will bust far sooner regardless of the math behind the rolls.
Unless my math is flawed... Feel free to chime in here if so.
CD
Yes it will fail over a long time, but it will eventually happen. That 1 in 2.17 million might just happen in your first bet. Better to just throw some dust bets, till you get a losing streak of 10, and then start with say 0.0001. But even this fails easily. So in the end, its all just a gamble. |
|
|
|
You also must deposit £10 to this casino in order to get the bonus, but your £10 deposit will NEVER be at risk.
Is that compulsary or just something, that can only be done in this casino? |
|
|
|
If your base bet is 1 satoshi you would need about 150.000.000 bets to get to 1.2 btc
I think that should usually depend on what kind of martingale strategy you are using. Some people martingale at 50%. Some also matingale at 10% or at 90%. They just increase their base bets by different ratios. Also, at 90% a martingale of 7-8 would get you at >1 BTC. I dont see how you can use 90% at 1 satoshi bet, that means you would win like what 0.1 satoshi each win? And anyways it would be the same at any ratio Anyone tried to do it and got some kind of warning about the returns? The rounding problem is an issue in the martingale strategy and should be take into account. The rounding problem does happen with 1 satishi. But betting 1 satoshi to win 0.1 satoshi is not worth it. Also, betting at 90% is an extremely slow strategy and people can have losing streaks up to 7 or 8. I have had 7 myself. |
|
|
|
Nice job on adding the good ones. Just another suggestion, but feel free to ignore it. The Hubsan X4 107C, also comes in a 2 MP 720 p model. Its for around 18$ more than the 0.3 MP option. Might be something you could add. PS: I am not looking to order something anytime, soon but have had issues finding that model on any of the bitcoin stores. Most only order a 0.3 MP model . |
|
|
|
Most of his profits come from the long losing streaks. If he was base betting at 2.821x (from picture posted) and almost doubling his bet size, then after every loss, the next win would get him a big profit. So a win at 1 BTC bet, would give him a profit of around 0.6-0.8 BTC. If he loses that, then the next win at around 2 BTC would give him a profit of around 1.7ish BTC. I guess his bets , when he was at 12 BTC profit, had these long streaks, and that is what got him back. But only 2 more losses, were all that was needed, for his next bet to be 6 BTC and 12 BTC. So unless, he takes those risks again, and get lucky. He will still continue to lose more. Also, maybe, he should have stopped at 33 BTC and probably started with a new account , so as to atleast sell this strategy and make some profit out of people, who would have blindly believed in him. That sounds a lot like martingale. Yes, It was martingale. And for some reason he claimed, that it wasn't a martingale system . |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
